PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | nr 3 | 116--131
Tytuł artykułu

Servitization of Public Service Processes with a Simulation Modelling Approach

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article aims to examine how the theory of co-production can be connected with servitization and digitalisation and used together for the public service development with the help of discrete-event simulation modelling to highlight time-related deficiencies of a complex public service process, which is most commonly used by patchwork families. Data was taken from the Guardianship Office in Győr (Hungary), based on which in-depth interviews were conducted. Based on the legal background and the interviews, the authors of the article created the process model of the contacting procedure. Based on the model, discrete-event simulation was used to identify the process elements for potential improvement through servitization. Discrete-event simulation showed the insufficiency of national regulation regarding the whole process and weaknesses of the contacting procedures in terms of quality and success. Basic reasons were found for the dissatisfaction expressed by participants of the procedures (administrators and customers). The increasing customer demand for high quality and efficient public services and failures in the New Public Management (NPM) in Eastern European countries require other approaches to advance. The paper connects the theory of co-production and servitization in a public service context and demonstrates how a complex public service can be examined with this approach to find possible improvements. The government must change the process regulation considering the number of the cases, the workload of administrators and family types (divorced or patchwork). The emphasis should be placed on the training and experience of administrators. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
116--131
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Széchenyi István University, Hungary
  • Széchenyi István University, Hungary
Bibliografia
  • Act CL of 2016 on the General Administrative Order Law.
  • Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code Fourth Book (Family Law) Chapter XVIII of the Exercise of Parental Supervision, Section 4:178. - 4:185.
  • Act XXXI of 1997 on the Protection of Children and Guardianship Administration (Child Protection Act) provides for children and parental rights and duties, as well as the main rules of child protection and guardianship administration.
  • Ahuja, R.D., Capella, L.M., & Taylor, R.D. (1998). Child influences, attitudinal and behavioral comparisons between single parent and dual parent households in grocery shopping decisions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(1), 48-62.
  • Alford, J. (2002). Defining the client in the public sector: A social-exchange perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337-346.
  • Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Springer.
  • Alford, J. (2016). Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending public service-dominant logic. Public Management Review, 18(5), 673-691.
  • Alford, J., & Speed, R. (2006). Client focus in regulatory agencies: Oxymoron or opportunity? Public Management Review, 8(2), 313-331.
  • Allan, G., & Crow, G. (2001). Families, households and society. Palgrave.
  • Arantes, J.A. (2020). The servitization of Australian K-12 educational settings. Postdigital Science and Education, 1-29. doi: 10.1007/s42438-019-00097-0
  • Baines, T., & Lightfoot H., (2013). Made to Serve: How manufacturers can compete through servitization and product service systems, John Wiley & Sons.
  • Baines, T., Lightfoot, H., Peppard, J., Johnson, M., Tiwari, A., Shehab, E., & Swink, M. (2009). Towards an operations strategy for product centric servitization. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(5), 494-519.
  • Banks, J., Carson, J.S., Nelson, B.L., & Nicol, D.M. (2013). Discrete-event system simulation: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
  • Barberis, P. (1998). The new public management and a new accountability. Public Administration, 76(3), 451-470.
  • Barker, R.L. (2003). The social work dictionary (5th ed.). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
  • Beck-Gernsheim, E., & Camiller, P. (2002). Reinventing the family: In search of new lifestyles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Benedettini, O., & Neely, A. (2012, June). Complexity in services: an interpretative framework. 23rd Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), 1-11.
  • Benedettini, O., & Neely, A. (2013). Factors Influencing Service Complexity: The Perspective of Servitized Manufacturers. Cambridge Service Alliance Executive Briefing Paper. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
  • Biblarz, T.J. & Gottainer, G. (2000). Family structure and children's success: a comparison of widowed and divorced single-mother families, Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 533-548.
  • Bien, W., Hartl, A., & Teubner, M. (2002). Stieffamilien in Deutschland. Eltern und Kinder zwischen Normalität und Konflikt. Opladen. Leske und Budrich.
  • Bohács, G. (2012). Folyamatelemzés és szimuláció. Járműipari Felsőoktatási és Kutatási Együttműködés, Európai Unió, Európai Szociális Alap.
  • Bouckaert, G., Nakrošis, V., & Nemec, J. (2011). Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE. Main Trajectories and Results. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 4, 9-29. doi: 10.2478/v10110-011-0001-9.
  • Bray, J.H., & Berger, S.H. (1993). Developmental Issues in StepFamilies Research Project: Family relationships and parent-child interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), 76-90.
  • Brown, S.L. (2004). Family structure and child well-being: The significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(2), 351-367.
  • Brudney, J.L., & England, R.E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 59-65. doi: 10.2307/975300
  • Casalino, N., Draoli, M., & Martino, M. (2013, May). Organizing and Promoting Value Services in Public Sector by a New E-government Approach. Proceedings of XIV Workshop dei Docenti e Ricercatori di Organizzazione Aziendale (WOA 2013), Università La Sapienza, Rome.
  • Cheal, D. (2002). Sociology of Family Life. Palgrawve, MacMillan, Basingstoke.
  • Clarke, L., & Joshi, H. (2003). Children's changing families and family resources. In Jensen A.-M., & L. McKee (Eds.), Children and the Changing Family: Between Transformation and Negotiation (pp. 15-26). London: Routledge.
  • Clingempeel, W.G., & Brand-Clingempeel, E. (2004). Pathogenic-conflict families and children: What we know, what we need to know. In Coleman M., & Ganong L.H. (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families: Considering the past, contemplating the future (pp. 244-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cockett, M., & Tripp, J.H. (1994). The Exeter family study: Family breakdown and its impact on children. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
  • Corfman, K.P., & Lehmann, D.R. (1987). Models of cooperative group decision-making and relative influence: An experimental investigation of family purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(1), 1-13.
  • Cusumano, M.A., Kahl, S.J., & Suarez, F.F. (2015). Services, industry evolution, and the competitive strategies of product firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 559-575.
  • Dachs, B., Biege, S., Borowiecki, M., Lay, G., Jäger, A., & Schartinger, D. (2012). The servitization of European manufacturing industries. Retrieved form https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38873/1/MPRA_paper_38873.pdf
  • Dinges, V., Urmetzer, F., Martinez, V., Zaki, M., & Neely, A. (2015). The future of servitization: Technologies that will make a difference. Cambridge: Cambridge Service Alliance, University of Cambridge.
  • Drechsler, W. (2005). The re-emergence of "Weberian" public administration after the fall of new public management: The central and eastern European perspective. Administrative Culture, 6(1), 94-108.
  • Drechsler, W. (2009). The rise and demise of the New Public Management: Lessons and opportunities for South East Europe. Central European Public Administration Review, 7(3), 7-27.
  • Drechsler, W., & Kattel, R. (2009). Conclusion: Towards the neo-Weberian state? Perhaps, but certainly adieu, NPM. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 1(2), 95-99.
  • Drechsler, W., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). The new public management then and now: Lessons from the transition in Central and Eastern Europe. In de Vries M., & Nemec J. (Eds.), Implementation of New Public Management Tools. Experiences from transition and emerging countries (pp. 33-49). Brussels: Bruylant.
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead-long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494.
  • Durose, C., Mangan, C., Needham, C., Rees, J., & Hilton, M. (2013). Transforming local public services through co-production. Swindon: Arts and Humanities Research Council.
  • Eisingerné, B.B. (2014). Édesem vagy mostohák?: Vásárlási döntések a mozaikcsaládokban, Pécs, Magyarország, Győr. Magyarország: Széchenyi István Egyetem Regionális- és Gazdaságtudományi Doktori Iskola.
  • Eisingerné, B.B., & Makkos-Káldi, J. (2012). "Biologic" in stepfamilies. 3rd Emac CEE Regional Conference, 62-69.
  • Fang, E., Palmatier, R.W., & Steenkamp, J.B.E. (2008). Effect of service transition strategies on firm value. Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 1-14.
  • Felker, J.A., Fromme, D.K., Arnaut, G.L., & Stoll, B.M. (2002). A qualitative analysis of stepfamilies: The stepparent. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 38(1-2), 125-142.
  • Fergusson, D.M., Horwood, L.J., & Shannon, F.T. (1984). A proportional hazards model of family breakdown. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(3), 539-549.
  • Filep, B., Földesi, P., & Csík, Á. (2010). Competitiveness of cities, searching for a model to optimize cities. Acta Technica Jaurinensis, 3(3), 383-393.
  • Filep, B., & Kovács, Zs. (2005). Karrierszolgáltatók a felsőoktatásban. Comitatus: Önkormányzati Szemle, 15(11-12), 82-86.
  • Fischer, E. (2005). Modern mostohák. Budapest: Saxum kiadó.
  • Fisher, P.A., Leve, L.D., O'Leary, C.C., & Leve, C. (2003). Parental monitoring of children's behavior: Variation across stepmother, stepfather, and two-parent biological families. Family Relations, 52(1), 45-52.
  • Foxman, E.R., Tansuhaj, P.S., & Ekstrom, K.M. (1989). Family members' perceptions of adolescents' influence in family decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 482-491.
  • Garrido, J.M. (2009). Object Oriented Simulation: A Modeling and Programming Perspective. Springer US.
  • Gerson, R., & McGoldrick, M. (1993). Genogramas en la evaluación familiar. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Government Decree 149/1997 (IX.10.) on Guardianship Authorities and Child Protection and Guardianship Procedures Chapter IV. (Sections 27-33/B).
  • Hajnal, G. (2004). Administrative culture and New Public Management reforms: A multiple-case study. Budapest: University of Economics and Management.
  • Hajnal, G., Kádár, K., & Kovács, É. (2018). Government Capacity and Capacity-Building in Hungary: A New Model in the Making?. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11(1), 11-39.
  • Hetherington, E.M. (1999). Family functioning and the adjustment of adolescent siblings in diverse types of families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64(4), 1-25. doi: 10.1111/1540-5834.00045.
  • Hockerts, K., & Weaver, N. (2002, May). Towards a theory of sustainable product service systems-what are the dependent and independent variables of S-PSS. Proceedings of the INSEADCMER research workshop "Sustainable product service systems-key definitions and concepts.
  • Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267-282.
  • Huszka, P., & Platz, P. (2017). Középiskolások erkölcsi értékrendjének és a házassággal kapcsolatos attitűdjeinek vizsgálata I. In Dusek, T. (Ed.), A városi rendszer működése: Közösségi szféra, oktatás és Győr jövőképe (pp. 104-134). Győr, Magyarország. Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Kft.
  • Jenei, G. (2009). A post-accession crisis? Political developments and public sector modernization in Hungary (No. 67). BERG Working Paper Series on Government and Growth.
  • Jeong, C.H.I. (2007). Fundamental of Development Administration. Selangor: Scholar Press
  • Jun, K.N., & Weare, C. (2011). Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 495-519.
  • Kaboolian, L. (1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 189-193.
  • Kettl, D.F. (1995). Building lasting reform: Enduring questions, missing answers. In D.F. Kettle, & Jr.J. DuIulio (Ed.), Inside the reinvention machine: Appraising governmental reform (pp. 9-83). Washington. D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
  • Kozłowska, J. (2020). What Influences the Servitization Process the Most? A Perspective of Polish Machinery Manufacturers. Sustainability, 12(12), 5056. doi: 10.3390/su12125056
  • Krähenbühl, V., Jellouschek, H., Kohaus-Jellouschek, M., & Weber, R. (2011). Stieffamilien: Struktur-Entwicklung-Therapie. Lambertus-Verlag.
  • Kurdek, L.A., Fine, M.A., & Sinclair, R.J. (1995). School adjustment in sixth graders: Parenting transitions, family climate, and peer norm effects. Child Development, 66(2), 430-445.
  • Kurucz, A. (2016). The SMEs surf in change flow. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 4, 109-121.
  • Lansford, J.E., Ceballo, R., Abbey, A., & Stewart, A.J. (2001). Does family structure matter? A comparison of adoptive, two-parent biological, single-mother, stepfather, and stepmother households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 840-851.
  • Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Lawton, J.M., & Sanders, M.R. (1994). Designing effective behavioral family interventions for stepfamilies. Clinical Psychology Review, 14(5), 463-496.
  • Lindquist, E.A., & Paquet, G. (1996). Government restructuring and the federal public service: The search for a new cosmology. Ottawa: Faculty of Administration, University of Ottawa.
  • Mes, M. (2017). Simulation Modelling using Practical Examples: A Plant Simulation Tutorial.
  • Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation?. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 192-219.
  • Mintel, A. (2005). Marketing to Families. London: Mintel International Group Ltd.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1996). Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 75-83.
  • Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766-776.
  • Nambisan, S., & Nambisan, P. (2013). Engaging citizens in co-creation in public services. IBM Center for Business Development.
  • Neely, A. (2007, June). The servitization of manufacturing: an analysis of global trends. 14th European Operations Management Association Conference (pp. 1-10). Turkey Ankara.
  • Neely, A. (2008). Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing. Operations Management Research, 1(2), 103-118.
  • Neely, A. (2013). Servitization in Germany: An international comparison. Cambridge Service Alliance, 1-10.
  • Neely, A., (2012). Society's Grand Challenges: What Role for Services? Cambridge Service Alliance Executive Briefing Paper. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
  • Neely, A., Benedettini, O., & Visnjic, I. (2011). The servitization of manufacturing: Further evidence. 18th European Operations Management Association Conference.
  • Nemec, J. (2010). New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What do we Know and where do we Go? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 3(1), 31-52.
  • Nemec, J., Svidroňová, M.M., & Kovács, É. (2019). Welfare Co-Production: Hungarian and Slovak Reality. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 195-215.
  • Németh, K., & Dőry, T. (2019). Influencing factors of innovation performance in family firms-Based on an empirical research. Vezetéstudomány-Budapest Management Review, 50(5), 58-71.
  • O'Toole Jr, L.J., & Meier, K.J. (2015). Public management, context, and performance: In quest of a more general theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 237-256.
  • Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 1-10.
  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to statehouse. City Hall to Pentagon. Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
  • Osborne, S.P., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the C o-production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24, S31-S47.
  • Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.
  • Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment?. Public Management Review, 18(5), 639-653.
  • Ostrom, E. (1972). Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53(3), 474-493.
  • O'Toole Jr, L.J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 45-52.
  • Papernow, P.L. (1993). Becoming a Stepfamily. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Parks, R.B., Baker, P.C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy S.L., Vandivort, M.B., Whitaker, G.P., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001-1011.
  • Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503-519.
  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Prateek Sh. (2015). Discrete-Event Simulation. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(04), 136-140.
  • Rámháp, S., Nagy, D., Országh, Á., Rechnitzer, J., & Filep, B. (2017). Career Choice Motivation Of High School Students In Context Of Changing Higher Education In Knowledge Economy. Poslovna Izvrsnost: Znanstveni Časopis za Promicanje Kulture Kvalitete i Poslovne Izvrsnosti, 11(2), 23-37.
  • Reicher, R. (2014). CRM informatikai rendszer bevezetésének és működtetésének vállalati problémái a magyar KKV-k körében. Doctoral dissertation SZIE, Gödöllő.
  • Richwine, J. (2012). Government Employees Work Less than Private Sector Employees. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
  • Ringold, D., Holla, A., Koziol, M., & Srinivasan, S. (2013). Citizens and Service Delivery: Assessing the Use of Social Accountability Approaches in Human Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Rodgers, K.B., & Rose, H.A. (2002). Risk and resiliency factors among adolescents who experience marital transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 1024-1037.
  • Sabbagh, K., Friedrich, R., El-Darwiche, B., Singh, M., Ganediwalla, S., & Katz, R. (2012). Maximizing the Impact of Digitization. In The Global Information Technology Report (pp. 121-133). World Economic Forum.
  • Schumacher Dyke, K. (2005). Successful stepfamilies: A family life education program to address unique needs. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=miami1113921837&disposition=inline
  • Shikata, N., Goto, S., & Gemba, K. (2019). Servitisation of manufacturing industry in Japan. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(3), 19-30. doi: 10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO3_2
  • Slack, N. (2005). Patterns of Servitization: Beyond Products and Service. An Initial Report on Initial Exploratory Work Undertaken January-April 2004. Institute for Manufacturing, CUEA.
  • Spéder, Zs. (2005). Az európai családformák változatossága. Párkapcsolatok, szülõi és gyermeki szerepek az európai országokban az ezredfordulón. Századvég, 3, 1-47.
  • Stark, A. (2002). What is the new public management? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 12(1), 137-151.
  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance?. The American Review of public administration, 36(1), 41-57.
  • Süle, E. (2018). A digitális technológiák és a termelékenységnövekedés. Logisztikai Évkönyv, 2019(25), 46-53.
  • Tamándl, L., Kovács, Zs., Rámháp, Sz., & Nagy, D. (2014). A felsőoktatás térbeli szerkezete az Észak-Dunántúlon. In Dusek, T. (Eds.), A városi rendszer működése (pp. 104-134). Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Kft.
  • Terry, L.D. (1999). From Greek Mythology to the real world of the new public management and democratic Governance (Terry Responds). Public Administration Review, 59(3), 272-277.
  • Tinson, J., & Nancarrow, C. (2007). "GROw" ing up: tweenagers' involvement in family decision making. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(3), 160-170.
  • Tinson, J., Nancarrow, C., & Brace, I. (2008). Purchase decision making and the increasing significance of family types. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(1), 45-56.
  • Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988). Servitization of business: adding value by adding services. European Management Journal, 6(4), 314-324.
  • Visher, E.B., & Visher, S. (1995). Stiefeltern, Stiefkinder und ihre Familien. 2. neubearb. München: Psychologie Verlags Union.
  • Wise, R., & Baumgartner, P. (1999). Go downstream. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 133-141.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171614677

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.