Competitiveness, Fiscal Policy and Corruption : Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries

• Autorzy: Ramona Tiganasu , Gabriela Carmen Pascariu , Dan Lupu
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: The transformations induced by global challenges call for new approaches towards competitiveness and thus require a consistent rethinking of strategies and mechanisms so that they could be better adapted to the constantly changing context. Prior to the European Union (EU) accession, the Central and Eastern European (CEE) states began a broad process of economic reforms, including trade liberalization, mass privatization, exchange rate liberalization, all of which led to a wider opening to new markets, the creation of new opportunities for production and to ensuring the competitiveness of companies on foreign markets. By far, the most important step in the post-communist period was joining the EU, achieved after 2004. Over time, these states have faced, on the one hand, issues related to addressing systemic vulnerabilities, and on the other hand, finding the most appropriate measures to induce competitiveness. The influence of public policies on competitiveness is still an issue that needs to be debated, our study proposing to examine the reaction of external competitiveness to the increase of government spending and corruption.
Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to analyze the impact of fiscal policies and corruption on the external competitiveness of the eleven countries from Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia) for the period 1995-2020. The choice of this time interval is to better capture the trinomial relationship between competitiveness, fiscal policy and corruption before and after the process of integration of the CEE states into the EU.
Methods: The methodology chosen is based on ARDL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag) with structural breaks, the period taken into account being 1995-2020. The Unit root test of augmented Dickey-Fuller ADF (2016) was used to assess the time series stationarity. The test developed by Bai and Perron (2003) is applied to detect structural breaks, by resorting to the LM test. The tests for the cointegration between the considered variables, using the ARDL model, proposed by Pesaran et al. (2001), were also part of the research. The causality test of Granger et al. (2000) was used to assess the conditionality between the indicators. By applying these methods, it was highlighted that, especially after 2007, in the states under analysis, expansionary fiscal policies have led to internal devaluations of the currency, which ultimately increased external competitiveness, measured as real effective exchange rate. Instead, corruption has a negative impact on competitiveness.
Findings & value added: The obtained results point out the relationship between competitiveness, fiscal policy and corruption in CEE countries. In the case of those that have a high competitiveness, even if there are large government expenditures, there is also an economic environment conducive to the implementation of measures that generate added value on a large scale. Conversely, in countries where corruption is high, the impact of government fiscal policies on competitiveness is reduced due to the negative effects caused by this phenomenon. Our study brings at least two contributions to the literature. First of all, the research shows how a growth in public spending affects the competitiveness of CEE economies through the real exchange rate. Secondly, it takes into account the phenomenon of corruption applied to Eastern countries, emphasizing a decrease in the external competitiveness of these economies in response to the manifestation of corruption. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Competitiveness; Fiscal policy; Corruption

PL

Konkurencyjność; Polityka fiskalna; Korupcja

• Czasopismo: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 13
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 667--698

Twórcy

autor

Ramona Tiganasu

• Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

autor

Gabriela Carmen Pascariu

• Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

autor

Dan Lupu

• Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

Bibliografia

• Abid, A. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and exchange rates in emerging markets: short and long runs evidence. Finance Research Letters, 37, 101- 378. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.101378.
• Ahmad, A. H., & Aworinde, O. B. (2021). Fiscal and external deficits nexus in GIIPS countries: evidence from parametric and nonparametric causality tests. International Advances in Economic Research, 27(3), 171-184. doi: 10.1007/s11294-021-09829-0.
• Arachi, G., & Assisi, D. (2021). Fiscal devaluation and relative prices: evidence from the Euro area. International Tax and Public Finance, 28(3), 685-716. doi: 10.1007/s10797-020-09623-4.
• Arsic, M., Nojkovic, A., & Randjelovic, S. (2017). Determinants of discretionary fiscal policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Economic Systems, 41(3), 367-378. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.10.003.
• Audzei, V., & Brázdik, F. (2018). Exchange rate dynamics and their effect on macroeconomic volatility in selected CEE countries. Economic Systems, 42(4), 584-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2018.02.003.
• Auerbach, A. J., & Y. Gorodnichenko. (2016). Effects of fiscal shocks in a globalized world. IMF Economic Review, 64(1), 177-215. doi: 10.1057/imfer.2015.15.
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Mohammadian, A. (2018). Asymmetry effects of exchange rate changes on domestic production in emerging countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(6), 1442-1459. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1307730.
• Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 1-22. doi: 10.1002/jae.659.
• Bajo-Rubio, O., Berke, B., & Esteve, V. (2020). Fiscal policy and the real exchange rate: some evidence from Spain. Empirica, 47(2), 267-280. doi: 10.1007/s10663-018-9415-9.
• Balcerzak, A. P., & Rogalska, E. (2016). Non-Keynesian effects of fiscal consolidations in Central Europe in the years 2000-2013. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, (Eds.). Entrepreneurship, business and economics - Vol. 2. Proceedings of the 15th Eurasia Business and Economics Society (pp. 271-282). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27573-4_18.
• Balcerzak, A. P., Pietrzak, M. B., & Rogalska, E. (2016). Fiscal contractions in Eurozone in the years 1995-2012: can non-Keynesian effects be helpful in future deleverage process? In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, U. Can (Eds.). Business challenges in the changing economic landscape - Vol. 1. Proceedings of the 14th Eurasia Business and Economics Society (pp. 483-496). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22596-8_35.
• Bayar, Y., Remeikiene, R., Androniceanu, A., Gaspareniene, L., & Jucevicius, R. (2020). The shadow economy, human development and foreign direct investment inflows. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 5-21. doi: 10.7441/joc.2020.01.01.
• Bazo, L., Cukanova, M., Markovicova, L., & Steinhauser, D. (2019). The impact of institutional environment on Slovak enterprises and the institutional hysteresis effect. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(3), 35-52. doi: 10.7441/joc.2019.03.03.
• Belan, P., Carbonnier, C., & Carré, M. (2021). Fiscal devaluation with endogenous markups: productivity and welfare. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1159-1189. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12435.
• Bénétrix, A. S., & Lane, P. R. (2013). Fiscal shocks and the real exchange rate. International Journal of Central Banking, 9(3), 6-37.
• Bierut, B. K., & Kuziemska-Pawlak, K. (2017). Competitiveness and export performance of CEE countries. Eastern European Economics, 55(6), 522-542. doi: 10.1080/00128775.2017.1382378.
• Bierut, B. K., & Dybka, P. (2021). Increase versus transformation of exports through technological and institutional innovation: evidence from Bayesian model averaging. Economic Modelling, 99, 105501. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105501.
• Bilas, V. (2020). FDI and economic growth in EU13 countries: cointegration and causality tests. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(3), 47-63. doi: 10.7441/joc.2020.03.03.
• Born, B., D'Ascanio, F., Müller, G., & Pfeifer, J. (2019). The worst of both worlds: fiscal policy and fixed exchange rates. CESifo Working Paper, 7922.
• Bournakis, I., & Tsoukis, C. (2016). Government size, institutions, and export performance among OECD economies. Economic Modelling, 53, 37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.011.
• Bouakez, H., & Eyquem, A. (2015). Government spending, monetary policy, and the real exchange rate. Journal of International Money and Finance, 56, 178-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.09.010.
• Brandao-Marques, L., Gelos, G., & Melgar, N. (2018). Country transparency and the global transmission of financial shocks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 96, 56-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.015.
• Buitrago R, R. E., Barbosa Camargo, M. I., & Cala Vitery, F. (2021). Emerging economies' institutional quality and international competitiveness: a PLS-SEM approach. Mathematics, 9(9), 928. doi: 10.3390/math9090928.
• Cacciatore, M., & Traum, N. (2018). Trade flows and fiscal multipliers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 20, 1-44. doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00985.
• Çebi, C., & Çulha, A. A. (2014). The effects of government spending shocks on the real exchange rate and trade balance in Turkey. Applied Economics, 46(26), 3151-3162. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.922673.
• Chalil, T. M. (2020). Rethinking corruption on fiscal decentralization and global competitiveness nexus, Competitiveness Review, 30(5), 507-527. doi: 10.110/CR-04-2019-0039.
• Chatterjee, S., & Mursagulov, A. (2016). Fiscal policy and the real exchange rate. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(7), 1742-1770. doi: 10.1017/S1365100515000048.
• Chen, Y., & Liu, D. (2018a). Government spending shocks and the real exchange rate in China: evidence from a sign-restricted VAR model. Economic Modelling, 68, 543-554. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.03.027.
• Chen, Y., & Liu, D. (2018b). Dissecting real exchange rate fluctuations in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(2), 288-306. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1342621.
• Cieślik, A., & Turgut, M. B. (2021). Fiscal harmonization in view of the Euro adoption: economic implications for Poland. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(2), 394-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2020.05.001.
• Ciżkowicz, P., Radzikowski, B., Rzońca, A., & Wojciechowski, W. (2020). Fiscal devaluation and economic activity in the EU. Economic Modelling, 88, 59-81. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.010.
• Clancy, D., Jacquinot, P., & Lozej, M. (2016). Government expenditure composition and fiscal policy spillovers in small open economies within a monetary union. Journal of Macroeconomics, 48, 305-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.04.003.
• Cruz, M., & Sánchez-Vargas, A. (2022). Government spending and the exchange rate: exploring this relationship in Mexico using a cointegrated system of equations. Review of Development Economics, 26(1), 587-605. doi: 10.1111/rode.12834.
• Cuestas, J. C., Monfort, M., & Shimbov, B. (2022). Has the relationship between the real exchange rate and its fundamentals changed over time? Baltic Journal of Economics, 22(2), 68-89. doi: 10.1080/1406099X.2022.2096732.
• Dimakou, O. (2015). Bureaucratic corruption and the dynamic interaction between monetary and fiscal policy. European Journal of Political Economy, 40(A), 57-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.07.004.
• Došenović Bonča, P., & Tajnikar, M. (2018). Austerity policies, economic growth and fiscal balance: lessons from Slovenia. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 36(1), 287-308. doi: 10.18045/zbefri.2018.1.287.
• Farla, K., De Crombrugghe, D., & Verspagen, B. (2016). Institutions, foreign direct investment, and domestic investment: crowding out or crowding in? World Development, 88, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.04.008.
• Fatta, D. D., Musotto, R., & Vesperi, W. (2018). Government performance, ethics and corruption in the Global Competitiveness Index. In G. Dominici, M. Del Giudice & R. Lombardi (Ed.). Governing business systems (141-151). Springer.
• Ferrara, L., Metelli, L., Natoli, F., & Siena, D. (2021). Questioning the puzzle: fiscal policy, real exchange rate, and inflation. Journal of International Economics, 133: 103524, doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103524.
• Fidora, M., Giordano, C., & Schmitz, M. (2020). Real exchange rate misalignments in the euro area. Open Economies Review, 32, 71-107. doi: 10.1007/s11079-020-09596-1.
• Forni, M., & Gambetti, L. (2016). Government spending shocks in open economy VARs. Journal of International Economics, 99, 68-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.11.010.
• Giannellis, N., & Koukouritakis, M. (2017). Competitiveness divergence in the Eurozone: the need for symmetric adjustment. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(5), 942-962. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.07.003.
• Di Giorgio, G., Nisticò, S., & Traficante, G. (2018). Government spending and the exchange rate. International Review of Economics & Finance, 54, 55-73. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.07.030.
• Gomes, F. A. R., Sakurai, S. N., & Soave, G. P. (2020). Government spending multipliers in good times and bad times: the case of emerging markets. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 26(3), 726-768. doi: 10.1017/S136510052000036X.
• Gorynia, M., Matysek-Jędrych, A., & Mińska-Struzik, E. (2021). Poland on the path of competitiveness growth. In S. I. Bukowski, A. Hyz & M. B. Lament (Eds.). Competitiveness and economic development in Europe (116-130). Routledge.
• Granger, C. W., Huangb, B. N., & Yang, C. W. (2000). A bivariate causality between stock prices and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asianflu. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 40(3), 337-354. doi: 10.1016/S1062-9769(00)00042-9.
• Hammudeh, S., Sohag, K., Husain, S., Husain, H., & Said, J. (2020). Nonlinear relationship between economic growth and nuances of globalisation with income stratification: roles of financial development and governance. Economic Systems, 44(3), 100761. doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100761.
• Haug, A. A., Jędrzejowicz, T., & Sznajderska, A. (2019). Monetary and fiscal policy transmission in Poland. Economic Modelling, 79, 15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.031.
• Hein, E., & Detzer, D. (2015). Post-Keynesian alternative policies to curb macroeconomic imbalances in the Euro area. Panoeconomicus, 62(2), 217-236. doi: 10.2298/PAN1502217H.
• Horobet, A., Shivarov, A., & Belascu, L. (2017). Exposure to exchange rate risk and competitiveness: an application to South-Eastern Europe. In S. Goić, A. Karasavvoglou & P. Polychronidou (Ed.). Finance in Central and Southeastern Europe (pp. 57-87). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64662-6_4.
• Ilzetzki, E., & Jin, K. (2021). The puzzling change in the international transmission of US macroeconomic policy shocks. Journal of International Economics, 130, 103444. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103444.
• Jalles, J. T., Mulas-Granados, C., & Tavares, J. (2021). Fiscal discipline and exchange rates: does politics matter? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 68(2), 155-178. doi: 10.1111/sjpe.12262.
• Julio, I. F., & Oviedo, J. M. (2022). The asymmetric effects of Argentina's fiscal deficits on the real exchange rate. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(9), 2567-2601. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2021.2004888.
• Khyareh, M. M., & Amini, H. (2021). Governance quality, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Journal of Competitiveness, 13(2), 41-64. 10.7441/joc.2021.02.03.
• Kim, S. (2015). Country characteristics and the effects of government consumption shocks on the current account and real exchange rate. Journal of International Economics, 97(2), 436-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.07.007.
• Kim, H., & Lee, D. (2018). The effects of government spending shocks on the trade account balance in Korea. International Review of Economics & Finance, 53, 57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.10.001.
• Klein, M., & Linnemann, L. (2019). Tax and spending shocks in the open economy: are the deficits twins? European Economic Review, 120, 103300. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103300.
• Kordalska, A. K., & Olczyk, M. (2016). Global competitiveness and economic growth: a one-way or two-way relationship? Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11(1), 121-142. doi: 10.12775/EQUIL.2016.006.
• Kohler, K., & Stockhammer, E. (2022). Growing differently? Financial cycles, austerity, and competitiveness in growth models since the global financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 29(4), 1314-1341. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2021.1899035.
• Kuncoro, H. (2015). Credible fiscal policy and exchange rates stabilization. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 3(2), 7-18. doi: 10.15640/jeds.v3n2a2.
• Kutasi, G., & Marton, Á. (2020). The long-term impact of public expenditures on GDP-growth. Society and Economy, 42(4), 403-419, doi: 10.1556/204.2020.00018.
• Kuziemska-Pawlak, K., & Mućk, J. (2020). Structural current accounts in the European Union countries: cross-sectional exploration. Economic Modelling, 93, 445-464. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.011.
• Litsios, I., & Pilbeam, K. (2017). An empirical analysis of the nexus between investment, fiscal balances and current account balances in Greece, Portugal and Spain. Economic Modelling, 63, 143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.003.
• Liu, C. (2017). International competitiveness and the fourth industrial revolution. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 5(4), 111-133. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2017.050405.
• Loganatan, N., Ahmad, N., Mursitama, T. N., Taha, R., Mardani, A., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). The effects of exchange rate, price competitiveness indices and taxation on international tourism demand in Malaysia. Economics & Sociology, 12(3), 86-97. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/6.
• Mačkić, V., Cota, B., & Erjavec, N. (2019). External competitiveness and the role of fiscal policy: does fiscal austerity matter? Croatian Operational Research Review, 10(1), 55-64. doi: 10.17535/crorr.2019.0006.
• Makin, A. J., & Ratnasiri, S. (2015). Competitiveness and government expenditure: the Australian example. Economic Modelling, 49, 154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.04.003.
• Masca, S. G., Nistor, S., & Vaidean, V. L. (2019). Do government arrangements matter for CEE countries' growth? A two-piece puzzle perspective. Applied Economics Letters, 26(19), 1612-1626. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1591582.
• Médici, F., Mario, A., & Fiorito, A. (2021). Questioning the effect of the real exchange rate on growth: new evidence from Mexico. Review of Keynesian Economics, 9(2), 253-269. doi: 10.4337/roke.2021.02.05.
• Milovic, N., & Jocovic, M. (2017). Impact of foreign direct investment on competitiveness of Montenegrin economy. Transformations in Business & Economics, 16(1), 223-231.
• Miyamoto, W., Nguyen, T. L., & Sheremirov, V. (2019). The effects of government spending on real exchange rates: evidence from military spending panel data. Journal of International Economics, 116, 144-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2018.11.009.
• del Monte, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2020). Corruption, government expenditure and public debt in OECD countries. Comparative Economic Studies, 62, 739-771. doi: 10.1057/s41294-020-00118-z.
• Nuru, N. Y. (2020). Government spending shocks and external competitiveness: evidence from South Africa. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 11(03), 2050013. doi: 10.1142/S1793993320500131.
• Ozcelebi, O., Tokmakcioglu, K., & Su, E. (2021). Revisiting the asymmetric impacts of the exchange market pressure on the inflation, interest rate and foreign trade balance in Eastern Europe. Empirical Economics, 61(5), 2517-2538. doi: 10.1007/s00181-020-01965-6.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616.
• Petrevski, G., Trenovski, B., & Tashevska, B. (2019). The effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policies in a small open economy-the case of Macedonia. Post-Communist Economies, 31(6), 805-821. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2019.1607437.
• Podkaminer, L. (2015). Central and Eastern Europe: trapped in integration? Acta Oeconomica, 65(1), 83-106. doi: 10.1556/032.65.2015.s1.6.
• Portella-Carbó, F., & Dejuán, Ó. (2019). Trade imbalances and fiscal policy in the Eurozone: an analysis of economic interrelations with a global supermultiplier input-output model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(2), 311-334. doi:10.1093/cje/bey011.
• Postula, M., & Raczkowski, K. (2020). The impact of public finance management on sustainable development and competitiveness in EU member states. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 125-144. doi: 10.7441/joc.2020.01.08.
• Rajković, M., Bjelić, P., Jaćimović, D., & Verbič, M. (2020). The impact of the exchange rate on the foreign trade imbalance during the economic crisis in the new EU member states and the Western Balkan countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 182-203. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1708771.
• Romero-Martínez, A., & García-Muiña, F. (2021). Digitalization level, corruptive practices, and location choice in the hotel industry. Journal of Business Research, 136, 176-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.032.
• Rontos, K., Syrmali, M. E., Vavouras, I., & Salvati, L. (2020). Corruption and economic competitiveness: what Greece can tell us. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 19(1), 97-123. doi: 10.1386/pjss_000221.
• Roszko-Wójtowicz, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2020). Macroeconomic stability and the level of competitiveness in EU member states: a comparative dynamic approach. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(4), 657-688. doi: 10.24136/oc.2020.027.
• da Silva, M. E. A., Baerlocher, D., & de Paiva Fonseca, H. V. (2015). Fiscal shocks, the real exchange rate and the trade balance: some evidence for emerging economies. BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 15(2), 727-768. doi: 10.1515/bejm-2014-0018.
• Simionescu, M., Lazányi, K., Sopková, G., Dobeš, K., & Balcerzak, A. P. (2017). Determinants of economic growth in V4 countries and Romania. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(1), 103-116. doi: 10.7441/joc.2017.01.07.
• Stanojević, J., Dimovski, D., & Milić, I. (2018). The impact of corruption on national competitiveness. Proceedings of University of Niš, 57(79):297-312. doi:10.5937/zrpfni1879297S.
• Useche, A. J., & Reyes, G. E. (2020). Corruption, competitiveness and economic growth: evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries 2004-2017. Journal of Globalization, Competitiveness and Governability, 14(1). doi: 10.3232/GCG.2020.V14.N1.05.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/oc.2022.020