Koncepcja zabezpieczenia egzystencji i podatności społecznej w rozwoju regionalnym

• Autorzy: Mirosława Czerny

Warianty tytułu

Conception of Livelihood Strategies and Social Vulnerability in Regional Development

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W opracowaniu przedstawiono problem zabezpieczenia podstawowych potrzeb jednostki lub grupy oraz omówiono zagadnienie społecznej podatności na zagrożenia. Ukazano problem stymulowania rozwoju miast i regionów przez pewne cechy społeczności.

EN

As is being noted increasingly often by authors in the field of socio-economic geography, aside from the traditional "hard" factors there are also "soft" factors which determine whether a local or regional community is able to effectively carry out urban and regional development plans and programmes, and make use of local resources in a way which guarantees development. Geographers agree with sociologists and psychologists that there is a set of factors which through their impact on community decisions, relations and organisations, determine the nature of spatial development within a geographic area. Of the many cultural, psychological, social and other factors explored by geographers studying specific regions of the world, the two factors that are analysed most often are: livelihood strategies (ways and methods used by individuals and social groups to satisfy their basic needs) and social vulnerability (how likely people are to suffer due to various hazards and disasters, unforeseen adverse conditions, stressors, crises, etc.). Thus, in order to be able to study the development of cities and regions, one needs to have access to data pertaining to social behaviour patterns and how they change over time. Regional development analyses should also take into account the fact that social groups may be included in or excluded from the process of development at any given time (or stage of development). Only studies taking all these elements into consideration may help us shed light on why the level of development varies so greatly from one urban area or geographic region to the next, even when the traditional or "hard" development factors appear to be equal or nearly equal.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Geografia regionalna; Rozwój regionalny; Potrzeby społeczne

EN

Regional geography; Regional development; Social needs

• Czasopismo: Biuletyn Polska Akademia Nauk. Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju
• Rocznik: 2008
• Numer: nr 237
• Strony: 171--185

Twórcy

autor

Mirosława Czerny

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

Bibliografia

• Adger W. N. 2006, Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, s. 268-281.
• Anderson M. B. 2000, Vulnerability to Disaster and Sustainable Development, a General Framework for Assessing Vulnerability, [w:] Storms, R. Pielke Jr., R, Pielke Sr. (red.). Routledge, London.
• Batterbury S.P.J., 2001, Landscapes of Diversity; a Local Political Ecology of Livelihood Diversification in South-western Niger. Ecumene, 8, s. 438-464.
• Beall J., Kanji N., 1999, Households, Lovelihoods and Urban Poverty. Background Paper for ESCOR Commissioned Research on Urban Development, International Development Department, University of Birmingham.
• Bernstein H., B., Johnson C. H., 1992, Rural Livelihoods: Crises and Responses. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Blaikie P., Brookfield H. C. (red.), 1987, Land Degradation and Society. Methuen,7 London.
• Blaikie P., Cannon T" Davis I., Wisner B., 1994, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters. Routledge, London.
• Bohle H. G., 2002, The Geography of Vulnerable Food Systems (editorial.) Die Erde 133 (4). (online), http://www.die-erde.de/BohleEditorial.pdf
• Bryant R. L., Bailey S., 1997, Third World Political Ecology. Routledge, London.
• Burton I., Kates R. W., White G. F., 1993, The Environment as Hazard. Second ed. Guilford, New York.
• Carney D,, 1998, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution Can We Make? Department for International Development, London.
• Chambers R., 1995, Poverty and Livelihoods: Whose Reality Counts. IDS, Brighton.
• Chambers R., Conway G., 1991, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Institute of Development Stu-dies, Brighton.
• Cutter, S. L., Mitchell J. T., Scott M. S., 2000. Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 90, no. 4, s. 713-737.
• Cutter S. L., Boruff B. J., Shirley W. L., 2003, Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 84, no. 2, s. 242-261.
• Czerny M., 2005, Globalizacja a rozwój. Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
• Czemy M., Łuczak R., Makowski J., 2007, Globalistyka. Wyd. Naukowe PWN. Warszawa.
• Ellis F., 1998, Survey Article: Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification. The Journal of Development Studies, Vol.35, No. 1, s. 1-38.
• Ellis F., 2000, Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Francis, E., 2000, Making a Living: Changing Livelihoods in Rural Africa. Routledge, London.
• Francis E., 2002, Rural Livelihoods. Institutions and Vulnerability in North-West Province, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 28 s. 531-550.
• Gutry-Korycka M. (ed.), 2005, Urban Sprawl. Warsaw Agglomeration Case Study. Warsaw University Press. Warsaw.
• Haan L. J. de., 2000, Globalization, Localization and Sustainable Livelihood. Sociología Ruralis, Vol. 40, no. 3, s. 339-365.
• Hewitt K., 1997, Regions of Risk: a Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Longman, Essex, U.K.
• Kaspexson J. X., Kasperson R. E., Turner B. L. (red.), 1995, Regions at Risk: Comparisons of Threatend Environments. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
• Krüger F., 2003, Handlungsorientierte Entwicklungsforschung: Trends, Perspektiven, Defizite. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 147. No 1. s. 6-15.
• Müller-Mahn D., 2002, Globalisierung: Definitionesn und Fragestellungen. Geographische Rundschau, H. 10, s. 4-5.
• Radoki C., 2002, Urban Livelihoods: a People Centred Approach to Reducing Poverty. Earthscan, London.
• Stenning A., Świątek D., Smith A., Rochovská A., 2002, Wykluczenie społeczne a ekonomiczne praktyki gospodarstw domowych w Nowej Hucie, www.gmul.ac.uk/socialexclusion/pdENHreportPolish.pdf
• Wallman S., 1984, Eight London Households. Tavistock, London.
• WCED, 1987, Food 2000: Global Policies for Sustainable Agriculture, a Report of the Advisory Panel on Food Security, Forestry and Environment to the World Commission on Environment and Development. Zed Books Ltd. London and New Jersey.