University Campuses' role in Accelerating the Natural Urban Transformation Process

• Autorzy: Ahmed M.S. Mohammed , Tetsuya Ukai , Michael W Hall
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

University campuses have proven to play a significant role in the productivity of cities due to their impact as knowledge and innovation hubs. Therefore, this paper examines the impact that building new campuses in suburban areas has, in order to see the extent to which a campus can affect the transformation process in its city. Kyushu University's Ito campus area was selected to be analysed using space syntax, spacematrix and the mixed-use index to see the impact caused by the campus from 1993 until 2017. The results show that, after Ito campus was established, urbanisation started to expand throughout the area, having previously been limited to accessible parts around major routes and stations. Therefore, the locating of a campus is considered to be a vital decision that needs to be taken with the engagement of the city, stakeholders and business owners to harness a successful campus-city relationship(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Urbanisation; Students; City; Cooperation

PL

Urbanizacja; Studenci; Miasto; Współpraca

• Czasopismo: Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: No. 58
• Strony: 75--96

Twórcy

autor

Ahmed M.S. Mohammed

• Kyushu University

autor

Tetsuya Ukai

• Kyushu University

autor

Michael W Hall

• Kyushu University

Bibliografia

• Adhya, A. (2009). Evaluating the campus-downtown relationship the spatial configuration of four college towns in small metropolitan regions in the United States. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, 32, 1-19. Available at: http://www.sss7.org/Proceedings/06%20Urban%20 Territoriality%20and%20Private%20and%20 Public%20Space/032_Adhya.pdf.
• Alexander, E.R. (1993). Density measures: A review and analysis. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 10(3): 181-202. Available at: https://www. jstor.org/stable/43028746.
• Allinson, J. (2006). Over-educated, over-exuberant and over here? The impact of students on cities. Planning Practice and Research, 21(1): 79-94. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/02697450600901541.
• Baltzopoulos, A. & Broström, A. (2013). Attractors of entrepreneurial activity: universities, regions and alumni entrepreneurs. Regional Studies, 47(6): 934- 949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.60 2335.
• Benneworth, P., Charles, D. & Madanipour, A. (2010). Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies, 18(10): 1611-1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.504345.
• Berg, L.V. (2021). European Cities in the Knowledge Economy: The Cases of Amsterdam, Dortmund, Eindhoven, Helsinki, Manchester, Munich, Mnster, Rotterdam and Zaragoza. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi. org/10.4324/9781351158725.
• Berghauser, M. & Haupt, P. (2010). Spacematrix. space, density and urban form. Rotterdam: NAi Publisher. Available at: https://research.tudelft.nl/en/ publications/spacematrix-space-density-and-urbanform.
• Berkowitz, R., Moore, H., Astor, R.A. & Benbenishty, R. (2016). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2): 425-469. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669821.
• Borsi, K. & Schulte, C. (2018). Universities and the City: from islands of knowledge to districts of innovation. The Journal of Architecture, 23(7-8): 1143-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2018.1514524.
• Cohen, L.E. & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4): 588-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589.
• Cundiff, K. (2021). Colleges and community crime: an analysis of campus proximity and neighborhood crime rates. Crime & Delinquency, 67(3): 431-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128720974312.
• Daggett, J. & Gutkowski, R. (2003). University transportation survey: Transportation in university communities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of The Transportation Research Board, 1835(1), 42-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1835-06.
• Dawson, P. (2003). Analysing the effects of spatial configuration on human movement and social interaction in Canadian Arctic communities. 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, 37, 1-14. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.196.2051&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
• Den Heijer, A.C. (2011). Managing the university campus: Information to support real estate decisions. PhD Dissertation. Netherlands: TU Delft. Available at: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:337ca4e3-2895-4fcfaee9-752141bc6104.
• Den Heijer, A.C. & Magdaniel, F.T.J.C. (2018). Campus-City Relations: Past, Present, and Future. (in:) Meusburger P., Heffernan M., Suarsana L. (Eds.). Geographies of the University. Switzerland: Springer, 439-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 75593-9_13.
• Drucker, J. & Goldstein, H. (2007). Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30(1): 20-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017606296731.
• ESRI. (2001). ArcGIS spatial analyst: Advanced GIS spatial analysis using raster and vector data. ESRI White Paper, 1-17. Available at: https://www.esri.com/ library/whitepapers/pdfs/arcgis_spatial_analyst.pdf95.
• Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Paydar, M. & Hamidi, S. (2018). University-related travel behavior: Young adults' decision-making in Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43: 495-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scs.2018.09.011.
• Fernández-Maldonado, A.M., & Romein, A. (2008). A knowledge-based urban paradox: The case of delft. Knowledge-Based Urban Development: Planning and Applications in the Information Era, 221-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-720-1.CH013.
• Forsyth, A. (2003). Measuring density: working definitions for residential density and building intensity. Design Brief, 9(1): 2-8. Available at: http:// annforsyth.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/db9.pdf.
• Fox, J.A., & Hellman, D.A. (1985). Location and other correlates of campus crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(5): 429-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047- 2352(85)90043-1.
• Geenhuizen, M.V. & Soetanto, D.P. (2012). Open innovation among university spin-off firms: what is in it for them, and what can cities do? The European Journal of Social Science Research , 25(2): 191-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660328.
• Gil, J. (2015). Examining "Edge Effects" : Sensitivity of Spatial Network Centrality Analysis to Boundary Conditions. Proceedings of 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, Beijing, 147, 1-16. Available at: http://www.sss10.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2015/07/SSS10_Proceedings_147.pdf.
• Grabkowska, M. & Frankowski, J. (2016). "Close to the city centre, close to the university". Are there symptoms of studentification in Gdańsk, Poland? Bulletin of Geography: Socio-Economic Series, 32: 73- 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bog-2016-0016.
• Hamlin, D. (2020). Can a Positive School Climate Promote Student Attendance? Evidence From New York City: American Educational Research Journal, 58(2): 315- 342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220924037.
• Hebbert, M. (2018). The campus and the city: a design revolution explained. Journal of Urban Design, 23(6): 883-897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.201 8.1518710.
• Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. London: Space Syntax. Available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3881/1/SITM. pdf.
• Hillier, B. (2008). Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Building Research and Information, 36(3): 216-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210801928073.
• Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (1989). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hopson, L.M. & Lee, E. (2011). Mitigating the effect of family poverty on academic and behavioral outcomes: The role of school climate in middle and high school. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11): 2221-2229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J. CHILDYOUTH.2011.07.006.
• Hoyt, L. (2010). A city-campus engagement theory from, and for, practice. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 75-88. Available at: https://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/EJ950767.pdf.
• Karpińska, D. & Kunz, M. (2021). Analysis of the visibility and signal strength of the LoRaWAN network in an urbanized area - a case study of the Bielany campus at the Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 54: 137-149. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2478/bog2021-0039.
• Kenji Tani. (2021). Ima Mukashi Map Database. Human Geography Laboratory. Available at: https://ktgis.net/ kjmapw/index.html.
• Kim, T.W., Cha, S. & Kim, Y. (2018). Space choice, rejection and satisfaction in university campus. Indoor and Built Environment, 27(2): 233-243. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16665897.
• Kyushu University Public Relations. (2021). ITO campus guidebook. Fukuoka: Kyushu University. Available at: https://www.kyushu-u.ac.jp/f/43578/ kyudai_guidebook_2021_22_eng.pdf.
• Larkham, P.J. (2000). Institutions and urban form: the example of universities. Urban Morphology, 4(2): 63- 78. Available at: http://urbanmorphology.org/online_ unlimited/um200002_63-77.pdf.
• Li, C. & Wang, Y. (2020). Capital advantages: could colleges and universities located in Beijing City win more national social science fund projects? Applied Economics, 52(38): 4135-4145. DOI: https://doi.org/1 0.1080/00036846.2020.1730754.
• Macintyre, C. (2003). New models of student housing and their impact on local communities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(2): 109- 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080032000122 598.
• Magdaniel, F.T.C., Den Heijer, A.C. & De Jonge, H. (2018). The locations of innovation described through thirty-nine tech-campuses. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(1): 58-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2017-0014.
• Mohammed, A.M.S. & Hirai, Y. (2021). Utilising urban gamification for sustainable crime prevention in public spaces: A citizen participation model for designing against vandalism. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(1): 25-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/IJSDP.160103.
• Mohammed, A.M.S. & Ukai, T. (2021). The impact of university campuses on city urbanization: a syntactic and socio-spatial analysis of Kyushu university campuses in japan. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(7): 1209-1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/IJSDP.160702.
• Mohammed, A.M.S. & Ukai, T. (2022). University campuses as agents for urban change. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies 10(1): 22-37. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.2478/environ-2022-0003.
• Mohammed, A.M.S., Ukai, T. & Hall, M. (2022). Towards a sustainable campus-city relationship: A systematic review of the literature. Regional Sustainability, 3(1): 53-67. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.regsus.2022.03.004.
• Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2): 309-332. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1086/226311.
• Moos, M., Revington, N., Wilkin, T. & Andrey, J. (2019). The knowledge economy city: Gentrification, studentification and youthification, and their connections to universities. Urban Studies, 56(6): 1075-1092. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1177/0042098017745235.
• Moscati, R., Regini, M. & Rostan, M. (2010). Torri d'avorio in frantumi? dove vanno le università europee. (Shattered ivory towers? where European universities go - in Italian) Bologna: Il Mulino. Available at: https://air.unimi.it/handle/2434/71899.
• OSM Foundation. (2020). OpenStreetMap. Available at: https://www.openstreetmap.org
• Penn, A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition: or why the axial line? Environment And Behavior, 35(1): 30- 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238864.
• Rugg, J., Rhodes, D. & Jones, A. (2000). The nature and impact of student demand on housing markets. York Publishing Services. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.455.641&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
• Russo, A.P., Berg, L.V. & Lavanga, M. (2016). Toward a sustainable relationship between city and university: a stakeholdership approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2): 199-216. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07307208.
• Sayed, A.M. (2021). Using Urban Gamification to Promote Citizen Participation for Designing Out Graffiti in Public Spaces. MSc Thesis, Fukuoka: Kyushu University. Available at: http://hdl.handle. net/2324/4495581.
• Selwyn, N. (2008). "High-jinks" and "minor mischief ": A study of undergraduate students as perpetrators of crime. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1): 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794759.
• Starczewski, T., Rogatka, K. & Kowalski, M. (2022). Evaluation of revitalisation projects in Poland using the Maslin Multi-Dimensional Matrix. Heading towards green & social revitalization. Bulletin of Geography: Socio-Economic Series, 55: 123-139. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0009.
• Stoker, R.P., Stone, C.N. & Horak, M. (2015). Contending with Structural Inequality in a New Era. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.7208/9780226289151.
• Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S. & Higgins-D'Alessandro, A. (2013). A Review of School Climate Research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3): 357-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907.
• Toprak, I., Ünlü A. & Van Nes, A. (2017). Diachronic assessment of cultural diversity in historic neighbourhoods using space syntax: Studies of three neighbourhoods in Istanbul. XI SSS: 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, 154, 1-14.
• Van den Hoek, J. (2010). The mixed-use index as a planning tool for new towns in the 21st century. Proceedings of New Towns for the 21st Century: The Planned vs the Unplanned city. Netherlands, 98-207.
• Van Nes, A., Berghauser, M. & Mashhoodi, B. (2012). Combination of Space syntax with spacematrix and the mixed use index: The Rotterdam South test case. Proceedings of 8th International Space Syntax Symposium. Available at: http://sss8.cl/8003.pdf.
• Van Nes, A. & Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to space syntax in urban studies. Springer. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3.
• Van Nes, A. & Ye, Y. (2014). The theory of the natural urban transformation process: The relationship between street network configuration, density and degree of function mixture of built. Proceedings AESOP 2014: Annual Conference. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.964.2543&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Weisburd, D., Groff, E.R. & Yang, S.M. (2012).
• The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195369083.001.0001.
• Ye, Y. & Van Nes, A. (2013). Measuring urban maturation processes in Dutch and Chinese new towns: Combining street network configuration with building density and degree of land use. The Journal of Space Syntax, 4: 18-37. Available at: http:// joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/journal/index.php/joss/article/ view/153

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/bgss-2022-0035