PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2022 | 27 | nr 1 | 7--19
Tytuł artykułu

Risk and Uncertainty in Consumer Decision-Making: an Overview of Principles and Perspectives

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Consumers' decision-making power is irrational in everyday life due to risk uncertainty, limited information, perceived cost, and other variables; hence, it is critical to research consumers' decision-making to select the best out of numerous alternatives. This entails selecting a course of action to address a specific problem from among two or more possible alternatives- decision-making processes incorporate elements of uncertainty and risk. Therefore, this article aims to explore the principles, values, and approaches to decision- -making risk and uncertainties by analysing recent literature. Decision-making analyses are conducted from a variety of analytical viewpoints. However, Tversky and Kahneman's prospect theory, published in 1979, remains one of the most widely utilised approaches for analysing decision-making under suspicion and ambiguity. Also, personal choices are a problem-solving approach with an emphasis on alternative selection. Ultimately, working on consumer decision-making and aging is critical for a complete knowledge of how customer loyalty and high-quality decision-making may be retained over a person's life. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
27
Numer
Strony
7--19
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
autor
  • University of Pécs, Hungary
Bibliografia
  • Alexander, A. (2020). Decision making in uncertain times (A. Smet, L. Weiss, Eds.). Mckinsey. Access on the internet: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and- organizational-performance/our-insights/decision-making-in-uncertain-times.
  • Anam, R. K., Munir, M., Hadi, P. H. (2021). Online shopping behavior in the perspective of martin heidegger's technological philosophy. "Modern Management Review", 26(3). DOI: 10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.14.
  • Barberis, N. (2012). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A Review and Assessment. "SSRN Electronic Journal", 4(2). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2177288.
  • Bullock, J. B., Logan, S. (1969). A Model for Decision Making Under Uncertainty. "Agricultural Economics Research", 21(4).
  • Carpenter, S. M., Yoon, C. (2011). Aging and consumer decision making. "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences", 1235(1). DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06390.x.
  • Castel, A. D. (2005). Memory for grocery prices in younger and older adults: The role of schematic support. "Psychology and Aging", 20(4). DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.718.
  • Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. "Psychological Review", 106(1). DOI: 10.1037/0033- 295x.106.1.180.
  • Elliott, S. R. (1998). Experiments in decision-making under risk and uncertainty: thinking outside the box. "Managerial and Decision Economics", 19(4-5). DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1468(199806/08)19:4.
  • Frazier, I., Lighthall, N. R., Horta, M., Perez, E., Ebner, N. C. (2019). CISDA: Changes in Integration for Social Decisions in Aging. "WIREs Cognitive Science", 10(3). DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1490.
  • Gavrilov, L. A., Gavrilova, N. S. (2012). Biodemography of Exceptional Longevity: Early-Life and Mid-Life Predictors of Human Longevity. "Biodemography and Social Biology", 58(1). DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2012.666121.
  • Gottlieb, D. (2012). Prospect theory, life insurance, and annuities. "The Wharton School Research", 44.
  • Gottlieb, D., Azevedo, E. M. (2012). Risk-neutral firms can extract unbounded profits from consumers with prospect theory preferences. "Journal of Economic Theory", 147(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2012.01.002.
  • Hanoch, Y., Rolison, J. J., Freund, A. M. (2016). Does Medical Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Change with Age? "Risk Analysis", 38(5). DOI:10.1111/risa.12692.
  • Henninger, D. E., Madden, D. J., Huettel, S. A. (2010). Processing speed and memory mediate age-related differences in decision making. "Psychology and Aging", 25(2). DOI:10.1037/a0019096.
  • Herrmann, J. W. (2017). Rational Decision Making. "Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online". DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat07928.
  • Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description - experience gap in risky choice. "Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(12). DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004.
  • Jedrusik, A. (2021). Project risk management based on a set of best practices. "Modern Management Review", 26(3). DOI: 10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.19.
  • Johnson, J. G., Busemeyer, J. R. (2010). Decision making under risk and uncertainty. "Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science", 1(5). DOI: 10.1002/wcs.76.
  • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. "Econometrica", 47(2). DOI: 10.2307/1914185.
  • Karl, M. (2016). Risk and Uncertainty in Travel Decision-Making: Tourist and Destination Perspective. "Journal of Travel Research", 57(1). DOI: 10.1177/0047287516678337.
  • Kazuhisa, T. (2021). Escaping from bad decisions: a behavioral decision-theoretic perspective. Academic Press.
  • Kirmani, A., Campbell, Margaret C. (2004). Goal Seeker and Persuasion Sentry: How Consumer Targets Respond to Interpersonal Marketing Persuasion. "Journal of Consumer Research", 31(3). DOI: 10.1086/425092.
  • Korniotis, G. M., Kumar, A. (2011). Do Older Investors Make Better Investment Decisions? "Review of Economics and Statistics", 93(1). DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00053.
  • Korobkin, R. B., Ulen, T. S. (2000). Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics. "SSRN Electronic Journal", 88(4). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.229937.
  • Kurhade, M., Wankhade, R. (2016). An Overview on Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty. "International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)", 5(4). DOI: 10.21275/v5i4.nov162585.
  • Kusev, P., Purser, H., Heilman, R., Cooke, A. J., Schaik, V., Baranova, V., Martin, R., Ayton, P. (2017). Understanding risky behavior: The influence of cognitive, emotional and hormonal factors on decision-making under risk. "Frontiers in Psychology", 8(2). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102.
  • Leder, J., Lauer, T., Schütz, A., Gürerk, Ö. (2021). Background Uncertainty Can Increase Risk Aversion in Decision Making. "PsyArXiv", 2. DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6s4vf.
  • Leuker, C., Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., Pleskac, T. J. (2018). Exploiting risk - reward structures in decision making under uncertainty. "Cognition", 175(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition. 2018.02.019.
  • Lighthall, N. R. (2019). Neural mechanisms of decision-making in aging. "WIREs Cognitive Science", 11(1). DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1519.
  • Łodziński, A. (2020). Support of decision-making under risk by a risk-averse decision-maker. "Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services", 13(1). DOI: 10.7494/dmms.2019.13. 1-2.3473.
  • Long, X., Nasiry, J. (2015). Prospect Theory Explains Newsvendor Behavior: The Role of Reference Points. "Management Science", 61(12). DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2050.
  • Luce, R. D., Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decision. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mathis, K. (2015) 'European perspectives on behavioural law and economics' [In:] European Perspectives on Behavioural Law and Economics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11635-8.
  • Polman, E., Wu, K. (2019). Decision making for others involving risk: A review and meta- analysis. "Journal of Economic Psychology". DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.007.
  • Quinn, P., Cockburn, A. (2018). Loss Aversion and Preferences in Interaction. "Human- Computer Interaction, Taylor & Francis", 35(2). DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2018.1433040.
  • Ranyard, R. (2014). Decision Making Strategies. "Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online". DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat06715.
  • Rolison, J. J., Hanoch, Y., Wood, S. (2012). Risky decision making in younger and older adults: The role of learning. "Psychology and Aging", 27(1). DOI: 10.1037/a0024689.
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3). DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403.
  • Sproten, A. N., Diener, C., Fiebach, C. J., Schwieren, C. (2018). Decision making and age: Factors influencing decision making under uncertainty. "Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics", 76. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2018.07.002.
  • Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. "Econometrica", 47(2). DOI: 10.2307/1914185.
  • Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. "Journal of Risk and Uncertainty", 5(4). DOI: 10.1007/bf00122574.
  • Ulen, T.S., Korobkin, R.B. (2000). Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics. "SSRN Electronic Journal", 88(4). DOI: 10.2139/ ssrn.229937.
  • Vaupel, J. W. (2010). Biodemography of human ageing. "Nature", 464(7288). DOI: 10.1038/ nature08984.
  • Xia, Y., Xiong, Z., Dong, X., Lu, H. (2017). Risk Assessment and Decision-Making under Uncertainty in Tunnel and Underground Engineering. "Entropy", 19(10). DOI: 10.3390/ e19100549.
  • Yoe, C. E. (2019). Principles of risk analysis: decision making under uncertainty. Crc Press, Taylor and Francis.
  • Zaleskiewicz, T., Traczyk, J. (2020). Emotions and Financial Decision Making. "Psychological Perspectives on Financial Decision Making". New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3- 030-45500-2_6.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171643813

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.