Classification of Benefits by the Criterion of Factors of the Location of Production as a Tool for Management of the Spatial Organization of the Economy

• Autorzy: Jerzy Stadnicki , Andrii Terebukh
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main purpose of the article is to try to substantiate the advisability of classification of benefits according to the criterion of factors of the location of their production and to develop a matrix for such a classification. Morphological analysis is used as the main study method. The existence of four groups and a number of subgroups of benefits is established, in the location of production of which one pair of factors dominates: from the "production of benefits" side and from the "place" side. The basics of the classification of benefits are developed, the location of production of which should take into account several pairs of factors. The result is a matrix for performing the classification of benefits by factors of the location of production, the filling of which will improve the quality and speed up decisionmaking on the choice of optimal places for the production of benefits. This study, in addition to being important for the theory of benefits and the theory of the spatial organization of the economy, has significant practical and social consequences, since it makes an important step in improving the justification for the location of production of benefits. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industrial production location; Management tools; Management of the economy

PL

Lokalizacja produkcji przemysłowej; Narzędzia zarządzania; Zarządzanie gospodarką

• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 11
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 25--33

Twórcy

autor

Jerzy Stadnicki

• Kielce University of Technology

autor

Andrii Terebukh

• Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Ahrens J., Hoen H., Ohr R., Deepening integration in an enlarged EU: A club-theoretical perspective, European Integration, 27, 4, 417-439, 2005.
• Barnes P., Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to reclaiming the commons, San-Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.
• Benkler Y., The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006.
• Berry C.J., The idea of luxury. A conceptual and historical investigation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994.
• Buchanan J., An economic theory of clubs, Economica, 32, 125, 1-14, 1965.
• Buchanan J., Public benefits in theory and practice: A note on the Minasian-Samuelson discussion, Journal of Law and Economics, 10, 193-197, 1967.
• Buchanan J., Public choice: Politics without romance, Policy, 19, 3, 13-18, 2003.
• Chohan U., D'Souza A., Club theory: A contemporary economic review, SSRN, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512557.
• Cornes R., Sandler T., The theory of externalities, public benefits, and club benefits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• Fisher B., Turner R., Morling P., Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecol. Econ., 68, 643-653, 2009.
• Green J., Laffont J., Characterization of satisfactory mechanisms of the revelation of preferences for public benefits, Econometrica, 45, 2, 427-438, 1977.
• Groot S., Wilson M., Boumans R., A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, benefits and services, Ecol. Econ., 41, 3, 393-408, 2002.
• Hardin G., The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 3859, 1243-1248, 1968.
• Heine K., Phan M., Trading-up mass-market goods to luxury products, Australasian Marketing Journal, 19, 2, 108-114, 2011.
• Holcombe R., Theory of the theory of public benefits, Review of Austrian Economics, 10, 1, 1-22, 1997.
• Hoppe H., Fallacies of the Public Benefits Theory and the Production of Security, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, IX, I, 27-46, 1989.
• Hoy M., Robson A., Insurance as a giffen benefit, Economics Letters, 8, 47-51, 1981.
• Hummel J., National benefits versus public benefits: Defense, disarmament and free riders, Review of Austrian Economics, 4, 88-122, 1990.
• Jensen R., Miller N., Giffen behavior and subsistence consumption, American Economic Review, 97, 4, 1553-1577, 2008.
• Kapferer J., Managing luxury brands, Journal of Brand Management, 4, 4, 251-260, 1997.
• La Notte A., D'Amato D., Mäkinen H., Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework, Ecological Indicators, 74, 392-402, 2017.
• Laerhoven van F., Ostrom E., Traditions and trends in the study of commons, International Journal of Commons, 1, 1, 3-28, 2007.
• Ostrom E., Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
• Roger S., Robert Giffen and the Giffen Paradox, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books, 1989.
• Samuelson P., Contrast between welfare conditions for joint supply and for public benefits, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 1, 26-30, 1969.
• Stigler G., Notes on the History of the Giffen Paradox, Journal of Political Economy, 55, 2, 152-156, 1947.
• Tullock G., Public benefits, redistribution and rent seeking, Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2005.
• Vigneron F., Johnson L., Measuring perceptions of brand luxury, The Journal of Brand Management, 11, 6, 484-506, 2004.
• Wallace K., Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions, Biological Conservation, 139, 3-4, 235-246, 2007.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2020.136117