Leadership Malpractice : Exposing the Reality Underpinning Unleaderly Behaviour

• Autorzy: Christopher M. Branson , Maureen Marra
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. A mounting body of research literature is highlighting the prevalence of serious malpractice by persons in leadership positions. Arguably, too many of those appointed to a leadership position believe that they have the right to act in any way that they choose. They believe that the title of 'leader' affords them the licence to act with little regard for others. But just because a person has been appointed to a leadership position, this does not automatically make them a leader. Nor does it imply that everything they do is leadership. Thus, the impetus for this article is the acknowledgement that it's time to clearly distinguish what truly constitutes leadership from that which is its antithesis - leadership malpractice. Not to do so only allows serious leadership malpractice to become normalised as acceptable leadership activity.
Research Aim. Therefore, the aim of this article is to first use research literature to describe the growing concern about the prevalence of malpractice by persons in leadership positions and then to illustrate how such malpractice can be naturally eradicated when leadership is seen, fundamentally, as a relational phenomenon. The purpose of this article is thus to provide a new theoretical perspective of leadership, one that will help to distinguish between that which is and is not leadership.
Findings. A close inspection of the extremely damaging and injurious outcomes produced by leadership malpractice shows that these mirror those caused by persons with extremely harmful psychosocial disorders. Despite any short-term gains, the research shows that leadership malpractice can ultimately cause serious and enduring poisonous effects on the individuals, families, organizations, communities, and even entire societies they lead. Furthermore, rules, regulations and policies have proven powerless. Seemingly, one cannot mandate true leadership; its manifestation must be inherent within our leadership theory.
Practical implications. In response, this article first explores the foundational values, principles and norms underpinning true leadership practice and then presents a new way to understand leadership from a transrelational perspective which naturally eradicates malpractice by those in leadership positions.
Social implications. Given that worldwide research has demonstrated how leadership malpractice causes seriously toxic personal, organisational and social outcomes, this article seeks to provide a theoretical rather than a technical or practical way of redressing this untenable situation. By inference, when leadership is practiced properly, when it is based upon appropriate foundational values and principles, then malpractice is ended and workplaces become safe, gratifying and productive.
Originality. This article makes a significant contribution to the expanding area of research that is exploring the benefits to be gained by theorising leadership as a relational phenomenon. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Leadership; Managerial attitudes

PL

Przywództwo; Postawy kierownicze

• Czasopismo: International Journal of Contemporary Management
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 1--10

Twórcy

autor

Christopher M. Branson

• Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia

autor

Maureen Marra

• inLeadership Consultancy, Hamilton, New Zealand

Bibliografia

• Barelds, D. P. H., Wisse, B., Sanders, S., & Laurijissen, L.M. (2018). No regard for those who need it: The moderating role of follower self-esteem in the relationship between leader psychopathy and leader self-serving behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1281), 1-12.
• Begley, P. T. (2003). In Pursuit of authentic school leadership practices (pp. 1-12). In P. T. Begley & O. Johansson (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of school leadership. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Blickle, G., Schütte, N., & Genau, H.A. (2018). Manager psychopathy, trait activation, and job performance: a multi-source study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(4), 450-461.
• Bhandarker, A., & Rai, S. (2018). Toxic leadership: Emotional distress and coping strategy. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 22(1), 65-78.
• Boddy, C. R. (2011). The corporate psychopaths theory of the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 255-259.
• Boddy, C. R. (2014). Corporate psychopaths, conflict, employee affective well-being and counterproductive work behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 107-121.
• Branson, C. M., & Marra, M. (2019). Leadership as a relational phenomenon: What this means in practice. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 4(1), 81-108.
• Branson, C. M., & Marra, M. (2020). An exploration of the emotional impact of false leadership (pp. 81-94). In R. Dorczak & A. Szczudlińska-Kanoś (Eds.), Emotions in leadership. Krakow, Poland: Jagiellonian University.
• Branson, C. M., & Marra, M. (2021). A new theory of organizational ecology, and its implication for educational leadership. London: Bloomsbury.
• Branson, C. M., Marra, M., Franken, M., & Penney, D. (2018). Leadership in higher education from a transrelational perspective. London: Bloomsbury.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
• Clarke, J. (2005). Working with monsters. How to identify and protect yourself from the workplace psychopath. Sydney: Random House, Sydney.
• Coid, J., Yang, M., Ullrich, S., Roberts, A., & Hare, R. D. (2009). Prevalence and correlates of psychopathic traits in the household population of Great Britain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 65-73.
• Costello, T. H., Unterberger, A., Watts, A. L., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2018). Psychopathy and pride: Testing Lykken's hypothesis regarding the implications of fearlessness for prosocial and antisocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(185), 1-13.
• Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 77-86.
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and Personhood. In R. Harré and L. Van Langenhove (eds), Positioning Theory, (pp. 32-52). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
• Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 57(7), 56-59.
• Erickson, A., Shaw, B., Murray, J., & Branch, S. (2015). Destructive leadership: Causes, consequences and countermeasures. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 266-272.
• Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2017). Leader narcissism and subordinate embeddedness: The moderating roles of moral attentiveness and behavioral integrity. EuroMed Journal of Business, 12(2), 146-162.
• Fahie, D. (2019). The lived experience of toxic leadership in Irish higher education. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 13(3), 341-255.
• Fatfouta, R. (2019). Facets of narcissism and leadership: A tale of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 1-12.
• Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometreus.
• Frieder, R. E., Hockwarter, W. A., & De Ortentis, P. S. (2015). Attenuating the negative effects of abusive supervision: The role of proactive voice behaviour and resource management ability. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 821-837.
• Greenfield, T. B. (1981). Can science guide the administrator's hand? In T.T. Aoki (Ed.), Rethinking Education Modes of Inquiry in the Human Sciences. Edmonton, AL: University of Alberta Press.
• Harré, R. & Slocum, N. (2003). Disputes as Complex Social Events: On the Uses of Positioning Theory. In R. Harré and F. Moghaddam (eds.), The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts, (pp. 123-36). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
• Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. (2003). Introduction: The Self and Others in Traditional Psychology and in Positioning Theory. In R. Harré and F. Moghaddam (eds.), The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts, (pp. 1-11). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
• Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). The Dynamics of Social Episodes. In R. Harré and L. van Langenhove (eds.), Positioning Theory, (pp. 1-13). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
• Hodgkinson, C. (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Kernberg, O. F. (1989). Narcissistic personality disorder in childhood. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12, 671-694.
• Kranefeld, I., & Blickle, G. (2022). Disentangling the relation between psychopathy and emotion recognition ability: A key to reduced workplace aggression? Personality and Individual Differences, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111232
• Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1308-1338.
• Landay, K., Harms, P. D., & Credé, M. (2019). Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 183-196.
• Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 617-630.
• Lipmen-Blumen, J. (2005). Toxic leadership: When grand illusions masquerade as noble visions. Leader to Leader, Spring, 1-16.
• Lu, H., Ling, W., Wu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2012). A Chinese perspective on the content and structure of destructive leadership. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 271-283.
• Maccoby, M. (2000, January-February). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review, 69-77.
• Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 120-s137.
• Mathieu, C., Neumann, C., Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2014). A dark side of leadership: Corporate psychopathy and its influence on employee well-being and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 83-88.
• Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893-899.
• Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617-633.
• Scheuer, M. L., Burton, J. P., Barber, L. K., Finkelstein L. M., & Parker, C. P. (2016). Linking abusive supervision to employee engagement and exhaustion. Organization Management Journal, 13(3), 138-147.
• Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138-158.
• Seifried, C. (2018). The use of sport in North Korea: An illustrative case of megalomania as a style of destructive leadership. Journal of Contemporary Athletics, 12(3), 191-207.
• Seifried, C., Katz, M., & Pfleegor, A. (2015). Megalomaniac or narcissist? Re-examining the leadership style of Huey P. Long through sport. Journal of Sport History, 42: 401-420.
• Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Shamir, B. (2011). Leadership takes time: Some implications of (not) taking time seriously in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 307-315.
• Shaw, J. B., Erickson, A., & Harvey, M. (2011). A method for measuring destructive leadership and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 575-590.
• Sheehy, B., Boddy, C., & Murphy, B. (2020). Corporate law and corporate psychopaths. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 0(0), 1-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1795000
• Starratt, R. J. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical response to the moral crisis in school. London: Falmer Press.
• Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261-289.
• Thoroughgood, C. N., Tate, B. W., Sawyer, K. B., & Jacobs, R. (2012). Bad to the bone: Empirically defining and measuring destructive leader behaviour. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(2), 230-255.
• Thoroughgood, C. N., Sawyer, K. B., Padilla, A., & Lunsford, L. (2016). Destructive leadership: A critique of leader-centric perspectives and toward a more holistic definition. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 627-649.
• Vergauwe, J., Hofmans, J., Wille, B., Decuyper, M., & De Fruyt, F. (2021). Psychopathy and leadership effectiveness: Conceptualizing and testing three models of successful psychopathy. The Leadership Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101536
• Winn, G. L., & Dykes, A. C. (2019). Identifying toxic leadership & building worker resilience. Professional Safety Journal, March, 38-45.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ijcm-2021-0015