Integration of the TRIZ Matrix and ANP to Select the Reactive Maintenance Tactics Using the Meta-Synthesis Approach

• Autorzy: Mohammad Amin Mortazavi , Atefeh Amindoust , Arash Shahin , Mehdi Karbasian
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

So far, numerous studies have been published on the selection of appropriate maintenance tactics based on some factors affecting them such as time, cost, and risk. This paper aims to develop the TRIZ contradiction matrix by explaining the dimensions and components of each of the following Reactive maintenance tactics. The related findings of previous studies were analyzed by adopting "Rousseau and Sandoski" seven-step method to identify and extract the relationships between TRIZ principles and Reactive maintenance tactics. Thereafter, 5 Reactive maintenance tactics were replaced TRIZ's 40 principles in the TRIZ contradiction matrix. Finally, the ANP method were used to extract and prioritize the appropriate Reactive maintenance tactics. The proposed matrix in this research was used in the desalination section of one of the oil companies to select on the appropriate Reactive maintenance tactics. The results of this research is useful for managers and maintenance specialists of units in making decisions to provide appropriate Reactive maintenance tactics for the desired equipment. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Random Matrix Theory (RMT); TRIZ method; Analytic Network Process (ANP)

PL

Teoria macierzy przypadkowych; Metoda TRIZ; Analityczny proces sieciowy

• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 12
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 108--118

Twórcy

autor

Mohammad Amin Mortazavi

• Islamic Azad University, Iran

autor

Atefeh Amindoust

• Islamic Azad University, Iran

autor

Arash Shahin

• University of Isfahan, Iran

autor

Mehdi Karbasian

• Malek-Ashtar University of Technology, Iran

Bibliografia

• Abdi A. and Taghipour S. (2019). Sustainable asset management: A repair-replacement decision model considering environmental impacts, maintenance quality, and risk, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 136, pp. 117-134.
• Alrabghi, A., Tiwari, A. and Alabdulkarim, A. (2013). Simulation based optimization of joint maintenance and inventory for multi-components manufacturing systems, in: Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference: Simulation: Making Decisions in a Complex World, IEEE Press, pp. 1109-1119.
• Alrabghi, A., and Tiwari, A. (2015). State of the art in simulation-based optimisation for maintenance systems, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 82, pp. 167-182.
• Alsyouf I. (2004). Cost effective maintenance for competitve advantages, in, Växjö university press.
• Arunraj N. and Maiti, J. (2010). Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming, Safety science, vol. 48, pp. 238-247.
• Briš, R. (2008). Parallel simulation algorithm for maintenance optimization based on directed Acyclic Graph, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 93, pp. 874-884.
• Fraser, K. (2014). Facilities management: the strategic selection of a maintenance system, Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 12, pp. 18-37.
• Gan, S., Zhang, Z., Zhou, Y. and Shi, J. (2015). Joint optimization of maintenance, buffer, and spare parts for a production system, Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 39, pp. 6032-6042.
• Gento A.M. (2004). Decision rules for a maintenance database, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 210-22.
• Glarner A. and Alsyouf A. (2007). A model for selecting a computerized maintenance system: - A case study.
• Goossens, A.J. and Basten, R.J. (2015). Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; an application for naval ships, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 142, pp. 31-41.
• Kader, B., Sofiene, D., Nidhal, R. and Walid, E. (2015). Ecological and joint optimization of preventive maintenance and spare parts inventories for an optimal production plan, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, pp. 2139-2144.
• Kang, K. and Subramaniam, V. (2018). Joint control of dynamic maintenance and production in a failureprone manufacturing system subjected to deterioration, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 119, pp. 309-320.
• Khazraei, K. and Deuse, J.A (2011). Strategic standpoint on maintenance taxonomy, Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 9, pp. 96-113.
• Kumar, G. and Maiti, J. (2012). Modeling risk based maintenance using fuzzy analytic network process, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, pp. 9946- 9954.
• Labib, A.W. (2004). A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 191-202.
• Manzini, R., Regattieri, A., Pham, H. and Ferrari E. (2009). Maintenance for industrial systems, Springer Science & Business Media.
• Martinod, R.M., Bistorin, O., Castañeda, L.F. and Rezg, N. (2018). Maintenance policy optimisation for multicomponent systems considering degradation of components and imperfect maintenance actions, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 124, pp. 100-112.
• Minou, C., Olde Keizer, A., Teunter, R. and Veldman J. (2016). Clustering condition-based maintenance for systems with redundancy and economic dependencies, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 251, pp. 531-540.
• Mobley, R.K. (2002). An introduction to predictive maintenance, Elsevier.
• Mortazavi, M.A., Amindoust, A., Shahin, A. and Karbasian, M. (2020). Identification and Extraction of Factors Affecting Maintenance Strategy Selection With 39 Parameters of TRIZ Approach Using Meta-Synthesis, Journal of Critical Review, vol. 7, pp. 2428-2447.
• Nakagawa T. and Mizutani, S.A (2009). Summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 94, pp. 89-96.
• Peng H. and Zhu Q. (2017). Approximate evaluation of average downtime under an integrated approach of opportunistic maintenance for multi-component systems, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 109, pp. 335-346.
• Seecharan, T., Labib, A. and Jardine, A. (2018). Maintenance strategies: Decision Making Grid vs Jack-Knife Diagram, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 61-78.
• Seiti, H., Hafezalkotob, A. and Martínez, L. (2019). Rnumbers, a new risk modeling associated with fuzzy numbers and its application to decision making, Information Sciences, vol. 483, pp. 206-231.
• Shahin, A. and Pourhamidi, M. (2011). Service TRIZ: an approach for service quality design-with a case study in the hospitality industry, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 5, pp. 291-308.
• Shahin, A., Shahrestani, H.V. and Iraj, E.B. (2013). Proposing a contradiction matrix by developing KANSEI engineering based on theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ), International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, vol. 7, pp. 717-729.
• Shahanipour, S., Amindoust, A., Sahraian, K. and Beiranvand, S. (2020). Identification and prioritization of human resource strategies with employees' creativity approach in administrative organizations using SWOT-ANP, OPSEARCH, vol. 57, pp. 119-143.
• Tan, J.S. (1995). A quantitative approach for continuous improvement in process safety and reliability, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Trojan, F., Marçal, R.F., (2017). Proposal of Maintenance-types Classification to Clarify Maintenance Concepts in Production and Operations Management, Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 8, pp. 560-572.
• Wang, W., Carr, M., Xu, W. and Kobbacy, K. (2011). A model for residual life prediction based on Brownian motion with an adaptive drift, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 285-293.
• Wang, J., Makis, V. and Zhao, X. (2019). Optimal condition-based and age-based opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 134, pp. 1-10.
• Vaneker, T., van Diepen, T. (2016). Design support for maintenance tasks using TRIZ, Procedia CIRP, vol. 39, pp. 67-72.
• Zio, E. and Compare, M. (2013). Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 109, pp. 53-650.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2021.136876