Welfare State Agenda of Successful Populist Parties in Czechia and Slovakia

• Autorzy: Tomáš Sirovátka , Steven Saxonberg , Lucie Novotná
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Several studies suggest that the welfare state agenda, which has traditionally been a crucial issue for left-wing populist parties (LWP), has become important for all kinds of populist parties: centrist-populist (CP) as well as right-wing populist (RWP). In this paper, we examine the role of the welfare state agenda in the election programmes of the Czech and Slovak populist parties that either won the elections in 2017 in the Czech Republic and 2020 in Slovakia (this was the case for CP parties in both countries) or they won representation in Parliament in these elections (this was the case of RWP parties). The findings show that the welfare state agendas of CP and RWP parties regarding the pattern of welfare state objectives and deservingness criteria applied in their policy proposals do not differ so much in some respects. At the same time, the policy proposals of CP in the two countries diverge to some extent. Specific country political contexts such as the political opportunity structure and the manoeuvring of the populist parties may provide some explanation. Comparison with the other countries is a challenge for future research. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Welfare state; Populism

PL

Państwo opiekuńcze; Populizm

• Czasopismo: Problemy Polityki Społecznej
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 56
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 21--43

Twórcy

autor

Tomáš Sirovátka

• Masaryk University

autor

Steven Saxonberg

• Södertörn University, Sweden

autor

Lucie Novotná

• Masaryk University, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• Abou-Chadi, T. & Wagner, M. (2019). The Electoral Appeal of Party Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: When Can the Mainstream Left Succeed? Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1405-1419. https://doi.org/10.1086/704436
• Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875-1975. Cambridge University Press.
• Barr, N.A. & Whynes, D.K. (1993). Current issues in the economics of welfare. St. Martin's Press.
• Brunnerová, O. (2019). Not all entrepreneurs are created equal: The institutionalisation of entrepreneurial parties in Central Europe. Central European Journal of Politics 5(1), 100-124.
• Buštíková, L. (2019). The State as a Firm: Understanding the Autocratic Roots of Technocratic Populism. East European Politics and Societies and Culture 33(2), 302-330.
• Caiani, M. & Della Porta, D. (2011). The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A frame analysis of extreme right wing discourses in Italy and Germany. Acta Politica 46(2): 180-202. DOI:10.1057/ap.2010.28
• Dallinger, U. (2010). Public Support for Redistribution: What Explains Cross-National differences? Journal of European Social Policy 20(4), 333-349.
• Enggist, M. & Pinggera, M. (2021). Radical right parties and their welfare state stances - not so blurry after all? West European Politics, 102-128. DOI:10.1080/01402382.2021.1902115
• Engler, S. (2020). Centrist anti-establishment parties and their protest voters: more than a superficial romance? European Political Science Review, 12(3), 307-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000132
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2016). A welfare state for whom? A group-based account of the Austrian Freedom Party's social policy profile. Swiss Political Science Review, 22(3), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12218
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2018). Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles. Social Policy & Administration, 52(1), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12325
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Greve, B. (2019). Welfare populism and welfare chauvinism. Policy Press.
• Havlík, V. (2019). Economy and political distrust: Explaining public anti-partism in the Czech Republic. Human affairs 30(1), 72-85. doi:10.1515/humaff-2020-0007.
• Heinisch, R. & Saxonberg, S. (2017). Entrepreneurial Populism and the Radical Centre: Examples from Austria and the Czech Republic. In R. Heinisch, Ch. Holtz--Bacha, & O. Mazzoleni (eds.) Political Populism: A Handbook (209-226). Nomos.
• Heinisch, R. & Saxonberg, S. (forthcoming). Filling the Demand Gap: Explaining the Success of Centrist Entrepreneurial Populism in the Czech Republic. East-Asia Studies. Forthcoming.
• Hill, M. (2003). Understanding social policy. Blackwell.
• Kriesi, H. K. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
• Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037
• Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48(2), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
• Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Throwing Out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism. World Politics, 62(2), 221-260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000043
• Pop-Eleches, G. & Tucker, J.A. (2017). Communism's Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes. Princeton University Press.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Ringen, S. (1987). The Possibility of Politics. Oxford Clarendon Press.
• Rooduijn, M. & Burgoon, B.M. (2018). The paradox of wellbeing: Do unfavorable socioeconomic and sociocultural contexts deepen or dampen radical left and right voting among the less well-off? Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1720-1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720707
• Rooduijn, M., van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C. & Taggart,P. (2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. http://www.popu-list.org.
• Roosma, F., Gelissen, J. & van Oorschot, W. (2012). The Multidimensionality of Welfare State Attitudes: A European Cross-National Study. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 235-255.
• Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2015). Explaining the Emergence of Populism in Europe and the Americas. In C. de La Torre (ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives (189-227). University of Kentucky Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1531426X00002004
• Rovny, J. (2013). Where Do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition. European Political Science Review, 5(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000282
• Schumacher G & K. van Kersbergen (2016). Do Mainstream Parties Adapt to the Welfare Chauvinism of Populist Parties? Party Politics 22(3),300-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549345
• Spruyt, B., Keppens, G. & van Droogenbroek, F. (2016). Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It? Political Research Quaterly, 69(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639138
• Swank, D. & Betz, H.G. (2003). Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 1(2), 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/soceco/1.2.215
• Vachudova, M.A. (2019). From Competition to Polarization in Centrist Europe: How Populists Change Party Systems and the European Union. Polity, 51(4), 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1086/705704
• van Hauwaert, S.M. and S. van Kessel (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research 57: 68-92. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12216
• van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perceptions among Citizens of European Welfare States. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059829
• Vasilopoulou, S., Halikiopoulou, D. & Exadaktylos, T. (2014). Greece in crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52, 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12093
• ANO (2017). TEĎ NEBO NIKDY Program hnutí ANO pro volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2017 TEN JEDINÝ PROGRAM, KTERÝ POTŘEBUJETE. Election manifesto. https://www.anobudelip.cz/file/edee/2017/09/program-hnuti-ano-pro-volby-do-poslanecke-snemovny.pdf
• ANO (2013). Resortní program. Election manifesto. https://www.anobudelip.cz/cs/o-nas/program/volby-2013/resortni-program/
• OLANO (2016). Program za ludské a rozumné Slovensko. http://www.obycajniludia.sk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/program-olano.pdf
• OLANO (2020). Uprímne, odvážně, pre ludí. Election manifesto. https://www.obycajniludia.sk/program-2020/
• Sme Rodina (2020). Program pomoci rodinám. https://hnutie-smerodina.sk/program/
• Sme Rodina (2016). Program Sme rodina - Boris Kollár (2016). http://hnutie-smerodina.sk/Program-Hnutia-Sme-Rodina.pdf
• SPD (2017). Volební progr,am SPD. Election manifesto, http://web.archive.org/web/20171022212422/http://www.spd.cz/program
• UPD (2013). Chceme zavést politický systém s důsledným oddělením moci výkonné, zákonodárné a soudní a s přímou odpovědností volených představitelů. Election manifesto. https://docplayer.cz/2506345-Chceme-zavest-politicky-system-s-duslednym-oddelenim-moci-vykonne-zakonodarne-a-soudni-a-s-primou-odpovednosti-volenych-predstavitelu.html

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.31971/pps/149634