Unemployment as a Determinant of Local Service-oriented Entrepreneurship: a Case Study of Poland

• Autorzy: Małgorzata Wosiek
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Motivation: Unemployment is an important entrepreneurship determinant which is captured by the unemployment push/pull hypotheses. Those issues remain underexplored, with only few studies investigating the relationship between unemployment and the sector structure of entrepreneurship, while considering the specificity of the local economy. Aim: The main goal of the study is to assess the impact of local unemployment rate on the number of newly registered service businesses in Poland, taking into account both the heterogeneity of that sector and the specificities of local economies in 2003-2018. Results: The research results show that in Poland growing unemployment contributed to the increasing registration of new service businesses, which empirically supports the unemployment-push hypothesis. Both the occurrence and the intensity of the unemployment-push effect were conditioned by territorial factors, with the higher elasticity of entrepreneurship in relation to unemployment changes in lagged local units. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Unemployment; Entrepreneurship; Local economy

PL

Bezrobocie; Przedsiębiorczość; Gospodarka lokalna

• Czasopismo: Ekonomia i Prawo
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 20
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 693--708

Twórcy

autor

Małgorzata Wosiek

• University of Rzeszów, Poland

Bibliografia

• Armington, C., & Acs, Z.J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120099843.
• Bennett, D.L. (2019). Infrastructure investments and entrepreneurial dynamism in the U.S. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.005.
• Beynon, M.J., Jones, P., & Pickernell, D. (2019). The role of entrepreneurship, innovation, and urbanity-diversity on growth, unemployment, and income: US state-level evidence and an fsQCA elucidation. Journal of Business Research, 101, 675-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.074.
• Block, J.H., & Wagner, M. (2010). Necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs in Germany: characteristics and earnings differentials. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62(2), 154-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396803.
• Calá, D.C. (2018). Sectoral and regional determinants of firm dynamics in developing countries: evidence for low-, medium-and high-tech manufacturing in Argentina. CEPAL Review, 124, 121-142. https://doi.org/10.18356/0451c758-en.
• Carree, M. (2002). Does unemployment affect the number of establishments: a regional analysis for US States. Regional Studies, 36(4), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220131151.
• Congregao, E., Golpe, A.A., & van Stel, A. (2012). The 'recession-push' hypothesis reconsidered. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-011-0176-1.
• CSO. (2021). Local data bank. Retrieved 20.05.2020 from https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDLS/start.
• Cyrek, M. (2012). Rozwój sektora usług a gospodarka oparta na wiedzy. Uniwersytet Rzeszowski.
• Dilli, S., Elert, N., & Jovanovic, B. (2018). Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through "varieties of capitalism" arguments. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 293-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0002-z.
• Fairlie, R.W., & Fossen, F.M. (2018). Defining opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship: two components of business creation. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 11258, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140340.
• Fritsch, M., & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by industry over space and time: a multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400600928301.
• Fritsch, M., Kritikos, A., & Pijnenburg, K. (2015). Business cycles, unemployment and entrepreneurial entry: evidence from Germany. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(2), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0326-3.
• Glückler, J., & Hammer, I. (2011). Pragmatic service typology: capturing the distinctive dynamics of services in time and space. The Service Industries Journal, 31(6), 941-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060903078743.
• Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700301.
• Huggins, R., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurship and the determinants of firm survival within regions: human capital, growth motivation and locational conditions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 29(3-4), 357-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1271830.
• Kantis, H., Angelelli, P., & Moori Koening, V. (Eds.). (2005). Developing entrepreneurship: experience in Latin America and worldwide. Inter-American Development Bank.
• Konon, A., Fritsch, M., & Kritikos, A.S. (2018). Business cycles and start-ups across industries: an empirical analysis of German regions. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(6), 742-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.006.
• Mickiewicz, T. (2016). Tocqueville in Poland: social self-organization, business support policies of local authorities and entrepreneurship. WSIZ Working Paper Series, 19, 1-30.
• Money.pl. (2019). Praca dla programistów: branża IT coraz chętniej przechodzi na samozatrudnienie. Retrieved 20.05.2020 from https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/praca-dla-programistow-branza-it-coraz-chetniej-przechodzi-na-samozatrudnienie-6356830056912513a.html.
• Nikolaev, B.N., Boudreaux, Ch.J., & Palich, L. (2018). Cross-country determinants of early-stage necessity and opportunity-motivated entrepreneurship: accounting for model uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 243-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12400.
• Plehn-Dujowich, J.M. (2012). The dynamic relationship between entrepreneurship, unemployment, and growth: evidence from U.S. Industries. Retrieved 20.07.2020 from https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/advocacy/rs394tot.pdf.
• Rampini, A. (2004). Entrepreneurial activity, risk, and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(3), 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.06.003.
• Remington, T.F., & Marques II, I. (2020). Partnerships for skill development in Russia. Post-Communist Economies, 32(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1640990.
• Rocha, H.O., & Sternberg, R. (2005). Entrepreneurship: the role of clusters theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1993-9.
• Roman, C., Congregado, E., & Millán, J.M. (2013). Start-up incentives: entrepreneurship policy or active labour market programme. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.01.004.
• Stephens, H.M., Partridge, M.D., & Faggian, A. (2013). Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 778-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12019.
• Supreme Audit Office. (2015). Dotacje z funduszu pracy na podjęcie działalności gospodarczej w Polsce Wschodniej. Retrieved 20.07.2020 from https://bip.nik.gov.pl/kontrole/wyniki-kontroli-nik/pobierz,llu~p_14_093_201409150934111410773651~01,typ,kk.pdf.
• Urbano, D., Audretsch, D., Aparicio, S., & Noguera, M. (2020). Does entrepreneurial activity matter for economic growth in developing countries: the role of the institutional environment. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1065-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00621-5.
• van Stel, A.J., & Storey, D.J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: is there a upas tree effect. Regional Studies, 38(8), 893-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280929.
• van Stel, A.J., Barrientos-Marín, J., Caçador-Rodrigues, L., Millán, A., & Millán, J.M. (2021). Measuring performance differentials across entrepreneurship types. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00755-5.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.041