Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The aim of the article is to discuss the problem of theoretical pluralism in International Relations (IR), therefore it refers to the fact that, as IR scholars, we work with multiple, often competing, theories offering different ways of explanation or understanding of a given question. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part is focused on the role that theories played at the moment of formation of IR and the role they play today. The second one discusses theoretical pluralism in the meaning of a feature of IR, taking into account in particular its consequences for all IR scholars and theorists, as well as distinguishing between two terms: 'plurality' and 'pluralism'. The third part discusses the opinions on the problem of theoretical pluralism present in the literature - ranging from 'embracing' to 'structured' versions of pluralism.(original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
autor
- Uniwersytet Jagielloński
Bibliografia
- M. Kozub- -Karkut, 'Pomiędzy pluralizmem a teoretyczną syntezą: próby łączenia teorii stosunków międzynarodowych' (Between pluralism and theoretical synthesis: attempts to combine the theory of international relations), in: E. Haliżak, R. Ożarowski, A. Wróbel (eds.), Liberalizm i neoliberalizm w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Teoretyczny pluralizm (Liberalism and neoliberalism in the science of international relations. Theoretical pluralism), Warszawa: Rambler, 2016, pp. 69-85.
- J.J. Mearsheimer, St. Walt, 'Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations', European Journal of International Relations, No. 19(3), 2013, p. 449.
- E.G. Guba, 'The Alternative Paradigm Dialog', in: The Paradigm Dialog, Newbury Park: Sage, 1990, pp. 17-30.
- E.G. Guba, Y.S. Lincoln, 'Kontrowersje wokół paradygmatów, sprzeczności i wyłaniające się zależności' (Controversies around paradigms, contradictions and emerging relationships), in: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Metody badań jakościowych (Qualitative research methods), Vol. 1, Warszawa: PWN, 2009, pp. 281-313.
- P.Th. Jackson, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics, London, New York: Routledge, 2016 (2011), pp. 26-41.
- B. Buzan, 'The level of analysis problem in international relations reconsidered', in: K. Booth, S. Smith (eds.), International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press, 1995, pp. 198-216.
- K.N. Waltz, Man, State, and War. A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Columbia University Press, 1954, 1959, 2001.
- J.D. Singer, 'The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations', World Politics, No. 14(1), 1961, pp. 77-92.
- K. Holsti, The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory, Allen and Unwin: Boston, 1985.
- 'Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Which Are the Fairest Theories of All?', International Studies Quarterly, No. 33(3), 1989, pp. 255-261.
- R.O. Keohane, 'International Institutions: two Approaches', International Studies Quarterly, No. 32(4), 1988, pp. 379-396.
- S. Smith, 'Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11', International Studies Quarterly, No. 48(3), 2004, pp. 499-515.
- Ch. Brown, 'IR Theory in Britain: The New Black?', Review of International Studies, No. 32(4), 2006, pp. 677-687.
- C. Wight, L. Hansen, T. Dunne, 'Special Issue: The End of International Relations Theory?', European Journal of International Relations, No. 19, 2013, pp. 405-665.
- Y.H. Ferguson, 'Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics', International Studies Perspectives, No. 16(1), 2015, pp. 3-12.
- H. Leira, 'International Relations Pluralism and History - Embracing Amateurism to Strengthen the Profession', International Studies Perspectives, No. 16(1), 2015, pp. 23-31.
- N. Rengger, 'Pluralism in International Relations Theory: Three Questions', International Studies Perspectives, No. 16(1), 2015, pp. 32-39.
- J. Sterling-Folker, 'All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order', International Studies Perspectives, No. 16(1), 2015, pp. 40-49.
- O. Wæver, 'Still a Discipline after All These Debates?', in: T. Dunne, M. Kurki, St. Smith (eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 306- 328.
- S. Smith, 'Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory', in: T. Dunne, M. Kurki, St. Smith (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 1-13.
- A. Wojciuk, 'Innowacje teoretyczne w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych' (Theoretical innovations in the science of international relations), in: M.F. Gawrycki, E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar, G. Michałowska, D. Popławki, J. Zajączkowski, R. Zięba (eds.), Tendencje i procesy rozwojowe współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 40-lecia Instytutu Stosunków Międzynarodowych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego (Trends and development processes in contemporary international relations. Jubilee book on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the Institute of International Relations at the University of Warsaw), Warszawa: Scholar, pp. 250-260.
- A. Gałganek, 'Pierwsza "Wielka Debata"? Rewizjonistyczna historia genezy teoretyzowania w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych' (The First 'Great Debate'? The revisionist history of the origin of theorizing in the science of international relations), Przegląd Strategiczny, No. 7(10), 2017, pp. 15-39.
- A. Abbott, Chaos of Disciplines, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
- Ch. Brown, 'The Poverty of Grand Theory', European Journal of International Relations, 2013, 19(3), pp. 483-497.
- D. Lake, 'Theory is Dead, Long Live Theory: The end of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations', European Journal of International Relations', No. 19(3), 2013, pp. 567-587.
- R. Sil, P. Katzenstein, Beyond Paradigms: Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics, London, New York, 2010.
- 'Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics', Perspectives on Politics, No. 8(2), 2010, pp. 411-431.
- B. Buzan, R. Little, 'Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do about It?', Millennium, No. 30(1), 2001, pp. 19-39.
- C. Wight, 'Incommensurability and Cross-Paradigm Communication in International Relations Theory: 'What's the Frequency Kenneth?', Millennium: Journal of International Studies, No. 25(2), 1996, pp. 291-319.
- Cambridge Dictionary, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pl/dictionary/english/pluralism (accessed on: 20 August 2019).
- G. van der Ree, 'Saving the Discipline: Plurality, Social Capital, and the Sociology of IR Theorizing', International Political Sociology, No. 8(2), 2014, pp. 218-233, DOI: 10.1111/ips.12053.
- D.J. Levine, D.M. McCourt, 'Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations', Perspectives on Politics, No. 16(1), 2018, pp. 92-109.
- O. Wæver, Theory - The Shifting Center of Our Discipline. Paper for the International Studies of Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, 1-4 April 2012, pp. 3-7.
- N. Guilhot, 'The Realist Gambit', in: The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory, N. Guilhot (eds.), New York: Columbia University Press, 2011, p. 128.
- A. Osiander, 'Rereading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited', International Studies Quarterly, No. 42(3), 1998, pp. 409-432, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00090.
- S. Guzzini, Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy, London: Routledge, 1998, p. 11.
- D. Easton, 'The Decline of Modern Political Theory', Journal of Politics, No. 13(1), 1951, pp. 36-58.
- R. Dahl, 'The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to A Successful Protest', American Political Science Review, No. 55(4), 1961, pp. 763-772.
- S. Guzzini, Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy, London: Routledge, 1998, p. 27.
- S. Guzzini, Realizm w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych (Realism in the science of international relations), Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 2017.
- T. Łoś-Nowak, 'Wyjaśniać czy interpretować: dylematy i wyzwania czwartej debaty interparadygmatycznej' (Explain or interpret: dilemmas and challenges of the fourth interparadigmatic debate), Stosunki Międzynarodowe - International Relations, 2009, 39(1-2), p. 46.
- P.K. Frankowski, 'Pragmatycznie i eklektycznie o stosunkach międzynarodowych' (Pragmatically and Eclectically on International Relations), Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin - Polonia, No. 20(2), 2013, p. 8.
- D.A. Lake, 'Why "isms" are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress', International Studies Quarterly, No. 55(2), 2011, pp. 465-480.
- N. Rengger, 'Pluralism in International Relations Theory: Three Questions', International Studies Perspectives, No. 16, 2015, pp. 32-39.
- J. Sterling-Folker, 'All Hail to the Chief: Liberal IR Theory in the New World Order', International Studies Perspectives, No. 16, 2015, pp. 40-49.
- A. Acharya, 'Theoretical Perspectives in International Relations in Asia', in: D. Shambaugh, M. Yahuda (eds.), International Relations of Asia, 2008, pp. 57-82.
- Yong-Soo Eun, K. Pieczara, 'Getting Asia Rightand Advancing the Field of IR', Political Studies Review, No. 11, 2013, pp. 369-377.
- St. Walt, 'One World, Many Theories', Foreign Policy, No. 110, 1998, pp. 29-36.
- S. Smith, 'Dialogue and Reinforcement of Orthodoxy in International Relations', International Studies Review, No. 5, 2003, pp. 141-153.
- T. Pugacewicz, Teorie polityki zagranicznej. Perspektywa amerykańskiej analizy polityki zagranicznej (Theories of foreign policy. Perspective of the American analysis of foreign policy), Kraków: UJ, 2017, pp. 60-70.
- E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, New York: Palgrave, 1939, 1945, 1981.
- L.M. Ashworth, 'Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations', International Relations, No. 16(1), 2002, pp. 33-51.
- M., Kahler, 'Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory After 1945', in: M.W. Doyle, G.J. Ikenberry (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.
- N. Guilhot, The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory, New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
- C.G. Thies, 'Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of Idea - list- Realist Debate', European Journal of International Relations, No. 8(2), 2002, pp. 147-185.
- K. Both, '75 Years On: Rewriting the Subject's Past - Reinventing its Future', in: S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski (eds.), International Relations Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 328-339.
- J.N. Rosenau, K.E. Knorr, Contending Approaches to International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969, p. 18.
- P. Th. Jackson, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics, Routledge, Abingdon 2011, pp. 7-8.
- R.O. Keohane, 'International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint', Millennium: Journal of International Relations, No. 18(2), 1989, pp. 245-253.
- A.J. Tickner, 'You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists', International Studies Quarterly, No. 41(4), 1997, pp. 611-632.
- A. Polus, K. Chweczuk-Szulc, 'Konstruktywizm społeczny a prognozowanie w stosunkach międzynarodowych' (Social constructivism and forecasting in international relations), in: Normy, wartości i instytucje we współczesnych stosunkach międzynarodowych (Norms, values and institutions in contemporary international relations), Vol. 1, E. Stadtmüller, Ł. Fijałkowski (eds.), Warszawa: Rambler, 2015, p. 32.
- N.G. Onuf, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia: University of South California Press, 1989.
- A. Wendt, 'The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory', International Organization, No. 41(3), 1987, pp. 335-370.
- 'Levels of Analysis versus Agents and Structures: Part III', Review of International Studies, No. 18(2), 1992, pp. 181-185.
- 'Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics', International Organization, No. 46(2), 1992, pp. 391-425.
- A. Wendt, Social Theory of International Relations (Społeczna teoria stosunków międzynarodowych), Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa 2008, pp. 11-12.
- R.J. Bernstein, The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992, p. 335.
- T. Dunne, L. Hansen, C. Wight,'The End of IR Theory?',European Journal of International Relations, No. 19(3), 2013, pp. 405-425.
- A. Moravcsik, 'Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical', International Studies Review, No. 5(1), 2003, pp. 123-153.
- D.J. Levine, D.M. McCourt, 'Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations', Perspectives on Politics, No. 16(1), 2018, pp. 92-109.
- M. Kurki, 'Critical Realism and Causal Analysis in International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies', No. 35(2), 2007, pp. 361-378.
- Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
- A. Bennett, 'The Mother of All Isms: Casual Mechanisms and Structured Pluralism in International Relations Theory', European Journal of International Relations, No. 19(3), 2013, pp. 462-464.
- A. Bennett, 'From Analytic Eclecticism to Structured Pluralism', Qualitative & Multi Method Research, No. 8(2), 2010, pp. 6-9.
- P.M. Haas, 'Introduction', 'Qualitative & Multi Method Research', No. 8(2), 2010, p. 5.
- D.J. Levine, D.M. McCourt, 'Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Con temporary International Relations', Perspectives on Politics, No. 16(1), 2018, pp. 92-109.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171620578