Environmental, Organizational, and Economic Implications for Agriculture in Areas with Different Share of the Natura 2000 Network

• Autorzy: Marek Zieliński

Warianty tytułu

Implikacje środowiskowe i organizacyjno-ekonomiczne dla rolnictwa zlokalizowanego na obszarach o różnym nasyceniu siecią natura 2000

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the study is to assess environmental, organizational, and economic implications for agriculture in municipalities with different share of the Natura 2000 network in Poland. Data on the distribution of Natura 2000 sites and natural management conditions in municipalities are derived from the General Directorate for Environmental Protection and the Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute for 2018. Data on the features of the organizational potential of agriculture across municipalities were collected from the Agency for Restructuring and Modernisation of Agriculture. They were generated on the basis of applications for direct payments under the 2016 and 2021 campaigns submitted by 1345.2 and 1269.5 thousand farms, i.e., the beneficiaries of the 2014-2020 common agricultural policy (CAP), respectively. It was found that municipalities with a large and particularly large share of Natura 2000 areas, as compared to municipalities without such areas, were characterized by significantly worse management conditions and a more diverse landscape, as well as a larger share in agricultural area with extensive production characteristic of high nature value farmlands (HNVf) designated in Poland under the 2014-2020 CAP. Farms located in Natura 2000 areas, as compared to other farms, were characterized by a larger average agricultural area, as well as by lower labor inputs per 1 ha of agricultural area. They were characterized by lower total costs, including direct costs, which resulted in lower factor productivity and income per 1 ha of agricultural area. The conclusion was that they had less development opportunities. (original abstract)

Celem opracowania jest ocena implikacji środowiskowych oraz organizacyjno-ekonomicznych dla rolnictwa z gmin o różnym nasyceniu siecią Natura 2000 w Polsce. Dane dotyczące rozkładu obszarów Natura 2000 oraz przyrodniczych warunków gospodarowania w gminach w kraju pochodziły z Generalnej Dyrekcji Ochrony Środowiska oraz Instytutu Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa Państwowego Instytutu Badawczego w Puławach za 2018 rok. Natomiast dane dotyczące cech potencjału organizacyjnego rolnictwa w ujęciu gmin zaczerpnięto z Agencji Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa. Wygenerowane zostały na podstawie wniosków składanych przez odpowiednio 1345,2 i 1269,5 tys. gospodarstw rolnych - beneficjentów wspólnej polityki rolnej (WPR) 2014-2020 - o przyznanie płatności bezpośrednich w ramach kampanii za 2016 i 2021 rok. Ustalono, że gminy z dużym i szczególnie dużym nasyceniem obszarów Natura 2000 na tle gmin bez tych obszarów cechowały się wyraźnie gorszymi warunkami gospodarowania oraz bardziej zróżnicowanym krajobrazem, a także większym udziałem użytków rolnych (UR) z produkcją ekstensywną charakterystyczną dla użytków rolnych o wysokiej wartości przyrodniczej (ang. high nature value farmlands - HNVf) wyznaczonych w Polsce w ramach WPR 2014-2020. Gospodarstwa rolne z obszarów Natura 2000 na tle gospodarstw pozostałych charakteryzowały się większą przeciętną powierzchnią UR, a także niższymi nakładami pracy w przeliczeniu na 1 ha UR. Cechowały je niższe koszty ogółem, w tym bezpośrednie, co wpłynęło na mniejszą produktywność czynników produkcji oraz dochód w przeliczeniu na 1 ha UR. W konkluzji stwierdzono, że miały one słabsze możliwości rozwoju. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Natura 2000 Networking Programme; Agriculture

PL

Program Natura 2000; Rolnictwo

• Czasopismo: Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 47--78

Twórcy

autor

Marek Zieliński

• Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

Bibliografia

• Alexander, P., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Dislich, C., Dodson, J. R., Engström, K., & Moran, D. (2015). Drivers for Global Agricultural Land Use Change: The Nexus of Diet, Population, Yield and Bioenergy. Global Environmental Change, 35, 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.011
• Andersen, E., Baldock, D., Bennett, H., Beaufoy, G., Bignal, E., Brouwer, F., Elbersen, B., Eiden, G., Godeschalk, F., Jones, G., McCracken, D., Nieuwenhuizen, W., van Eupen, M., Hennekens, S., & Zervas, G. (2004). Developing a High Nature Value Farming Area Indicator. Final Report. Internal Report for the European Environment Agency. IEEP, 2007. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40802398_Developing_a_high_nature_value_farming_area_indicator_ Final_report
• Aue, B.T., Diekötter, T.K., Gottschalk, V., & Hotes, S. (2014). How High Nature Value (HNV) Farmland is Related to Bird Diversity in Agro-Ecosystems - Towards a Versatile Tool for Biodiversity Monitoring and Conservation Planning. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 194, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.012
• Buckwell, A., & Armstrong-Brown, S. (2004). Changes in Farming and Future Prospects - Technology and Policy. Ibis, 146(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00351.x
• Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A., Baillie, J.E.M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., Bruno, J., Carpenter, K.E., Carr, G.M., Chanson, J., Chenery, A.M., Csirke, J., Davidson, N.C., Dentener, F., Foster, M., Galli, A., Watson, R. (2010). Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164-1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512
• Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R.K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152-158. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
• Early, R., Bradley, B.A., Dukes, J.S., Lawler, J.J., Olden, J.D., Blumenthal, D.M., Gonzalez, P., Grosholz, E.D., Ibañez, I., Miller, L.P., Sorte, C.J.B., & Tatem, A.J. (2016). Global Threats from Invasive Alien Species in the Twenty-First Century and National Response Capacities. Nature Communications, 7, 12485. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485
• European Commission [EC]. (2013). The Economic Benefits of Natura 2000 Network. EC, Luxembourg. https://ec.europa. eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/Economic%20Benefits%20Factsheet.pdf
• European Commission [EC]. (2015). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council. The Mid- -Term Review of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. COM(2015) 478 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015DC0478
• European Commission [EC]. (2016). Practices to Identify, Monitor and Assess HNV Farming in RDPs 2014-2020. https:// enrd.ec.europa.eu/evaluation/publications/practices-identify-monitor-and-assess-hnv-farming-rdps-2014-2020_en
• European Commission [EC]. (2018). Farming for Natura 2000. Guidance on How to Support Natura 2000 Farming Systems to Achieve Conservation Objectives, Based on Member States Good Practice Experiences. https://ec.europa.eu/ environment/nature/natura2000/management/docs/FARMING%20FOR%20NATURA%202000-final%20guidance.pdf
• European Commission [EC]. (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN
• European Commission [EC]. (2020a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing Nature Back into our Lives. COM(2020) 380 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380
• European Commission [EC]. (2020b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. COM(2020) 381 final. https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0381
• European Commission [EC]. (2020c). Natura 2000. The New European Green Deal. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 47. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/ENG%20Nat2k47%20WEB.pdf
• European Commission [EC]. (2021a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Forging a climate - resilient Europe_the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, COM(2021) 82 final. https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:82:FIN
• European Commission [EC]. (2021b). Accounting for Ecosystems and their Services in the European Union (INCA).
• Final Report from Phase II of the INCA Project Aiming to Develop a Pilot for an Integrated System of Ecosystem Accounts for the EU: 2021 Edition. https://doi.org/10.2785/197909
• European Commission [EC]. (2021c). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Fit to 55: Delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality. COM(2021) 550 final. https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0550
• European Commission [EC]. (2021d). New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. COM (2021) 572 final. https://eur-lex.europa. eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A572%3AFIN
• European Commission [EC]. (2021e). Natura 2000. "Branding" Natura 2000 Goods and Services. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 50. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d31b281c-fa4d-11eb-b520-01aa75ed71a1/ language-en/format-PDF/source-223687552
• European Commission [EC]. (2021f). Natura 2000. "Branding" Natura 2000 Goods and Services. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter, 50. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d31b281c-fa4d-11eb-b520-01aa75ed71a1/ language-en/format-PDF/source-223687552
• European Environmental Agency [EEA]. (2015). The European Environment State and Outlook 2015. https://www. eea.europa.eu/soer/2015
• European Environmental Agency [EEA]. (2018). The Natura 2000 Barometer. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/ dashboards/natura-2000-barometer
• European Environmental Agency [EEA]. (2019). The European Environment State and Outlook 2020. Knowledge for Transition to a Sustainable Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2020
• European Envionmental Agency [EEA]. (2020). State of Nature in the EU. Results from Reporting under the Nature Directives 2013-2018, EEA Report, 10. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu-2020
• European Union [EU] (2012). Consolidated Version of The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C326/47. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT
• Eurostat. (2022, February, 3). Statistics Explained. Agri-environmental indicator - High Nature Value farmland. https:// ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Agri-environmental_indicator_-_High_Nature_Value_farmland
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. (2017). Voluntary Guidelines for Sustainable Soil Management for the Achievement of a Zero Hunger World. https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/resources/ events/detail/en/c/1042165/
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. (2021). World Food Statistical and Agriculture Yearbook 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/fao-statistical-yearbook-2021-world-food-and-agriculture
• Gamero, A., Brotons, L., Brunner, A., Foppen, R. P. B., Fornasari, L., Gregory, R. D., Herrando, S., Horak, D., Jiguet, F., Kmecl, P., Lehikoinen, A., Lindstrom, Å., Paquet, J. Y., Reif, J., Sirkia, P., Skorpilova, J., van Strien A. J., Szep, T., Telenský, T., Vorísek, P. (2017). Tracking Progress Toward EU Biodiversity Strategy Targets: EU Policy Effects in Preserving its Common Farmland Birds. Conservation Letters, 10(4), 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12292
• Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska [GDOŚ]. (2017). Realizacja Dyrektywy ptasiej i Dyrektywy siedliskowej. https://www.senat.gov.pl/gfx/senat/userfiles/_public/k9/komisje/2016/ks/materialy/mat_1_73.pdf
• Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska [GIOŚ]. (2018a). Stan środowiska w Polsce. Raport 2018. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska. https://www.gios.gov.pl/pl/aktualnosci/521-stan-srodowiska-w-polsce-raport-2018
• Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska [GIOŚ]. (2018b). Trendy liczebności ptaków w Polsce. https://otop.org.pl/ wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Trendy_liczebnosci_ptakow_w_Polsce_2018.pdf
• Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska [GIOŚ]. (2022, February, 2). Państwowy Monitoring Środowiska. Monitoring Ptaków Polski. Wskaźnik liczebności pospolitych ptaków krajobrazu rolniczego - Rok 2021. https://monitoringptakow. gios.gov.pl/ptaki-krajobrazu-rolniczego.html
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2013). Powszechny Spis Rolny 2010. Rolnictwo na obszarach specyficznych. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/psr-2010/powszechny-spis-rolny-2010-rolnictwo-na- -obszarach-specyficznych,13,1.html
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2021a). Powszechny Spis Rolny. 2020. Raport z wyników. https://stat.gov.pl/ obszary-tematyczne/rolnictwo-lesnictwo/psr-2020/powszechny-spis-rolny-2020-raport-z-wynikow,4,1.html
• Główny Urząd Statystyczny [GUS]. (2021b). Ochrona środowiska. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko- -energia/srodowisko/ochrona-srodowiska-2021,1,22.html
• Henle, K., Alard, D., Clitherow, J., Cobb, P., Firbank, L., Kull, T., McCracken, D., Moritz, R.F.A., Niemela, J., Rebane, M., Wascher, D., Watt, A., & Young, J. (2008). Identifying and Managing the Conflicts Between Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation in Europe - A Review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 124(1-2), 60-71. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005
• IPBES. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E.S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, & H.T. Ngo (Eds.). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673
• Jadczyszyn, J., & Zieliński, M. (2020). Assessment of Farms from High Nature Value Farmland Areas in Poland. Annals PAAAE, XXII(3), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.4013
• Laktić, T., & Malovrh, S.P. (2018). Stakeholder Participation in Natura 2000 Management Program: Case Study of Slovenia. Forests, 9(10), 599, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100599
• Liu, J., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., & Luck, G.W. (2003). Effects of Household Dynamics on Resource Consumption and Biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922), 530-533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01359
• Lomba, A., Guerra, C., Alonso, J., Honrado, J.P., Jongman, R., & McCracken, D. (2014). Mapping and Monitoring High Nature Value Farmlands: Challenges in European Landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 143, 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.029
• Łopatka, A., Koza, P., & Siebielec, G. (2017). Propozycja metodyki wydzieleń zasięgów obszarów ONW typ specyficzny wg tzw. kryteriów krajowych. Ekspertyza dla MRiRW.
• Magurran, A.E. (1996). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-015-7358-0
• Matyka, M. (2017). Ocena regionalnego zróżnicowania struktury zasiewów w kontekście oddziaływania na środowisko przyrodnicze. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu, XIX, 3, 188-192. https:// doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.3245
• Müller, A., Schneider, U.A., & Jantke, K. (2018). Is large Good Enough? Evaluating and Improving Representation of Ecoregions and Habitat Types in the European Union's Protected Area Network Natura 2000. Biological Conservation, 227, 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.09.024
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Biodiversity: Finance and the Economic and Business Case of Action. [Report]. French G&Presidency and the G7 Environments Ministers' Meeting, Metz, 5-6 May 2019. https://www.oecd.org/env/resources/biodiversity/biodiversity-finance-and-the-economic-and-business-case-for-action.html
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). Cities in the World. A New Perspective on Urbanization. OECD Urban Studies. https://www.oecd.org/publications/cities-in-the-world-d0efcbda-en.htm
• Potts, S.G., Roberts, S.P.M., Dean, R., Marris, G., Brown, M.A., Jones, R., Neumann, P., & Settele, J. (2010). Declines of Managed Honey Bees and Beekeepers in Europe. Journal of Apicultural Research, 49(1), 15-22. https://doi. org/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.02
• Prandecki, K., Wrzaszcz, W., & Zieliński, M. (2021). Environmental and Climate Challenges to Agriculture in Poland in the Context of Objectives Adopted in the European Green Deal Strategy. Sustainability, 13(18), 10318. https://doi. org/10.3390/su131810318
• Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D.M. (2010). Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 25-55. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548
• Schowalter, T.D., Noriega, J.A., & Tscharntke, T. (2018). Insect Effects on Ecosystem Services-Introduction. Basic and Applied Ecology, 26, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.011
• Sienkiewicz, J. (2010). Koncepcje bioróżnorodności - ich wymiary i miary w świetle literatury. Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych, 45, 7-29. https://docplayer.pl/24746150-Jadwiga-sienkiewicz-koncepcje-bioroznorodnosci- -ich-wymiary-i-miary-w-swietle-literatury.html
• Stoate, C., Baldi, A., Beja, P., Boatman, N.D., Herzon, I., van Doorn, A., de Snoo, G.R., Rakosy, L., & Ramwell, C. (2009). Ecological Impacts of Early 21st Century Agricultural Change in Europe - A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005
• Tsiafouli, M.A., Thebault, E., Sgardelis, S.P., de Ruiter, P.C., van der Putten, W.H., Birkhofer, K., Hemerik, L., de Vries, F.T., Bardgett, R.D., Brady, M.V., Bjornlund, L., Jørgensen, H.B., Christensen, S., Hertefeldt, T.D'., Hotes, S., Gera Hol, W.H., Frouz, J., Liiri, M., Mortimer, S.R., ..., Hedlund, K. (2015). Intensive Agriculture Reduces Soil Biodiversity Across Europe. Global Change Biology, 21(2), 973-985. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12752
• United Nations [UN]. (2010). Provisional Technical Rationale, Possible Indicators and Suggested Milestones for the Aichi Biodiversity Target (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/27/Add.1 19 December 2010, Nagoya 18-29 October, Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020; An Information Document (UNEP/CBD/COP/10/inf/12/rev.1).3. https://www.cbd.int/ kb/record/decision/12268
• United Nations [UN]. (2014). Resourcing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: An Assessment of Benefits, Investments and Resource needs for Implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. Second Report of the High-Level Panel on Global Assessment of Resources for Implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. https:// www.cbd.int/financial/hlp/doc/hlp-02-report-en.pdf
• United Nations [UN]. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/en/home/library/sustainable-development-report/the-2030-agenda-for- -sustainable-development.html?utm_source=EN&utm_medium=GSR&utm_content=US_UNDP_PaidSearch_Brand_ English&utm_campaign=CENTRAL&c_src=CENTRAL&c_src2=GSR&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgOWnwrHQ9gIVi QWiAx08fw4wEAAYASAAEgJmj_D_BwE
• United Nations [UN]. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. ST/ESA/SER.A/42.3. Highlights. https://population. un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf
• United Nations [UN]. (2021a). Food Waste Index Report 2021. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste- -index-report-2021
• United Nations [UN]. (2021b). Kunming Declaration "Ecological Civilization: Building a Shared Future for All Life on Earth", CBD/COP/15/5Add.1. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/c2db/972a/fb32e0a277bf1ccfff742be5/cop-15-05-add1-en.pdf
• Van Dyck, H., Van Strien, A.J., Maes, D., & Van Swaay, C.A.M. (2009). Declines in Common, Widespread Butterflies in a Landscape Under Intense Human Use. Conservation Biology, 23(4), 957-965. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523- 1739.2009.01175.x
• Vickery, J.A., Feber, R.E., & Fuller, R.J. (2009). Arable Field Margins Managed for Biodiversity Conservation: A Review of Food Resource Provision for Farmland Birds. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 133(1-2), 1-13. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012
• Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Transformative Change through Sustainable Development Goals. Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4191
• World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Nature and Business. New Nature Economy Report II. https://www. weforum.org/reports/new-nature-economy-report-ii-the-future-of-nature-and-business
• World Economic Forum. (2021). The Global Risks Report 2020. 15th Edition. World Economic Forum. https://www. weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020
• Wrzaszcz, W., & Zieliński, M. (2022). Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Poland - Towards Organization and Biodiversity Improvement? European Journal of Sustainable Development, 11(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.14207/ ejsd.2022.v11n1p87
• Zieliński, M., Łopatka, A., & Koza, P. (2020). Assessment of the Functioning of Farms in Less-Favored Areas and in Areas of Significant Natual Value (LFA Specific type Zone I). Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej / Problems of Agricultural Economics, 363(3), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/124638
• Zieliński, M. (Ed.). (2019). Przedsiębiorstwo i gospodarstwo rolne wobec zmian klimatu (5). Monografie Programu Wieloletniego, 97. IERiGŻ PIB. http://www.ierigz.waw.pl/download/23701-pw-97.pdf
• Zisenis, M. (2017). Is the Natura 2000 Network of the European Union the Key Land Use Policy Tool for Preserving Europe's Biodiversity Heritage? Land Use Policy, 69, 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.045
• Zomeni, M., Martinou, A.F., Stavrinides, M.C., & Vogiatzakis, I.N. (2018). High Nature Value Farmlands: Challenges in Identification and Interpretation Using Cyprus as a Case Study. Nature Conservation, 31, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/ natureconservation.31.28397
• Zoppi, C. (2018). Integration of Conservation Measures Concerning Natura 2000 Sites into Marine Protected Areas Regulations. A study Related to Sardinia. Sustainability, 10(10), 3460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103460

Identyfikatory

DOI

doi.org/10.30858/zer/147883