Comparative Arguments in the Legal Debate Over Judiciary Reform in Poland

• Autorzy: Rett R. Ludwikowski , Izabela Kraśnicka

Warianty tytułu

Argumenty porównawcze w prawniczej debacie nad reformą sądownictwa w Polsce

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The judiciary reform in Poland started in 2015 with the replacement of judges in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, the court responsible for the judicial review. It continued with amendments of laws addressed to judges and functioning of the Polish Supreme Court. Controversies over the reform reached the international level and triggered reactions from the European institutions and resulted in judgments of the Court of Justice. The article deals with comparative arguments (examples from the United States, Austria, France or Germany) concerning the extensive judiciary reform that have been presented by its authors throughout the debates and as response to criticism. (original abstract)

Reforma sądownictwa w Polsce rozpoczęła się w 2015 roku od wymiany sędziów w polskim Trybunale Konstytucyjnym, sądzie odpowiedzialnym za kontrolę konstytucyjności prawa. Reforma była kontynuowana poprzez zmiany ustaw dotyczących sędziów i sposobu funkcjonowania polskiego Sądu Najwyższego. Kontrowersje wokół reformy osiągnęły poziom międzynarodowy i wywołały reakcje instytucji europejskich oraz zaowocowały wyrokami Trybunału Sprawiedliwości.
W artykule omówiono argumenty porównawcze (przykłady ze Stanów Zjednoczonych, Austrii, Francji czy Niemiec) dotyczące szeroko zakrojonej reformy sądownictwa, które były przedstawiane przez jej autorów w toku debat i jako odpowiedź na krytykę. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Judicature; Judicial reform

PL

Sądownictwo; Reforma sądownictwa

• Czasopismo: Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe
• Rocznik: 2021
• Numer: nr 2 Globalne wyzwania u progu trzeciej dekady XXI wieku
• Strony: 95--118

Twórcy

autor

Rett R. Ludwikowski

• Columbus School of Law; The Catholic University of America

autor

Izabela Kraśnicka

• Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

Bibliografia

• Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [The Constitution of the Republic of Poland] Apr. 2, 1997, Dz. U. 78.483.
• Constitution of the United States of America.
• Staatsgrundgesetz [The Federal Constitutional Law] of 1920 as amended in 1929, Law No. 153/2004.
• Treaty on the European Union, Feb. 7, 1992, 1992 O.J. (C191) 1.
• Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Sept. 5, 2008, 2008 O.J. (C 115) 47.
• Bundesverfassungsgerichts-Gesetz [Federal Constitutional Court Act], 12 March 1951, Federal Law Gazette I, p. 1473.
• Ustawa z dnia 19 listopada 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym [Act of 19 November 2015 amending the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal], Dz. U. 1928.
• Ustawa z dnia 22 grudnia 2015 r. o zmianie ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym [Act of 22 December 2015 amending the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal] Dz. U. 2217.
• Ustawa z dnia 28 stycznia 2016 r. Prawo o prokuraturze [Act of 28 January 2016 on the Law on Prosecutor's Office], Dz. U. 177.
• Ustawa z dnia 22 lipca 2016 r. o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym [Act of 22 July 2016 on the Constitutional Tribunal] Dz. U. 1157.
• Ustawa z dnia 12 maja 2011 r. o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa [Act of 12 May 2011 on the National Council for the Judiciary], Dz. U. 126.714.
• Uchwała 158/2019 Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa z dnia 24 stycznia 2019 r. w sprawie Regulaminu Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa [Resolution of the National Council for the Judiciary of 24 January 2019 concerning the Rules of Procedure of the National Council Judiciary], M.P. 192.
• Trybunał Konstytucyjny [Constitutional Tribunal] Dec. 3, 2015, K 34/15.
• Trybunał Konstytucyjny [Constitutional Tribunal] Dec. 9, 2015 K 35/15.
• Trybunał Konstytucyjny [Constitutional Tribunal] Mar. 9, 2016, K 47/16.
• Case C - 36/75 Roland Rutili v Ministre de I'interieur, 1975 ECLI:EU:C:1975:137.
• Proposal of the European Commission for a "Council Decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law", 2017, COM/2017/0835 final - 2017/0360 (NLE).
• Opinion of the ENCJ Executive Board on the adoption of the amendments to the law on the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa of Poland, at 2, https://encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/Members/krs_pl_opinion_encj_eb_5_dec_2017.pdf [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Arnull A. et al. (eds.), Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis Jacobs, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
• Bogdanowicz P., Schmidt M., The infringement procedure in the rule of law crisis: How to make effective use of Article 258 TFEU, 55, "Common Market Law Review" 2018, vol. 55, no. 4.
• Delmas-Marty M., Spencer J.R. (eds.), European Criminal Procedures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
• Doran S., Jackson J., The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2000.
• Elliott C., Vernon C., Jeanpierre E., French Legal System, Pearson-Longman, Prentice Hall 2006.
• Granat K., The Principle of Subsidiarity and its Enforcement in the EU Legal Order. The Role of National Parliaments in the Early Warning System, Oxford, Hart Publishing 2018.
• Granat M., Granat K., The Constitution of Poland. A Contextual Analysis, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2019.
• Hodgson J., French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2005.
• Jakab A., Dyevre A., Itzcovich G. (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2017.
• Kochenov D., Pech L., Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality, "European Constitutional Law Review" 2015, vol. 11 (3).
• Kułak K., Kwestia niezależności prokuratora w nowej ustawie - Prawo o prokuraturze [The Issue of the Prosecutor's Autonomy in the New Act - Law on the Prosecutor's Office], "Studia Iuridica Lublinensia" 2016, vol. 25 (105).
• Kustra A., Poland's Constitutional Crisis. From Court-Packing Agenda to Denial of Constitutional Court's Judgments, "Studi Polacco-Italliani di Toruń" 2016, vol. XII.
• Kustra-Rogatka A., The Polish Constitutional Court and Political "Revolution" after 1989: Between the Continuity and Discontinuity of the Constitutional Narrative, "Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration and Economics" 2016, vol. 6.
• Ludwikowski R., Judicial Review in the Socialist Legal System: Current Developments, "The International and Comparative Law Quarterly" 1988, vol. 37, no 1.
• Pech L., Scheppele K.L., Illiberalism within: rule of law backsliding in the EU, "Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies" 2017, vol. 19.
• Segado F.F. (ed.), The Spanish Constitution in the European Constitutional Context, Dickinson, Madrid 2003.
• Skrodzka M. (ed.), Subsydiarność - uwarunkowania, regulacje i praktyka [Subsidiarity - conditions, regulations and practice], C.H. Beck, Warszawa 2020.
• Śledzińska-Simon A., The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Government in Poland: On Judicial Reform reversing Democratic Transition, "German Law Journal" 2018, vol. 16.
• Visser M. de, Constitutional Review in Europe - A Comparative Analysis, Hart Publishing, Oxford 2014.
• Zoll F., Wortham L., Judicial Independence and Accountability: Withstanding Political Stress in Poland, "Fordham International Law Journal" 2019, vol. 42.
• Candlelight protest against changes to Poland's judiciary, EURACTIV, 24.07.2017, https://www.euractiv.com/section/freedom-of-thought/news/candlelight-protestagainst-changes-to-polands-judiciary [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Chronology: Poland clashes with EU over judicial reforms, rule of law, Reuters, 4.07.2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-poland-chronology-idUSKBN1JU25U [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• The Constitutional Role of the Judiciary in Poland Has Been Completely Undermined, The Helsinki Foundation, https://www.hfhr.pl/en/the-constitutional-role-of-thejudiciary-in-poland-has-been-completely-undermined [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Dorani S., The Supremacy of EU Law over National Law: The ECJ's Perspectives, The Political Reflection Magazine, 19.01.2020, https://politicalreflectionmagazine.com/2020/01/19/the-supremacy-of-eu-law-over-national-law-the-ecjs-perspectives [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• ENCJ Board proposes to suspend the National Council of Judiciary (KRS) of Poland, 2018, https://www.encj.eu/index.php/node/492 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• ENCJ Guide, 2018, https://www.encj.eu/encj-guide [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• European Commission triggers Article 7 against Poland, Deutsche Welle, 20.12.2017, https://www.dw.com/en/european-commission-triggers-article-7-againstpoland/a-41873962 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Eyre M., Allosp J., Poland is Purging Its Prosecutors, Foreign Policy, 11.10.2019, https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/10/11/poland-is-purging-its-prosecutors [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Federal and Länder Authorities, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection, 2021, https://www.bmu.de/en/ministry/federal-and-laender-authorities [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Final Opinion (on Draft Amendments to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and Certain Other Acts of Poland, JUD-POL/305/2017-Final [AlC/YM], sec 109, https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/7393/file/313_JUD_POL_30Aug2017_en.pdf [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Fleming S., Shotter J., Brussels warns Poland to comply with EU ruling s or face fines, Financial Times, 20.07.2021, https://www.ft.com/content/9591a832-681b-41a0-aa54-572bbe5b60dd [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Hamilton D., Milosevic's trial and Selective justice, Global Policy, 9.04.2001, https://archive.globalpolicy.org/wldcourt/tribunal/2001/0409chom.htm [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Henley J., Rankin J., Polish court rules EU laws incompatible with its constitution, The Guardian, 7.11.2021, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/07/polish-courtrules-that-eu-laws-incompatible-with-its-constitution [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• History of the Constitutional Court: Overview, https://www.vfgh.gv.at/verfassungsgerichtshof/geschichte/history_overview.en.html [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• The Judicial System in Poland, District Court in Warsaw, Biuletyn Informacji Publicznej Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie, http://bip.warszawa.so.gov.pl/artykuly/436/the-judicial-system-in-poland [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Kelemen R.D., Poland's Constitutional Crisis. How the Law and Justice Party is Threatening Democracy, Foreign Affairs, 25.08.2016, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/poland/2016-08-25/polands-constitutional-crisis [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Koper A., Kelly L., Protests in Poland condemn controversial judicial reforms, Reuters, 16.07.2017, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-politics-protestsidUSKBN1A10S3 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Koschyk M., How independent are German judges?, Deutche Welle, 5.08.2017, https://www.dw.com/en/how-independent-are-german-judges/a-39980017 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Laurent Pech Twitter, https://twitter.com/ProfPech/status/1205776422809276416 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Lemnitzer J., Nuremberg war crimes trials 70 years on: a complex legacy, The Conversation, 20.11.2015, http://theconversation.com/nuremberg-war-crimes-trials-70-yearson-a-complex-legacy-50503 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Lyman R., In Poland, an Assault on the Courts Provokes Outrage, The New York Times, 19.07.2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/19/world/europe/poland-courts-lawand-justice-party.html [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Ministry of Justice Twitter, 31.01.2017, https://twitter.com/MS_GOV_PL/status/826380467679195137 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Murphy P.P., Protests grow as Polish president considers judicial bill, CNN, 23.07.2017, https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/21/europe/poland-judicial-bill-pass-upper-house/index.html [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• OSCE/ODIHR Final Opinion on Draft Amendments to the Act on the National Council of the Judiciary and Certain Other Acts of Poland (the 2011 Act on the National Council of the Judiciary (hereinafter "the 2011 Act"). (based on an unofficial English translation of the Draft Act commissioned by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights), JUD-POL/305/2017-Final [AlC/YM], 5.05.2017, https://www.osce.org/odihr/315946?download=true [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Pech L., Kelemen R.D., If you think the U.S. is having a constitutional crisis, you should see what is happening in Poland, The Washington Post, 25.01.2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/01/25/if-you-think-us-is-having-constitutionalcrisis-you-should-see-what-is-happening-poland [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Poland judiciary reforms: EU takes disciplinary measures, BBC News, 20.12.2017, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42420150 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Poland's PiS takes control of judicial watchdog, Deutsche Welle, 6.03.2018, https://www.dw.com/en/polands-pis-takes-control-of-judicial-watchdog/a-42853145 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Protests sweep Poland over law to control judiciary, FRANCE24, 23.07.2017, https://www.france24.com/en/20170723-protests-poland-law-control-judiciary-walesakaczynski [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Santora M., Polish Crisis Deepens as Judges Condemn Their Own Court, The New Your Times, 5.07.2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/world/europe/poland-courtcrisis-constitutional-tribunal.html [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Siedlecka E., Kto wykona wyrok TSUE? Sędziowie. Inaczej nie będą sędziami europejskimi [Who will execute the judgment of the CJEU? Judges. Otherwise they will not be European judges], OKO press, 10.06.2020, https://oko.press/siedlecka-ktowykona-wyrok-tsue-sedziowie-inaczej-nie-beda-sedziami-europejskimi [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Sobczak K., Polski system dyscyplinarny wobec sędziów sprzeczny z prawem UE [Polish disciplinary system against judges contrary to EU law], Prawo.pl, 15.07.2021, https://www.prawo.pl/prawnicy-sady/izba-dyscyplinarna-nie-jest-sadem-wyroktsue,509466.html (Pl) [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Sytuacja wokół TK analogiczna do austriackiej z 1933 r.? Co wtedy faktycznie się stało [Situation around CT analogous to the Austrian one from 1933? What actually happened then], TVN24, 13.05.2016, https://tvn24.pl/polska/sytuacja-wokol-tkanalogiczna-do-austriackiej-z-1933-r-co-wtedy-faktycznie-sie-stalo-ra643300 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• 'There will be no Polexit': Kaczynski says Poland's future is in EU, Euronews with AP, AFP, 15.09.2021, https://www.euronews.com/2021/09/15/there-will-be-no-polexitkaczynski-says-poland-s-future-is-in-eu [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Wagener V., How does Germany choose its judges? Always the best pick?, Deutche Welle, 27.09.2019, https://www.dw.com/en/how-does-germany-choose-its-judgesalways-the-best-pick/a-39846970 [accessed: 11.12.2021].
• Zbigniew Ziobro - wystąpienie z 18 lipca 2017 r. [Zbigniew Ziobro - speech of July 18, 2017], https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iS9x-A5Mnw (Pl) [accessed: 11.12.2021].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.48269/2451-0610-ksm-2021-2-004