Czasopismo
Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Introduction/background: The creation of a knowledge-based economy determines the growth of interest in innovations and the possibility of using them as a tool for building a competitive advantage. This requires companies to develop an appropriate innovation strategy. Its choice is determined by the environment and the company's own capabilities. On the other hand, the effectiveness of strategic decisions in the area of innovation contributes to building a company's competitive advantage.
Aim of the article: The aim of the article is to present the cause-effect relations between the choice of innovation strategy and the competitive position of the enterprise.
Materials and methods: The methods of critical analysis and synthesis, the method of generalization and logical methods as well as the desk research method were used in the research process.
Result and conclusions: As a result of the work, a concept has been developed and direct and indirect consequences of innovation activity have been classified. The choice of innovation strategy usually is based on the direct financial results. But the indirect results are important for creating innovative potential of company and give a multiplier effects. These effects should be taken into account in the process of creating and strategy of innovation. The author presents a diagram of creating an innovative strategy, the direct and indirect effects of innovative activity and the cause and effect relations between the results of innovative activity and the creation of a strong competitive position of the company. The article is aimed at enterprise managers, decision makers of state institutions and scientists dealing with innovation problems. (original abstract)
Aim of the article: The aim of the article is to present the cause-effect relations between the choice of innovation strategy and the competitive position of the enterprise.
Materials and methods: The methods of critical analysis and synthesis, the method of generalization and logical methods as well as the desk research method were used in the research process.
Result and conclusions: As a result of the work, a concept has been developed and direct and indirect consequences of innovation activity have been classified. The choice of innovation strategy usually is based on the direct financial results. But the indirect results are important for creating innovative potential of company and give a multiplier effects. These effects should be taken into account in the process of creating and strategy of innovation. The author presents a diagram of creating an innovative strategy, the direct and indirect effects of innovative activity and the cause and effect relations between the results of innovative activity and the creation of a strong competitive position of the company. The article is aimed at enterprise managers, decision makers of state institutions and scientists dealing with innovation problems. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
125--140
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Kielce University of Technology
Bibliografia
- Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., and Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation an inverted U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 120, pp. 701-28.
- Andrews, K.R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy. Dow-Jones Irwin.
- Atkinson, R.D. (2013). Competitiveness, Innovation and Productivity. Washington D.C.: The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, pp. 1-4.
- Barsh, J., Capozzi, M., Davidson, J. (2008). Leadership and innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, January, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/leadership-and-innovation.
- Becker, J. (1998). Marketing-Koncepzion/Grundlagen des strategischen Marketing-Managements. Munchen: Vahlen, p. 335.
- Buckley, P.J., Pass, C.L., Prescott, K. (1988). Measures of international competitiveness: A critical survey. Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 4(2), p. 180.
- Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Daveri, F., Parisi, M.L. (2015). Experience, Innovation, and Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Italy's Slowdown. ILR Review, Vol. 68, iss. 4, pp. 889-915.
- EIS 2020. European Innovation Scoreboard 2020 (2020). http://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/42981.
- Leonards, A. (2019). How to create an innovative culture. http://www.raconteur.net/hr/corporate-culture/create-innovative-culture.
- McGregor, L., Doshi, N. (2015). How Company Culture Shapes Employee Motivation. Organizational Culture. Harward Bussines Review, November 25. https://hbr.org/2015/11/how-company-culture-shapes-employee-motivation.
- Mróz, J. (2016). Determinanty i miary międzynarodowej konkurencyjności gospodarki. In: P. Urbanek, E. Walińska (Eds.), Ekonomia i zarządzanie w teorii i praktyce. Tom 9. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, p. 21.
- Niestrój, R. (1998). Zarzadzanie marketingiem. Aspekty strategiczne. Kraków: PWN, p. 84.
- Oksanych, O. (2020). Innovation as an opportunity for economic development of central eastern Europe countries (Poland case study). Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, vol. 14(1). Bulgaria, pp. 268-281.
- Pisano, G.P. (2015). You Need an Innovation Strategy. Harvard Business Review, June, pp. 44-54, https://hbr.org/2015/06/you-need-an-innovation-strategy, 28.03.2020.
- Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, March, http://hbr.org/1990/03/the-competitive-advantage-of-nations/ar/1.
- Porter, M.E. (1980). The Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press, pp. 10-11.
- Pysiak, B. (2006). Innowacje w regionie. In: M. Strużycki (ed.), Innowacyjność w teorii i praktyce (p. 189). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
- Rouse, M. (2015). Innovation culture. https://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/ innovation-culture.
- Rowley, J., Baregheh, A., Sambrook, S. (2011). Towards an innovation-type mapping tool. Manag. Decis., vol. 49, pp. 73-86.
- Saadat, V., Saadat, Z. (2016). Organizational Learning as a Key Role of Organizational Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 230, p. 225.
- Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard Economic Studies, vol. 46. Harvard University Press.
- Schwab, K. (2013). Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. World Economic Forum, September 2012, http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitivenessreport-2012-2013.
- Setiawanta, Y., Purwanto, A. (2019). Stakeholder power, sustainability reporting, and corporate governance: A case study of manufacturing industry at Indonesia's stock exchange. Sci. Pap. Univ. Pardubice Ser. D Fac. Econ. Adm., vol. 46, pp. 147-158.
- Spacey, J. (2016). What is Innovation Culture. http://www.simplicable.com/new/innovation-culture.
- Staack, V., Cole, B. (2017). Reinventing innovation. Five findings to guide strategy through execution. PwC. https://www.pwc.com/us/en/advisory-services/business-innovation/assets/2017-innovation-benchmark-findings.pdf.
- Tam, J.P.K., Fernando, Y. Ecological Performance as a New Metric to Measure Green Supply Chain Practices. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition, ch. 465, p. 5389.
- Teece, D.J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, vol. 43, pp. 172-194.
- Vila, J. (2011). Innovative Culture: Values, Principles and Practices of Senior Executives in Highly Innovative Companies. Innovation. Perspectives for the 21st Century. SpainŁ BBVA. ISBN 978-84-92441-47-1.
- Zhou, K.Z. (2006). Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 394-402.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171634248