The Economic Situation of Households in Poland

• Autorzy: Joanna Maria Kozak , Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska

Warianty tytułu

Sytuacja ekonomiczna gospodarstw domowych w Polsce

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this article was a one-dimensional and multidimensional assessment as well as a diagnosis of the economic situation of households according to socio-economic groups in Poland in the years 2009-2019. In the first stage of the research, the development of objective indicators reflecting the economic welfare of households was analyzed. The analysis of the economic situation of households included indicators of the income and expenditure situation in equivalent terms, the expenditure structure, measures of housing welfare including access to durable goods in households and average usable floor area of household per 1 person in m². In the second stage of the research, with the help of the classic TOPSIS (the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution) method, a synthetic measure of the economic situation of the studied aggregate units (socio-economic groups) was built. On the basis of the value of the synthetic measure, a linear arrangement of studied aggregate units was performed, considering variables related to the economic situation of households. The analysis was prepared on the basis of data derived from household budget surveys conducted by Statistics Poland (GUS). The research covered data from the 2009-2019 period. The performed analysis, both one-dimensional and multidimensional, proved that in considerably the best economic situation in the studied period were households of self-employed persons and households of white-collar workers. However, in the worst financial situation were households of pensioners, which occupied the lowest positions in the ranking created on the basis of the value of the synthetic measure.(original abstract)

Celem artykułu była jedno- jak i wielowymiarowa ocena i diagnoza sytuacji ekonomicznej gospodarstw domowych w układzie grup ekonomiczno-społecznych w Polsce, w latach 2009- 2019. W pierwszym etapie badań analizie poddano kształtowanie się obiektywnych wskaźników obrazujących dobrobyt ekonomiczny gospodarstw domowych. W analizie sytuacji ekonomicznej gospodarstw domowych uwzględniono wskaźniki sytuacji dochodowej oraz wydatkowej gospodarstw domowych w ujęciu ekwiwalentnym, strukturę wydatków, mierniki dobrobytu mieszkaniowego z uwzględnieniem zaopatrzenia gospodarstw domowych w dobra trwałe oraz przeciętną powierzchnię użytkową zajmowaną przez gospodarstwo domowe na 1 osobę w m². W drugim etapie badania, przy użyciu klasycznej metody TOPSIS zbudowano miernik syntetyczny sytuacji ekonomicznej badanych jednostek agregatowych (grup ekonomiczno-społecznych). Na podstawie wartości miernika syntetycznego dokonano uporządkowania liniowego badanych jednostek agregatowych, uwzględniając zmienne dotyczące sytuacji ekonomicznej gospodarstw domowych. Analizę przygotowano na podstawie danych pochodzących z badań budżetów gospodarstw domowych przeprowadzonych przez Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Okresem badawczym objęto dane za lata 2009-2019. Przeprowadzona analiza, zarówno jedno-, jak i wielowymiarowa, dowiodła, że w stosunkowo najlepszej sytuacji ekonomicznej w badanym okresie znalazły się gospodarstwa domowe osób pracujących na własny rachunek oraz gospodarstw domowych pracowników na stanowiskach nierobotniczych. W najgorszej natomiast sytuacji finansowej były gospodarstwa domowe rencistów, które zajęły najniższe pozycje w rankingu utworzonym na podstawie wartości miernika syntetycznego.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Social welfare; Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS); Household expenditures; Households; Economic analysis

PL

Dobrobyt społeczny; Metoda TOPSIS; Wydatki gospodarstw domowych; Gospodarstwa domowe; Analiza ekonomiczna

• Czasopismo: Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 24
• Numer: z. 1
• Strony: 134--160

Twórcy

autor

Joanna Maria Kozak

• Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland

autor

Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska

• Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Aitken Andrew. 2019. Measuring welfare beyond GDP. National Institute Economic Review 249: R3-R16. DOI: 10.1177/002795011924900110.
• 2. Amaya-Lara Jeannette Liliana. 2016. Catastrophic expenditure due to out-of-pocket health payments and its determinants in Colombian households. International Journal for Equity in Health 15: 182. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-016-0472-z.
• 3. Anderloni Luisa, Emanuele Bacchiocchi, Daniela Vandone. 2012. Household financial vulnerability: An empirical analysis. Research in Economics 66 (3): 284-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2012.03.001.
• 4. Baye Francis Menjo. 2013. Household economic well-being: Response to micro-credit access in Cameroon. African Development Review 25 (4): 447-467.
• 5. Borowska Agnieszka, Aneta Mikuła, Małgorzata Raczkowska, Monika Utzig. 2020. Konsumpcja dóbr i usług w gospodarstwach domowych w Polsce (Consumption of goods and services in households in Poland). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SGGW.
• 6. Cambir Andreea, Valentina Vasile. 2015. Material dimension of life quality and social inclusion. Emerging Markets Queries in Finance and Business. Procedia Economics and Finance 32: 932-939. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01551-8.
• 7. Clark Andrew, Paul Frijters, Michael Shields. 2008. Relative income, happiness, and utility. An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature 46 (1): 95-144. DOI: 10.1257/jel.46.1.95.
• 8. Di Tella Rafael Di, Robert MacCulloch. 2006. Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 25-46. DOI: 10.1257/089533006776526111.
• 9. Frajman Ivković Anita. 2016. Limitations of the GDP as a measure of progress and well-being. Review of Contemporary Entrepreneurship, Business, and Economic Issues 29 (1): 257-272.
• 10. Frey Bruno S., Alois Stutzer. 2002. What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2): 402-435.
• 11. Giannetti Biagio F., Feni Agostinho, Cecília M.V.B. Almeida, Donald Huisingh. 2014. A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality. Journal of Cleaner Production 87 (1): 11-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.051.
• 12. Głowicka-Wołoszyn Romana, Andrzej Wołoszyn, Feliks Wysocki. 2018. Quality of life in farmers' households assessment with TOPSIS method. [In] Proceedings of the 2018 International Scientific Conference; Agribusiness and Rural Economy 2: 257-263. DOI: 10.22630/ESARE.2018.2.34.
• 13. GUS (Central Statistical Office - CSO). 2009, ...., 2019. Budżety Gospodarstw Domowych (Household Budgets). Warsaw: CSO Publishing House.
• 14. Howe Laura, James Hargreaves, George Ploubidis, Bianca De Stavola, Sharon Huttly. 2011. Subjective measures of socio-economic position and the wealth index: a comparative analysis. Health Policy and Planning 26 (3): 223-232. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq043.
• 15. Hwang Ching-Lai, Kwangsun Yoon. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. Berlin; Springer.
• 16. İzmen Ümit, Yeşim Üçdoğruk Gürel. 2020. The importance of linking social capital in unequal and fragmented societies: an analysis of perceived economic well-being in Turkish rural and urban households. The Annals of Regional Science. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-019-00964-5.
• 17. Joo So-hyun, John E. Grable. 2004. An exploratory framework of the determinants of financial satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 25 (1): 25-50.
• 18. Kania Tomasz. 1995.Welfare measures in UN report. Wiadomości Statystyczne 40 (03): 39-42.
• 19. Karimli Leyla, Bijetri Bose, Njeri Kagotho. 2019. Integrated graduation program and its effect on women and household economic well-being: Findings from a randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso. The Journal of Development Studies 56 (7): 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1677887.
• 20. Kukuła Karol. 2000. Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej (Zero unitarization method). Warszawa: PWN.
• 21. Kumar Anjani, Ashok K. Mishra, Vinay K. Sonkar, Sunil Saroj. 2020. Access to credit and economic well-being of rural households: Evidence from Eastern India. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45 (1): 145-160. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.298439.
• 22. Leszczyńska Małgorzata. 2007. Farmer's household and its social and economic role. Studia Socjologiczne 1 (184): 127-145.
• 23. Lipiński Marek. 2009. Organizing and planning your own finances. Gliwice: Quick Publishing.
• 24. Ma Wanglin, Peng Nie, Pei Zhang, Alan Renwick. 2020. Impact of Internet use on economic well-being of rural households: Evidence from China. Review of Development Economics 24 (2): 503-523. DOI: 10.1111/rode.12645.
• 25. Mahdzan Nurul Shahnaz, Rozaimah Zainudin, Mohd Edil Abd. Sukor, Fauzi Zainir, Wan Marhaini Wan Ahmad. 2019. Determinants of Subjective Financial Well-Being Across Three Different Household Income Groups in Malaysia. Social Indicators Research 146 (3): 699-726. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02138-4.
• 26. Mohd Daud Siti Nurazira, Ainulashikin Marzuki, Nursilah Ahmad, Zurina Kefeli. 2018. Financial vulnerability and its determinants: Survey evidence from Malaysian households. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 55 (9): 1991-2003. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1511421.
• 27. Perry Bryan. 2016. The material wellbeing of New Zealand households: trends and relativities using non-income measures, with international comparisons. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
• 28. Pizło Wojciech, Ewelina Dobrzyńska. 2016. The economic situation of pensioners' households in rural areas in Poland. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW. Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej 115: 101-115. DOI: 10.22630/EIOGZ.2016.115.35.
• 29. Pizło Wojciech, Anna Mazurkiewicz. 2010. Equipment of farmers', workers' and entrepreneurs' households in Poland (in 1993-2008). Problems of Agricultural Economics 325 (4): 104-121.
• 30. Podolec Barbara, Anieszka Wałęga. 2011. The economic situation of households living on unearned sources of income. Zeszyty Naukowe/Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie 847: 25-46.
• 31. Ravallion Martin, Michael Lokshin. 1999. Subjective economic welfare. Policy Research Working Papers. Development Research Group. World Bank.
• 32. Rusnak Zofia. 2007. Statistical analysis of welfare of households. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego we Wrocławiu.
• 33. Salnikova Daria. 2019. Factors of subjective household economic well-being in transition countries: Friends or institutions in need? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 39 (9-10): 695-718.
• 34. Stiglitz Joseph E., Kumar Sen Amartya, Jean-Paul Fitoussi. 2013. Measurement error. Why GDP is not enough. Warszawa: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne.
• 35. Talberth John, Clifford Cobb, Noah Slattery. 2007. The genuine progress indicator 2006. A tool for sustainable development. Oakland: Redefining Progress.
• 36. Tambo Ernest, Christopher Khayeka-Wandabwa, Wagithi Muchiri Grace, Yun-Na Liu, Shenglan Tang, Xiao-Nong Zhou. 2019. China's belt and road initiative: Incorporating public health measures toward global economic growth and shared prosperity. Journal of Global Health 3 (2): 46-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.glohj.2019.06.003.
• 37. Ulman Paweł. 2016. The economic situation of Polish households. [In] When we think family..., eds. M. Duda, K. Kutek-Składek,73-88. Kraków: Pontifical University of John Paul II in Cracow. Scientific Publishing. DOI:10.15633/9788374385091.07.
• 38. Ustawa z dnia 11 lutego 2016 r. o pomocy państwa w wychowywaniu dzieci (Act of February 11, 2016, on state aid in bringing up children). Journal of Laws 2017.1851, 2017.10.05.
• 39. Van den Bergh Jeroen, Antal Miklós. 2014. Evaluating alternatives to GDP as measures of social welfare/progress. WWWforEurope Working Paper 56. Vienna: WWWforEurope.
• 40. Wołoszyn Andrzej, Romana Głowicka-Wołoszyn, Stanisław Świtek, Monika Grzanka. 2019. Multidimensional subjective assessment of material living conditions and well-being of farmers' households in Poland. Fragmenta Agronomica 36 (4): 15-26. DOI: 10.26374/fa.2019.36.29.
• 41. Wysocki Feliks. 2010. Taxonomic methods in the recognition of economic types of agriculture and rural areas. Poznan: University Publisher Poznan University of Life Sciences.
• 42. Xiao Jing Jian. 2013. Family economic well-being [In] Handbook of marriage and the family, ed. Gary W. Peterson, Kevin R. Bush, 573-611. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3987-5_24.
• 43. Zacharias Ajit, Thomas Masterson. 2009. Measuring household economic well-being in developing countries: Toward broader measures. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper.
• 44. Zachłod-Jelec Magdalena. 2008. The concept of household wealth: Estimates for Poland. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics Warsaw School of Economics 226 (9): 19-50. DOI: 10.33119/GN/101298.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.7629