From Hybrid Institutional Logics to Solidarity Capital

• Autorzy: Izabela Grabowska , Bohdan Skrzypczak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the paper is to analyse the process of the creation of the hybrid organizational form and the mechanisms of its action. The paper is theory oriented and is based on new institutionalism and hybridity. The research question is how a hybrid organization efficiently functions while simultaneously drawing on three different and partially contradictory institutional logics: commercial (profit-oriented activities), social (non-profit activities), and public (focused on the provision of high-quality social services). We argue that the core mechanism of action of the new organizational form is the solidarity capital. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Hybrid organizations; Institutional economics; Solidarity economy; Social economy

PL

Organizacje hybrydowe; Ekonomia instytucjonalna; Ekonomia solidarności; Ekonomia społeczna

• Czasopismo: Polityka Społeczna
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: nr 1 (ang) Social Economy and Co-Production of Public Policy
• Strony: 25--36

Twórcy

autor

Izabela Grabowska

• Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

autor

Bohdan Skrzypczak

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahrens, B. & Diez, T., 2015. Solidarisation and its limits: the EU and the transformation of international society. Global Discourse. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought, 5(3): 341-355.
• 2. Arnsperger, C. & Varoufakis, Y., 2003. Toward a Theory of Solidarity. Erkenntnis, 59(2): 157-188.
• 3. Batson, C.D., 1998. Altruism and prosocial behaviour. In: D.T. Gilbety, S.T. Fiske, G. Lindzey, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 2., 4th edition, 282-316, New York: McGraw-Hill.
• 4. Barr, A., Fafchamps, M., & Owens, T., 2005. The governance of non-governmental organizations in Uganda. World Development, 33(4): 657-679.
• 5. Brandsen, T. & Karré, P.M., 2011. Hybrid organizations: no cause for concern. International Journal of Public Administration, 34: 827-836.
• 6. Bauder, H., 2005. Institutional Capital and Labour Devaluation: The Non-Recognition of Foreign Credentials in Germany, INTERVENTION: Journal of Economics, 2(1): 75-93.
• 7. Bresser, R.K.F. & Millonig, K., 2003. Institutional Capital: Competitive Advantage in light of the New Institutionalism in Organization Theory. Schmalenbach Business Review, 55: 220-241.
• 8. Chemin, C. & Vercher, C., 2011. The Challenge of Activist Coalition Governance: Accommodating Diversity to Create Institutions-An Approach Via the Inter-Relationships Between Action, Project and Instrument. Voluntas, 22(4): 682-705.
• 9. Garrabé, M., 2007. Economie sociale et développement [Social economy and development], Programme MED-TEMPUS, available at: http://www.formder.iamm.fr.
• 10. Chudzicka-Czupała, A., 2013. Etyczne zachowanie się człowieka w organizacji [Ethical human behaviour in an organisation]. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
• 11. Daft, R.L. & Lewin A.Y., 1993. Where are the theories for the "new" organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organ. Sci., 4, i-iv.
• 12. Daokui, D., Feng, J. & Jiang, H., 2006. Institutional Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs and enterprises in China's transition to market, 96(2): 358-362.
• 13. Diani, M., 2008. "Analiza sieciowa" [Network analysis]. In: K. Gorlach & P.H. Mooney, eds. Dynamika życia społecznego. Współczesne koncepcje ruchów społecznych [Dynamics of social life. Contemporary concepts of social movements], Warszawa: Scholar.
• 14. DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W., 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
• 15. DiMaggio, P.J., 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In: L. Zucker, ed. Institutional Patterns and Organizations, 3-21, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
• 16. Doherty, B., Haugh, H. & Lyon, F., 2014. Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16: 417-436.
• 17. Eisenberg, N., 1986. Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behaviour. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• 18. Eisenberg, N., 2000. Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51: 665-697.
• 19. Elliot, J., 1991. Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
• 20. Evans, B., Richmond, T., & Shields, J., 2005. Structuring neoliberal governance: The non-profit sector, emerging new modes of control and the marketization of service delivery. Policy and Society, 24(1): 73-97.
• 21. Fedderke, J.W., Luiz, J.M., 2008. Does human capital generate social and institutional capital? Exploring evidence from South African time series data. Oxford Economic Papers, 60(4): 649-682.
• 22. Fric, P., 2004. Political developments after 1989 and their impact on the non-profit sector. Prague: Charles University.
• 23. Friedland, R. & Alford, R.R., 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: W.W. Powell, P.J. DiMaggio, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 232-266, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 24. Froelich, K.A., 1999. Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in non-profit organizations. Non-profit and voluntary sector quarterly, 28(3): 246-268.
• 25. Galaskiewicz, J. & Barringer, S.N., 2012. Social enterprises and social categories. In: B. Gidron & Y. Hasenfeld, eds. Social enterprises: An organizational perspective, 47-70, Palgrave: Basingstoke.
• 26. Garud, R., Jain, S. & Kumaraswamy, A., 2002. Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Management J., 45: 196-214.
• 27. Gerhards, J., Lengfeld, H., Ignacz, Z.S., Kley, F.K. & Priem, M., 2018. How Strong is European Solidarity? Berlin Studies on the Sociology of Europe (BSSE), 37.
• 28. Greenwood, D. & Lewin, M., 1998. Introduction to Action Research. London: Sage Publication.
• 29. Greenwood, R., Diaz, A.M., Li, S. & Lorente, J.C., 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ. Sci., 21(2): 521-539.
• 30. Henriksen, L.S., Smith, S.R. & Zimmer, A., 2012. At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany, and the United States. Voluntas, 23(2): 458-501.
• 31. Haidt, J., 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108: 814-834.
• 32. Hoffman, M.L., 2000. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring an justice. New York: Cambridge University Press, Rand McNally.
• 33. Hustinx, L. & De Waele, E., 2015. Managing Hybridity in a Changing Welfare Mix: Everyday Practices in an Entrepreneurial Non-profit in Belgium, Voluntas, 26 (5):1666-1689.
• 34. Jay, J., 2013. Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 137-159.
• 35. Jones, T.M., 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations. An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16: 366-395.
• 36. Karnani, A.G., Garrette, B., Kassalow, J.S. & Lee, M., 2010. Better Vision for the Poor. Ross School of Business Paper, No. 1137.
• 37. Katre, A. & Salipante, P., 2012. Start-up social ventures: Blending fine-grained behaviours from two institutions for entrepreneurial success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5): 967-994.
• 38. Knodt, M. & Tews, A., 2017. European Solidarity and Its Limits: Insights from Current Political Challenges. In: A. Grimmel and S. My Giang, eds. Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis, 47-64, Switzerland: Springer.
• 39. Kooiman, J., 2009. Governing as governance. London: Sage Publications.
• 40. Kulig, J., 2000. Community resiliency: the potential for community health nursing theory development. Public Health Nursing, 17 (5), 2000.
• 41. Lind, G., 1987. Moral competence and education in a democratic society. In: G. Zecha, P. Weingartner, eds. Conscience: An Interdisciplinary View. Salzburg Colloquium on Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities, Theory and Decision Library. Dordrecht: Reidel Publications: 91-122.
• 42. Lounsbury, M., 2002. Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Acad. Management J., 45:255-266.
• 43. Maguire, S., Hardy, C. & Lawrence, T.B., 2004. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J., 47:657-679.
• 44. Marody, M., 2017. Wartości w świecie postspołecznym [Values in postsocial world], Zarządzanie Publiczne, 1(39).
• 45. Masten, A.S., 2007. Resilience in developing system: Progress and promise as the fourth waves rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19:921-930.
• 46. Mikołajczak, P., 2020. Social Enterprises' Hybridity in the Concept of Institutional Logics: Evidence from Polish NGOs. Voluntas, 31:472-483.
• 47. Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 48. Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F., 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 972-1001.
• 49. Paul, B., Poncet, Ch., Vallade, D., 2014. Capital institutionnel et économie sociale et solidaire: Quel cadre institutionnel pour le développement de l'économie sociale et solidaire en Haïti? [Institutional capital and social and solidarity economy: What institutional framework for the development of the social and solidarity economy in Haiti?]. Haiti Perspectives, 3(3).
• 50. Placek, M., Valentinow, V., Vacekova, G., Ochrana, F., Curda, S. & Anam, C., 2021. The hybridity of waste management: An in-depth exploratory case study from the Znojmo municipality, Waste Management, 126: 433-442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.040.
• 51. Platje, J., 2008. Institutional Capital as a factor of sustainable development - the importance of institutional equilibrium. Baltic Journal on Sustainability, 14 (2):150.
• 52. Portes, A., 1988. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24.
• 53. Prendergast, Ch., 2005. Social Capital. In: G. Ritzer, eds. Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Vol. II, London.
• 54. Pospısil, M., Navratil, J., & Pejcal, J., 2014. Czech Republic. In: Maecenata Institute, eds. Civil society in the 'Visegrad Four': Data and literature in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, 48-93. Berlin: Maecenata Institute.
• 55. Rao, H. & Giorgi, S., 2006. Code breaking: How entrepreneurs exploit cultural logics to generate institutional change. Res. Organ. Behav., 27: 279-314.
• 56. Rao, H., Morrill, C. & Zald, M.N., 2000. Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav., 22: 239-282.
• 57. Ray, T. & Hinings, C.R., 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organisation Studies, 30(6): 629-652.
• 58. Romanelli, E., 1991. The evolution of new organizational forms. Annual Rev. Sociol., 17: 79-103.
• 59. Roth, S.,Valentinov, V., Kaivo-oja, J. & Dana, L.P., 2018. Multifunctional organisation models: A systems - theoretical framework for new venture discovery and creation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(7): 1383-1400, https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2018-0113.
• 60. Seo, M.G. & Creed, W.E.D., 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectic perspective. Acad. Management Rev., 27: 222-248.
• 61. Skelcher, C. & Smith, S.R., 2015. Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of non-profits. Public Admin, 93: 433-448.
• 62. Skrzypczak, B., 2015. Współczynnik społecznościowy. Rekonstrukcja instytucji społecznościowych w perspektywie pedagogiki społecznej [Social Factor. Reconstruction of social institutions in the perspective of social pedagogy]. Toruń: Akapit.
• 63. Smets, M. & Jarzabkowski, P., 2013. Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10): 1279-1309.
• 64. Smith, S.R., 2010. Hybridization and non-profit organizations: The governance challenge. Policy and Society, 29: 219-2.
• 65. SOLIDUS, Solidarity in European societies: empowerment, social justice and citizenship. HORIZN 2020, available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/649489/pl.
• 66. Stjerno, S., 2011. The Idea of Solidarity in Europe. European Journal of Social Law, 3: 156-176.
• 67. Suddaby, R. & Greenwood, R., 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart., 50: 35-67.
• 68. Sztompka, P., 2016. Kapitał społeczny. Teoria przestrzeni międzyludzkiej [Social capital. The theory of interpersonal space]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
• 69. Sztompka, P., Co dalej z przestrzenią moralną. In: Idee dla Polski, Obywatelski Thinkletter, available at: www.kongresobywatelski.pl.
• 70. Takle, M., 2018. Is the Migration Crisis a Solidarity Crisis. In: A. Grimmel, ed. The Crises of the European Union: Challenges, Analyses and Solutions, 116-128, London: Routledge.
• 71. Thornton, P.H., 2004. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• 72. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O., 2011. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22: 60-80.
• 73. Vacekova, G., Valentinov, V. & Nemec, J., 2017. Rethinking non-profit commercialization: The case of the Czech Republic. Voluntas, 28(5): 2103-2123.
• 74. Will, M.G., Roth, S. & Valentinov, V., 2017. From Non-profit Diversity to Organizational Multifunctionality: A Systems-Theoretical Proposal, Administration & Society, 50(7): 1015-1036, https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717728093.
• 75. Wilson, F. and & Post, J.E., 2013. Business models for people, planet (& profits): exploring the phenomena of social business, a market-based approach to social value creation. Small Business Economics, 40: 715-737.
• 76. Williamson, O.E., 1998. Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where is Headed, The Economist, 146, pages 23-58.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.5908