Financial Sector Supervision in Digital Age: Transformation in Progress

• Autorzy: Jan Monkiewicz , Marek Monkiewicz
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper aims at the identification and analysis of major issues facing financial sector supervision resulting from the digitalization of financial markets and the digitalization of supervisory architecture with the tool box applied. It is based on the desk research using foremostly industrial studies which provide necessary information on the current international accomplishments and plans. The paper indicates a growing application of new supervisory tool box and digital-based suptech instruments. It is reinforced by increased digitalization of supervisory analytics, application of big data, and artificial intelligence. Digitalization involves additionally changing relationships between supervisors and supervised entities. The findings of the paper allow for better understanding of the necessary adaptive actions to be taken by both supervisors and supervised entities. The issues raised by the paper are poorly documented by current research and may constitute a contribution to further research in the area. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Financial market supervision; Digital technologies; Big Data; Artificial intelligence; Financial sector

PL

Nadzór nad rynkiem finansowym; Technologie cyfrowe; Big Data; Sztuczna inteligencja; Sektor finansowy

• Czasopismo: Foundations of Management
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 25--36

Twórcy

autor

Jan Monkiewicz

• Warsaw University of Technology, Poland

autor

Marek Monkiewicz

• Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• AIR, 2020. Barefoot, J.A., 2020. A Regtech Manifesto: Redesigning Financial Regulation for the Digital Age. [online] Available at: <https://www.dcfintechweek.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Barefoot_Jo-Ann_AIR-Regtech-Manifesto-July-2020.pdf>
• Auer, R., 2019. Embedded Supervision: How to Build Regulation into Blockchain Finance, BIS Working Papers, No. 811, September 2019. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/publ/work811.htm>
• BaFin, 2018. Rüping, R., 2018. Big Data Meets Artificial Intelligence. Challenges and Implications for Supervision and Regulation of Financial Services. [online] Available at: <https://www.iaisweb.org/uploads/2022/01/181116-Keynote-Addres-Big-Data-Meets-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf>
• BFA, 2018. di Castri, S., Grasser, M., and Kulenkampff, A., 2018. Financial Authorities in the Era of Data Abundance: RegTech for Regulators and SupTech Solutions, August 2018. [online] Available at: <https://bfaglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/R2AWhitePaper.pdf>
• BIS, 2010. Borio, C., Implementing a Macroprudential Framework: Blending Boldness and Realism. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/repofficepubl/hkimr201007.12c.pdf>
• BIS, 2016. Kenc, T., 2016. Macroprudential Regulation: History, Theory and Policy. BIS Paper, No 86c, pp.1-16. [online] Available at: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844226>
• BIS, 2018. BCBS, Framework for Early Supervisory Intervention. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d439.htm>
• BIS, 2018. FSI. Broeders, D., Prenio, J., 2018. Innovative Technology in Financial Supervision (Suptech) - The Experience of Early Users. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights9.htm>
• BIS, 2019. FSI. Coelho, R., De Simoni, M., Prenio, J., 2019. Suptech Applications for Antimony Laundering. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights18.htm>
• BIS, 2020. FSI. Ehrentraud, J., Ocampo, D.G., Garzoni, L., Piccolo, M., 2020. Policy Responses to Fintech: A Cross-country Overview. [online] Available at: <https://www.econbiz.de/Record/policy-responses-to-fintech-a-cross-country-overview-ehrentraud-johannes/10012201536>
• Borsuk, M., Klupa, K., 2016. Testy warunków skrajnych jako metoda pomiaru ryzyka banków (Stress Tests as a Method of Measuring Banks' Risk). Bezpieczny Bank, 3(64), pp.29-46.
• Broeders, D., Prenio, J., 2018. Innovative Technology in Financial Supervision (SupTech): The Experience of Early Users. BIS, Financial Stability Institute, FSI Insights on Policy Implementation, No. 9, July 2018. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights9.htm>
• Brummer, Ch., Yadav, Y., 2019. Fintech and the Innovation Trilemma, The Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 107, pp.235-307. [online] Available at: <https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2112&context=faculty-publications>
• Coelho, R., DeSimoni, M. and Prenio, J., 2019. SupTech Applications for Anti-Money Laundering. FSI Insights on Policy Implementation, No 18. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights18.pdf>
• Dewatripont, M., Tirole J., 1994. The Prudential Regulation of Banks, MIT Press, 1994.
• EBA, 2018. Final Report on Guidelines on Institutions' Stress Testing. [online] Available at: <https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/paper/2020/december/gl-institutions-stress-testing.pdf>
• ESMA, 2019. RegTech and SupTech - Change for Markets and Regulators. ESMA Report on Trends, Risks and Vulnerabilities, No 1, 2019. [online] Available at: <https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/regtech-and-suptech-%E2%80%93-change-markets-and-regulators>
• EU, 2019. Fitness Check of EU Supervisory Reporting Requirements. Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, SWD(2019) 402 final. [online] Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/191107-fitness-check-supervisory-reporting-staff-working-paper_en.pdf>
• FSB, 2017. Financial Stability Implications from FinTech: Supervisory and Regulatory Issues that Merit Authorities' Attention, 27 June 2017. [online] Available at: <https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R270617.pdf>
• FSB, 2020. Regulation, Supervision and Oversight of Global Stablecoin Arrangement. Final Report, 13 October 2020. [online] Available at: https://www.fsb.org/2020/10/regulation-supervision-and-oversight-of-global-stablecoin-arrangements/
• FSI, 2020. Crisanto, J.C., Kienecker, K., Prenio, J. and Tan., E., 2020. From Data Reporting to Data Sharing: How Far Can Suptech and Other Innovations Challenge the Status Quo of Regulatory Reporting? FSI Insights, No. 29, December. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights29.htm>
• Gal, M., Rubinfeld, D., 2019. Data Standardization. New York University Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, October (2019), pp.737-780. [online] Available at: <https://www.academia.edu/38698773/DATA_STANDARDIZATION>
• Gąsiorkiewicz, L., Monkiewicz, J. (eds), 2021. Innovation in Financial Services. Balancing Public and Private Interests. London and New York: Routledge.
• Jagtiani, J., Wall, L., Vermilyea, T., 2018. The Roles of Big Data and Machine Learning in Bank Supervision. Mimeo, 9 March 2018. <https://www.bankingperspectives.com/the-roles-of-big-data-and-machine-learning-in-bank-supervision/>
• KPMG, 2018. The Pulse of Fintech. Biannual Global Analysis of Investment in Fintech.
• Masciandaro, D., Quintyn, M., 2013. The Evolution of Financial Supervision: The Continuing Search for the Holy Grail, in: Balling M. and Gnan E., (eds). In: 50 Years of Money and Finance: Lessons and Challenges. Chapter 8, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum., 2013, pp.263-318. [online] Available at: <https://ideas.repec.org/h/erf/erfftc/1-8.html>
• NAIC - Insurance Data Security Model Law, 2017. NAIC Model Laws, Regulations, Guidelines and Other Resources - 4th Quarter 2017. [online] Available at: <https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/MDL-668.pdf>
• Renz, E., Tarnowska, M., 2011. Testowanie warunków skrajnych (Stress Conditions Testing). EFORUM Bankowość i Finanse - KNF. [online] Available at: <https://nmf.knf.gov.pl/Microportals/NMF/Images/testy_warunkow_skrajnych_tcm74-18499.pdf>
• Schoenmaker, D., Wierts, P., 2016. Macroprudential Supervision: from Theory to Policy. Working Paper Series, No. 2, Februar 2016, ESRB. [online] Available at: <https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/wp/esrbwp2.en.pdf>
• Toronto Centre, 2017. FinTech, RegTech and SupTech: What They Mean for Financial Supervision, TC Notes, August 2017. [online] Available at: <https://res.torontocentre.org/guidedocs/FinTech%20RegTech%20and%20SupTech%20-%20What%20They%20Mean%20for%20Financial%20Supervision%20FINAL.pdf>
• World Bank Group, 2017. Understanding Bank Recovery and Resolution in the EU: A Guidebook to the BRRD. Open Knowledge Repository - World Bank Group. [online] Available at: <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25974>
• Zawadzka, P., 2017. Modele nadzoru rynku finansowego (Models of Supervision of Financial Market). CeDeWu.
• Zetzsche, D., Arner, D.W., Buckley, R.P. and Weber, R.H., 2019. The Future of Data-Driven Finance and RegTech: Lessons from EU Big Bang II. UNSW Law Research Series, March 2019. [online] Available at: <https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2019/05/future-data-driven-finance-and-regtech-lessons-eu-big-bang-ii>

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/fman-2022-0002