Substitution Between Production Factors and Intermediate Inputs in the Light of KLEMS Growth Accounting for Poland

• Autorzy: Dariusz Kotlewski , Mirosław Błażej
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The generally adopted view is that the gross-output-based MFP is the most correct in terms of methodology, and the value-added-based MFP is its imperfect substitute performed when some data are missing. In this paper, however, performing both of them and comparing their results is proposed as a valuable means to studying the development of outsourcing in the economy. The paper presents the elaboration of the methodology for the latter, which is its main contribution to the field. The case of the Polish economy is used as an applicative example (covering the period between 2005 and 2016), as KLEMS growth accounting has recently been implemented in Poland. The results demonstrate that around the year 2011, the expansion of outsourcing ceased. Since outsourcing was one of the main processes of the Polish transition, this observation can be considered as an indication of the maturing of the market economy in Poland. Moreover, KLEMS growth accounting makes it possible to study this issue through NACE activities, i.e. at the industry level. It shows that manufacturing (section C of NACE) is predominantly responsible for the situation described above, which is the main empirical finding of the study. The dominant role of manufacturing is also confirmed by some other sectoral observations of lesser importance. The methodology developed in this paper can potentially be applied to other countries for which both kinds of MFP are performed. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Production factors; KLEMS productivity accounts

PL

Czynniki produkcji; Rachunek produktywności KLEMS

• Czasopismo: Przegląd Statystyczny
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 68
• Numer: z. 2
• Strony: 1--19

Twórcy

autor

Dariusz Kotlewski

• Warsaw School of Economics (SGH); Statistics Poland

autor

Mirosław Błażej

• Statistics Poland

Bibliografia

• Główny Urząd Statystyczny. (2019, November 15). Methodology of decomposition in KLEMS productivity accounts for the Polish economy. https://stat.gov.pl/en/experimental-statistics/klems-economic-productivity-accounts/methodology-of-decomposition-in-klems-productivity-accounts-for-the-polish-economy,2,1.html.
• Gradzewicz, M., Growiec, J., Kolasa, M., Postek, Ł., & Strzelecki, P. (2014). Poland's exceptional growth performance during the world economic crisis: New growth accounting evidence (NBP Working Paper No. 186). https://www.nbp.pl/publikacje/materialy_i_studia/186_en.pdf.
• Gradzewicz, M., Growiec, J., Kolasa, M., Postek Ł., & Strzelecki P. (2018). Poland's uninterrupted growth performance: new growth accounting evidence. Post-Communist Economies, 30(2), 238- 272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2017.1398519.
• Gu, W. (2016). Explaining Productivity Trends in Canada. The 34th IARIW General Conference, Dresden.
• Hall, R. E. (1989). Invariance Properties of Solow's Productivity Residual (NBER Working Paper No. 3034). https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w3034/w3034.pdf.
• Hulten, C. R. (2009). Growth Accounting (NBER Working Paper No. 15341). https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w15341/w15341.pdf.
• Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). Capital Theory and Investment Behavior. The American Economic Review, 53(2), 247-259.
• Jorgenson, D. W. (1989). Productivity and Economic Growth. In E. R. Berndt & J. E. Triplett (Eds.), Fifty Years of Economic Measurement (pp. 19-118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6806683.pdf.
• Jorgenson, D. W. (Ed.). (2009). The Economics of Productivity. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Jorgenson, D. W., Gollop, F. M., & Fraumeni, B. M. (1987). Productivity and US Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Jorgenson, D. W., & Griliches Z. (1967). The Explanation of Productivity Change. Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296675.
• Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Stiroh, K. J. (2005). Productivity: vol. 3. Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Kotlewski, D., & Błażej, M. (2018). Implementation of KLEMS Economic Productivity Accounts in Poland. Folia Oeconomica, 2(334), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6018.334.01.
• Kotlewski, D., & Błażej, M. (2020). KLEMS growth accounting implemented in Poland. Statistics in Transition new series, 21(1), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.21307/stattrans-2020-006.
• O'Mahony, M., & Timmer, M. P. (2009). Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database. The Economic Journal, 119(538), F374-F403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). Measuring Productivity: OECD Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264194519-en.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Measuring Capital: OECD Manual. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264068476-en.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/pdtvy-2013-en.
• Phelps, M. G. (2010). Comparing different estimates of productivity produced by the Office for National Statistics. Economic & Labour Market Review, 4(5), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1057/elmr.2010.65.
• Schreyer, P., & Pilat, D. (2001). Measuring Productivity. OECD Economic Studies, 2(33), 127-170. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-v2001-art13-en.
• Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513.
• Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047.
• Timmer, M. P., Inklaar, R., O'Mahony, M., & van Ark B. (2010). Economic Growth in Europe: A Comparative Industry Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762703.
• Timmer, M. P., van Moergastel, T., Stuivenwold, E., Ypma, G., O'Mahony, M., & Kangasniemi M. (2007a). EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts. Part I: Methodology. Groningen: EU KLEMS Consortium. http://www.euklems.net/data/EUKLEMS_Growth_and_Productivity_Accounts_Part_I_Methodology.pdf.
• Timmer, M. P., van Moergastel, T., Stuivenwold, E., Ypma, G., O'Mahony, M., & Kangasniemi M. (2007b). EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts. Part II: Sources by country. Groningen: EU KLEMS Consortium. http://www.euklems.net/data/EUKLEMS_Growth_and_Productivity_Accounts_Part_II_Sources.pdf.
• Wölfl, A. & Hajkova, D. (2007). Measuring multifactor productivity growth (STI Working Paper No. 2007/5). https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/246367010342.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.2729