PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2022 | nr 71 | 50
Tytuł artykułu

Are Ideas Really Getting Harder To Find? R&D Capital and the Idea Production Function

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
We supplement the 'Idea Production Function' (IPF) with measures of R&D capital. We construct a time series of R&D capital stock in the US (1968-2019), and estimate the IPF allowing for a flexible treatment of unit productivity of R&D capital and R&D labor. We find that the elasticity of substitution between R&D input factors is 0.7-0.8 and significantly below unity. This implies that R&D capital is an essential factor in producing ideas, complementary to R&D labor. We also identify a systematic positive trend in R&D labor productivity at about 1% per year on average and a cyclical trend in R&D capital productivity. Our results can be used to revisit the ongoing discussion on whether ideas are getting harder to find, and to assess recent developments in total factor productivity growth. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
50
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics
autor
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, USA
autor
  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics
Bibliografia
  • Ang, James B., Jakob B. Madsen. 2011. Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain the Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production in the Asian Miracle Economies? Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4): 1360-1373.
  • Ark, Bart van, Kirsten Jäger. 2017. Recent Trends in Europe's Output and Productivity Growth Performance at the Sector Level, 2002-2015. International Productivity Monitor, 33(Fall): 8-23.
  • Aum, Sangmin, Sang Yoon Lee, Yongseok Shin. 2018. Computerizing Industries and Routinizing Jobs: Explaining Trends in Aggregate Productivity. Journal of Monetary Economics, 97: 1-21.
  • Bai, Jushan, Pierre Perron. 1998. Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes. Econometrica, 66(1): 47-78.
  • Bai, Jushan, Pierre Perron. 2003. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1): 1-22.
  • Bernstein, Jeffrey I., Theofanis P. Mamuneas. 2006. R&D depreciation, stocks, user costs and productivity growth for US R&D intensive industries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17(1): 70-98.
  • Bloom, Nicholas, Charles I. Jones, John Van Reenen, and Michael Webb. 2020. Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? American Economic Review, 110(4): 1104-1144.
  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Manuel Trajtenberg. 1995. General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth? Journal of Econometrics, 65: 83-108.
  • Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton & Co.
  • Brynjolfsson, Erik, Daniel Rock, Chad Syverson. 2019. Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics, pp.23-57, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, eds.: A. Agrawal, J. Gans, A. Goldfarb, University of Chicago Press.
  • Christiano, Lawrence J., Terry J. Fitzgerald. 2003. The Band Pass Filter. International Economic Review, 44(2): 435-465.
  • Christopoulos, Dimitris K., and Miguel A. León-Ledesma. 2010. Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: Post-Bretton Woods real exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(6): 1076-1093.
  • De Loecker, Jan, Jan Eeckhout, and Gabriel Unger. 2020. The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2): 561-644.
  • Feenstra, Robert C., Robert Inklaar, and Marcel P. Timmer. 2015. The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10): 3150-3182.
  • Fernald, John G. 2018. A quarterly, utilization-adjusted series on total factor productivity. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series 2012-19 (current update).
  • Fernald, John G., J. Christina Wang. 2016.Why Has the Cyclicality of Productivity Changed? What Does It Mean? Annual Review of Economics, 8(1): 465-496.
  • Fernald, John G., Robert E. Hall, James H. Stock, and Mark W. Watson. 2017. The Disappointing Recovery of Output after 2009. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 48(1 (Spring): 1-81.
  • Gordon, Robert J. 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living since the Civil War. Princeton University Press.
  • Greenwood, Jeremy, Zvi Hercowitz, Per Krusell. 1997. Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change. American Economic Review, 87(3): 342-62.
  • Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman, Ezra Oberfield, and Thomas Sampson. 2017. The Productivity Slowdown and the Declining Labor Share: A Neoclassical Exploration. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc NBER Working Papers 23853.
  • Growiec, Jakub. 2019. The Hardware-Software Model: A New Conceptual Framework of Production, R&D, and Growth with AI. SGH Warsaw School of Economics KAE Working Paper No. 2019/042.
  • Growiec, Jakub. 2022. What Will Drive Global Economic Growth in the Digital Age? SGH Warsaw School of Economics KAE Working Paper No. 2020/054.
  • Ha, Joonkyung, Peter Howitt. 2007. Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(4): 733-774.
  • Jones, Charles I. 1995. Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 495-525.
  • Jones, Charles I. 1999. Growth: With or Without Scale Effects? American Economic Review, 89(2):139-144.
  • Jones, Charles I. 2002. Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas. American Economic Review, 92: 220-239.
  • Jones, Charles I. 2021. The Past and Future of Economic Growth: A Semi-Endogenous Perspective. Annual Review of Economics, forthcoming.
  • Jorgenson, Dale W. 2005.Accounting for Growth in the Information Age. In Handbook of Economic Growth, eds.: P. Aghion, S.N. Durlauf, North-Holland.
  • Klump, Rainer, Olivier de La Grandville. 2000. Economic growth and the elasticity of substitution: Two theorems and some suggestions. American Economic Review, 90(1): 282-291.
  • Klump, Rainer, Peter McAdam, Alpo Willman. 2007. Factor Substitution and Factor Augmenting Technical Progress in the US. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89: 183-192.
  • Klump, Rainer, Peter McAdam, Alpo Willman. 2012. The Normalized CES Production Function: Theory and Empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5): 769-799.
  • Kruse-Andersen, Peter K. 2017. Testing R&D-Based Endogenous Growth Models. University of Copenhagen Working Paper.
  • La Grandville, Olivier de 1989. In Quest of the Slutzky Diamond. American Economic Review, 79: 468-481.
  • León-Ledesma, Miguel A., Peter McAdam, and Alpo Willman. 2010. Identifying the Elasticity of Substitution with Biased Technical Change. American Economic Review, 100(4): 1330-1357.
  • Li, Wendy C.Y., Bronwyn H. Hall. 2019. Depreciation of Business R&D Capital, Review of Income and Wealth, 66(1): 161-180.
  • Madsen, Jakob B. 2008. Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(1): 1-26.
  • Marco, Alan C., Michael Carley, Steven Jackson, and Amanda Myers. 2015. The USPTO Historical Patent Data Files: Two Centuries of Innovation, Office of Chief Economist U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Working Papers.
  • Oberfield, Ezra, Devesh Raval. 2021. Micro Data and Macro Technology, Econometrica, 89(2): 703-732.
  • OECD. 2009. Measuring Capital OECD Manual, 2nd Edition. OECD Publications.
  • OECD. 2015. Frascati Manual 2015. OECD Publications.
  • Ramey, Valerie A. 2020. Secular stagnation or technological lull? Presented at the 2020 AEA session The United States Economy: Growth, Stagnation or New Financial Crisis?, January 3, San Diego.
  • Rivera-Batiz, LuisA., Paul M. Romer. 1991. Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2): 531-555.
  • Romer, Paul M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98: S71-S102.
  • Ruggles, Steven, Sarah Flood, Ronald Goeken, Josiah Grover, Erin Meyer, Jose Pacas, Matthew Sobek. 2019. IPUMS USA: Version 9.0 [dataset].
  • Sato, Ryuzo. 1970. The Estimation of Biased Technical Progress and the Production Function. International Economic Review, 11(2): 179-208.
  • Venturini, Francesco. 2012. Looking into the black box of Schumpeterian growth theories: An empirical assessment of R&D races. European Economic Review, 56(8): 1530 - 1545.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171639887

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.