Using the Concept of a Learning Organisation to Build a Third Generation University : Case Study of the Jagiellonian University

• Autorzy: Małgorzata Madej , Magdalena M. Stuss

Warianty tytułu

Wykorzystanie koncepcji organizacji naukowej do budowy uniwersytetu trzeciej generacji : studium przypadku Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. Currently, the university management requires undertaking the execution of new activities. In response to the challenges of the contemporary processes of the management - building a third generation university - universities are adapting the concepts of management, which up to now have been first and foremost availed of in the sector of enterprises. Such a solution is the concept of a learning organisation.
Research aims. The aim of the research conducted was to verify the using of the concepts of a learning organisation during the building of the third generation university
Methodology. In the research methodology, a systematic literary review was applied, as well as a case study of the Jagiellonian University. The choice of this university was made on the basis of a subjective evaluation of the process of evolution of the university from the second generation to the third generation. The adoption of such research methodology shall facilitate the building of propositions of good practices of the university management for other universities in the future.
Findings. The research conducted reveals that the university has been using a learning organisation to build a third generation university. (original abstract)

Tło. Obecnie kierownictwo uczelni wymaga podjęcia nowych działań. W odpowiedzi na wyzwania współczesnych procesów zarządzania - budowania uniwersytetu trzeciego pokolenia - uczelnie dostosowują koncepcje zarządzania, z których dotychczas korzystano przede wszystkim w sektorze przedsiębiorstw. Takim rozwiązaniem jest koncepcja organizacji uczącej się.
Cele badawcze. Celem przeprowadzonych badań była weryfikacja wykorzystania koncepcji organizacji uczenia się podczas budowy uczelni trzeciej generacji.
Metodologia. W metodyce badań zastosowano systematyczny przegląd literacki oraz studium przypadku Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Wybór tej uczelni został dokonany na podstawie subiektywnej oceny procesu ewolucji uczelni od drugiego pokolenia do trzeciego pokolenia. Przyjęcie takiej metodologii badań ułatwi w przyszłości budowanie propozycji dobrych praktyk zarządzania uczelnią dla innych uczelni.
Kluczowe wnioski. Z przeprowadzonych badań wynika, że uczelnia wykorzystuje organizację uczącą się do budowy uniwersytetu trzeciej generacji. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Higher education; Education management; University of the Third Age; Learning organisations; Case study

PL

Szkolnictwo wyższe; Zarządzanie szkolnictwem; Uniwersytet Trzeciego Wieku; Organizacje uczące się; Studium przypadku

• Czasopismo: International Journal of Contemporary Management
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 19
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 65--87

Twórcy

autor

Małgorzata Madej

• Jagiellonian University in Kraków

autor

Magdalena M. Stuss

• Jagiellonian University in Kraków

Bibliografia

• Amiresmaili, M., Saberi, H. & Barkhordari, F. (2019). Identifying the effective factors on the transition to the third-generation university: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 235.
• Armstrong, A. & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a learning organisation: Organisation learning mechanisms. The Learning Organisation, 10(2/3), 74-82.
• Bielicki, M. & Stevenson, B. (2020). Business Pre-Incubators as Structures for Change toward the Entrepreneurial and Third Generation University. Rome: European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
• Birnbaum, R. (2000). The life cycle of academic management fads. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 1-16.
• Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej UJ (2020). Uniwersytet w liczbach, https://bip.uj.edu.pl/uniwersytet/liczby/ (Accessed: 17th Match 2021).
• Bone, J. (2017). How to design an intelligent organisation. CFO.com.
• Borhani, M., Amiran, H., Edalatian Shahriari, J. & Kabaran Zadeh Ghadim, M.R. (2020). A readiness framework to evaluate local economy for an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Industry: University Collaboration, 2(3), 111-123.
• Bui, H. & Baruch, Y. (2010). Creating learning organisations: A systems perspective. The Learning Organisation, 17(3), 208-227.
• Campbell, T. & Cairns, H. (1994). Developing and measuring the learning organisation: From buzz words to behaviours. Industrial and Commercial Training, 26(7), 10-15.
• Chrisman, J. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the university of Calgary. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281.
• Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford-New York: Issues in Higher Education, Elsevier Science; IAU Press.
• Coto, R. (2012). Five disciplines concerning the dynamics of change. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(6), 259-275.
• Creswell, J. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B. & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
• Datta, A., Mukherjee, D. & Jessup, L. (2014). Understanding commercialization of technological innovation: Taking stock and moving forward. R&D Management, 45(3), 1-35.
• Day, M. (1994). Can organisations have a learning disability? The Canadian Manager, 19(2), 22.
• Etzkowitz, H. (1984). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2-3), 198-233.
• Fernández, L., Fernández-López, S., Rey-Ares, L. & Bobillo, M. (2018). Innovation in the first mission of universities. Journal of Innovation Management, 6(4), 32-48.
• Ghorbani, A.A., Sohrabi, Z., Yazdani, S. & Azandehi S.K. (2020). Structural requirements of the third-generation university: The case of medical sciences universities in Iran. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, 63-70.
• Godlewska-Majkowska, H. & Komor, A. (2019). Intelligent organisation in a local administrative unit: From theoretical design to reality. European Research Studies, 22(4), 290-307.
• Halmaghi, E. (2018). From the traditional organisation to the learning organisation. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 9(1), 98-103.
• Hee Kim, J. & Callahan, J.L. (2013). Finding the intersection of the learning organisation and learning transfer: The significance of leadership. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(2), 183-200.
• Hodgkinson, M. (2002). A shared strategic vision: Dream or reality? The Learning Organisation, 9(2), 83-95.
• Kotosz, B., Lukovics, M., Molnár, G. & Zuti, B. (2015). How to measure the local economic impact of universities? Methodological overview. Regional Statistics, 5(2), 3-19.
• Łapuńka, I. & Pisz, I. (2014). Knowledge management in the project life cycle: Initial research on Polish SMEs. Foundations of Management, 6(2), 67-82.
• Mella, P. & Gazzola, P. (2019). Improving managers' intelligence through Systems Thinking. Kybernetes, 48(1), 58-78.
• Molnár, G. & Lukovics, M. (2016). Universities and responsible innovation. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(5), 517-526.
• Moosmayer, D.C. (2010). Professors as value agents: a typology of management academics' value structures. Higher Education, 62(1), 49-67.
• Nikolaevich, R.V., Ivanovna, A.G. & Alexandrovna, F.T. (2019). Management as the basis for education quality at university in terms of education for sustainable development. Economic and Social Development: Book of proceedings, 326-330.
• Örtenblad, A. (2015). Towards increased relevance: Context-adapted models of the learning organisation. The Learning Organisation, 22(3), 163-181.
• Oudejans, S.C.C., Schippers, G.M., Schramade, M.H., Koeter, M.W.J. & Van Den Brink, W. (2011). Measuring the learning capacity of organisations: Development and factor analysis of the Questionnaire for Learning Organisations. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20(4), 307-313.
• Qanaati, S., Kerdnaeech, A. & Yazdani, H.R. (2010). The study of the status of entrepreneurial organisational culture in Tehran University. J Entrep Dev, 3, 115-133.
• Reese, S. & Sidani, Y. (2018a). A view of the learning organisation from a practical perspective: Interview with Michael Marquardt. The Learning Organisation, 25(5), 353-361.
• Reese, S. & Sidani, Y. (2018b). A view of the learning organisation from a corporate governance perspective: Interview with Bob Garratt. The Learning Organisation, 25(6), 434-442.
• Reese, S. & Sidani, Y. (2018c). A journey of collaborative learning organisation research: Interview with Victoria Marsick and Karen Watkins. The Learning Organisation, 25(3), 199-209.
• Rook, L. (2013). Mental models: A robust definition. The Learning Organisation, 20(1), 38-47.
• Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A. & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities' third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 11(3), 354-372.
• Schwaninger, M. (2001). Intelligent organisations: An integrative framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18(2), 137-158.
• Stein, R.G. & Pinchot, G. (1995). Building an intelligent organisation. Association Management, 47(11), 32.
• Stonehouse, G.H. & Pemberton, J.D. (1999). Learning and knowledge management in the intelligent organisation. Participation & Empowermen, 7(5), 131-144.
• Taghipoor Zahir, A. & Hasanmorad, N. (2006). Developing entrepreneurial university model. Econ Manag Res, 18, 31-40.
• Uchwała z dnia 24 czerwca 2015 r. Senatu Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w sprawie uchwalenia Regulaminu zarządzania własnością intelektualną oraz zasad komercjalizacji w Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim No. 102/VI/2015, https://ius. uj.edu.pl/423-lista/d/4361/5/ (Accessed: 17th March 2021).
• Umowa No. 06/IDUB/2019/94 zawarta 16 grudnia 2019 w Warszawie, https://id.uj.edu.pl/documents/144624357/144737427/umowa_IDUB.pdf/226c0805-303e-4018-a507-65f0db46b859/ (Accessed: 17th March 2021).
• UJ [Uniwersytet Jagielloński] (2020a). Rector, https://en.uj.edu.pl/en_US/about-university/governance/rector (Accessed: 13th December 2020).
• UJ [Uniwersytet Jagielloński] (2020b). Overview, https://en.uj.edu.pl/en_US/about-university/overview (Accessed: 13th December 2020).
• UJ [Uniwersytet Jagielloński] (2020c). Facts and Figures, https://en.uj.edu.pl/en_US/about-university/facts-and-figures (Accessed: 13th December 2020).
• Van Eijnatten, F.M. & Putnik, G.D. (2004). Chaos, complexity, learning, and the learning organisation: Towards a chaordic enterprise. The Learning Organisation, 11(6), 418-429.
• Yeo, R.K. (2005). Revisiting the roots of learning organisation: A synthesis of the learning organisation. The Learning Organisation, 12(4), 368-382.
• Yin, R. (2015). Studium przypadku w badaniach naukowych. Projektowanie i metody. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/24498939IJCM.20.014.13485