Integrated Commercialization Model of Research and Development Project Results

• Autorzy: Małgorzata Malec , Lilianna Stańczak , Brian Ricketts
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The need to undertake research work on the commercialization of results from scientific research and development projects emerged from the Author's professional experience as well as the incomprehensive literature on the role of Polish research institutes in the process of technology transfer and commercialization of innovative solutions, in particular in the case of mining machinery and equipment. From the available literature, the commercialization of research results and technology transfer are analyzed from the perspectives of academia and entrepreneurs, but there is no analysis of this challenge from the perspective of the research institutes which create the majority of innovative solutions implemented in Poland. The research results presented in this article identify and highlight not only the main factors which facilitate knowledge transfer in the widest sense, but also the barriers which should be overcome. An integrated commercialization model of research results, developed by the Author, is described in the article. Some examples of other models, used to assess innovative technology transfer processes, i.e. Transfer model of the Cracow University of Technology, Jolly's model, United model (science + market), Trzmielak's linear - subsequent model, Network - interactive model and IpOp model, are also presented. Special attention is paid to the process of generating innovative ideas and to the area of efficient project management. Based on the integrated model, practical management recommendations for the successful commercialization of innovative solutions are given. It is highlighted that the integrated model can be treated as a diagnostic tool, enabling an efficient assessment of the transfer of research results and commercialization of innovative solutions. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Scientific-research institute; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge commercialisation; Research results; Literature review

PL

Instytuty naukowo-badawcze; Transfer wiedzy; Komercjalizacja wiedzy; Wyniki badań; Przegląd literatury

• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 28
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 228--239

Twórcy

autor

Małgorzata Malec

• KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology, Gliwice, Poland

autor

Lilianna Stańczak

• KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology, Gliwice, Poland

autor

Brian Ricketts

• EURACOAL (European Association for Coal and Lig

Bibliografia

• Adams R. et al, (2006), "Innovation Management Measurement: A review". International Journal of Management Reviews.
• Aguilar-Fernández M. E., Otegi-Olaso J. R. (2018), "Firm Size and the Business Model for Sustainable Innovation". Sustainability, 10(12), 4785.
• Apanowicz J., (1997), Zarys metodologii prac dyplomowych z organizacji i zarządzania, Gdynia, Wydawnictwo Wyższego Seminarium Duchownego Bernardinum.
• Arnold E. et al, (2006), The role of industrial research institutes in the national innovation system: A report to VINNOVA, Technopolis.
• Buckley P.J., Campos J. at al, (1997), International Technology Transfer by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Country Studies, Basingstoke and London, Macmillan Press Ltd.
• Cadenhead G., (2002), "No longer MOOT. The premier new venture competition from idea to global impact", Remoir, pp. 186-191.
• Centrum Transferu Technologii, (2009), Komercjalizacja wyników badań - wskazówki, przykłady, praktyka, Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków.
• Chakravorti B., (2004), The new rules for bringing innovation to market. Harvard Business Review.
• Chesbrough H., (2003), Open innovation: The new Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J., (2006), Open Innovation: Researching a new Paradigm, Oxfor University Press, London.
• Costa S.F., Ehrenhard M.L., Caetano A., Santos S.C. (2016). "The role of different opportunities in the activation and use of the business opportunity prototype". Creativity and innovation management, 25(1), pp. 58-72.
• Daszkiewicz M., (2008), "Jednostki badawczo-rozwojowe jako źródło innowacyjności w gospodarce i pomoc dla ma-łych i średnich przedsiębiorstw", Wydawnictwo Polskiej Agencji Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości, Seria: Innowacje, Warszawa.
• Doddgson M., Hinze S., (2000), "Indicators used to measure the innovation process: defects and possible remedies", Research Evaluation 9 (2), pp. 101-114.
• Drucker P., (1992), Innowacje i przedsiębiorczość, PWE, Warszawa, str. 39.
• Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., (2000), "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university - industry - government relations", Vol. 29, Research Policy.
• Eui-Sun Paik, (2009), "Knowledge transfer of government research institute - the case of ETRI in Korea", Interantional Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 47, No. 4.
• Freeman C., (1992), Formal scientific and technical institutions in the NSI, in Lundvall B.A., National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.
• Gassman O., (2006), "Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda", R&D Management, Vol. 36, No. 3.
• Gutierrez A., LLeras E., Diaz J., (2018), Learning Communities as Support for a Knowledge and Innovation Management System. A case study. International journal of engineering, social justice and peace, 6(1), pp. 7-25.
• Hippel E., (2005), Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge.
• Jones M., Jain R., (2002), "Technology transfer for SMEs: challenges and barriers", International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 1(1-2), pp. 146-162.
• Kaźmierczak J., (2011), Inżynieria innowacji: techniczny wymiar wdrażania innowacyjnych rozwiązań w gospodarce, Komputerowo zintegrowane zarządzanie pod redakcją Ryszarda Knosali, T. 1, Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją, Opole, pp. 463-472.
• Kirkland J., (1999), Barriers to international technology transfer, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
• Li Z., Li J., Chen J., Vinig T., (2020), "Innovation with Chinese characteristics: theory and practice", Chinese management studies - special issue.
• Lichtenthaler U., (2008), "Open innovation in practice: an analysis of strategic approaches to technology transactions", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 55, No.1.
• Lundwall B., (2004), Innovation, growth and social cohesion: The Danish model, Edward Eldar Publishing, Meltenham.
• Malec M. (2013), Zintegrowany model komercjalizacji wyników badań naukowych i prac rozwojowych w zakresie maszyn i urządzeń górniczych - praca doktorska pod kierunkiem prof. dr. hab. inż. Mariana Turka, Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechniki Śląskiej, Zabrze (not published).
• Materiały szkoleniowe Centrum Transferu Technologii Politechniki Krakowskiej, (2013), Kraków (not published).
• Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B., (2011), "System conditions supporting the development and commercialization of innovative technical solutions", Zagadnienia Eksploatacji Maszyn, No. 1.
• Olszewski M., Bek A., "Komercjalizacja osiągnięć naukowych, Przewodnik", Nauka 4/2007.
• Oygür I., Thompson J. A. A. (2019), "Intra-organizational user-centred design practices: The impact of design research departments at design consultancies". Creativity and innovation management, 29(1), pp. 112-127.
• Poole G.R., Moore R., (2002), "A theoretical model of commercialization". International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Vol. 1, No. 1-2, pp. 201-215
• Rogers E.M., (2003), Diffusion of innovation, Free Press, New York.
• Rose R., Hölzle K., Björk J. (2020), "More than a quarter century of Creativity and Innovation Management: The journal's characteristics, evolution, and a look ahead". Creativity and innovation management, 29(1), pp. 5-20.
• Sáiz P., Amengual R. (2018), "Do patents enable disclosure? Strategic innovation management of the four-stroke engine". Industrial and corporate change, 27(6), 975-997.
• Sanz-Llopis J., Ostermann M. (2020), "Innovation in project management through framing and challenge redefinition". International journal of managing projects in business. doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2019-0210 [Mar. 3, 2020]
• Schumpeter J., (1997), OECD, The Oslo Manual, Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris, OECD.
• Trzmielak D., (2008), Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Business - Polish Perspectives, Value-Added Partnership and Innovation in the Changing World, red. M. van Geenghuizen, D. Trzmielak, D. Gibson, M. Urbaniak, Purdue University Press.
• Turek M., (2008), Scenariusze rozwoju technologicznego przemysłu wydobywczego węgla kamiennego. Główny Instytut Górnictwa. Katowice.
• Tworek, P. Tchorzewski, S. Valouch, P. Risk Management in Coal-Mines - Methodical Proposal for Polish and Czech Hard Coal Mining Industry. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, 2018, pp. 72-80.
• Ustawa o niektórych formach wspierania działalności innowacyjnej z dnia 30 maja 2008 r., Dz. U. z 2008, Nr 116, poz. 730.
• A. Elbakian, B. Sentyakov, P. Bozek, I. Kuric, K. Sentyakov. Automated separation of basalt fiber and other earth resources by the means of acoustic vibrations. Acta Montanistica Slovaca. Vol. 23, no. 3, 2018, pp. 271-281.
• Wydawnictwo Ministerstwa Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyż-szego, (2010), Komercjalizacja b+r dla praktyków, Warszawa, ISBN 978-83-6100-29-4.
• Zasiadły K., Trzmielak D., (2005), Doświadczenia amerykańskie, Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość akademicka - światowe doświadczenia. Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości. Warszawa.
• Cernecky, J. Valentova, K. Pivarciova, E. Bozek, P. Ionization impact on the air cleaning efficiency in the interior. Measurement Science Review. Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 156-166, 2015.
• Zieliński M., (2011), "Innowacje a kultura organizacji". Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej nr 1837, z. 55

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2020-0033