A Panel Data Analysis of the Roles of Education Level and Financial Capacity on E-government Adoption for Higher Transparency and Efficiency in ASEAN Countries

• Autorzy: Vince Ratnawati , Ria Nelly Sari , Norlaila Md Zin , Sharifah Norzehan Syed Yusuf , Jahanzaib Haider , Azlan Ali
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

E-government is an emerging phenomenon that refers to the use of new and innovative technologies to provide services to citizens, which results in increased transparency and efficiency. Financial capacity of a country refers to the ability of a country or a government to manage the expenses and finances of the country and to make rational decisions related to finance. Level of education means the literacy rate or the number of knowledgeable people in the country. The basic plan of this study is to analyze the impact of education level and financial capacity on the e-government adoption by using the two control variables which are per capita income and GDP growth. The data for this study has been collected for the ASEAN countries for 28 years. In the research process, several techniques are used such as IPS unit root test, Pedroni cointegration test, coefficient test of FMOLS, Granger causality test, etc. The results of the study explain that financial capacity and education level have an impact on the GDP growth. However, per capita income does not have any impact on the GDP growth. This study has several implications and benefits which are related to practical, theoretical and policy making benefits for e-government adoption. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Data analysis; e-government; Education

PL

Analiza danych; e-administracja; Edukacja

• Czasopismo: Contemporary Economics
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 521--531

Twórcy

autor

Vince Ratnawati

• Universitas Riau, Indonesia

autor

Ria Nelly Sari

• Universitas Riau, Indonesia

autor

Norlaila Md Zin

• Universiti Teknologi MARA

autor

Sharifah Norzehan Syed Yusuf

• Universiti Teknologi MARA

autor

Jahanzaib Haider

• Universiti Kuala Lumpur

autor

Azlan Ali

• University College of Technology Sarawak, Malaysia

Bibliografia

• Abu-Shanab, E. (2017). E-Government familiarity influence on Jordanians' perceptions. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.001
• Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in human Behavior, 53, 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025
• Alam, M. (2017). E-government in India Public Administration in South Asia. Routledge.
• Althonayan, M., & Althonayan, A. (2017). E-government system evaluation: The case of users' performance using ERP systems in higher education. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(3), 306-342. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2015-0045
• Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016). Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare. gov website. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003
• Arendsen, R., Peters, O., Ter Hedde, M., & Van Dijk, J. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.002
• Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (1989). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press.
• Boonratmaitree, A., Yodsurang, S., Thongrawd, C., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The influence of e-government adoption and political stability on levels of happiness: A panel study of ASEAN countries. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(11), 360-374.
• Bowman, W. (2011). Financial capacity and sustainability of ordinary nonprofits. Nonprofit management and leadership, 22(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.20039
• Buffat, A. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy and e-government. Public Management Review, 17(1), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771699
• Dodel, M., & Aguirre, F. (2018). Digital inequalities' impact on progressive stages of e-government development. In A. Kankanhalli, A. Ojo, & D. Soares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 459-463). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209475
• Dziekański, P. (2017). Diversification synthetic indicator for evaluating the financial capacity of local government. The case of Polish voivodeships. Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae mendelianae brunensis, 65(2), 611-619. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765020611
• Ebbers, W., Jansen, M., & van Deursen, A. (2016). Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007
• Gerstenecker, A., Eakin, A., Triebel, K., Martin, R., Swenson-Dravis, D., Petersen, R., & Marson, D. (2016). Age and education corrected older adult normative data for a short form version of the Financial Capacity Instrument. Psychological assessment, 28(6), 737. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000159
• Güler, M., Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2019). Analysis of e-government strategies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision making techniques. In C. Kahraman, S. Cebi, S. C. Onar, B. Oztaysi, A. C. Tolga, & I. U. Sari (Eds.), International conference on intelligent and fuzzy systems (pp. 1068-1075). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_126
• Gupta, K., Bhaskar, P., & Singh, S. (2017). Prioritization of factors influencing employee adoption of e-government using the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 19(1/2), 116-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-04-2017-0028
• Hussain, H. I., Slusarczyk, B., Kamarudin, F., Thaker, H. M. T., & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2020). An investigation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system to predict the relationship among energy intensity, globalization, and financial development in major ASEAN economies. Energies, 13(4), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040850
• Hussain, H. I., Kamarudin, F., Thaker, H. M. T., & Salem, M. A. (2019). Artificial neural network to model managerial timing decision: Nonlinear evidence of deviation from target leverage. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 12(2), 1282-1294. https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.191101.002
• Jiménez-Rodríguez, R., & Sánchez, M. (2005). Oil price shocks and real GDP growth: Empirical evidence for some OECD countries. Applied economics, 37(2), 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000281561
• Khan, F., & Majeed, M. (2019). ICT and e-Government as the sources of economic growth in information age: Empirical evidence from South Asian economies. South Asian Studies, 34(1), 227-249.
• Klein, H., & Kleinman, D. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700102
• Kurfalı, M., Arifoğlu, A., Tokdemir, G., & Paçin, Y. (2017). Adoption of e-government services in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.041
• Lichtenberg, P., Stoltman, J., Ficker, L., Iris, M., & Mast, B. (2015). A person-centered approach to financial capacity assessment: Preliminary development of a new rating scale. Clinical gerontologist, 38(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2014.970318
• Martin, R., Gerstenecker, A., Triebel, K., Falola, M., McPherson, T., Cutter, G., & Marson, D. (2018). Declining Financial Capacity in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Six-Year Longitudinal Study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(2), 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy030
• Mensah, I., & Mi, J. (2017). Citizens' Trust and E-Government Services Adoption: The Role of Demographic Factors. International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications, 8(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSITA.2017010102
• Mensah, I., Mi, J., & Feng, C. (2017). Determinants of E-Government services adoption from the African students' perspective. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences. 11(10), 2467-2470. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132469
• Morin, R., Gonzales, M., Bickford, D., Catalinotto, D., Nelson, C., & Mackin, R. (2019). Impaired financial capacity in late-life depression: Revisiting associations with cognitive functioning. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 25(10) pp. 1088-1093. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617719000705
• Niccolai, L., Triebel, K., Gerstenecker, A., McPherson, T., Cutter, G., Martin, R., & Marson, D. (2017). Neurocognitive predictors of declining financial capacity in persons with mild cognitive impairment. Clinical gerontologist, 40(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1228022
• Okunola, O., Rowley, J., & Johnson, F. (2017). The multi-dimensional digital divide: Perspectives from an e-government portal in Nigeria. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.002
• Pedroni, P. (1996). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels and the case of purchasing power parity [Manuscript, Indiana University] Williams. https://web.williams.edu/Economics/pedroni/WP-96-20.pdf
• Pedroni, P. (2001a). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (pp. 93-130). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2
• Pedroni, P., & Doan, T. (2001b). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727-731. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237803
• Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20(3), 597-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
• Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social studies of science, 14(3), 399-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
• Rajan, R., & Ramcharan, R. (2016). Local financial capacity and asset values: evidence from bank failures. Journal of Financial Economics, 120(2), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.006
• Sá, F., Rocha, Á., & Cota, M. (2016). Potential dimensions for a local e-government services quality model. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.005
• Schnoll, H. (2015). E-Government: Information, Technology, and Transformation: Information, Technology, and Transformation. Routledge.
• Sriyakul, T. & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Role of e-government and open data to enhance transparency in ASEAN region: A panel data analysis. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 10, 337-347. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.10.Oct (26).
• Steckel, R. (1983). Height and per capita income. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 16(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.1983.10594092
• Tracy, V., Basso, M., Marson, D., Combs, D., & Whiteside, D. (2017). Capacity for financial decision making in multiple sclerosis. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 39(1), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1201050
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Chan, F., & Hu, P. (2016). Managing citizens' uncertainty in e-government services: The mediating and moderating roles of transparency and trust. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0612
• Zheng, Y. (2017). Explaining citizens' E-participation usage: functionality of E-participation applications. Administration & Society, 49(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715593313

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5709/ce.1897-9254.423