Sin Stocks and ESG Scores: Does the Nature of Your Business Really Matter?

• Autorzy: Edgardo Cayón , Juan Camilo Gutierrez
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of sin stocks held by companies that operate in sectors with ethical implications (gaming, defence, adult entertainment, etc.). For this purpose, the model of choice was a panel based on the stocks of the global S&P 1200 index for the period between 2014 and 2018, for which the accounting data was available at the time of the study. The panel model accounted for different control variables and non-sin ESG performance. Having analysed its results, we have found that the ESG performance of sin stocks is positively correlated to future ESG performance, which was a surprise given that most of the analysed companies operate in sectors that are deemed as socially and ethically controversial. One hypothesized explanation for this is the phenomenon of "social cleaning", when a company engages in ESG activities with the sole purpose of reducing reputational risk while trying to attract a wider base of socially aware investors. Therefore, we conclude that in order to avoid the risk of "social cleaning" ESG rating companies should give more weight to environmental and social factors rather than governance ones, especially in the case of sin stocks. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Corporate governance; Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); Business activity ethics; Rating; Panel data

PL

Ład korporacyjny; Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu; Etyka działalności gospodarczej; Rating; Dane panelowe

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 114--123

Twórcy

autor

Edgardo Cayón

• CESA Business School Colombia

autor

Juan Camilo Gutierrez

• Direct TV Colombia

Bibliografia

• Baron, D. P., Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). The economics and politics of corporate social performance. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1-46.
• Borgers, A., Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Horst, J. t. (2015). Do social factors influence investment behavior andperformance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112-126.
• Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2006). Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 409-434.
• Cappucci, M. (2018). The ESG Integration Paradox. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 30(2), 22-28. doi: 10.1111/jacf.12296
• Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Horst, J. T. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2137-2147.
• Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915.
• Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
• Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 135-147.
• Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility - where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 25-35.
• Henke, H.-M. (2016). The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 69-84.
• Jain, A., Jain, P. K., & Rezaee, Z. (2016). Value-Relevance of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Short Selling. Journal of Management and Accounting Research, 29-52.
• KPMG. (2020). The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. Retrieved from: https://home.kpmg/be/en/home/insights/2020/12/sus-the-kpmg-survey-of-sustainability-reporting********2020.html
• Limkriangkrai, M., Koh, S., & Durand, R. B. (2017). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Profiles, Stock Returns, and Financial Policy: Australian Evidence. International Review of Finance, 17(3), 461-471. doi: 10.1111/irfi.12101
• Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.08.003
• Park, A., & Ravenel, C. (2013). Integrating Sustainability Into Capital Markets: Bloomberg LP And ESG's Quantitative Legitimacy. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 25(3), 62-67. doi: 10.1111/jacf.12030
• Porter, M., Serafaim, G., & Kramer, M. (2019). Where ESG fail? Retrieved from: https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1hm5ghqtxj9s7/Where-ESG-Fails
• RobecoSAM. (2019) SAM Corporate Sustainability Assessment 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.robecosam.com/csa/csa-resources/
• Verheyden, T., Eccles, R. G., & Feiner, A. (2016). ESG for All? The Impact of ESG Screening on Return, Risk, and Diversification. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 47-55.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-3/7