The Concept of Eco-Efficiency In Fisheries. A Literature Review

• Autorzy: Kalina Piwońska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In light of the decreasing level of biodiversity in the seas and oceans, humanity has to take action to simultaneously maintain a socio-ecological balance and a satisfactory level of fish catches. The degree to which these priorities are achieved can be analyzed using measures of eco-efficiency. The aim of this paper is to present the concept of eco-efficiency in fisheries in literature. In other words, to find out and compare which definitions and measurement methods are most often used by researchers in this area. For this purpose, manual content analysis has been used to research documents available in the SCOPUS database. The review found that, while literature on eco-efficiency in agriculture is abundant, there is still a deficit of research strictly on the fisheries sector. Among 980 articles, only 8 dealt accurately with the selected issue. The most common definition of eco-efficiency is the one proposed by the WBCSD, and the dominant method for measuring eco-efficiency in fisheries is DEA+LCA; however, social aspects are often omitted in these studies, and the studies themselves have a short time span. It is also mentioned that the results obtained in fisheries have lower reliability than in the agricultural sector, mainly due to the phenomenon of bycatch and poorer control of activity at sea.(original abstract)

W obliczu zmniejszającego się poziomu bioróżnorodności mórz i oceanów, ludzkość zmuszona jest do podejmowania działań, mających na celu jednoczesne utrzymanie równowagi społeczno-ekologicznej oraz podtrzymanie zadowalającego poziomu połowów ryb. Stopień osiągnięcia tych priorytetów może być analizowany za pomocą miar ekoefektywności. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie koncepcji ekoefektywności w rybołówstwie w literaturze przedmiotu. Innymi słowy, poznanie i porównanie, jakimi definicjami i metodami pomiaru najczęściej posługują się badacze tego obszaru. W tym celu do badania artykułów naukowych dostępnych w bazie SCOPUS wykorzystano manualną analizę treści. W wyniku przeglądu stwierdzono, że choć literatura dotycząca ekoefektywności w rolnictwie jest bogata, to nadal istnieje deficyt badań dotyczących ściśle sektora rybołówstwa. Spośród 980 wstępnie wyselekcjonowanych artykułów, tylko w 8 zajmowano się zagadnieniem ekoefektywności w kontekście badanego w artykule sektora. Najczęściej występującą definicją ekoefektywności jest ta zaproponowana przez WBCSD, a dominującą metodą w pomiarze poziomu ekoefektywności w rybołówstwie jest DEA+LCA. Jednak często pomija się w tych badaniach aspekty społeczne, a same badania cechują się krótkim przedziałem czasowym. Wspomina się również, że uzyskane wyniki w rybołówstwie charakteryzują się niższą wiarygodnością niż sektorze rolniczym, głównie przez zjawisko przyłowu i uboższy sposób kontroli aktywności na morzu.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sustainable development; Fishery; Data analysis

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Rybołówstwo; Analiza danych

• Czasopismo: Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 23
• Numer: z. 4
• Strony: 149--167

Twórcy

autor

Kalina Piwońska

• Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Arreguín-Sánchez Francisco, Thelma Mónica Ruiz-Barreiro. 2014. Approaching a functional measure of vulnerability in marine ecosystems. Ecological Indicators 45: 130-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.009.
• 2. Avadí Ángel, Ivonne Acosta-Alba. 2021. Eco-efficiency of the fisheries value chains in the Gambia and mali. Foods 10 (7):1-21. DOI: 10.3390/foods10071620.
• 3. Avadí Ángel, Ian Vázquez-Roweb, Pierre Fréon. 2014. Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+DEA framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 70: 118-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.047.
• 4. Basset-Mens Claudine, Stewart Ledgard, Mark Boyes. 2009. Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in new Zealand. Ecological Economics 68 (6): 1615-1625. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.017.
• 5. Blanco Sonia L., Cristina Sobrado, Corina Quintela, Santiago Cabaleiro, José González, Juan Vieites. 2007. Dietary uptake of dioxins (PCDD/PCDFs) and dioxin-like PCBs in Spanish aquacultured turbot (psetta maxima). Food Additives and Contaminants 24 (4): 421-428. DOI: 10.1080/02652030601064821.
• 6. Bravo-Olivas Myrna, Rosa Chávez-Dagostino. 2020. Sustainable fishing? Ecological footprint analysis of an artisanal fishing organization. The Open Environmental Research Journal 13 (1): 1-10. DOI: 10.2174/1874213002013010001.
• 7. Belschner Tobias, Johanna Ferretti, Harry Strehlow, Sarah B.M. Kraak, Ralf Döring, Gerd Kraus, Alexander Kempf, Christopher Zimmermann. 2019. Evaluating fisheries systems: A comprehensive analytical framework and its application to the EU's common fisheries policy. Fish and Fisheries 20 (1): 97-109. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12325.
• 8. Berdnikov Sergey, Valerii Kulygin, Vera Sorokina, L.V. Dashkevich, Igor Sheverdyaev. 2019. An integrated mathematical model of the large marine ecosystem of the Barents Sea and the White Sea as a tool for assessing natural risks and efficient use of biological resources. Doklady Earth Sciences 487 (2): 963-968. DOI: 10.1134/S1028334X19080117.
• 9. Caiado Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão, Raquel de Freitas Dias, Lisiane Veiga Mattos, Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas, Wale rLeal Filho. 2017. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of ecoefficiency: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 165: 890-904. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166.
• 10. Cao Shouqi, Yu Song, Zhang Zheng. 2020. GPS relative positioning strategies for the fishery internet of things. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 36 (10): 158-165. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.10.019.
• 11. Cortés Antonio, Ramón Casillas-Hernández, Cristina Cambeses-Franco, Rafael Bórquez-López, Francisco Magallón-Barajas, Walter Quadros-Seiffert, Gumersindo Feijoo, Maria Teresa Moreira. 2021. Eco-efficiency assessment of shrimp aquaculture production in Mexico. Aquaculture 544: 737145. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737145.
• 12. Chen Jyun-Long, Yu-Sheng Lin, Ching-Ta Chuang. 2018. Improving the management of Taiwanese fishery resource conservation zones based on public perceptions and willingness to pay for ecosystem services. Journal of Coastal Conservation 22 (2): 385-398. DOI: 10.1007/s11852-017-0586-5.
• 13. DeSimone Livio D., Frank Popoff. 1997. Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainability. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• 14. FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization). 2020. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture, http://www.fao.org/3/ca9229en/online/ca9229en.html, access: 10.10.2021.
• 15. Freeman Alen V. Kneese, A. Myrick III, Robert H. Haveman. 1973. The economics of environmental policy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• 16. Gao Lei, Taowu Pei, Tielong Wang, Yue Hao, Chao Li, Yu Tian, Xu Wang, Jingran Zhang, Weiming Song, Chao Yang. 2021. What type of industrial agglomeration is beneficial to the eco-efficiency of northwest china? Sustainability (Switzerland) 13 (1): 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/su13010163.
• 17. García-Santiago Xela, Amaya Franco-Uría, Luis T. Antelo, José A. Vázquez, Ricardo Pérez-Martín, Teresa Moreira, Gumersindo Feijoo. 2020. Eco-efficiency of a marine biorefinery for valorization of cartilaginous fish biomass. Journal of Industrial Ecology 25 (3): 789-801. DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13066.
• 18. González-García Sara, Pedro Villanueva-Rey, Sara Belo, Ian Vázquez-Rowe, Maria Teresa Moreira, Gumersindo Feijoo, Luis Arroja. 2015. Cross-vessel eco-efficiency analysis. A case study for purse seining fishing from north Portugal targeting European pilchard. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20 (7): 1019-1032. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0887-6.
• 19. Halkos George, Kleoniki Natalia Petrou. 2019. Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review. Economic Analysis and Policy 62: 97-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2019.01.005.
• 20. Hoffren Jukka. 2006. Reconsidering quantification of eco-efficiency: Application to a national economy. Progress in Industrial Ecology an International Journal 3 (6): 538-558. DOI: 10.1504/PIE.2006.012752.
• 21. Janisse Kevyn, Pauline M. Capelle, John W. Heath, Mitchel G. Dender, Daniel D. Heath, Christina A.D. Semeniuk. 2019. Life in captivity: Varied behavioural responses to novel setting and food types in first-generation hybrids of farmed and wild juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 76 (11): 1962-1970. DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2018-0311.
• 22. Kao Yu-Chun, Mark Rogers, David B. Bunnell, Ian G. Cowx, Song S. Qian et al. 2020. Effects of climate and land-use changes on fish catches across lakes at a global scale. Nature Communications 11 (1): 2526. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14624-2.
• 23. Kelly Joe, Wolfgang Haider, Peter W. Williams, Krista Englund. 2007. Stated preferences of tourists for eco-efficient destination planning options. Tourism Management 28 (2): 377-390. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.015.
• 24. Laso Jara, Ian Vázquez-Rowe, María Margallo, Ángel Irabien, Rubén Aldaco. 2018a. Revisiting the LCA+DEA method in fishing fleets. How should we be measuring efficiency? Marine Policy 91: 34-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.030.
• 25. Laso Jara, Isabel García-Herrero, María Margallo, Ian Vázquez-Rowe, Pére Fullana, Alba Bala, Cristina Gazulla, Ángel Irabien, RubénAldaco. 2018b. Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: An eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 133: 428-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.004.
• 26. Lockwood Ben. 2018. Pareto efficiency. [In] The new palgrave dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• 27. Lorenzo-Toja Yago, Ian Vázquez-Rowe, María José Amores, Montserrat Termes-Riféc, Desirée Marín-Navarro, María Teresa Moreira, Gumersindo Feijoo. 2016. Benchmarking wastewater treatment plants under an eco-efficiency perspective. Science of the Total Environment 566-567: 468-479. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.110.
• 28. Matuszczak Anna, Łukasz Kryszak, Bazyli Czyżewski, Artur Łopatka. 2020. Environment and political economics: Left-wing liberalism or conservative leftism - which is better for eco-efficiency? Evidence from Poland. Science of The Total Environment 743: 140779. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140779.
• 29. Modzelewski Piotr. 2011. System zarządzania jakością a skuteczność i efektywność administracji samorządowej (The quality management system versus the effectiveness and efficiency of local administration). Warszawa: CeDeWu Sp. z o.o.
• 30. Papież Monika, Sławomir Śmiech, Katarzyna Frodyma. 2019. Factors affecting the efficiency of wind power in the European Union countries. Energy Policy 132: 965-977. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.036.
• 31. Rebolledo-Leiva Ricardo, Lidia Angulo-Meza, Alfredo Iriarte, Marcela C. González-Araya. 2017. Joint carbon footprint assessment and data envelopment analysis for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture production. Science of the Total Environment 593-594: 36-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.147.
• 32. Repar Nina, Pierrick Jan, Dunja Dux, Thomas Nemecek, Reiner Doluschitz. 2017. Implementing farm-level environmental sustainability in environmental performance indicators: A combined global-local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 140 (2): 692-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.022.
• 33. Rutkowska Anna. 2013. Theoretical aspects of efficiency - the concept and methods of measurement. Zarządzanie i Finanse 11 (1): 439-453.
• 34. Samuelson Paul A., William D. Nordhaus. 2005. Ekonomia (Economy). Warszawa: PWN.
• 35. Schaltegger Stefan, Andreas Sturm. 1990. Öcologische Rationalität (Environmental rationality). Die Unternehmung 44 (4): 117-131.
• 36. Stępień Sebastian, Bazyli Czyżewski, Agnieszka Sapa, Michał Borychowski, Walenty Poczta, Agnieszka Poczta-Wajda. 2020. Eco-efficiency of small-scale farming in Poland and its institutional drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production 279: 123721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123721.
• 37. Tilley Alexander, Joctan Dos Reis Lopes, Shaun P. Wilkinson. 2020. PeskAAS: A near-real-time, open-source monitoring and analytics system for small-scale fisheries. PLoS ONE 15 (11 November). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234760.
• 38. Vázquez-Rowe Ian, Diego Iribarren, Almudena Hospido, Teresa Moreira, Gumersindo Feijoo. 2011. Computation of operational and environmental benchmarks within selected Galician fishing fleets. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15 (5): 776-795. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00360. x.
• 39. Vázquez-Rowe Ian, Diego Iribarren, Teresa Moreira, Gumersindo Feijoo. 2010. Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15 (3): 272-283. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-010-0154-9.
• 40. Vázquez-Rowe Ian, Peter Tyedmers. 2013. Identifying the importance of the "skipper effect" within sources of measured inefficiency in fisheries through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Marine Policy 38: 387-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.018.
• 41. Vázquez-Rowe Ian, Pedro Villanueva-Rey, Diego Iribarren, Teresa Moreira, Gumersindo Feijoo. 2012. Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis of grape production for vinification in the Rías Baixas appellation (NW Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production 27: 92-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.039.
• 42. Wackernagel Mathis, William Rees. 1996. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
• 43. Willison Martin J.H., Raymond P. Côté. 2009. Counting biodiversity waste in industrial eco-efficiency: Fisheries case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (3): 348-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.003.
• 44. Yang Kai, Wang Yao-Wu, Xue Wei-Rui. 2013. Industry eco-efficiency regional differences and anti-gradient development strategy under regional gradient development model in China. System Engineering - Theory and Practice 33 (12): 3095-3102. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(2013)12-3095.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.5224