Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Liberal institutionalism has traditionally emphasized the need for institutional arrangements to initiate and sustain cooperation among states. The theory regenerated much interest in the capacity and potential of global governance structures, for stable international cooperation and peaceful coexistence in the post-cold war world. During the last 30 years the world has witnessed a revolution in governance, both private and public, in the areas that have been filled with regulatory bodies, loose initiatives, regimes, ephemeral and more persistent forms of governance whose political activity in most cases takes place outside the channels of formal politics. This should not, however, overshadow the fact that global organizations designed to address global problems are increasingly incapable of managing the instabilities created by global interdependence. This article explores the relationship between neoliberal conceptualisations of the international affairs, state power and global governance, analysing the features of the current geopolitical transition and its possible consequences for the liberal world order.(original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
autor
- Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
Bibliografia
- J.N. Rosenau and E.O. Czempiel. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
- J.N. Rosenau, 'Governance in the Twenty-first Century', Global Governance, 1995, Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 16.
- K.W. Abbott, 'Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers', Yale Journal of International Law, 1989, Vol. 14, Issue 2.
- A.-M. Slaughter, 'International Law in a World of Liberal States', 6 EJIL, 1995, p. 508.
- K. Raustiala, 'The Architecture of International Cooperation: Trans-governmental Networks and the Future of International Law', Virginia Journal of International Law, 2000, Vol. 43.
- A.-M. Slaughter, 'The Accountability of Government Networks', Global Legal Studies, 2001.
- K. Dingwerth, P. Philipp, 'A Review of Governance as a Perspective on World Politics', Global Governance, No. 12, 2006, p. 186.
- M. Shapiro, 'Administrative Law Unbounded: Reflections on Government and Governance, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, No. 8, 2001, p. 369.
- A. Giddens, The Third Way and its Critics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
- P. Hirstand, G. Thomp - son, Globalization in Question. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.
- A. Kalfagianni, P. Pattberg, The Effectiveness of Transnational Rule-Setting Organisations in Global Sustainability Politics: An Analytical Framework, Global Governance Working Paper, No. 43, Amsterdam: VU University, 2011.
- R.W. Cox, T.J. Sinclar, Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
- Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict: Preventing Deadly Conflict, New York: Carnegie Corporation, 1997.
- S. Hix, 'The Study of the European Union II: the "New Governance" Agenda and its Rival', Journal of European Public Policy, No. 5(1), 1998, pp. 38-65.
- R. Axelrod, R.O. Keohane, 'Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions', World Politics, 1985, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 226-254.
- R.O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- R.O. Keohane, 'International Institutions: Two Approaches', International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 379- 396.
- Ch. Lipson, 'International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs', World Politics, (October 1984), Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1-23.
- L.L. Martin, 'Institutions and Cooperation: Sanctions During the Falkland Islands Conflict', International Security. (Spring 1992), Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 143-178.
- L.L. Martin, Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- K.A. Oye, 'Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies', World Politics (October 1985), Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 1-24.
- T. Pogge, 'Moral Progress in Problems of International Justice' in S. Luper-Foy (ed.), Boulder: Westview Press, 1988, p. 198.
- R.O. Keohane, J. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little, Brown, 1977.
- R.O. Keohane, Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective in World Politics, International institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press, 1989.
- G.J. Ikenberry, 'Liberal Internationalism 3.0. America and the Dilemmas of the Liberal World Order', Perspectives on Politics, 2009, Vol. 7, No. 1.
- G.J. Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
- R. Schuman, The Schuman Declaration (9 May 1950), (Europa 1/12/8).
- A. Wendt, 'Driving with the Rear View Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design', in B. Koremenos, C. Lipson and D. Snidal (eds.), The Rational Design of International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- A. Moravcsik, 'Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach', JCMS, 1993, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 475-477.
- A. Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power From Rome to Maastricht, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998, p. 24.
- D. Moggeridge (ed.), The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 26, London, 1980, p. 101.
- J. E. Stiglitz and A. Weiss, 'Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information', American Economic Review, No. 71(3), 1981, pp. 393-410.
- C. Norrlof, America's Global Advantage: US Hegemony and International Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- S.G. Brooks, W.C. Wohlforth, America Abroad: the United States' Global Role in the 21st Century, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
- D. Stokes, 'D. Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order', Internatio nal Affairs, No. 94(1), 2018, p. 138.
- J.G. Ikenberry, 'Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order', Perspectives on Politics, (March 2009), Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 77.
- D. Rampton, S. Nadaraja, 'A Long View of the Liberal Peace and its Crisis', European Journal of International Relations, No. 32(2), 2017, p. 444.
- J.P. Kaufman, 'The US Perspective on NATO under Trump: Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future', International Affairs, No. 93(2), March 2017, pp. 251-266.
- P. Dombrowski and S. Reich, 'Does Donald Trump have a Grand Strategy?', International Affairs, No. 93(5), September 2017, pp. 113-138.
- 'Definition of Empowerment', World Bank website (accessed on 12 April 2019), http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTPOVERTY/EXTEMPOWERMEN T/0,,contentMDK:20272299~pagePK:210058~piPK:210062~theSitePK:486411~isCURL:Y,00.html.
- UNDP (2019), 'Human Development Index', United Nations website, http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ hdi/ (accessed on 21 April 2019).
- A. Moravcsik, 'Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Working Paper', Centre for International Affairs (1992).
- A-M. Slaughter-Burley, International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda, American Journal of International Law, 1993, vol. 87, p. 205.
- J. Horton, 'Political Leadership and Contemporary Liberal Political Theory', in: J. Femia, A. Korosenyi and G. Slomp (eds.), Political Leadership in Liberal and Democratic Theory, Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2009, pp. 11-30.
- G. Stoker, 'Governance as Theory: Five Propositions', International Social Science Journal, No. 155, 1998, pp. 17-28.
- J.J. Mearsheimer, 'The False Promise of International Institutions', International Security, Winter 1994/95, Vol. 19, No. 3.
- R.O. Keohane, L. Martin, 'The Promise of Institutionalist Theory', International Security, 1995, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 40.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171620582