State's Role and Methods of Impact on Its Economy in a Transition Period

• Autorzy: Giorgi Kharshiladze

Warianty tytułu

Rola państwa i metody jego wpływu na własną gospodarkę w okresie przejściowym

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article discusses the transformation process and state's economic role in the transition period. The article also deals with the main objectives and goals of state regulations, the peculiarities of countries' socio-economic formation and procedures of institutional transformation. A government's role in economic development is changing during the transition period. The main important issues that must be set are strictly centralised state regulations and forms that are completely new systems in economic management, which should be achieved through the elimination of a state's domination over the economic system, strengthening a privatisation process and so on. It is true that the government's dominating power should be eliminated but establishing a new marketing-institutional environment and market culture should be developed only under the state's active legislative, coordinative and stimulating control. The theoretical basis of the article represents the researches of foreign scientists, economists and international organisation. The methodological basis of the article is based on economic analysis, comparison, and grouping methods. While preparing the article, modern experimental methods and model of macro-economic researches, as well as researches and statistical data, approaches and methodology of several international organisations were widely used. (original abstract)

W artykule omówiono proces transformacji i gospodarczą rolę państwa w okresie przejściowym. Ukazuje on również główne cele regulacji państwowych, specyfikę społeczno-ekonomicznego formowania się krajów oraz procedur transformacji instytucjonalnej. Rola rządu w rozwoju gospodarczym zmienia się w okresie przejściowym. Główne ważne kwestie, którymi należy się zająć, to ściśle scentralizowane przepisy i formy państwa, które są całkowicie nowymi systemami zarządzania gospodarczego, które należy osiągnąć poprzez wyeliminowanie dominacji państwa nad systemem gospodarczym, wzmocnienie procesu prywatyzacji itd. Prawdą jest, że dominująca pozycja rządu powinna zostać wyeliminowana, ale stworzenie nowego środowiska instytucjonalnego i kultury rynkowej powinno być prowadzone jedynie pod aktywną kontrolą legislacyjną, koordynacyjną i stymulacyjną państwa. Teoretyczna podstawa artykułu przedstawia badania zagranicznych naukowców, ekonomistów i organizacji międzynarodowej. Podstawa metodologiczna opiera się na analizie ekonomicznej, porównaniu i metodach grupowania. Podczas przygotowywania artykułu powszechnie stosowano nowoczesne metody eksperymentalne i model badań makroekonomicznych, a także badania i dane statystyczne, podejścia i metodologię kilku organizacji międzynarodowych. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Systemic transformations in the economy; States' role in economy; Institutional transformation; Economic growth

PL

Przekształcenia systemowe w gospodarce; Rola państwa w gospodarce; Przemiany instytucjonalne; Wzrost gospodarczy

• Czasopismo: Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: nr 1 (71)
• Strony: 77--99

Twórcy

autor

Giorgi Kharshiladze

• Georgian National University

Bibliografia

• Arndt, Heinz W. 1988. "'Market Failure' and Underdevelopment." World Development, vol. 16, no. 2.
• Aristovnik, Aleksander (19 July, 2006) - "The determinants & Excessiveness of current account deficits in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union." William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan.
• Alan Smith, Introduction in Alan Smith (editor), Challenges for Russian Economic Reform, 1995, London: Royal Institute for International Affairs and Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
• Garnaut, Ross. 1991. "The Market and the State in Economic Development: Applications to the International Trading System," The Singapore Economic Review, vol. 26, no. 2.
• EBRD, Transition Report 1994, London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
• EBRD, Transition Report 2000, London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
• EBRD, Transition Report 2008, London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
• EBRD, Transition Report 2010, London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
• EBRD, Transition Report 2013, London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
• Galbraith, John K. 1990. "Revolt in Our Time: The Triumph of Simplistic Ideology."
• Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 1978. Between Power and Plenty (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press; Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975 (Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• László Csaba, Transformation as a subject of economic theory in Zbyněk Balandrán and Vít Havránek, Atlas of Transformation, 2011, Jeffrey Sachs, What I did in Russia, posted 14 March 2012.
• Michael Kaser on Privatization in the CIS in Alan Smith (editor), Challenges for Russian Economic Reform, 1995, London: Royal Institute for International Affairs and Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
• Havrylyshyn, Oleh; Wolf, Thomas. "Determinants of Growth in Transition Countries, Finance & Development Magazine, June 1999, Volume 36, Number 2 by the International Monetary Fund.
• Marie Lavigne, The Economies of Transition: From socialist economy to market economy, 1995, London: Macmillan.
• Marie Lavigne, The Economies of Transition: From socialist economy to market economy, 1995, London: Macmillan.
• MF staff estimates in Stanley Fischer, Ratna Sahay and Carlos Vegh, Stabilization and growth in transition economies: The early experience, April 1996, IMF Working Paper WP/96/31; downloaded from http:// mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20631/; retrieved on 1/11.2013; UNDP, Human Development Report for Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS, 1999, New York: United Nations Development Programme.
• "Transition Economies: An IMF Perspective and Progress and Prospects". IMF. 3 November 2000.
• Napier Nancy K, Vuong Quan Hoang - What we see, why we worry, why we hope: Vietnam going forward, October 2013.
• Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, (Cambridge University Press).
• Kornai, Janos. 1992. "The Post Socialist Transition and the State: Reflection in the Light of Hungarian Fiscal Problems," American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 2.
• The first ten years: Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union" (PDF). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 2002 Retrieved 9 March 2009.
• Voung, Vuan-Hoang: Financial Markets in Vietnam's Transition Economy: Facts, insights, implication Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Feb. 2010.
• Simon Clarke (editor), Structural Adjustment without Mass Unemployment? Lessons from Russia, 1998, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, J. L. Porket, Unemployment in Capitalist, Communist and Post-Communist Economies, 1995, London: Macmillan.
• Thompson, E. P. 1971. "The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century," Past and Present, no. 50.
• The UNDP used a poverty line of $4 per person per day in 1990 dollars at purchasing power parity; UNDP, Human Development Report for Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS, 1999, New York: United Nations Development Programme.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26399/meip.1(71).2021.04/g.kharshiladze