PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | nr 3 | 7--17
Tytuł artykułu

Managerial Decisions on the Nature and Scale of Corporate Activity Diversification in the Construction Sector

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Corporate activity diversification is a promising but at the same time risky condition of a company's adaptation to the business environment. Effectiveness of diversification processes in enterprises may be achieved by research in the following areas: development of methods of internal and external business environment analysis as a basis for diversification decisions; understanding the dependence of the scope and nature of corporate activity diversification on the market situation; providing science-based advice for the management of diversified companies, especially large ones; improvement in the methods of diversification measuring so that a complex analysis of the diversification process would become implementable. Based on the study of the Lithuanian construction sector, this paper seeks to provide new insights into the following aspects of corporate activity diversification: preconditions and conditions for deciding on corporate activity diversification; the problem of the scale and nature of diversification; organisational management conditions for the success of diversification projects. Furthermore, an in-depth discussion of the problematic of measuring the achieved level of diversification is offered. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
7--17
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Amik, R., Livnat, J., & Zarowin, P. (1989). The Mode of Corporate Diversification: Internal Ventures versus Acquisitions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(2), 89-100.
  • Anghel, I., Enache, C., & Merino, F. (2020). Macroeconomic determinants of corporate failures. Evidence from Romania and Spain. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(3), 743-759. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2020.12217
  • Ansoff, H.J. (1957). Strategies for Diversification. Harvard Business Review, 35(5), 111-125.
  • Ansoff, H.J. (1965). Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Comp.
  • Arbeitskreis. (1973). Diversifizierung, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche. Forschung, 25, 294-335.
  • Becerra, M., & Santaló, J. (2006). The Effect of Diversification on Performance Revisited: How the Dominance of Diversifiers Versus Specialists Drives the Diversification-Performance Relationship. Management Research, 4(1), 23-34. doi: 10.2753/JMR1536-5433040102
  • Berry, Ch. (1971). Corporate Growth and Industrial Diversification. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 371-383.
  • Bilan, Y., Vasilyeva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Bagmet, K. (2019). Institutional complementarity for social and economic development. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 103-115. doi: 10.3846/btp.2019.10
  • Bühner, R. (1985). Strategie und Organisation. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
  • Busse, M., Dacorogna, M., & Kratz, M. (2014). The Impact of Systemic Risk on the Diversification Benefits of a Risk Portfolio. Risks, 2(3), 260-276. doi: 10.3390/risks2030260.
  • Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Wang, C., & Chung Hsu, W. (2014). How do resources and diversification strategy explain the performance consequences of internationalization? Management Decision, 52(5), 897-915. doi: 10.1108/MD-10-2013-0527.
  • Chen, Y.-Y., & Jaw, Y.L. (2014). How do business groups' small world networks effect diversification, innovation, and internationalization? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 1019-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10490-014-9385-9
  • Chonghui, J., Yongkai, M., & Yunbi, A. (2013). International diversification benefits: an investigation from the perspective of Chinese investors. China Finance Review International, 3(3), 225-249.
  • Chung, H.-M. (2013). The role of family management and family ownership in diversification: The case of family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 871-891. doi: 10.1007/s10490-012-9284-x
  • Dickinson, V. (2005). Firm Life Cycle and Future Profitability and Growth. Working paper. Madison, USA: School of Business, University of Wisconsin.
  • Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., Halicka, K., Kononiuk, A., Magruk, A., Nazarko, J., Nazarko, Ł., Szpilko, D., & Widelska, U. (2019). Foresight in Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from Poland. Foresight and STI Governance, 13, 77-89. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.1.77.89
  • Gaur, A., & Delios, A. (2015). International Diversification of Emerging Market Firms: The Role of Ownership Structure and Group Affiliation. Management International Review, 55, 235-253. doi: 10.1007/s11575-015-0240-0
  • Ginevičius, R. (1998a). Įmonės situacija ir strategija [Corporate situation and strategy]. Vilnius, Lithuania: Technika.
  • Ginevičius, R. (1998b). Įmonės veiklos diversifikacija [Diversification Activities of Enterprises]. Vilnius, Lithuania: Technika.
  • Ginevičius, R. (2009). Quantitative evaluation of unrelated diversification of enterprise activities. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(1), 105-111. doi: 10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.105-111.
  • Ginevičius, R. (2012). Įmonių susijusios diversifikacijos matavimas. Verslas: teorija ir praktika = Business: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 150-159.
  • Ginevičius, R., & Andruškevičius, A. (2008a). Construction Enterprises on the Efficiency of their Commercial and Economic Activities. The 5th International Scientific Conference "Business and Management", 16-17 May, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Ginevičius, R., & Andruškevičius, A. (2008b). The Influence of Diversification of Construction Enterprises on the Efficiency of their Commercial and Economic Activities. The 5th International Scientific Conference "Business and Management 2008", 16-17 May, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. (2008). Determining the optimal number of enterprise activities. The 5th International Scientific Conference "Business and Management 2008", 16-17 May, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  • Ginevičius, R., & Podvezko, V. 2005. Generation of a set of evaluation criteria. Business: Theory and Practice, 6(4), 199-207.
  • Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and Integration in American Industry. Princeton.
  • Gort, M., & Klepper, S. (1982). Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations. Economic Journal Royal Economic Society, 92(367).
  • Hann, R., Ogneva, M., & Ozbas, O. (2013). Corporate Diversification and the Cost of Capital. Journal of Finance, 68(5), 1961-1999. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12067
  • Hernández-Trasobares, A., & Galve-Górriz, C. (2016). The influence of family control on decisions regarding the specialization and diversification of business groups. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 73-89. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2015.09.001
  • Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Hoskisson, R. (2001). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalisation. 4th ed. Cincinnati, USA: South-Western College Publishing.
  • Hyland, D.C. (2003). The Effect of Diversification on Firm Value: a Pre- and Post-Diversification Analysis. Studies in Economics and Finance, 21(2), 22-39. doi: 10.1108/eb028773
  • Jackuemin, A.P., & Berry, C.H. (1979). Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 46-57.
  • Jara-Bertin, M., López-Iturriaga, F.J., & Espinosa, Ch. (2015). Diversification and control in emerging markets: The case of Chilean firms. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 18(4), 259-274. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2015.01.002
  • Kieser, A., & Kubicek, H. (1992). Organization. 3. Völling neu Bearb. Aufl. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
  • Kim, S.W., Kim, T., Choi, K.-H., & Yang, J.A. (2014). Comparative Analysis of the Diversification Effects between Firm Performance and Whole Supply Chain Performance in Korea and Japan. Journal of Korea Trade, 18(1), 1-27.
  • Knapková, M., Kiaba, M., & Hudec, S. (2019). Impact of macroeconomic indicators on public debt of Slovak Republic. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(4), 734-753. doi: 10.3846/jbem.2019.10184
  • Kuppuswamy, V., Serafeim, G., & Villalonga, B. (2014). The Effect of Institutional Factors on the Value of Corporate Diversification. Finance and Strategy, 31, 37-68. doi: 10.1108/S0742-332220140000031000
  • Lehmann, R. (1993). Kann Diversifikation Wert schaffen? Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Haupt.
  • Li, D., Li, L., & Huang, Y. (2013). Technological Diversification Effect on Business Performance: A Probing into Intermediaries Role of Product Innovation Strategy. 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering and Management 278, 181-190. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-54930-4_18
  • Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. (2013). Incorporating opportunity costs in strategic management research: The value of diversification and payout as opportunities forgone when reinvesting in the firm. Strategic Organization, 11(4), 347-363. doi: 10.1177/1476127013481447
  • Macsimovic, V., & Gordon, Ph. (2005). The Industry Life Cycle and Acquisitions and Investment: Does Firm Organisation Matter? Cambridge, USA: University of Maryland, CES.
  • Mauer, D.C., Wang, S., Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Global diversification and IPO returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 58, 436-456. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.05.015
  • Miller, D.J. (2006). Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 601-619. doi: 10.1002/smj.533
  • Montgomery, C.A. (1994). Corporate Diversification. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 163-168.
  • Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., & Nazarko, Ł. (2015). Foresight Application for Transport Sector. In M. Fiorini (Ed.), Clean Mobility and Intelligent Transport Systems (pp. 379-402). London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. doi: 10.1049/PBTR001E_ch17
  • Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Nazarko, Ł., Kononiuk, A., & Olszewska, A. (2007a). Factor Analysis as a Tool Supporting STEEPVL Approach to the Identification of Driving Forces of Technological Innovation. Procedia Engineering, 182, 491-496. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.142
  • Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Nazarko, Ł., Kononiuk, A., & Olszewska, A. (2007b). Structural Analysis as an Instrument for Identification of Critical Drivers of Technology Development. Procedia Engineering, 182, 504-509. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.137
  • Nazarova, V. (2015). Corporate Diversification Effect on Firm Value (Unilever Group Case Study). Annals of Economics and Finance, 16(1), 173-198.
  • Palepu, K. (1985). Diversification Strategy, Profit Performance and the Entropy measure. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 238-245.
  • Pennings, J.M., Barkema, H., & Douma, S. (1994). Organizational learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 608-640. doi: 10.2307/256702
  • Pierscionek, Z. (1966). Strategie rozwoju firmy [Company development strategies]. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Qian, G., Li, L., & Rugman, A.M. (2013). Liability of country foreignness and liability of regional foreignness: Their effects on geographic diversification and firm performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6), 635-647. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.21
  • Rumelt, R. (1974). Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  • Sanchez-Bueno, M., & Usero, B. (2014). How may the nature of family firms explain the decisions concerning international diversification? Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1311-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.003.
  • Santarelli, E., & Tran, H.T. (2016.) Diversification strategies and firm performance in Vietnam Evidence from parametric and semi-parametric approaches. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 24(1), 31-68. doi: 10.1111/ecot.12082
  • Sawada, M. (2013). How does the stock market value bank diversification? Empirical evidence from Japanese banks. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 25, 40-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.08.001
  • Schmid, T., Ampenberger, M., Kaserer, Ch., & Achleitner, A.-K. (2015). Family Firm Heterogeneity and Corporate Policy: Evidence from Diversification Decisions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 285-302. doi: 10.1111/corg.12091.
  • Schüle, F.M. (1992). Diversifikation und Unternehmenserfolg: eine Analyse empirischer Forschungsergebnisse. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
  • Teece, D.J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1993). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1), 1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90094-9
  • Thoumrungroje, A., & Tansuhaj, P. (2005). Entrepreneurial Strategic Posture, International Diversification, and Firm Performance. Multinational Business Review, 3(1), 55-73.
  • Uton, M.A. (1977). Large Firm Diversification in British Manufacturing Industry. Economic Journal, 87, 6-11.
  • Varadarajan, P., & Ramanujan, V. (1987). Diversification and Performance. A Reexamination Using a New Two-Dimensional Conceptualization of Diversity in Firms. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 380-393.
  • Wan, W.P., & Hoskisson, R.E. (2003). Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 27-45. doi: 10.2307/30040674
  • Wang, Y., Ning, L., & Chen, J. (2014). Product diversification through licensing: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms. European Management Journal, 32(4), 577-586. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2013.09.001
  • Wolf, J. (1995a). Die Messung des Divertifikationsgrads von Unternehmen (I). Wirtschaftsstudium, 5, 439-445.
  • Wolf, J. (1995b). Die Messung des Divertifikationsgrads von Unternehmen (II). Wirtschaftsstudium, 6, 519-523.
  • Wrigley, L. (1970). Divisional Autonomy and Diversification. Boston: Harvard Business School.
  • Yahaya, M.I., Aliyu, M.I., & Kabir, B. (2009). Geographic diversification, performance, and the risk profile of UK construction firms. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 7(2),171-185.
  • Yücel, E., & Önal, Y.B. (2015). Industrial Diversification and Risk in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(6), 1292-1306. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1011544
  • Zahavi, T., & Lavie, D. (2013). Intra-industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 978-998. doi: 10.1002/smj.2057
  • Zhipeng, Y. (2006). New Methodology of Measuring Corporate Life-Cycle Stages. Waltham, USA: Brandeis University International Business School.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171614679

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.