PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2021 | 7 (21) | nr 4 | 28--53
Tytuł artykułu

Agricultural Commodities: an Integrated Approach to Assess the Volatility Spillover and Dynamic Connectedness

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In this article the dynamic connectedness between the five agricultural commodities is examined by implementing the Diebold and Yılmaz (VAR based) and TimeVarying Parameter Vector Autoregressions (TVP-VAR) measures for understanding the time-varying variance-covariance mechanism using daily data for the period of 2005 to 2019. The findings reveal that at an overall level all the commodity prices are less susceptible to significant volatility shocks from other commodities specifically before the introduction of the pan-India electronic trading portal (eNAM). Cotton prices do not show any variation due to spillover from others for the entire study period. The volatility spillover is visible post eNAM period particularly for the commodity stock prices. Whereas at an overall level the total directional connectedness has gone down in the post eNAM era. The network analysis suggests that the commodity stock prices show a stronger association as compared to market prices. Generally commodity prices show volatility connectedness but with respect to their own market which means strong spillover is missing among both the markets. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Numer
Strony
28--53
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, Sonipat, India
  • National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, Sonipat, India
Bibliografia
  • Agarwal, D.K., Billore, S.D., Sharma, A.N., Dupare, B.U., & Srivastava, S.K. (2013, October). Soybean: Introduction, improvement, and utilization in India - problems and prospects. Agricultural Research, 2, 293-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s4000301300880
  • Ahmadi, M., Behmiri, N.B., & Manera, M. (2016, September). How is volatility in commodity markets linked to oil price shocks?. Energy Economics, 59, 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.006
  • Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Gabauer, D. (2020, April). Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on time varying parameter vector autoregressions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13040084
  • Awartani, B., Aktham, M., & Cherif, G. (2016, December). The connectedness between crude oil and financial markets: Evidence from implied volatility indices. Journal of Commodity Markets, 4, 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2016.11.002
  • Balli, F., Naeem, M.A., Shahzad, S.J., & de Bruin, A. (2019, June). Spillover network of commodity uncertainties. Energy Economics, 81, 914-927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.001
  • Bonato, M. (2015). Realized correlations, betas and volatility spillover in the commodity market: What has changed?. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2571217
  • Bouri, E., Demirer, R., Gabauer, D., & Gupta, R. (2021, April). Financial market connectedness: The role of investors' happiness. Finance Research Letters, 102075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102075
  • Cabrera, B.L., & Schulz, F. (2016, February). Volatility linkages between energy and agricultural commodity prices. Energy Economics, 54, 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.018
  • Caporin, M., Gupta, R., & Ravazzolo, F. (2021, January). Contagion between real estate and financial markets: A Bayesian quantile-on-quantile approach. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 55, 101347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101347
  • Ciner, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2020, March). Spillovers, integration and causality in LME nonferrous metal markets. Journal of Commodity Markets, 17, 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2018.10.001
  • COCPC. (2020). National cotton scenario. The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. Retrieved from https://cotcorp.org.in/national_cotton.aspx
  • Dahl, R.E., & Jonsson, E. (2018, December). Volatility spillover in seafood markets. Journal of Commodity Markets, 12, 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2017.12.005
  • Department of Agriculture. (2021). e-NAM Overview. Retrieved October 20, 2021 from https://www.enam.gov.in/web/
  • Didar Singh, A. (2014). India Maize Summit 2014. FICCI. Retrieved from https://ficci.in/spdocument/20386/IndiaMaize2014_v2.pdf
  • Diebold, F., & Yilmaz, K. (2009, August). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119, 158-171.
  • Diebold, F., & Yilmaz, K. (2011, October). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. (Working Paper No. 17490). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17490
  • Diebold, F., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28, 57-66.
  • Diebold, F., Liu, L., & Yilmaz, K. (2017, August). Commodity connectedness. (Working Papers No. 23685). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23685
  • FICCI. (2018). Vision 2022. Retrieved from https://ficci.in/spdocument/22966/India-Maize-Summit.pdf
  • Fowowe, B. (2016, June). Do oil prices drive agricultural commodity prices? Evidence from South Africa. Energy, 104, 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.101
  • Guhathakurtha, K., Bhattacharya, S.N., & Bhattacharya, M. (2020, November). A network analysis of the Asia-Pacific and other developed stock markets: Pre and post global financial crisis. Applied Finance Letters, 9, 112-131. https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v9i2.283
  • Hassouneh, I., Serra, T., Bojnec, Š., & Gil, J.M. (2016, December). Modelling price trans mission and volatility spillover in the Slovenian wheat market. Applied Economics, 49, 4116-4126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1276273
  • IBEF. (2020, May). Wheat production may cross 113 million tonnes: Skymet. India Brand Equity Foundation, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/news/wheat-production-may-cross-113million-tonnes-skymet
  • IBEF. (2021, July). Indian agriculture and allied industries report. Indian Agriculture Industry Analysis. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/industry/agriculture-presentation
  • ICAR. (2020). India maize scenario. ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research. Retrieved from https://iimr.icar.gov.in/india-maze-scenario/
  • Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., & Shahzad, S. J. (2018, September). Risk spillover between energy and agricultural commodity markets: A dependence-switching CoVaR-copula model. Energy Economics, 75, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.015
  • Koirala, K.H., Mishra, A.K., D'Antoni, J.M., & Mehlhorn, J.E. (2015, March). Energy prices and agricultural commodity prices: Testing correlation using copulas method. Energy, 81, 430-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.12.055
  • Korobilis, D., & Yilmaz, K. (2018). Measuring dynamic connectedness with large Bayesian VAR models. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3099725
  • Nazlioglu, S. (2011, May). World oil and agricultural commodity prices: Evidence from nonlinear causality. Energy Policy, 39, 2935-2943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.001
  • Nicola, F., Pace, P.D., & Hernandez, M.A. (2016, June). Co-movement of major energy, agricultural, and food commodity price returns: A time-series assessment. Energy Economics, 57, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.04.012
  • Reboredo, J.C. (2018, August). Green bond and financial markets: Co-movement, diversification and price spillover effects. Energy Economics, 74, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.030
  • Rigobón, R. (2019). Contagion, spillover, and interdependence. Economica, 19, 69-99. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2019.0002
  • Sendhil, R., Singh, R., Kumar, A., Chand, R., Pandey, J.K., Singh, R., ... Verma, R.P. (2018). Adoption level, yield and constraints in Indian barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivation: Insights from baseline data for identifying livelihood prospects. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 88, 1233-1240.
  • Sim, N., & Zhou, H. (2015, June). Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles. Journal of Banking & Finance, 55, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013
  • Singh, S.K. (2016). India grain and feed annual. Retrieved from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=GrainandFeedAnnual_NewDelhi_India_2262016.pdf
  • Thukral, S., & Sikka, R. (2020, November). Liquidity in Asian financial markets: Crowding out or spillover effect. Applied Finance Letters, 9, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.24135/afl.v9i2.251
  • Tricase, C., Amicarelli, V., Lamonaca, E., & Rana, R.L. (2018). Economic analysis of the barley market and related uses. In Z. Tadele (Ed.), Grasses as food and feed. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78967
  • Umar, Z., Gubareva, M., Naeem, M., & Akhter, A. (2021, February). Return and volatility transmission between oil price shocks and agricultural commodities. PLOS ONE, 16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246886
  • Wang, G.J., Xie, C., & Stanley, H.E. (2016, October). Correlation structure and evolution of world stock markets: Evidence from Pearson and partial correlation-based networks. Computational Economics, 51, 607-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1061401696277
  • Wang, Y., Wu, C., & Yang, L. (2014, July). Oil price shocks and agricultural commodity prices. Energy Economics, 44, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.016
  • Yan, W., & Deng, G. (2018, April). Origin of production shocks, agricultural price spikes and trade policy. The Manchester School, 87, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12219
  • Youssef, M., Mokni, K., & Ajmi, A.N. (2020, August). Dynamic connectedness between stock markets in the presence of COVID-19 pandemic: Does economic policy uncertainty matter?. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs61157/v1
  • Zhang, C., & Qu, X. (2015). The effect of global oil price shocks on China's agricultural commodities. Energy Economics, 51, 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.012
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171654216

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.