Determinanty ruchu pracowników pomiędzy segmentami rynku pracy

• Autorzy: Łukasz Arendt , Wojciech Grabowski

Warianty tytułu

Determinants of Employees' Movement Between Labour Market Segments

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Artykuł podejmuje problematykę mobilności pomiędzy wtórnym a pierwotnym segmentem na polskim rynku pracy, nawiązując do teorii segmentacji rynku pracy. Poszczególne segmenty wyodrębniono, uwzględniając równocześnie rodzaj kontraktu pracowniczego (umowa na czas nieokreślony lub określony) oraz rozkład płac. Korzystając z danych jednostkowych Badania Aktywności Ekonomicznej Ludności, oszacowano parametry modelu dwumianowego, co pozwoliło na wyznaczenie prawdopodobieństwa przejścia z segmentu wtórnego do pierwotnego oraz zidentyfikowanie podażowych i popytowych determinant tego procesu na polskim rynku pracy. Uzyskane wyniki są zgodne z hipotezą pułapki, wskazując na ograniczone szanse osób pracujących w segmencie wtórnym na przejście do segmentu pierwotnego. Tym niemniej, zauważalny jest wzrost skali przepływów do segmentu pierwotnego w ostatnich latach, co jest wynikiem zmian w sferze realnej (mierzonej spadkiem stopy bezrobocia) i instytucjonalnej. Najważniejszymi determinantami mobilności między segmentami okazały się wiek pracowników, poziom wykształcenia, skłonność do inwestowania w kapitał ludzki, a także wielkość przedsiębiorstwa. Ponadto zidentyfikowano regionalne i sektorowe różnice w prawdopodobieństwie mobilności - prawdopodobieństwo to było wyższe w przypadku pracowników mieszkających w dużych aglomeracjach i w bliskiej odległości od niemieckiego rynku pracy. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The paper studies upgrading patterns between secondary and primary segments in Polish labour market, with reference to the Segmented Labour Market theory. The type of contact (permanent vs. fixed-term) and wage distribution were used within one framework to define these labour segments. The parameters of binary choice model, based on Labour Force Survey microdata, were estimated to calculate the probabilities of shift from secondary to primary segment, and to identify supply and demand-side determinants of this upgrading. The results are, in general, in line with the trap hypothesis, pointing out to limited chances of upward shift from secondary to primary labour segment. However, this upward mobility has increased in recent years, being a result of changes in real (measured by lowering unemployment rate) and institutional sphere of the Polish labour market. Individual's age, education attainment, propensity to invest in human capital, as well as the size of an enterprise appeared to be the most important divers of inter-segments upgrading. Moreover, regional as well as sectoral differences in probability of upgrading were identified - this probability was higher in the case of workers living in regions with large agglomerations and close proximity to the German labour market. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Rynek pracy; Zatrudnienie; Segmentacja rynku pracy

EN

Labour market; Employment; Labour market segmentation

• Czasopismo: Polityka Społeczna
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: nr 11-12
• Strony: 24--31

Twórcy

autor

Łukasz Arendt

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

autor

Wojciech Grabowski

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• 1. Adair, P., Bellache, Y., 2018. Labor market segmentation and occupational mobility in Algeria: Repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses (2007 to 2012). Review of Development Economics, 22(4), pp. 1765-1783.
• 2. Ahn, N., Sanchez-Macros, V., 2017. Emancipation under the great recession in Spain. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(2), pp. 477-495.
• 3. Aoyagi, C., Ganelli, G., 2015. Does revamping Japan's dual labor market matter? Economic Systems, 39(2), pp. 339-357.
• 4. Arendt, L., Grabowski, W., 2017. Innovations, ICT and ICT-driven labour productivity in Poland. Economics of Transition, 25(4), pp. 723-758.
• 5. Arendt, L., Grabowski, W., 2019. Technical change and wage premium shifts among task-content groups in Poland. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), pp. 3392-3410.
• 6. Arendt, L., Grabowski, W., Kukulak-Dolata, I., 2020. County-Level Patterns of Undeclared Work: An Empirical Analysis of a Highly Diversified Region in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 149(1), pp. 271-295.
• 7. Atkinson, R., Court, R., 1998. The New Economy Index, Washington: Progressive Policy Institute.
• 8. Bartel, A.P., 1995. Training, Wage Growth, and Job Performance: Evidence from a Company Database. Journal of Labor Economics, 13(3), pp. 401-425.
• 9. Battisti, M., 2013. Reassessing segmentation in the labour market: an application for Italy 1995-2004. Bulletin of Economic Research, 65(1), pp. 38-55.
• 10. Bednarski, M., Frieske, K.W., red., 2012. Zatrudnienie na czas określony w polskiej gospodarce, Warszawa: IPiSS.
• 11. Blau, F.D., Kahn, L.M., 2007. The Gender Pay Gap: Have Women Gone as Far as They Can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), pp. 7-23.
• 12. Brkic, M., 2015. Labor Market Duality and the Impact of Prolonged Recession on Employment in Croatia. Croatian Economic Survey, 17(1), pp. 5-45.
• 13. Cieślik, A., Rokicki, B., 2016. Individual wages and regional market potential. Evidence from the Polish Labour Force Survey. Economics of Transition, 24(4), pp. 661-682.
• 14. Doeringer, P., Piore, M., 1971. Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Massachusets: Lexington.
• 15. Gallen, Y., Lessner, R.V., 2019. The labour market gender gap in Denmark: Sorting out the past 30 years. Labour Economics, 56(C), pp. 58-67.
• 16. Garibaldi, P., Taddei, F., 2013. Italy: A dual labour market in transition. Employment Working Paper, No. 144, Geneva: International Labor Organization.
• 17. Garz, M., 2013. Labour Market Segmentation: Standard and Non-Standard Employment in Germany. German Economic Review, 14(3), pp. 349-371.
• 18. Gash, V., 2008. Bridge or trap? Temporary workers' transitions to unemployment and to the standard employment contract. European Sociological Review, 24(5), pp. 651-668.
• 19. Gebel, M., 2010. Early career consequences of temporary employment in Germany and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), pp. 641-660.
• 20. Gunther, I., Launov, A., 2012. Informal employment in developing countries: Opportunity or last resort? Journal of Development Economics, 97(1), pp. 88-98.
• 21. Hara, H., 2018. The gender wage gap across the wage distribution in Japan: Within- and between-establishment effects. Labour Economics, 53(C), pp. 213-229.
• 22. Jasińska, K., 2017. Long-term Unemployment as a Problem of the Polish Labor Market. Annales Universistatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin - Polonia, Section H 51, pp. 49-58.
• 23. Jonek-Kowalska, I., 2015. Employment and Remuneration Trends in Polish Hard Coal Mines in the Context of the Relations Between Boards and Trade Unions. International Journal of Synergy and Research, 3(1), pp. 27-43.
• 24. Juska, A., Woolfson, C., 2015. Austerity, labour market segmentation and emigration: the case of Lithuania. Industrial Relations Journal, 46(3), pp. 236-253.
• 25. Kosior, A., Rubaszek, M., Wierus, K., 2016. The potential effects of labour market duality for countries in a monetary union. International Labour Review, 155(4), pp. 509-534.
• 26. Kumas, H., Caglar, A., Karaalp, H.S., 2014. Firm size and labour market segmentation theory: Evidence from Turkish micro data. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 150, pp. 360-373.
• 27. Lehmann, H., Pignatti, N., 2018. Informal employment relationships and the labor market: Is there segmentation in Ukraine? Journal of comparative economics, 46(3), pp. 838-847.
• 28. Lin, J-P., 2016. Taiwan temporary workers and labor marginalization in the context of segmented labor market, 1991-2010. Arbor, Vol. 192-777, http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2016.777n1007.
• 29. Loveridge, R., Mok, A.L., 1979. Theories of Labour Market Segmentation, Hague: Martinius Nijhoff.
• 30. Majchrowska, A., Strawiński, P., 2018. Impact of minimum wage increase on gender wage gap: Case of Poland. Economic Modelling, Vol. 70, pp. 174-185.
• 31. Merikull, J., Staehr, K., 2010. Unreported Employment and Envelope Wages in Mid-Transition: Comparing Developments and Causes in the Baltic Countries. Comparative Economic Studies, 52(4), pp. 637-670.
• 32. Mincer, J., 1974. Schooling, experience, and earnings. Human Behavior & Social Institutions, No. 2.
• 33. Mohan, P., Strobl, E., Watson, P., 2018. In-firm training, innovation and productivity: the case of Caribbean Small Island Developing States. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(9-10), pp. 987-1011.
• 34. Peter, S., Drobnicˇ, S., 2013. Women and their memberships: Gender gap in relational dimension of social inequality. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 31(1), pp. 32-48.
• 35. Piore, M., 1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• 36. Psacharopoulos, G., Chu Ng, Y., 1994. Earnings and Education in Latin America. Education Economics, 2(2), pp. 187-207.
• 37. Strawiński, P., Majchrowska, A., Broniatowska, P., 2018. Wage returns to different education levels. Evidence from Poland. Ekonomista, Vol. 1, pp. 25-49.
• 38. Williams, C.C., Horodnic, I.A., 2015. Explaining and tackling envelope wages in the Baltic Sea region. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(3), pp. 295-312.
• 39. Zimermanová, K., 2010. Selected actual aspects of employees remuneration in small and medium-sized Companies. E+M Ekonomie a Management, Vol. 3, pp. 33-44.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.5998