Model and technology for prioritizing the implementation end-to-end business processes components of the green economy

• Autorzy: Serhii Сhalyi , Ihor Levykin , Igor Guryev
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The problem of sustainable development of production is directly related to the three components of the "green economy" - economic, social, and environmental. Their harmonious combination makes it possible to obtain results that improve the social relations of both producers and consumers of goods and services. The implementation of the components of the "green economy" is carried out by various projects. The projects are carried out by irregular end-to-end business processes that compete for common resources in the process of their implementation. The impact on the components of the "green economy" is realized by the proposed model and technology. For this purpose, the software tool was developed. The use of this tool by the decision-maker employee allows them to find the best solutions for process management. The solution is represented as priorities to access to shared resources by each process. This ensures their fulfillment within the deadlines established by the contracts. The level of innovations, economic indicators, production stability and competitive ability of products in a dynamically changing market is thereby improved. The results of such commercialization of scientific research have an impact on all components of the "green economy".(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Innovations; Economic indicators; Sustainable development; Green economy; Business processes

PL

Innowacje; Wskaźniki ekonomiczne; Rozwój zrównoważony; Zielona gospodarka; Procesy biznesowe

• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 35
• Strony: 65--80

Twórcy

autor

Serhii Сhalyi

• Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

autor

Ihor Levykin

• Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

autor

Igor Guryev

• University of Guanajuato

Bibliografia

• Merino-Saum A., Baldi M.G., Gunderson I., Oberle B., Articulating natural resources and sustainable development goals through green economy indicators: A systematic analysis. Resources, "Conservation and Recycling" 139 (2018), 90-103.
• Yahya F., Boukadi K., Maamar Z., Ben-Abdallah H., CA4BPS: an end-to-end Context-based Approach for Business Process Socialisation. "International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management", 9, 3 (2019) 147-157.
• Pritchard C.L., Risk Management: Concepts and Guidance, CRC Press, London (2014).
• Gewald H., Dibbern J., Risks and benefits of business process outsourcing: a study of transaction services in the German banking industry. "Information and Management" 46 (2009), 249-257.
• Vom Brocke J., Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (2015).
• Pavlenko V., Shostak I., Morozova O., Danova M., Information support for BP on the virtual enterprises with the use of multi-agent technologies. IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT) (2018).
• Van Der Aalst WMP,. Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey, ISRN Software Engineering (2013), 1-37.
• Plesums C., An Introduction to Workflow, in: Fischer L., (Eds.) Workflow Handbook 2002, Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse point, FL (2002), 19-38.
• Prior C., Workflow and Process Management, in: Fischer L. (Eds.) Workflow Handbook 2003, Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse point, FL (2003), 17-25.
• Van Der Aalst W.M.P., Basten T,. Inheritance of Workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change, Theoretical Computer Science 270 (2002), 125-203.
• Polyvyanyy A., Smirnov S., Weske M., Business process model abstraction, in: vom Brocke J. (Eds.)International Handbook on Business Process Management 1, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2015), 147-165.
• la Rosa M., Dumas M., Ter Hofstede A.H.M., Mendling J,. Configurable multi-perspective business process models. "Information Systems" 36 (2011), 313-340.
• Davis R., Processes in Practice: It's the Customer Journey that Counts, BP Trends Column (2011) 1-5.
• Casati F., Pozzi G., Modeling Exceptional Behaviors in Commercial Workflow Management Systems. Proceedings Fourth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS 99). IEEE Computer Society, Brussels (1999), 127 - 138.
• Schuschel H., Weske M., Integrated Workflow Planning and Coordination. 14th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications 2736 (2003), 771-781.
• Kiepuszewski B., Expressiveness and Suitability of Languages for Control Flow Modelling in Workflows (submitted), PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (2002).
• Kalynychenko O., Chalyi S., Bodyanskiy Y., Golian V., Golian N., Implementation of search mechanism for implicit dependences in process mining. IEEE 7th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems (IDAACS) (2013), 138-142.
• Chalyi S., Levykin I., Petrychenko A., Bogatov I., Causality-based model checking in business process management tasks. IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies DESSERT'2018 (2018) 453 - 458.
• Power D.J., Sharda R., Model-driven Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Research Directions. Decision Support Systems 43 (2007) 1044-1061.
• Sauter VL,. Decision Support Systems for Business, Wiley (2011).
• Wang W., Ding H., Dong J., Ren C., A Comparison of Business Process Modeling Methods, IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI '06) (2006), 1136-1141.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.35.5