Discourse Construction by Non-Government Actors in Urban Regeneration Governance

• Autorzy: Aleksandra Zubrzycka-Czarnecka
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper employs critical discourse analysis to examine how Warsaw citizens (residents) perceived and organized the narratives of their participation in the governance of urban regeneration between 2004 and 2016 and how this evolved over that period. The study reveals citizens' discursive practices, such as the construction of positive and negative identities of the relevant social actors, the binary opposition between 'us and them', the development of new interpretations of urban regeneration, and finally, the gradual elaboration of a model of empowered citizenship. Drawing on the concept of democratic urban regeneration policymaking, the research suggests that in the case of Warsaw, one can speak of a shift from a citizen discourse of rebellious participation in non-deliberative governance towards one of more consensual and empowering participation in more deliberative governance. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Democracy; Participatory democracy; City revitalization; City management

PL

Demokracja; Demokracja uczestnicząca; Rewitalizacja miasta; Zarządzanie miastem

• Czasopismo: Polish Political Science Review. Polski Przegląd Politologiczny
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: Vol. 9, Iss. 2
• Strony: 40--51

Twórcy

autor

Aleksandra Zubrzycka-Czarnecka

• University of Warsaw

Bibliografia

• Atkinson, R., Tallon A., and Williams D. (2019). Governing urban regeneration in the UK: a case of "variegated neoliberalism" in action?. European Planning Studies. Vol. 27, No. 6, 1083-1106.
• Berry, M. (2014). Neoliberalism and the city: Or the failure of market fundamentalism. Housing Theory and Society. Vol. 31, No. 1, 1-18.
• Cohen J. (1997). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In J. Bohman, W. Rehg (eds.). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press, 67-91.
• Daniel K. (2020). Partycypacja obywatelska na poziomie lokalnym - przykład miasta Opola. Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne. Vol. 28, 133-145.
• Edelman M. (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Edelman M. (2001). The Politics of Misinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fairclough N. (2003). Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London Routledge.
• Fairclough N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies. Vol. 7, No. 2, 177-197.
• Farrelly M., Sullivan H. (2010). Discourses of democracy in neighborhood governance. Critical Policy Studies. Vol. 4. No. 3, 234-249.
• Fischer F. (2012). Participatory governance: From Theory to Practice. In. D. Levi-Faur (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 457-71.
• Galvin M., Mooney Simmie G. (2017). Theorising participation in urban regeneration partnerships: an adult education perspective. Journal of Education Policy. Vol. 32, No. 6, 809-831.
• Hilmer J. (2010). The State of Participatory Democratic Theory. New Political Science. Vol. 32, No. 1, 43-63.
• Jaśkowiec D. (2017). Partycypacja obywatelska jako utopijna wizja samorządzenia społeczności lokalnych... - na przykładzie miasta Krakowa'. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica. Vol. 18, No. 247, 40-49.
• Kennelly K., Watt P. (2012). Seeing Olympic eff ects through the eyes of marginally housed youth: changing places and the gentrification of East London. Visual Studies. Vol. 27, No. 2, 151-160.
• Office of the Capital City Of Warsaw (2008) Local Urban Regeneration Program for the years 2005-2013. (2008). Available at: https://rewitalizacja.um.warszawa.pl/lokalny-program-rewitalizacji-mst-warszawy
• Office of the Capital City Of Warsaw (2015) Integrated Urban Regeneration Program until 2022. Available at: http://rewitalizacja.um.warszawa.pl/zintegrowany-program-rewitalizacji
• Lowndes V., and Sullivan H. (2008). How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance. Public administration. Vol. 86, No. 1, 53-74.
• Merkel W., and Gagnon J.-P. (2016). Democracies and their Crises Reconsidered [Interview]. Democratic Theory. Vol. 3, No. 1, 91-109.
• Ogrodowski J. (2017). Partycypacja społeczna i partnerstwo w rewitalizacji. Report for the Instytut Rozwoju Miast Kraków.
• Pawłowska A., Kmieciak R., Radzik-Maruszak K., Antkowiak P., Kołomycew A. (2020). Od dialogu do deliberacji. Podmioty niepubliczne jako (nie)obecny uczestnik lokalnego procesu decyzyjnego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Pawłowska A., Radzik-Maruszak K. (2016). Instytucjonalno-prawne warunki partycypacji i dialogu obywatelskiego na poziomie lokalnym (na przykładzie wybranych miast). Acta Politica. Vol. 3, No. 37, 19-38.
• Pawłowska A., Radzik-Maruszak K. (2021). Social councils - responsible actors in collaborative local governance or silent information-providers? Empirical evidence from selected Polish cities. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne. Vol. 1, No. 83.
• Pierre J., Peters B., G. (2012). Urban governance. In. K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke, P. John (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71-86.
• Radzik-Maruszak K., Haveri A., Pawłowska A. (2020). Pro-Civic Representation? Citizens' Participation in the Opinion of Finnish and Polish Local Councilors. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Science. No. 60E/June, 85-103.
• Radziszewski M. (2016). Budżet obywatelski instrumentem rozwoju kapitału społecznego. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne. Vol. 51, 131-154.
• Richardson J. E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Rowe G., Frewer L., J. (2004). Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values. Vol. 29, No. 4, 512-556.
• Van Til J., Van Til S. B. (1970). Citizen Participation in Social Policy: The End of the Cycle?. Social Problems. Vol. 17, No. 3, 313-323.
• Vandenbussche L. (2018). Mapping Stakeholders' Relating Pathways in Collaborative Planning Processes; A Longitudinal Case Study of an Urban Regeneration Partnership. Planning Theory & Practice. Vol. 19, No. 4, 534-557.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ppsr-2021-0011