Temporary Contracts and Okun's Law in Poland

• Autorzy: Krzysztof Bartosik
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: The share of temporary workers in Poland is one of the largest of any EU country, which may affect the output unemployment relationship. The Polish case seems to be a natural experiment. Contrary to many advanced European countries, the spread of temporary contracts in Poland was not caused by labor market reform but instead resulted mainly from spontaneous processes.
Purpose of the article: This paper investigates the effect of the widespread use of temporary contracts on the relationship between output and unemployment in Poland.
Methods: The analysis is based on the 'dynamic' version of Okun's law and uses OLS regression, OLS split-sample regression and OLS rolling regression. The sample period is 1996-2018.
Findings & Value added: The study found that unemployment's sensitivity to output increased over time and was related to the greater use of temporary contracts, particularly among young people and women. Initially, at the turn of the 21st century, the expansion of temporary jobs changed the employment composition and had an insignificant effect on unemployment since firms mainly replaced permanent contracts with temporary contracts. Then, starting around 2006, temporary contracts began affecting unemployment levels and unemployment's responsiveness to output. During this period, firms used temporary contracts as the main workforce adjustment device during the business cycle. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Okun’s Law; Labour market; Economic growth

PL

Prawo Okuna; Rynek pracy; Wzrost gospodarczy

• Czasopismo: Equilibrium
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 15
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 735--760

Twórcy

autor

Krzysztof Bartosik

• Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Bibliografia

• Arak, P., Lewandowski, P., & Żakowiecki, P. (2014). Dual labour market in Poland - proposals for overcoming the deadlock. IBS Policy Paper, Warsaw, Institute for Structural Research (IBS), 1.
• Ball, L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2012). Okun's law: fit at 50? Paper presented at the 13th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference Hosted by the International Monetary Fund Washington DC, November 8-9.
• Banerji, A., Lin, H., & Saksonovs, S. (2015). Youth unemployment in advanced Europe: Okun's law and beyond. IMF Working Paper, 15/5. doi: 10.5089/9781498382519.001.
• Baranowska, A., & Gebel, M. (2008). Temporary employment in Central and Eastern Europe: individual risk patterns and institutional context. MZES Working Papers, Mannheimer, 106.
• Bentolila, S., & Saint-Paul, G. (1992). The macroeconomic impact of flexible labor contracts, with an application to Spain. European Economic Review, 36(5). doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90043-V.
• Bentolila, S., Cahuc, P., Dolado, J. J., & Le Barbanchon, T. (2012). Two-tier labor markets in the great recession: France vs. Spain. Economic Journal, 122(562). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02534.x.
• Boeri, T., & Garibaldi P,. (2007). Two tier reforms of employment protection: a honeymoon effect? Economic Journal, 117(521). doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02060.x.
• Bukowski, M., Koloch G., & Lewandowski, P. (2007). Labour market macrostructure - shocks and institutions. In M. Bukowski (Ed.). Employment in Poland 2007. Safety on the flexible labour market. Warszawa: Departament Analiz Ekonomicznych i Prognoz Ministerstwo Pracy i Polityki Społecznej.
• Cahuc, P., Charlot, O., & Malherbet, F. (2016). Explaining the spread of temporary jobs and its impact on labor turnover. International Economic Review, 57(2). doi: 10.1111/iere.12167.
• Cappellari, L., Dell'Aringa, C., & Leonardi, M. (2012). Temporary employment in Italy. CESifo DICE Report, 1.
• Cazes, S., Verick, S., & Hussami, F. A. (2013). Why did unemployment respond so differently to the global financial crisis across countries? Insights from Okuns law. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2(10). doi: 10.1186/2193-9004-2-10.
• Cevik, E. I., Dibooglu S., & Barisik, S. (2013). Asymmetry in the unemployment-output relationship over the business cycle: evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies, 55(4).
• Cichocki, S., Gradzewicz, M., & Tyrowicz, J. (2015). The responsiveness of employment to changes in GDP and the flexibility of labor market institutions in Poland. Gospodarka Narodowa, 278(4).
• Costain, J., Juan, F., Jimeno, J. F., & Thomas, C. (2010). Employment fluctuations in a dual labor market. Banco de España Documentos de Trabajo, 1013.
• Cuaresma, J. C. (2003). Okun's law revisited. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4). doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00056.
• d'Agostino, G., Pieroni, L., & Scarlato. M. (2018). Evaluating the effects of labour market reforms on job flows: the Italian case. Economic Modelling, 68. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.011.
• Dixon, R., Lim, G. C., & van Ours, J. C. (2017). Revisiting the Okun relationship. Applied Economics, 49(28). 2749-2765. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1245846.
• Dunsch, S. (2016). Okun's law and youth unemployment in Germany and Poland. International Journal of Management and Economics, 49(1). doi: 10.1515/ijme-2016-0003.
• Elsby, M. W., Hobijn, B., & Sahin, A. (2010). The labor market in the great recession. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring.
• Gajderowicz, T., Grotkowska, G., Wincenciak, L., & Wirtek, E. (2014). Unemployment rate sensitivity to GDP fluctuations across Polish voivodeships. Ekonomia, 39.
• Gatti, R., Goraus, K., & Morgandi, M. (2014). Balancing flexibility and worker protection. Understanding labor market duality in Poland. Washington DC: The World Bank,.
• Harris, R., & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun's law: crosscountry comparison. Economics Bulletin, 5(2).
• Hutengs, O., & Stadtmann, G. (2014). Don't trust anybody over 30: youth unemployment and Okun's law in CEE countries. Bank i Kredyt, 45(1).
• IMF (2010). Unemployment dynamic during recessions and recoveries: Okun's law and beyond. World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing Growth, April.
• Jimenez-Rodriguez, R., & Russo, G. (2012). Aggregate employment dynamics and partial labour market reforms. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(3). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00396.x
• Kahn, L. M. (2010). Employment protection reforms, employment and the incidence of temporary jobs in Europe: 1995-2001. Labour Economic, 17(1). doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.05.001.
• Kiersztyn, A. (2016). Fixed-term employment and occupational position in Poland: the heterogeneity of temporary jobs. European Sociological Review, 32(6). doi: 10.1093/esr/jcw044.
• Knotek, E. (2007). How useful is Okun's law? Economic Review Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Fourth Quarter.
• Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun's law: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2). doi: 10.1016/S0164-0704.00)00135-X.
• Lewandowski, P., Stroński, K., & Keister, R. (2016). Labour market segmentation and pensions in Polish defined-contribution scheme. Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje, 33(2).
• Lewandowski, P., Góra, M., & Lis, M. (2017). Temporary employment boom in Poland - a job quality vs . quantity trade-off ? IZA Discussion Paper Series, 11012.
• Lewandowski, P., & Magda, I. (2017). Temporary employment, unemployment and employment protection legislation in Poland. In A. Piasna & M. Myant (Eds.). Myths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labour market segmentation. Brussels: ETUI.
• Majchrowska, A., Mroczek, K., & Tokarski, T. (2013). Unemployment rate variations in Poland in 2002-2011. Gospodarka Narodowa, 265(9).
• Nikulin, D., & Szymczak, S. (2020). Effect of the integration into global value chains on the employment contract in Central and Eastern European countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2). doi: 10.24136/eq.2020.013.
• Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: its measurement and significance. Reprinted as Cowles Foundation Paper, 190. Retrieved form http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cp/p01b/p0190.pdf.
• Pilc, M. (2017). The temporary employed in Poland: beneficiaries or victims of the liberal labour market? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(3). doi: 10.1177/0143831X15574113.
• Saczuk, K. (2014). Labor force survey in Poland in the years 1995-2010. The correction of data. Materiały i Studia NBP, 301.
• Soylu, Ö. B., Çakmak, I., & Okur, F. (2018). Economic growth and unemployment issue: panel data analysis in Eastern European Countries. Journal of International Studies, 11(1). doi: 10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/7.
• Sögner, L., & Stiassny, A. (2002). An analysis on the structural stability of Okun's law - a cross-country study. Applied Economics, 32(14).
• Statistics Poland (2019). Labour force survey in Poland IV quarter 2018. Warsaw: Statistics Poland.
• Statistics Poland. Poland - macroeconomic indicators. https://stat.gov.pl/en/polandmacroeconomic-indicators/.
• Statistics Poland. Quarterly information on the labour market - various years.
• Virén, M. (2001). The Okun curve is non-linear. Economics Letters, 70(2). doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765.00)00370-0.
• Wojciechowski, W. (2011). How to reduce the number of fixed-term contracts in Poland and strengthen the economic growth? Analiza FOR, 7/2011.
• Zanin, L. (2014). On Okun's law in OECD countries: an analysis by age cohorts. Economics Letters, 125(2). doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.08.030.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/eq.2020.032