PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 14 | nr 4 | 579--588
Tytuł artykułu

Asymmetric Impacts of Macroeconomy on Environment Degradation in Thailand : a NARDL Approach

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The study aims to examine the asymmetric impacts of macroeconomic variables on environment degradation. For this purpose, the study utilizes the data of Thailand over the period of 1990-2018. Data are gathered from Global Economy. Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test is used to check the data stationarity. Results of NARDL reveal non-linear impact of macroeconomic variables on environmental degradation. Results show that positive and negative shocks in macroeconomic variables have different contributions in environment degradation. It is concluded that there exists non-linear/asymmetric relationship among macroeconomic variables (foreign direct investment, trade openness, industrialization, economic growth, globalization) and environment degradation as one-unit change (increase/decrease) in macroeconomic variable(s) do not bring the same change in environment degradation. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
14
Numer
Strony
579--588
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi
  • Mahanakorn University of Technology
  • Qilu Institute of Technology
Bibliografia
  • Alam, S. (2010). Globalization, poverty and environmental degradation: Sustainable development in Pakistan. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(3), 103.
  • Alper, A., Oguz, O. (2016), The role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth: Evidence from asymmetric causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 953-959.
  • Abulela, M. A. A., & Harwell, M. M. (2020). Data analysis: Strengthening inferences in quantitative education studies conducted by novice researchers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 59-78.
  • Aremu, A. O., Plačková, L., Bairu, M. W., Novák, O., Plíhalová, L., Doležal, K., Finnie, J. F., & Van Staden, J. (2014). How does exogenously applied cytokinin type affect growth and endogenous cytokinins in micropropagated Merwilla plumbea? Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 118(2), 245-256.
  • Audi, M., & Ali, A. (2018). Determinants of environmental degradation under the perspective of globalization: a panel analysis of selected MENA nations. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85776/
  • Beckerman, W. (2011). Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? World Development, 20(4), 481-496.
  • Bernard, J., & Mandal, S. K. (2016). The impact of trade openness on environmental quality: an empirical analysis of emerging and developing economies. In C. A. Brebbia, & J. L. Miralles i Garcia (Eds.), WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment (pp. 195-208) Southampton, England: WIT Press.
  • Bhandari, D., & Garg, R. K. (2015). Effect of industrialization on environment (Indian scenario). Global Journal of Research Analysis, 4(12), 281-282.
  • Barkhuizen, N., Lesenyeho, D., & Schutte, N. (2020). Talent retention of academic staff in South African higher education institutions. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 12(1), 191-207.
  • Bello, P. O., & John-Langba, J. (2020). University students and police legitimacy: The South African Police Service before the loudspeaker. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 12(2), 306-320.
  • Burgos, A. L., & Bocco, G. (2020). Contributions to a theory of rural innovation. Cuadernos de Economía, 39(79), 219-247.
  • Bello, P. O., & John-Langba, J. (2020). "Are they truly our friends?" A preliminary evaluation of university students' confidence in the police. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 12(1), 98-112.
  • Bilan, Y., Hussain, H.I., Kot, S., Haseeb, M. and Jermisittiparsert, K. (2020) Sustainability and economic performance: Role of organizational learning and innovation, Engineering Economics, 31 (1), 93-103.
  • Carranza Romero, J. E., González Espitia, C. G., & Bocanegra Ochoa, G. E. (2020). The effect of economic activity on homicidal violence: New evidence for Colombia based on panel data. Cuadernos de Economía, 39(79), 355-388.
  • Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71-81.
  • Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., & Zhang, L. (2017). Foreign direct investment and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 465-487.
  • Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic literature, 42(1), 7-71.
  • Chen, J., Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Li, P. (2020). Behavioral psychology analysis of individual decision, strategic interaction and climate governance. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 29(1), 423-434.
  • Chen, L., Zhen, J., Dong, K., & Xie, Z. (2020). Effects of sanction on the mentality of information security policy compliance. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 29(1), 39-49.
  • Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., & Lauer, A. (2007), Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 41(24), 8512-8518.
  • Costello, C., & McAusland, C. (2003). Protectionism, trade, and measures of damage from exotic species introductions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 964-975.
  • Dhami, J. K., Singh, H., & Gupta, M. (2013). Industrialization at the cost of environment degradation case of leather and iron and steel industry from Punjab economy. Innovative Journal of Business and Management, 3(2), 19-21.
  • Dubrovina, N., & Serova, N. (2020). Technology of the psychological and pedagogical support of families with preschool children with cerebral palsy. Revista De Psicología Del Deporte, 29, 207-212.
  • David, O. O., & Grobler, W. (2020). Age progression, social interventions, and food insecurity in South Africa: Logistic regression analysis. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 12(2), 289-305.
  • Federico, S. (2010). Outsourcing versus integration at home or abroad and firm heterogeneity. Empirica, 37(1), 47-63.
  • Govender, R. G., & Govender, D. W. (2019). Learning geometry online: A creative individual learning experience. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 12(2), 151-165.
  • Holladay, J. S. (2016). Exporters and the environment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 49(1), 147-172.
  • Hotar, N. (2020). Herd behavior in terms of social psychology: The example of crypto assets. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 12(1), 79-90.
  • Huang, Z., Liao, G., & Li, Z. (2019). Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 148-156.
  • Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation costs and international trade in the second rra of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131-154.
  • Hussain, H. I., Haseeb, M., Tvaronavičienė, M., Mihardjo, L. W., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The causal connection of natural resources and globalization with energy consumption in top Asian countries: Evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantile approach. Energies, 13(9), 2273.
  • Habanabakize, T. (2020). Assessing the impact of interest rate, catering, and fast-food income on employment in the social services industry. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(2), 534-550.
  • Kimanzi, M. K., & Gamede, V. W. (2020). Embracing the role of finance in sustainability for SMEs. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(2), 453-468.
  • Jermsittiparsert, K., Namdej, P., & Somjai, S. (2019). Green supply chain practices and sustainable performance: Moderating role of total quality management practices in electronic industry of Thailand. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 33-46.
  • Jermsittiparsert, K. Somjai, S., & Toopgajank, S. (2020). Factors affecting firm's energy efficiency and environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting, green innovation and environmental proactivity. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(3), 325-331.
  • Kahuthu, A. (2006). economic growth and environmental degradation in a global context. Environment, Developement & Sustainability, 8(1), 55-68.
  • Kumar, N. (2019). Globalization and environment: antagonistic or agnostic. In M. P. Singh, W. Cremer, & N. Kumar (Eds.), Open markets, free trade and sustainable development (pp. 123-136). Springer.
  • Li, Z., Dong, H., Huang, Z., & Failler, P. (2019). Impact of foreign direct investment on environmental performance. Sustainability, 11(13), 3538-3549.
  • Patnaik, R. (2018, March). Impact of industrialization on environment and sustainable solutions-reflections from a south Indian region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 120, 012016.
  • Perkins, R., & Neumayer, E. (2012). Do recipient country characteristics affect international spillovers of CO 2-efficiency via trade and foreign direct investment? Climatic Change, 112(2), 469-491.
  • Shafaeddin, M. (2010). Trade liberalization, industrialization and development; experience of recent decades. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/26355/
  • Shahbaz, M., Haouas, I., & Van Hoang, T. H. (2019). Economic growth and environmental degradation in Vietnam: Is the environmental Kuznets curve a complete picture? Emerging Markets Review, 38, 197-218.
  • Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A., & Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singapore Economic Review, 62(04), 929-957.
  • Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In R. C. Sickles, & W. C. Horrace (Eds.), Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281-314). Springer.
  • Somjai, S. & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). The trade-off between cost and environmental performance in the presence of sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(4), 237-247.
  • To, A. H., Ha, D. T. T., Nguyen, H. M., & Vo, D. H. (2019). The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: evidence from emerging markets in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1636-1645.
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2019). Revisiting trade and environment nexus in South Africa: fresh evidence from new measure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(28), 29283-29306.
  • Zheng, J., & Sheng, P. (2017). The impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) on the environment: market perspectives and evidence from China. Economies, 5(1), 8-19.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171609927

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.