Sectoral Structure of Employment and Economic Cohesion in the Eu Regions

• Autorzy: Magdalena Cyrek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Motivation: Regional cohesion constitutes an important aim of European policy. Nevertheless, it is mainly assessed in terms of economic results analyzed at an aggregate level. Sectoral determinants of interregional differences are often neglected. However, as the structural convergence concept suggests, sectoral features may be decisive for minimizing interregional disparities. Aim: The paper searches for connections between two dimensions of economic regional cohesion in the EU: economic results and structural features. It tests a hypothesis about the coexistence of high diversification in GDP per capita and in the sectoral structures of employment. It is also aimed at identification of sectoral features that characterize the best performing economies. Results: The research results confirm a positive correlation between interregional differences in production and in sectoral structures. It indicates knowledge-intensive market services as a sector the most favorable for economic results. Moreover, it also finds that a high concentration of sectoral structures coexists with a high level of regional GDP per capita and economic efficiency. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Socioeconomic cohesion; Region; Employment

PL

Spójność społeczno-ekonomiczna; Region; Zatrudnienie

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Prawo
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 20
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 63--77

Twórcy

autor

Magdalena Cyrek

• University of Rzeszów, Poland

Bibliografia

• Baumol, W.J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. The American Economic Review, 57(3).
• Bierbaumer-Polly, J., Huber, P., & Rozmahel, P. (2016). Regional business-cycle synchronization, sector specialization and EU accession. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(3). doi:10.1111/jcms.12296.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6). doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
• Chenery, H.B. (1971). Growth and structural change. Finance and Development, 8(3).
• Clark, C. (1940). The conditions of economic progress. London: Macmillan.
• Eurostat. (2020). Retrieved 28.01.2020 from https://ec.europa.eu.
• Färe, R., & Lovell, C. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19(1). doi:10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1.
• Fisher, A.B.G. (1935). The clash of progress and security. London: Macmillan.
• Fourastié, J. (1949). Le grand espoir du XXème siècle. Paris: PUF.
• Fuchs, V.R. (1965). The growing importance of the service industries. The Journal of Business, 38(4). doi:10.1086/294801.
• Guastella, G., & Timpano, F. (2016). Knowledge, innovation, agglomeration and regional convergence in the EU: motivating place-based regional intervention. Review of Regional Research, 36(2). doi:10.1007/s10037-015-0104-x.
• Iordan, M., Chilian, M.-N., & Ciurariu, G. (2017). Post-crisis changes in the sectoral and occupational employment structures of the Romanian labor market. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition, 20(2).
• Jain, R.K., & Natarajan, R. (2015). A DEA study of airlines in India. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(4). doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.03.004.
• Kallioras, D., & Petrakos, G. (2010). Industrial growth, economic integration and structural change: evidence from the EU new member-states regions. The Annals of Regional Science, 45(3). doi:10.1007/s00168-009-0296-5.
• Klodt, H. (1995). Productivity growth in service and non-service industries: implications for convergence. In E. Felli, F.C. Rosati, & G. Tria (Eds.), The service sector: productivity and growth. Rome: Physica-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-49999-9_9.
• Krieger-Boden, Ch. (2004). Regional structural change and cohesion in the process of European integration: a comparison of French, German, Portuguese and Spanish regions. Retrieved 20.03.2021 from http://hdl.handle.net.
• Krugman, P (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3). doi:10.1086/261763.
• Kukuła, K. (1996). Statystyczne metody analizy struktur ekonomicznych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Edukacyjne.
• Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: rate, structure and spread. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
• Longhi, Ch., & Musolesi, A. (2007). European cities in the process of economic integration: towards structural convergence. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(2). doi:10.1007/s00168-006-0104-4.
• Molle, W., & Boeckhout, S. (1995). Economic disparity under conditions of integration: a long term view of the European case. Papers in Regional Science, 74 (2). doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1995.tb00631.x.
• Monfort, P. (2008). Convergence of EU regions: measures and evolution. European Union Regional Policy Working Papers, (1).
• Neculita, M., & Sarpe, D.A. (2019). Convergence through Regionalization. Annals of "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Fascicle I. Economics and Applied Informatics, 25(1). doi:10.35219/eai158404092.
• Poveda, A.C. (2011). Economic development and growth in Colombia: an empirical analysis with super-efficiency DEA and panel data models. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 45(4). doi:10.1016/j.seps.2011.07.003.
• Rowthorn, R., & Ramaswamy, R. (1997). Deindustrilization: its causes and implications. Economic Issues, 10.
• Sassi, M. (2011). Convergence across the EU regions: economic composition and structural transformation. International Advances in Economic Research, 17(1). doi:10.1007/s11294-010-9286-8.
• Wacziarg, R. (2001). Structural convergence. Stanford University CDDRL Working Paper, (8).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/EiP.2021.004