The Question of Legitimizing Law in Adolf Reinach's Phenomenology

• Autorzy: Tomasz Bekrycht
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

When speaking about legitimizing law we can mainly mean analysis which concerns metaphysical justification for what is called the phenomenon of law. From the metaphysical point of view, the justification of law means indicating the foundation of its existence. It is about seeking (indicating) an esse (essence) basis of law, in line with the task set by the metaphysical analysis, namely seeking an answer to the question: Why does object X exist? And in the answer, there will appear a formula indicating the final reasons for its existence (ratio essendi). The same ideas that we can find in Adolf Reinach's principal work, The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law, provide a possibility of better understanding this important issue of legal philosophy, namely the question of legitimizing law (justifying law). The aim of this article is to present that argument. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Law; Phenomenology

PL

Prawo; Fenomenologia

• Czasopismo: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 90 Phenomenology of Law
• Strony: 63--73

Twórcy

autor

Tomasz Bekrycht

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Barbour, Ian G. 1976. Myths, Models and Paradigm. A comparative Study in Science and Religion. New York: Harper and Row Publisher.
• Bekrycht, Tomasz. 2015. Transcendentalna filozofia prawa. O zewnętrznym obowiązywaniu i uzasadnieniu istnienia prawa. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Conrad-Martius, Hedwig. 1929. "Farben. Ein Kapitel aus der Realontologie". Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung. Edmund Husserl zum 70. Geburtstag gewidmet 10: 339-370.
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996a. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Hart, Herbert L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Husserl, Edmund. 1901. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erke.n Hnatnllies: Max Niemeyer.
• Ingarden, Roman. 1987. Spór o istnienie świata. Tom II. Ontologia formalna. Część 1. Forma i istota. Warszawa: PWN.
• Ingarden, Roman. 2013. Controversy over the Existence of the World. Volume I. Translated by Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Larenz, Karl. 1969. "Der Rechtssatz als Bestimmungssatz". In Festschrift für Karl Engisch zum 70. Geburstag. 150-160. Edited by Paul Bockelmann, Arthur Kaufmann, Ulrich Klug. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
• Lipps, Hans. 1929. "Das Urteil". Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung. Edmund Husserl zum 70. Geburtstag gewidm e1t 0: 282-296.
• Loidolt, Sophie. 2009. Anspruch und Rechtfertigung. Eine Theorie des rechtlichen Denkens im Anschluss an die Phänomenologie Edmund Husser.l sDordrecht: Springer.
• Paulson, Stanley L. 1987. "Demystifying Reinach's Legal Theory". In Speech Act and Sachverhalt. Reinach and the Foundations of Realist Phenomenology. 133-154. Edited by Kevin Mulligan. Dordrecht: Matinus Nijhoff.
• Reinach, Adolf. 1983. "The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law". Aletheia 3: 1-142.
• Reinach, Adolf. 1989. "Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechtes". In Sämtliche Werke. Textkritische Ausgabe 1. Werke. 141-278. Edited by Karl Schumann, Barry Smith. München: Philosophia Verlag.
• Strauss, Leo. 1999. Natural Right and History. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Stróżewski, Władysław. 2005. Istnienie i sens. Kraków: Znak.
• Tugendhat, Ernst. 1993. Vorlesungen über Ethik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
• van der Leeuw, Gerardus. 1970. Phänomenologie der Religion. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
• Welte, Bernhard. 1985. Religionsphilosophie. Freiburg i. Br.-Basel-Wien: Herder.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18778/0208-6069.90.05