Micro-Business Entrepreneurs and Bricoleurs on their Way Towards Sustainable Practice - Implications for Learning Processes

• Autorzy: Anette Oxenswärdh

Warianty tytułu

Mikroprzedsiębiorcy na drodze do działalności zrównoważonej - implikacje dla procesów uczenia się

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of the study was to investigate how some micro-business entrepreneurs and bricoleurs experience their learning processes through workshops, especially with respect to sustainability issues. This qualitative and explorative study focuses on learning processes during the GreenBizz course, which are analysed on the basis of inquiries and observations of discussions among course participants and on documents describing the course design and assignments. It was found that entrepreneurs are aware and are familiar with sustainability issues but they have neither proper tools nor the knowhow for implementing sustainable changes in their businesses. To be successful, the learning process needs to sufficiently heterogeneous, should involve the transmission of tacit knowledge and provide opportunities for participants to learn about their motivations and should include both theoretical and practical elements. Participation in the course enables entrepreneurs to network with other entrepreneurs, give support and share knowledge about sustainable solutions in their businesses. The study shows that such courses not only must allow for a certain degree of flexibility but also require a course or team leader with a solid and practical knowledge in entrepreneurship and sustainability. (original abstract)

Celem badania było rozpoznanie, w jaki sposób niektórzy mikroprzedsiębiorcy odbierają proces uczenia się w trakcie warsztatów, zwłaszcza w odniesieniu do kwestii zrównoważonego rozwoju. W przeprowadzonym badaniu jakościowym o charakterze eksploracyjnym przedmiotem analizy były głównie procesy uczenia się podczas kursu GreenBizz. Analizowane były odpowiedzi udzielone przez respondentów w kwestionariuszu, notatki z obserwacji dyskusji między uczestnikami warsztatów oraz dokumenty opisujące strukturę kursu i wykorzystane w nim zadania. Stwierdzono, że przedsiębiorcy mają pewną wiedzę na temat kwestii zrównoważonego rozwoju, ale brakuje im odpowiednich narzędzi do wdrażania trwałych zmian w swoich firmach. Aby proces uczenia się był skuteczny, musi być wystarczająco zróżnicowany, powinien obejmować przekazywanie wiedzy ukrytej, dawać uczestnikom możliwość poznania swoich motywacji oraz zawierać zarówno elementy teoretyczne, jak i praktyczne. Udział w kursie umożliwił respondentom nawiązywanie kontaktów z innymi przedsiębiorcami, udzielanie sobie wzajemnego wsparcia i dzielenie się wiedzą na temat zrównoważonych rozwiązań w przedsiębiorstwach. Badanie pokazuje, że tego typu kursy muszą nie tylko zapewniać wystarczający zakres elastyczności, ale również powinny być prowadzone przez osoby posiadające solidną i praktyczną wiedzę z zakresu przedsiębiorczości i zrównoważonego rozwoju. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sustainable development; Tourism; Micro-enterprise; Learning process; Knowledge sharing; Entrepreneurship

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Turystyka; Mikroprzedsiębiorstwo; Proces uczenia się; Dzielenie się wiedzą; Przedsiębiorczość

• Czasopismo: Studia Periegetica
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 4(32)
• Strony: 89--104

Twórcy

autor

Anette Oxenswärdh

• Uppsala University, Sweden

Bibliografia

• Abolafia, M.Y. (2010). Narrative construction as sensemaking. Organisation Studies, 31(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609357380.
• Anderson, A. R. (2000). Paradox in the periphery: An entrepreneurial reconstruction? Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(2), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856200283027.
• Appelbaum, S. H., Calcagno, R., Magarelli, S. M., & Saliba, M. (2016). A relationship between corporate sustainability and organizational change (part two). Industrial and Commercial Training, 48(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-07-2014-0046.
• Ateljevic, I., & Doorne, S. (2000). Staying within the fence': Lifestyle entrepreneurship in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 5, 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580008667374.
• Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.
• Bergman, B., & Klefsjö, B. (2012). Kvalitet från behov till användning. Studentlitteratur.
• Boaden, R. (2006). Leadership development: does it make a difference? Leadership Organization Development Journal, 27(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730610641331.
• Bowerman, J. (2003). Leadership development through action learning: an executive monograph. Leadership in Health Services, 16(4), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/13660750310500049.
• Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our Common Future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
• Burns, P. (2001). Entrepreneurship and small business. McMillan.
• Conger, J., & Toegel, G. (2003). Action learning and multi-rater feedback as leadership development interventions: popular but poorly deployed. Journal of Change Management, 3(4), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/714023841.
• Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(49), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00094.x
• Davidsson, P., Baker, T., & Senyard, J. M. (2017). A measure of entrepreneurial bricolage behaviour. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 23(1), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0256.
• Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in Domenico social enter- prises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x
• Dobson, A. (2008). Nature (and Politics). Environmental Values, White Horse Press, vol. 17, 285-301.
• Gillies, J., Neimeyer, R. A., & Milman, E. (2014). The meaning of loss codebook: construction of a system for analyzing meanings made in bereavement. Death Studies, 38, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2013.829367.
• Gomez-Velasco, M., & Saleilles, S. (2007). The local embeddedness of lifestyle entrepreneur: an exploratory study. Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary European Conference on Entrepreneurship Research, Montpellier 2007.
• Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
• Friis, T. W., & Scholz, M. F. (Eds.) (2013). Ostsee - Kriegsschauplatz und Handelsregion. Festschrift für Robert Bohn. Gotland University Press.
• Haslett, B. B., & Ruebush, J. (1999). What Differences Do Individual Differences in Groups Make?: The Effects of Individuals, Culture, and Group Composition. In L. R. Frey (Ed.) The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research (pp. 115-138). Sage Publications.
• https://www.sh.se/forskning/var-forskning/forskningsdatabas/forskningsprojekt/naturebizz
• Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organisational events. Academical Management, 33(1), 7-41.
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Holubec, E. J. (2008). Cooperation in the classroom. Revised 8th ed. Interaction Book Co, Edina.
• Järvela, S., Violet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433539.
• Järvela, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350-374.
• Kang, T. (2017). Bricolage in the urban cultural sector: The case of Bradford city of film. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(3-4), 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1271461.
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, 1st edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
• Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg, L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227-247), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
• Korsgaard, S., Mueller, S., & Welter, F. (2018). It's right nearby: how entrepreneurs use spatial bricolage to overcome resource constraints. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 14361. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.14361abstract.
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
• Li, Y., & Hunter, C. (2015). Community involvement for sustainable heritage tourism: a conceptual model. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-08-2014-0027.
• Matthing, J., Sandén, B., & Edvardsson, B. (2004). New service development: learning from and with customers. International Journal of Service Industrial Management, 15(5), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230410564948.
• Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. Pages Bent edn. Simon & Schuster.
• Morrison, A. (2006). A contextualisation of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(4), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550610679159.
• Ohlsson, J. (1996). Collective learning: learning in working within childcare, Report/seminar on environmental education and knowledge. Stockholm University, Pedagogiska institutionen.
• Passarelli, A. M., & Kolb, D. A. (2011). The Learning Way - Learning from Experience as the Path to Lifelong Learning and Development. In: M. London (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lifelong Learning (1st edn). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390483.013.0028.
• Pedler, M., (2016). Reginald Revans: The Pioneer of Action Learning. In: D. Szabla, W. Pasmore, M. Barnes, A. Gipson (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers (pp. 1-19). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_20-1.
• Prahalad, C. K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business School Press.
• Rae, D., & Carswell, M. (2000). Using a life story approach in researching entrepreneurial learning: the development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences. Education and Training, 42(4/5), 220-227.
• Rambaud, A., & Richard, J., (2015). The "Triple Depreciation Line" instead of the "Triple Bottom Line": Towards a genuine integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.012.
• Salancick, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Qarterly, 23, 224-253.
• Schultz, B. G. (1999). Improving group communication performance: An overview of diagnosis and intervention. In L. R. Frey (Ed.) The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research (pp. 371-394). Sage Publications.
• Schön, D.A. (1995). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Arena.
• Shaw, E. (2004). Marketing in the social enterprise context: is it entrepreneurial? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 7(3), 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750410540209.
• Sunwolf, & Seibold, D. R. (1999). The impact of formal procedures on group processes, members, and task outcomes. In L. R. Frey (Ed.) The Handbook of Group Communication Theory and Research (pp. 395-431). Sage Publications.
• Stinchfield, B. T., Nelson, R. E., & Wood, M. S. (2013). Learning from Levi-Strauss' legacy: Art, craft, engineering, bricolage, and brokerage in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 889-921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00523.x.
• Thrift, N. (2006). Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist co-modification. Economy and Society, 35(2), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140600635755.
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations. Sage Publications.
• Wilhelmson, L. (1998). Lärande dialog. Samtalsmönster, perspektivförändring och lärande i gruppsamtal. Stockholm University

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0014.6596