Knowledge Pluralisation in For-common-good Science: Cross-disciplinary, Cross-institutional and Cross-sectoral Research in Environmental Conservation in Poland

• Autorzy: Anna Sworowska-Baranowska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Developing applicable solutions to urgent environmental concerns, which would reconcile the interests of various stakeholders with regard to the common good, requires the adoption of different perspectives related to knowledge processes. Thus, some authors have proposed undertaking cross-disciplinary, cross-institutional and cross-sectoral research. The objective of this paper is to inquire into the network structure, and investigate the rarely considered interdependence of these three types of collaboration within the environmental conservation field, as it is recognised in Poland. Research grant data from the POL-on database (the central nationwide ICT system) were used, and social network analysis (SNA) was applied. This study is institution- oriented and depended on formal collaboration in the form of partnership agreements, which are rarely applied but benefit the research process. Environmental conservation in Poland is weakly internally integrated, but is well connected with neighbouring disciplines, as well as with the technical sciences. Industrial research institutes, as well as profiled higher education institutions, hold more influential network positions than leading large universities. Moreover, cross-disciplinarity does not offer significant stimulation for cross-organisational or cross-sectoral collaboration. This study is embedded within the specific national context of the science sector, which is currently undertaking a transition period (especially since the most recent reform of the Polish science and higher education in 2018), and the presented results shed light on the present and future challenges which it faces. The work contributes to studies on the knowledge production processes involved in the environmental sciences and provides results that may be used by the science sector for assessing and adjusting its strategic position at both the national and the institutional levels. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Creating knowledge; Environmental protection; Social Network Analysis (SNA)

PL

Tworzenie wiedzy; Ochrona środowiska; Analiza sieci społecznych

• Czasopismo: Forum Scientiae Oeconomia
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 10
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 45--72

Twórcy

autor

Anna Sworowska-Baranowska

• West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin

Bibliografia

• Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A. (2004), Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks, in: M. Jünger and P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph Drawing Software (pp. 77-103), Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-18638-7_4
• Berawi, M. A. (2019), Managing Nature 5.0 in Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0 Era, International Journal of Technology, 10(2), 222-225. DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v10i2.3084
• Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2009), "Mode 3" and "Quadruple Helix": Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem, International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201-234. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
• Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2010), Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), 1(1), 41-69. DOI: 10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
• Chan, L. S. (2019). Environmental Protection, in: L. S. Chan and W. C. Tang (Eds.), Engineering-Medicine: Principles and Applications of Engineering in Medicine (1st edition) (pp. 329-341), Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press.
• Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., Etxebarria, G. (1997), Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions, Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491. DOI: 10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00025-5
• Crilly, M., Vemury, C. M., Humphrey, R., Rodriguez, S., Crosbie, T., Johnson, K., Wilson, A., Heidrich, O. (2020), Common Language of Sustainability for Built Environment Professionals - The Quintuple Helix Model for Higher Education, Energies, 13(22), 5860. DOI: 10.3390/en13225860
• Cummings, J. N., Kiesler, S. (2005), Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries, Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703-722. DOI: 10.1177/0306312705055535
• Dołęga, J. M. (2006), Sozologia systemowa - dyscyplina naukowa XXI wieku, Problemy Ekorozwoju, 1(2), 11-23. (original work published in Polish).
• Dovers, S. (2005). Clarifying the Imperative of Integration Research for Sustainable Environmental Management, Journal of Research Practice, 1(2), Article M1, retrieved from: http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/11/30 (accessed 29 May 2021).
• Eden, S., Donaldson, A., Walker, G. (2006), Green Groups and Grey Areas: Scientific Boundary- Work, Nongovernmental Organisations, and Environmental Knowledge, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(6), 1061-1076. DOI: 10.1068/a37287
• Edquist, C. (1997), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London - New York: Routledge.
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008), The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action (1st edition), New York: Routledge.
• European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2017), Poland's higher education and science system: Horizon 2020 Policy Support Facility: peer review. Publications Office, retrieved from: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/193011 (accessed 2 June 2021).
• Evans, L. (2017), The worst of times? A tale of two higher education institutions in France: Their merger and its impact on staff working lives, Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1699-1717. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1119107
• Evely, A. C., Fazey, I., Lambin, X., Lambert, E., Allen, S., Pinard, M. (2010), Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research, Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 442-450. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892910000792
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
• Gooch, D., Vasalou, A., Benton, L. (2017), Impact in interdisciplinary and cross-sector research: Opportunities and challenges, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 378-391. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23658
• GUS (Statistics Poland, Statistical Office in Szczecin). (2020). Innovation activities of enterprises in the years 2017-2019. Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych, retrieved from: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/nauka-itechnika-spoleczenstwo-informacyjne/nauka-i-technika/dzialalnosc-innowacyjna-przedsiebiorstw-w-latach-2017-2019,2,18.html (accessed 24 March 2021). (original work published in Polish).
• Hessels, L. K., van Lente, H. (2008), Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda, Research Policy, 37(4), 740-760. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
• Hicks, D. J., Coil, D. A., Stahmer, C. G., Eisen, J. A. (2019), Network analysis to evaluate the impact of research funding on research community consolidation, PloS One, 14(6), e0218273. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218273
• Hinze, S. (1999), Collaboration and cross-disciplinarity in autoimmune diseases, Scientometrics, 46(3), 457-471. DOI: 10.1007/BF02459604
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S., Wiesmann, U. (2006), Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research, Ecological Economics, 60(1), 119-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002
• Kareiva, P., Marvier, M. (2012). What Is Conservation Science? BioScience, 62(11), 962-969. DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.5
• Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
• Keidanren (Japan Business Federation), (2016), Toward Realization of the New Economy and Society. Reform of the Economy and Society by the Deepening of "Society 5.0". Tokyo: Keidanren, retrieved from: https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2016/029_outline.pdf (accessed 21 January 2022).
• Khan, G. F., Park, H. W. (2013), The e-government research domain: A triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels, Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), 182-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.003
• Klein, J. T. (2020), Sustainability and Collaboration: Crossdisciplinary and Cross-Sector Horizons, Sustainability, 12(4), 1515. DOI: 10.3390/su12041515
• Klincewicz, K., Marczewska, M. (2017), Polish systems of innovations - trends, challenges and policies, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. DOI: 10.7172/978-83-65402-63-9.2017.wwz.5
• Kotsemir, M., Shashnov, S. (2017), Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members, Scientometrics, 112(3), 1659-1689. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2450-7
• Kowalczewska, K., Behagel, J. (2019), How policymakers' demands for usable knowledge shape science-policy relations in environmental policy in Poland, Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 381-390. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scy065
• Kracher, B. (2000), Integrating environmental conservation and economics, Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 2(2), 190-200. DOI: 10.1504/ier.2000.054000
• Kronenberg, J., Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Zbieg, A., Żak, B. (2016), Wasting collaboration potential: A study in urban green space governance in a post-transition country, Environmental Science and Policy, 62, 69-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.018
• Ku, M., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J. (2016), The emergence and evolution of cross-boundary research collaborations: An explanatory study of social dynamics in a digital government working group, Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 796-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.005
• Leemans, R. (2005). Global environmental change and health: Integrating knowledge from natural, socioeconomic and medical sciences, in: W. Takken, P. Martens, and R.J. Bogers (Eds.), Environmental Change and Malaria Risk: Global and Local Implications (Vol. 9, pp. 15-26), Dodrecht: Springer.
• Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H. (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university - Industry - Government relations, Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279-286. DOI: 10.1093/spp/23.5.279
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers.
• Łącka, I. (2020), Barriers to using of quintuple helix model to create innovations in Polish regions, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology: Organization and Management, 146, 233-251. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2020.146.18
• Martin, J.-L., Maris, V., Simberloff, D. S. (2016), The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6105-6112. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525003113
• Mobjörk, M. (2010), Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research, Futures, 42(8), 866-873. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003
• Mutz, R., Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2015), Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today?, Research Evaluation, 24(1), 30-36. DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvu023
• Nooy, W. de, Mrvar, A., Batagelj, V. (2011), Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek (expanded edition), England, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M. (2003), Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge, Minerva, 41(3), 179-194. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025505528250
• Perz, S. G., Brilhante, S., Brown, I. F., Michaelsen, A. C., Mendoza, E., Passos, V., Pinedo, R., Reyes, J. F., Rojas, D., Selaya, G. (2010), Crossing boundaries for environmental science and management: Combining interdisciplinary, interorganizational and international collaboration, Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 419-431. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892910000810
• Pohl, C. (2005), Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research, Futures, 37(10), 1159-1178. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2005.02.009
• Pohl, C. (2011), What is progress in transdisciplinary research?, Futures, 43(6), 618-626. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001
• Pooley, S. P., Mendelsohn, J. A., Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2014), Hunting Down the Chimera of Multiple Disciplinarity in Conservation Science, Conservation Biology, 28(1), 22-32. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12183
• Reed, M. S. (2008), Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review, Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417-2431. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
• Rip, A. (2002), Science for the 21st century, in: P. Tindemans, A. Verrijn-Stuart, R. Visser (Eds.), The Future of Science and the Humanities (pp. 99-148), Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Rodela, R., Alašević, D. (2017), Crossing disciplinary boundaries in environmental research: Interdisciplinary engagement across the Slovene research community, The Science of the Total Environment, 574, 1492-1501. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.144
• Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 8 sierpnia 2011 r. w sprawie obszarów wiedzy, dziedzin nauki i sztuki oraz dyscyplin naukowych i artystycznych. (2011), retrieved from: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20111791065 (accessed 6 May 2021). (original work published in Polish).
• Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 20 września 2018 r. w sprawie dziedzin nauki i dyscyplin naukowych oraz dyscyplin artystycznych. (2018), retrieved from: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20180001818 (accessed 11 May 2021) (original work published in Polish).
• Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., Sloan, P. (2016), Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research, Environmental Develop-ment, 17, 48-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002.
• Scherngell, T., Barber, M. J. (2009), Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 531-546. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00215.x
• Skórka, P., Banach, A., Banasiak, M., Bokalska-Rajba, J., Bonk, M., Czachura, P., García-Rodríguez, A., Gaspar, G., Hordyńska, N., Kaczmarczyk, A., Kapłoniak, K., Kociński, M., Łopata, B., Mazur, E., Mirzaei, M., Misiewicz, A., Parres, A., Przystałkowska, A., Pustkowiak, S.,... Zduńczyk, P. (2021), Congruence between the prioritisation of conservation problems at the local and national scale: An evaluation by environmental scientists in Poland, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(27), 35317-35326. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14741-5
• Soulé, M. E. (1985), What Is Conservation Biology?, BioScience, 35(11), 727-734. DOI: 10.2307/1310054
• Stokols, D., Misra, S., Moser, R. P., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K. (2008), The ecology of team science: Understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2 Suppl.), S96-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003
• Sułkowski, Ł., Seliga, R., Woźniak, A. (2019), Strategic Challenges of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Higher Education Sector, Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(2), 199-215. DOI: 10.15678/EBER.2019.070211
• Uddin, S., Imam, T., Mozumdar, M. (2021), Research interdisciplinarity: STEM versus non-STEM, Scientometrics, 126(1), 603-618. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03750-9
• Upreti, G. (1994), Environmental Conservation and Sustainable Development Require a New Development Approach, Environmental Conservation, 21(1), 18-29. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892900024036
• Van Opstal, M., Hugé, J. (2013), Knowledge for sustainable development: A worldviews perspective, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(3), 687-709. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-012-9401-5
• Whitmer, A., Ogden, L., Lawton, J., Sturner, P., Groffman, P. M., Schneider, L., Hart, D., Halpern, B., Schlesinger, W., Raciti, S., Bettez, N., Ortega, S., Rustad, L., Pickett, S. T., Killilea, M. (2010), The engaged university: Providing a platform for research that transforms society, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), 314-321. DOI: 10.1890/090241
• Wojewnik-Filipkowska, A., Szczepaniak, K., Zamojska, A. (2019), Innovation system: A structural study for Poland, Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 63(2), 117-129. DOI: 10.15611/pn.2019.2.11
• Yang, C. H., Heo, J. (2014), Network analysis to evaluate cross-disciplinary research collaborations: The Human Sensing Research Center, Korea, Science and Public Policy, 41(6), 734-749. DOI:10.1093/scipol/scu007
• Yoon, J., Yang, J. S. W., Park, H. W. (2017), Quintuple helix structure of Sino-Korean research collaboration in science, Scientometrics, 113(1), 61-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2476-x
• Zhou, C. (2014), Four dimensions to observe a Triple Helix: Invention of 'cored model' and differentiation of institutional and functional spheres, Triple Helix, 1(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s40604-014-0011-0
• Zscheischler, J., Rogga, S. (2015), Transdisciplinarity in land use science - A review of concepts, empirical findings and current practices, Futures, 65, 28-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.005
• Zuo, Z., Zhao, K. (2018), The more multidisciplinary the better? - The prevalence and interdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions, Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 736-756. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.006

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.23762/FSO_VOL10_NO2_3