Creative Commons Licensing and Relations of Production in the Sound Industry

• Autorzy: Miłosz Miszczyński
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article describes current production practices taking place in the sound industry, concentrating on the process of implementation and popularization of Creative Commons. Existing studies have considered the role of classical copyright in the creative industries, pointing at its functions in regulating the creative process, but so far have not extensively examined its relationship to alternative intellectual property frameworks. This paper uses the empirical example of the largest sound repository to describe the change occurring in cultural production. The article posits that mass popularization of Creative Commons provokes transformation within three key and intersecting areas of production, including the subjects of property (creators), objects of property (creations) and articulation of usage (source information). The paper theoretically frames and expands our understanding of change provoked by open licensing and its relationship to the creative production process. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Licences; Open access; Music industry; Intellectual property protection

PL

Licencje; Otwarty dostęp; Przemysł muzyczny; Ochrona własności intelektualnej

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: nr 3 (215)
• Strony: 353--368

Twórcy

autor

Miłosz Miszczyński

• Kozminski University

Bibliografia

• Adorno, T., and Horkheimer, M. 1979. Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.
• Alexander, P.J. 2002. Peer-to-peer file sharing: the case of the music recording industry, Review of Industrial Organization 20(2): 151-161.
• Berry, D.M. 2008. Copy, Rip, Burn: The Politics of Copyleft and Open Source. London: Pluto Press.
• Boldrin, M., and Levine, K. 2002. The case against intellectual property. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 92(2): 209-212.
• Boldrin, M., and L e v i n e, K. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Boyle, J. 2004. A Manifesto on WIPO and the future of intellectual property, Duke Law and Technology Review 9: 1-12.
• Carruthers, B.G., and Ariovich, L. 2004. The Sociology of property rights, Annual Review of Sociology 30: 23-46.
• Communia Association. 2021. COMMUNIA policy paper on the Directive proposal on Collective Management of Copyright. Accessed on-line: https://www.communia-association.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/communia_policy_paper_colsoc_directive.pdf
• Cooper, J., and Harrison, D.M. 2001. The social organization of audio piracy on the Internet, Media Culture & Society 23(1): 71-89.
• Coriat, B., and Weinstein, O. 2011. Patent regimes, firms and the commodification of knowledge, Socio-Economic Review 10(2): 267-292.
• Creative Commons. 2015. State of the Commons, Available at: https://stateof.creativecommons.org/2015/ [01.05.2015]
• Creative Commons. 2021. Creative Commons France experiments, Available at: https://creativecommons.org/2015/06/05/creative-commons-france-experiments-with-ascribe-to-support-copyleft-through-the-blockchain/ [29.03.2021]
• Dowd, T.J. 2003. Structural power and the construction of markets, Comparative Social Research 21: 145-199.
• Dusollier, S. 2006. The master's tools v. the master's house: Creative commons v. copyright, Columbia Journal of Law & Arts 29: 271-293.
• Firth, S. 2001. The popular music industry, in: S. Frith, W. Straw, and J. Street (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Pop and Rock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26-52.
• Fligstein, N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Fox, M. 2004. E-commerce business models for the music industry, Popular Music and Society 27(2): 201-220.
• Fredriksson, M. 2014. Copyright culture and pirate politics, Cultural Studies 28(5-6): 1022-1047.
• Furgason, A. 2009. Afraid of technology? Major label response to advancements in digital technology, Popular Music History 3(2): 149-170.
• Goss, A.K. 2007. Codifying a commons: Copyright, copyleft, and the Creative Commons project, Chi.-Kent Law Review 82: 963-996.
• Graber, C.B., and Nenova, M.B. (eds.). 2008. Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Griswold, W. 1981. American character and the American novel: An expansion of reflection theory in the sociology of literature, American Journal of Sociology 86(4): 740-765.
• Hann, C. 2007. A new double movement? Anthropological perspectives on property in the age of neoliberalism, Socio-Economic Review 5(2): 287-318.
• Hardy, P. 2012. Download! How the Internet Transformed the Record Business. London: Omnibus.
• Haring, B. 2000. Beyond the Charts: MP3 and the Digital Music Revolution. Los Angeles: JM Northern Media.
• Harvey, D. 1990. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
• Hess, D.J. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 22.
• Hirsch, P.M. 1972. Processing fads and fashions: an organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems, American Journal of Sociology 77(4): 639-659.
• Holtgrewe, U., and Werle, R. 2001. De-commodifying software? Open source software between business strategy and social movement, Science Studies 14(2): 43-65.
• Jachimowski, M. 2012. Wpływ konwergencji mediów na kształtowanie się przestrzeni medialnej, Rocznik Prasoznawczy 6: 37-57.
• Jenkins, H., & Ito, M. 2015. Participatory Culture in a Networked Era. London: Wiley.
• Jones, S., and Lenhart, A. 2004. Music downloading and listening: findings from the Pew Internet and American Life Project, Popular Music and Society 27(2): 185-199.
• Juris, J.S. 2005. The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597(1): 189-208.
• Kretschmer, M., Klimis, G., and Wallis, R. 2001. Music in electronic markets: an empirical study, New Media and Society 3(4): 417-442.
• Latour, B. 1986. Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands, Knowledge and Society. Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6: 1-40.
• Lopes, P.D. 1992. Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry: 1969 to 1990, American Sociological Review 57(1): 56-71.
• Luhmann, N. 1990. Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Makelberge, N. 2012. Rethinking collaboration in networked music, Organised Sound 17(1): 28-35.
• Marshall, L. 2004. The effects of piracy upon the music industry: A case study of bootlegging, Media, Culture & Society 26(2): 163-181.
• Marshall, L. 2005. Bootlegging: Romanticism and Copyright in the Music Industry. London: Sage.
• McCourt, T., and Burkart, P. 2003. When creators, corporations and consumers collide: Napster and the development of on-line music distribution, Media, Culture and Society 25(3): 333-50.
• McLeod, K., and DiCola, P. 2011. Creative License: The Law and Culture of Digital Sampling. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
• Milan, S. 2013. Social Movements and their Technologies: Wiring Social Change. New York: Springer.
• Molteni, L. and Ordanini, A. 2003. Consumption patterns, digital technology and music downloading, Long Range Planning 36(4): 389-406.
• Negus, K. 1998. Cultural production and the corporation: musical genres and the strategic management of creativity in the US recording industry, Media, Culture & Society 20(3): 359-379.
• Neumann, M., and Simpson, T.A. 1997. Smuggled sound: Bootleg recording and the pursuit of popular memory, Symbolic Interaction 20(4): 319-341.
• Oberholzer-Gee, F., and Strumpf, K. 2007. The Effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis, Journal of Political Economy 115(1): 1-42.
• Orlikowski, W.J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations, Organization Science 11(4): 404-428.
• Plether, C. 2009. Are publicity rights gone in a flash: Flickr, Creative Commons, and the commercial use of personal photographs, Florida State University Business Review 8(1): 129-156.
• Poster, M. 2004. Consumption and digital commodities in the everyday, Cultural Studies 18(2-3): 409-423.
• Rayna, T. and Striukova, L. 2009. Monometapoly or the economics of the music industry, Prometheus 27(3): 211-222.
• Rochelandet, F. 2003. Are copyright collecting societies efficient organisations? An evaluation of collective administration of copyright in Europe, in: W.J. Gordon and R. Watt (eds.), The Economics of Copyright: Developments in Research and Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 176-197.
• Rodgers, T. 2003. On the process and aesthetics of sampling in electronic music production, Organised Sound 8(3): 313-320.
• Scherzinger, M. 2014. Musical property: Widening or withering?, Journal of Popular Music Studies 26(1): 162-192.
• Sinha, R.K., Machado, F.S., and Sellman, C. 2010. Don't think twice, it's all right: Music piracy and pricing in a DRM-free environment, Journal of Marketing 74(2): 40-54.
• Styven, M. 2007. The intangibility of music in the Internet age, Popular Music and Society 30(1): 53-74.
• Tkacz, N. 2014. Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Toynbee, J. 2016. Making Popular Music: Musicians, Creativity and Institutions. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Vaccaro, V., and Cohn, D. 2004. The evolution of business models and marketing strategies in the music industry, The International Journal on Media Management 6(1-2): 46-58.
• Van Houweling, M.S. 2010. Author autonomy and atomism in copyright law, Virginia Law Review 96: 549-642.
• Yin, R. 2002. Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
• Young, S., and Collins, S. 2010. A view from the trenches of music 2.0., Popular Music and Society 33(3): 339-355.
• Zagorski-Thomas, S. 2016. The Influence of Recording Technology and Practice on Popular Music Performance in the Recording Studio in Poland between 1960 and 1989, Polish Sociological Review 196(4): 531-548.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26412/psr215.04