PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2022 | nr 1 | 47--78
Tytuł artykułu

The Effects of IFRS 9 Valuation Model on Cost of Risk in Commercial Banks - the Impact of COVID-19

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of this paper is to analyse the variables determining the cost of risk in banks after the implementation of IFRS 9 with a particular focus on the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of the quality of credit portfolio. To achieve this we propose a panel research model with quarterly variables determining the cost of risk in commercial banks. The research data was taken from the domestic and European banking sector in 2018-2020 during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We show that contrary to regulatory assumptions, procyclical tendencies with a cliff effect have not been eliminated in commercial banks under the IFRS 9 framework. In addition, we observe significant differences in the recognition of loan impairment in the domestic banks versus the EU ones under IFRS 9. However, we demonstrate that IFRS 9 did allow banks to recognise loan impairment reasonably fast in the most acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
47--78
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Warsaw School of Economics
  • Warsaw School of Economics
Bibliografia
  • Abad J., Suarez J. (2017), Assessing the cyclical implications of IFRS 9 - a recursive model, ESRB Occasional Paper Series, 12, European Systemic Risk Board.
  • Acharya V., Ryan S. (2016), Bank's financial reporting and financial system stability, Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 277-340.
  • Barclays Bank (2017), European banks: IFRS9 - bigger than Basel IV, http://www.eifr.eu /document/file/ download/1877/barclays-european-banks-ifrs9-bigger-than-basel-iv-jan-17-pdf.
  • BCBS (2005), An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions, July, BIS.
  • BCBS (2009), Guiding principles for the replacement of IAS 39, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs161.pdf
  • BCBS (2011), Financial instruments: impairment, comment letters, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, https://www.bis.org/bcbs/commentletters/iasb32.pdf.
  • Beatty A., Liao S. (2011), Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks' willingness to lend?, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 1-20.
  • Beerbaum D. (2015), Significant increase in credit risk according to IFRS9: implications for financial institutions, International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences, 4(9), 1-3.
  • Bernanke B. (2009), Financial reform to address systemic risk, Remarks at the Council on Foreign Relations, https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090310a.htm.
  • Bischof J., Laux Ch., Leuz Ch. (2019), Accounting for financial stability: lessons from the financial crisis and future challenges, CFS, 622, Goethe University.
  • Bholat D., Lastra R., Markose S., Miglionico A., Sen K. (2016), Non-performing loans: regulatory and accounting treatments of assets, Staff Working Paper, 594, Bank of England.
  • Borio C., Furfine C., Lowe P. (2001), Procyclicality of the financial system and financial stability: issues and policy options, in: Marrying the macro- and micro-prudential dimensions of financial stability, BIS Papers, 1, March, 1-57.
  • Bouvatier V., Lepetit L. (2008), Banks' procyclical behaviour: does provisioning matter?, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18, 513-526.
  • Buesa A., Garcia F., Tarancon J. (2020), Measuring the procyclicality of impairment accounting regimes: a comparison between IFRS9 and US GAAP, Banco de Espana Working Paper, 2003.
  • Bushman R., Williams C. (2015 a), Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning and discipline of banks' risk-taking, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 1-18.
  • Bushman R., Williams C. (2015b), Delayed expected loss recognition and the risk profile of banks, Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3), 511-553.
  • Cohen B., Edwards G. (2017), The new era of expected credit loss provisioning, BIS Quarterly Review, March, 39-56.
  • Crockett A. (2000), Marrying the micro- and macroprudential dimensions for financial stability, https://www.bis.org/speeches/sp000921.htm.
  • Dolar B. (2019), Cyclicality of loan loss provisioning in the U.S. banking industry: evidence from the period 1993-2007, The Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 23(1), 1-17.
  • Dugan J. (2009), Loan loss provisioning and pro-cyclicality, https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/ speeches/2009/pub-speech-2009-16.pdf.
  • Edwards G. (2016), Supervisors' key roles as banks implement expected credit loss provisioning, SEACEN Financial Stability Journal, 7, 1-26.
  • EBA (2016), Guidelines on the Application of the Definition of Default under Article 178 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, EBA/GL/2016/07, EBA.
  • EBA (2017), EBA Report on Results from the Second EBA Impact Assessment of IFRS 9, July, EBA.
  • ECB (2020), COVID-19 Vulnerability Analysis. Results Review, European Central Bank, https://www. bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ssm.pr200728_annex~d36d893ca2.en.pdf.
  • EBA (2020a), The EU Banking Sector: First Insights into the Covid-19 Impacts, Thematic Note, EBA/REP/2020/17.
  • EBA (2020b), Guidelines on Legislative and Non-legislative Moratoria on Loan Repayments Applied in the Light of the COVID-19 crisis, EBA/GLA/2020/02, EBA.
  • Ewanchuk L., Frei Ch. (2019), Recent regulation in credit risk management: a statistical framework, Risks, 7(2), 1-19.
  • FCAG (2009), Report of the Financial Advisory Crisis Group, Financial Crisis Advisory Group, https://www.fasb.org/cs/ContentServer?d=Touc&c=Document_C&pagenam=FASB Document_ C DocumentPage&cid=1176156365880.
  • FSF (2009), Report of the FSF Working Group on Provisioning, Financial Stability Forum, https://www.fsb. org/wp-content/uploads/r_0904g.pdf.
  • Frykstrom N., Li J. (2018), IFRS9 - the new accounting standard for credit loss recognition, Sveriges Riks Bank Economic Commentaries, 3, Riksbank.
  • Gaffney E., McCann F. (2019), The cyclicality in SICR: mortgage modelling under IFRS9, Working Paper Series, 92/2019, ESRB.
  • Gaston E., Song I. (2014), Supervisory roles in loan loss provisioning in countries implementing IFRS, IMF Working Papers, WP/14/170.
  • Huizinga H., Leaven L. (2019), The procyclicality of banking: evidence from the euro area, Working Paper Series, 2288, June, European Central Bank.
  • Jiménez G., Saurina J. (2006), Credit cycles, credit risk, and prudential regulation, International Journal of Central Banking, June, 65-98.
  • Johannes R., Dedy D., Muksin A. (2018), The preparation of banking industry in implementing IFRS 9 financial instruments (a case research of HSBC Holdings Plc listed on London Stock Exchange of year 2015-2017), International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(6), 124-136.
  • Koleśnik J. (2020), The new European systemic approach to non-performing loans, in: E. Pohulak- -Żołędowska (ed.), The Impact of Economic Actors' Decision-making on Socio-economic Development, Publishing House of Wrocław University of Economics and Business.
  • Korzeb Z., Niedziółka P. (2020), Resistance of commercial banks to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Poland, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2), 205-234.
  • Korzeb Z., Niedziółka P. (2021), Determinants of differentiation of cost of risk among Polish banks during COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 205-234.
  • Kozińska M., Michalewicz J., Pycka J., Zdanowicz B. (2020), Implikacje doświadczeń krajowych i międzynarodowych dla procesu zarządzania kryzysowego w polskim systemie finansowym, Materiały i Studia, 336, Narodowy Bank Polski.
  • Kund A., Rugilo D. (2019), Assessing the implications of IFRS9 on bank stress tests, Occasional Paper Series, 12, July, ECRB.
  • Leaven L., Majnoni G. (2003), Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: too much, too late?, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12(2), 178-197.
  • Miu P., Ozdemir B. (2017), Adapting the Basel II advanced internal-ratings-based models for International Financial Reporting Standard 9, Journal of Credit Risk, 13(2), 53-83.
  • Novotny-Farkas Z. (2015), The Significance of IFRS 9 for Financial Stability and Supervisory Rules, European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ Regdata/etudes/STUD/2015/563461/IPOL_STU 2015 563461_EN.pdf.
  • Risaliti G., Cestari G., Pierotti M. (2013), Global financial crisis and accounting rules: the implications of the new Exposure Draft (ED) "Financial Instruments: Expected Credit Losses" on the evaluation of banking company loans, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 9(9), 1141-1162.
  • Sanchez Serrano A. (2018), Financial stability consequences of the expected credit loss model in IFRS 9, Financial Stability Review, 34, 77-97.
  • Seitz B., Dinh T., Rathgeber A. (2018), Understanding loan loss reserves under IFRS 9: a simulation- -based approach, Advances in Quantitative Analysis of Finance and Accounting, 16, 311-357.
  • Skwarzec M. (2020), Przesłanki zmian zasad wyceny aktywów finansowych w bankach jako efekt kryzysu finansowego 2007-2009, in: M. Wasilewski, J. Bereźnicka (eds), Wybrane problemy finansów publicznych i przedsiębiorstw, Wydawnictwo SGGW.
  • Ślązak E. (2011), Credit market imperfections in the theory of credit rationing, Finansowy Kwartalnik Internetowy e-Finanse, 7(4), 76-91.
  • Zaleska M. (2021), Reakcja sieci bezpieczeństwa finansowego na wybuch pandemii COVID-19, in: M. Zaleska (ed.), Wpływ COVID-19 na finanse. Polska perspektywa, Difin.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171645600

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.