Satisfaction with Democracy in Perspective: Anchoring Today By Looking Back and Forward

• Autorzy: Pepijn van Houwelingen , Paul Dekker
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The question of how satisfied people are with the workings of their national democracy has oft en been criticized but is still the international standard measurement of satisfaction with democracy (SWD). In this paper we explore the benefits of adding questions about remembered and expected satisfaction 'ten years ago' and 'ten years from now', as were asked in the ISSP citizenship surveys of 2004 and 2014. Based on the data from seventeen European countries, we find that national samples: ■ do not show universal 'nostalgia', ■ produce good guesses of past satisfaction but show no futurist insights, ■ give retrospective judgments that do not correlate well with changes in expert opinions, ■ give retrospective judgments that do not correlate well with changes in the share of the populist vote. At the individual level we find: ■ that in almost all countries expected satisfaction with democracy ten years from now is a better predictor of political trust and feelings of political efficacy than satisfaction with democracy today, ■ that in almost all countries expected satisfaction with democracy ten years from now is a better predictor of the preference for populist voting (in one national case study), we note that Poland is the only country in our sample where citizens were, in 2014, retrospectively more positive about the development of their democracy, probably due to the severe economic conditions Poland faced in 2004. Overall, we do not find evidence for the relevance of retrospective judgements, but some evidence for the relevance of prospective judgements. We recommend further research into individual changes in present satisfaction and perceptions of these changes to better understand the frames of reference of 'satisfaction with democracy today'. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Politics; Political science; Democracy; Satisfaction research

PL

Polityka; Politologia; Demokracja; Badanie satysfakcji

• Czasopismo: Polish Political Science Review. Polski Przegląd Politologiczny
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: Vol. 9, Iss. 1
• Strony: 14--26

Twórcy

autor

Pepijn van Houwelingen

• The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, Den Haag

autor

Paul Dekker

• The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, Den Haag

Bibliografia

• Anderson, C. (2002). Good questions, dubious inferences, and bad solutions: Some further thoughts on satisfaction with democracy. Binghamton University. Binghamton.
• Ariely, G. (2013). Public administration and citizen satisfaction with democracy: cross-national evidence International Review of Administrative Sciences 79(4), 747-766.
• Beckett, M., Da Vanzo, J., Sastry, N., Panis, C., & Peterson, C. (2001). The quality of retrospective data: An examination of long-term recall in a developing country. Journal of Human Resources, 36(3), 593-625.
• Bühlmann, M, Heyne, L., Merkel, W., Müller, L., Ruth, S. and B. Weßels (2015). Democracy barometer: a new approach to evaluating the quality of democratic systems. Democratic Audit Blog (09 Apr 2015). www.democraticaudit.com
• Canache, D., Mondak, J., & Seligson, M. (2001). Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public opinion quarterly, 65(4), 506-528.
• Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2016). Flames and debates: do social media affect satisfaction with democracy? Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 225-240.
• Christmann, P. (2018). Economic performance, quality of democracy and satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies, 53, 79-89.
• Chu, Y., & Wu, C. (2019). Equality of opportunity and satisfaction with te political system. In: Park, C. & Uslaner E. (eds), Inequality and Democratic Politics in East Asia. New York: Routledge.
• Clarke, H., Dutt, N., & Kornberg, A. (1993). The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in Western European democracies. The Journal of Politics, 55(4), 998-1021.
• Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics, 37(3), 515-537.
• Dekker, P. & Van Houwelingen, P. (2017). Burgerperspectieven 2017|4. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
• Finney, H. (1981). Improving the reliability of retrospective survey measures: Results of a longitudinal field survey. Evaluation Review, 5(2), 207-229.
• Foa, R.S., Klassen, A., Slade, M., Rand, A. and R. Williams (2020). The Global Satisfaction with Democracy Report 2020. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Centre for the Future of Democracy.
• Golden, B. (1992). The past is the past-or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management journal, 35(4), 848-860.
• Hochschild, A. (2016). Strangers in Their Own Land. Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: The New Press.
• Kenny, M. (2017). Back to the populist future?: understanding nostalgia in contemporary political discourse. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(3), 256-273.
• Kilpatrick, F. P., & Cantril, H. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: A measure of individuals' unique reality worlds. Journal of Individual Psychology, 16, 158-173.
• Lacy, D. & Christenson, D. (2017). Who Votes for The Future? Information, Expectations and Endogeneity in Economic Voting. Political Behavior, 39, p. 347-375.
• Lagos, M. (2003). Support for and Satisfaction with Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(4), 471-487.
• Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European journal of political research, 42(3), 391-408.
• Morlino, L., & Quaranta, M. (2014). The non-procedural determinants of responsiveness. West European Politics, 37(2), 331-360.
• Nadeau, R., V. Arel-Bundock & J. Daoust (2019). Satisfaction with Democracy and the American Dream. The Journal of Politics, 81(3), 1080-1084.
• Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Norris, P., & R. Inglehart (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Pammett, J. (ed.) (2016). ISSP 2014 - Citizenship II: Questionnaire development report. Cologne: Gesis (https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/download.asp?db=E&id=59917).
• Quaranta, M. (2018). How citizens evaluate democracy: an assessment using the European Social Survey. European Political Science Review, 10(2), 191-217.
• Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C. & Taggart, P. (2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe (http://www.popu-list.org).
• Schwarz, N., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 127-160.
• Smeets, V., & Warzynski, F. (2006). Job creation, job destruction and voting behavior in Poland. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(2), 503-519.
• Smith, T. (1984). Recalling attitudes: An analysis of retrospective questions on the 1982 GSS. Public opinion quarterly, 48(3), 639-649.
• Steenvoorden, E., & Harteveld, E. (2018). The appeal of nostalgia: the infl uence of societal pessimism on support for populist radical right parties. West European Politics, 41:1, 28-52.
• Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• The Economist Intelligence Unit (2019). Democracy Index 2019. London: EIU.
• Van Houwelingen, P., Dekker, P. & J. den Ridder (2012). Oordelen over de samenleving: tussen gewenning en gouden gloed. Paper presented at Sociologendagen 2012, Utrecht 24 May 2012.
• Van der Meer, T., & Dekker, P. (2011). Trustworthy states, trusting citizens? A multilevel study into objective and subjective determinants of political trust. In: S. Zmerliand & M. Hooghe (eds). Political trust: Why context matters, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 95-116.
• Van der Meer, T., & Hakhverdian, A. (2017). Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Performance: A Cross-National Study of 42 European Countries. Political Studies, 65(1), 81-102.
• Van Elsas, E., Lubbe, R., Van der Meer, T., & Van der Brug, W. (2013). Vote recall: A panel study on the mechanisms that explain vote recall inconsistency. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(1), 18-40.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ppsr-2021-0002