PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | nr 1(177) | 87--105
Tytuł artykułu

Pieniężne instrumenty polityki rodzinnej a dzietność i aktywność zawodowa kobiet

Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Family cash benefits, fertility and female labour suppl
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
Dzietność poniżej prostej zastępowalności pokoleń występująca w krajach rozwiniętych, a zwłaszcza niska dzietność utrzymująca się w wielu z nich, stanowi ważną przesłankę dyskusji o rozwiązaniach polityki rodzinnej wspierających wzrost dzietności. Jednym z narzędzi polityki rodzinnej są zasiłki na dzieci. Artykuł podejmuje próbę przeglądu skuteczności różnych form świadczeń pieniężnych na dzieci zarówno w odniesieniu do dzietności jak i pracy zawodowej kobiet. Zwrócono też uwagę na inne efekty, w tym związane z dobrostanem dzieci. Wyniki prowadzą do wniosku, zgodnego z ustaleniami innych analiz porównawczych, że wpływ na dzietność tych świadczeń jest zależny od kontekstu instytucjonalnego, w jakim są wdrażane. Zwraca też uwagę na konieczność rozpatrywania zasiłków wraz z innymi instrumentami polityki rodzinnej.(abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
The fertility rate below the replacement rate in developed countries, and especially the low- est low fertility persisting in many of them, is an important premise for the discussion on family policy solutions supporting the fertility recuperation. One of the tools of family policy are child benefits. The article attempts to review the effectiveness of various forms of cash benefits for children, both in relation to fertility and labour supply of women. Other effects were also noted, including those related to the well-being of children. The results lead to the conclusion, in line with the findings of other studies on different countries, that the impact of these benefits on fertility depends on a country's institutional context. The need to consider benefits together with other instruments of family policy is also stressed(original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
87--105
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
Bibliografia
  • Adema, W., Ali, N. Thévenon, O., (2014), Changes in Family Policies and Outcomes: Is there Convergence?, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No 157.
  • Amarante, V., Manacorda, M., Miguel, E., Vigorito, A. (2016). Do Cash Transfers Improve Birth Outcomes? Evidence from Matched Vital Statistics, Social Security and Program Data, "American Economic Journal: Economic Policy", 8 (2), s. 1-43.
  • Apps, P., Rees, R. (2020). Alternatives to Paying Child Benefit to the Rich: Means Testing or Higher Tax?, CESifo Working Papers, 8405.
  • Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., Mills, M., (2013). Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research, "European Journal of Population", 29, s. 1-38.
  • Barro, R. J., Becker, G. S. (1989). Fertility Choice in a Model of Economic Growth," Econometrica", 57 (2), s. 481-501.
  • Baughman, R., Dickert-Conlin, S. (2003). Did Expanding the EITC Promote Motherhood?, "The American Economic Review", 93 (2), s. 247-251.
  • Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., Tamura, R. (1990). Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth, "Journal of Political Economy", 98 (5), s. S12 S37.
  • Billari, F. C., Kohler, H. P. (2004). Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe." Population Studies", 58 (2), s. 161-176.
  • Billari, F. C., (2006) The transition to parenthood in European societies. W: Policy Implications of Changing Family Formation (s. 63-108), L. Hantrais, D. Philipov, F. C. Billari (eds.). Council of Europe Publishing.
  • [10] Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., Loken, K. V., Salvanes, K. G. (2014). Care or Cash? The Effect of Child Care Subsidies on Student Performance, "The Review of Economics and Statistics", 96 (5), s. 824-837.
  • Blundell, R., Duncan, A., McCrae, J., Meghir, C. (2000). The Labour Market Impact of the Working Families' Tax Credit, "Fiscal Studies", 21 (1), s. 75-103.
  • Borra, C., Gonzalez, L., Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2014). The Impact of Eliminating a Child Benefit on Birth Timing and Infant Health, IZA Discussion Paper, 7967.
  • Boyer, G. R. (1989). Malthus was right after all: poor relief and birth rates in southeastern England, "The Journal of Political Economy", 97 (1), s. 93-114.
  • Bradshaw, J. (2012). The case for family benefits, "Children and Youth Services Review", 34 (3), s. 590-596.
  • Brewer, M., Ratcliffe, A., Smith, S. (2011). Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK, "Journal of Population Economics", 25 (1), s. 245-266.
  • Brzeziński, M., Najsztub, M. (2017). The Impact of Family 500+ Programme on Household Incomes, Poverty, and Inequality," Polityka Społeczna", 44 (1), s. 16-25.
  • Cho, E. Y. N. (2017). Child Benefit Portfolios Across OECD Countries, Social Indicators Research. "Springer Netherlands", 132 (3), s. 1099-1115.
  • Chrzanowska, M., Landmesser, J. (2017). Simulation of Ex Ante Effects of OFamily 500+Ó Program, "Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu", 468, s. 38-46. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2017.468.04.
  • Cigno, A., Luporini, A., Pettini, A. (2003). Transfers to families with children as a principal-agent problem, "Journal of Public Economics", 87(5-6), s. 1165-1177.
  • Cohen, A., Dehejia, R., Romanov, D. (2013). Financial Incentives and Fertility, "The Review of Economics and Statistics", 95 (1), s. 1-20.
  • Doepke, M. (2004). Accounting for Fertility Decline During the Transition to Growth, "Journal of Economic Growth", 9 (3), s. 347-383.
  • Doepke, M., Kindermann, F. (2015). Bargaining over Babies: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications, IZA Discussion Paper, 60208.
  • Dunn, R. (2003). Subsidies for Childbearing and Fertility Rates, "Challenge", 46 (5), s. 90-99.
  • Egger, P. H., Radulescu, D. M. (2012). Family policy and the number of children: Evidence from a natural experiment," European Journal of Political Economy", 28 (4), s. 524- 539.
  • Ermisch, J. F. (1989). Purchased child care, optimal family size and mother's employment Theory and econometric analysis, "Journal of Population Economics", 2 (2), s. 79-102.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G., Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing Family Demographics, "Population and Development Review", 41 (1), s. 1-31.
  • Fanti, L., Gori, L. (2014). Endogenous fertility, endogenous lifetime and economic growth: The role of child policies, "Journal of Population Economics", 27 (2), s. 529-564.
  • Fehr, H., Ujhelyiova, D. (2011). Fertility, Female Labor Supply, and Family Policy, CESifo Working Paper Series.
  • Figlio, D. N., Guryan, J., Karbownik, K., Roth, J. (2014). The Effects of Poor Neonatal Health on Children's Cognitive Development, "American Economic Review", 104 (12), s. 3921-3955.
  • Frejka, T., Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 1: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, delayed and below replacement, Demographic Research, S7 (3), s. 15-46.
  • Gauthier, A. H., Hatzius, J. (1997). Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis, "Population Studies", 51 (3), s. 295-306.
  • Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., Lappegard, T. (2015). The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior," Population and Development Review", 41 (2), s. 207-239.
  • González, L. (2013). The Effect of a Universal Child Benefit on Conceptions, Abortions, and Early Maternal Labor Supply, "American Economic Journal: Economic Policy", 5 (3), s. 160-188.
  • González, L., Trommlerová, S. (2020). How the Introduction and Cancellation of a Child Benefit Affected Births and Abortions, Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series 1153.
  • Gross-Gołacka, E. (2009). Instytucjonalne formy opieki nad dzieckiem i rodziną. Działania MPiPS na rzecz dzieci i rodzin, "Polityka Społeczna", 426 (9), s. 34-39.
  • Guinnane, T. W. (2011). The Historical Fertility Transition: A Guide for Economists, "Journal of Economic Literature", 49 (3), s. 589-614.
  • Haas, L., Leira, A. (2003). Working Parents and the Welfare State: Family Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia," Contemporary Sociology", 32 (4), s. 492-494.
  • Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory, "Population and Development Review", 29 (3), s. 349-374.
  • Havnes, T., Mogstad, M. (2015). Is universal child care leveling the playing field?, "Journal of Public Economics", 127, s. 100-114.
  • Hener, T. (2016). Unconditional Child Benefits, Mothers' Labor Supply, and Family Well-Being: Evidence from a Policy Reform, CESifo "Economic Studies", 62 (4), s. 624-649.
  • Hotz, V. J. J., Miller, R. A. (1988). An Empirical Analysis of Life Cycle Fertility and Female Labor Supply," Econometrica", 56 (1), s. 91-118.
  • Jones, L. E., Milligan, K. S., Stabile, M. (2015). Child Cash Benefits and Family Expenditures: Evidence from the National Child Benefit, NBER Working Paper 21101.
  • Kearney, M. S. (2004). Is There an Effect of Incremental Welfare Benefits on Fertility Behavior? A Look at the Family Cap, "Journal of Human Resources", 39 (2), s. 295-325.
  • Kimmel, J. (1995). The Effectiveness of Child-Care Subsidies in Encouraging the Welfare-to-Work Transition of Low-Income Single Mothers, "The American Economic Review", 85 (2), s. 271-275.
  • Koebel, K., Schirle, T. (2016). The differential impact of universal child benefits on the labor supply of married and single mothers, "Canadian Public Policy", 42 (1), s. 49-64.
  • Kolm, A. S., Tonin, M. (2015). Benefits conditional on work and the Nordic model, "Journal of Public Economics", 127, s. 115-126.
  • Kooreman, P. (2000). The Labelling Effect of a Child Benefit System, "American Economic Review", 90, s. 571-583.
  • Kottelenberg, M. J., Lehrer, S. F. (2017). Targeted or universal? Assessing heterogeneity in the effects of universal childcare, "Journal of Labor Economics", 35 (2), s. 609-653.
  • Laroque, G. (2005). Income Maintenance and Labor Force Participation," Econometrica", 73 (2), s. 341-376.
  • Laroque, G., Salanié, B. (2014). Does Fertility Respond to Financial Incentives?," Journal of Applied Econometrics", 29, s. 314-332.
  • Lefebvre, P., Merrigan, P., Verstraete, M. (2009). Dynamic labour supply effects of childcare subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care," Labour Economics", 16 (5), s. 490-502.
  • Leibenstein, H. (1957) Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth: Studies in the Theory of Economic Development. Nowy Jork: Wiley.
  • Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition, "Population and Development Review. The Population Council", Inc., 36 (2), s. 211-251.
  • Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S. (2006). Raising children to work hard: Altruism, work norms, and social insurance, "Quarterly Journal of Economics", 121 (4), 1473-1503.
  • Luci-Greulich, A., Thevenon, O. (2014). Does Economic Advancement "Cause" a Re-increase in Fertility? An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries (1960-2007), "European Journal of Population", 30 (2), s. 187-221.
  • Magda, I., Kiełczewska, A., Brandt, N. (2018). The effects of large universal child benefits on female labour supply, IZA Discussion Paper 11652.
  • Matsaganis, M., O'Donoghue, C., Levy, H., Coromaldi, M., Mercader-Prats, M., Rodrigues, C. F., Tsakloglou, P. (2005). Child poverty and family transfers in Southern Europe, IZA Discussion Paper 1509.
  • McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility, "Journal of Population Research", 17, s. 1-16.
  • McNown, R., Ridao-Cano, C. (2004). The Effect of Child Benefit Policies on Fertility and Female Labor Force Participation in Canada," Review of Economics of the Household", 2 (3), s. 237-254.
  • Meghir, C., Phillips, D. (2008). Labour supply and taxes, "Mirrless Review", 80 (9), s. 409- 434.
  • Miho, A., Thévenon, O. (2020). Treating all children equally? Why policies should adapt to evolving family living arrangements, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 240.
  • Miller, S. M., Neanidis, K. C. (2015). Demographic transition and economic welfare: The role of in-cash and in-kind transfers, "Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance", 58, s. 84-92.
  • Milligan, K. (2005). Life-cycle asset accumulation and allocation in Canada," Canadian Journal of Economics", 38 (3), s. 1057-1106.
  • Milligan, K., Stabile, M. (2007). The integration of child tax credits and welfare: Evidence from the Canadian National Child Benefit program," Journal of Public Economics", 91 (1), s. 305-326.
  • Milligan, K., Stabile, M. (2009). Child benefits, maternal employment, and children's health: Evidence from Canadian child benefit expansions, "American Economic Review", 99 (2), s. 128-132.
  • Milligan, K., Stabile, M. (2011). Do Child Tax Benefits Affect the Well-Being of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions, "American Economic Journal: Economic Policy", 3 (3), s. 175-205.
  • Moffitt, R. (2000). Welfare Benefits and Female Headship in U. S. Time Series, "The American Economic Review", 90 (2), s. 373-377.
  • [69] Moffitt, R. (2002). Welfare Programs and Labor Supply, NBER Working Paper 9168.
  • Myck, M., Trzciński, K. (2019). From Partial to Full Universality: The Family 500 + Programme in Poland and its, ifo DICE Report 17 (3), s. 36-44.
  • Parr, N., Guest, R. (2011). The contribution of increases in family benefits to Australia's early 21st-century fertility increase: An empirical analysis, "Demographic Research", 25, s. 215-244.
  • Pestieau, P., Ponthiere, G. (2015). Optimal life-cycle fertility in a Barro-Becker economy, "Journal of Population Economics", 28 (1), s. 45-87.
  • Riphahn, R. T., Wiynck, F. (2017). Fertility effects of child benefits, "Journal of Population Economics", 10757, s. 1-50.
  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating Causal Effects of Treatment in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies, "Journal of Educational Psychology", 66 (5), s. 688-701.
  • Schellekens, J. (2009). Family Allowances and Fertility: Socio-economic Differences, "Demography", 46 (3), s. 451-68.
  • Schirle, T. (2015). The effect of universal child benefits on labour supply," Canadian Journal of Economics", 48 (2), s. 437-463.
  • Sobotka, T. (2008). The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe, "Demographic Research", 19, s. 171-224.
  • Sobotka, T., Toulemon, L. (2008) Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe," Demographic Research", 19 (6), s. 85-138.
  • Thévenon, O. (2011). Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," Population and Development Review," 37, s. 57-87.
  • Thévenon, O., Gauthier, A. H. (2011). Family policies in developed countries: a 'fertility-booster'with side-effects, Community," Work Family", 14 (2), s. 197-216.
  • Urban, I. Petzer, M. (2018). Microsimulation of Child Benefits: A Review of Studies, "International Journal of Microsimulation", 11 (3), s. 134-168.
  • [82] Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe's Second Demographic Transition," Population Bulletin", 42 (1), s. 1-59.
  • Werding, M. (2014). Children are costly, but raising them may pay: The economic approach to fertility, "Demographic Research", 30 (1), s. 253-276.
  • Woolley, F. (2004). Why Pay Child Benefits to Mothers?," Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politique"s, 30 (1), s. 47-69.
  • Yasuoka, M., Goto, N. (2015). How is the child allowance to be financed? By income tax or consumption tax?, I"nternational Review of Economics", 62 (3), s. 249-269.
  • Zhang, J., Quan, J., van Meerbergen, P. (1994). The Effect of Tax-Transfer Policies on Fertility in Canada, 1921-88, "The Journal of Human Resources", 29 (1), s. 181-201.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171611725

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.