PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2021 | 62 | nr 4 | 101--118
Tytuł artykułu

Analysis of the Twitter discourse on sustainability using natural language processing

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This publication aims to map the environmental sustainability discourse on Twitter. This will be achieved through two commonly used methods of natural language processing; topic modelling, which is used to uncover hidden themes in the document collection, and sentiment analysis, which is used to detect the attitudes of the authors of the text towards a particular attitude. The exploration of communication can provide an opportunity to find a solution to a multifaceted problem in order to protect our common future.(original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
62
Numer
Strony
101--118
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Department of Social Research Methodology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University
Bibliografia
  • Attenborough, D., & Hughes, J. (2020). A Life on Our Planet: My Witness Statement and a Vision for the Future. London: Ebury Publishing.
  • Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper No. 12-03. Rome, FAO. Retrieved from: http:// www.fao.org/3/ap106e/ap106e.pdf (accessed: 29.03.2021).
  • Ballestar, M. T., Cuerdo-Mir, M., & Freire-Rubio, M. T. (2020). The Concept of Sustainability on Social Media: A Social Listening Approach. "Sustainability", 12 (5), 2122. MDPI AG. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12052122
  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. "Journal of Machine Learning Research", 3, 993-1022.
  • Cody, E. M., Reagan, A. J., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P. S., & Danforth, C. M. (2015). Climate Change Sentiment on Twitter: An Unsolicited Public Opinion Poll. "PLoS ONE", 10 (8), e0136092. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0136092
  • Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A. P., & Li, Z. (2019). Topic modelling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets, "Social Network Analysis and Mining", 9 (24) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13278-019-0568-8
  • Dasgupta, P., & McKenzie, E. (2020). The Dasgupta Review - Independent Review on the Economics of Biodiversity Interim Report. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing. service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882222/ The_Economics_of_Biodiversity_The_Dasgupta_Review_Interim_Report.pdf (accessed: 28.01.2021).
  • Denny, M., & Spirling, A. (2018). Text Preprocessing or Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, And What to Do About It, "Political Analysis", 26 (2), 168-189. DOI:10.1017/pan.2017.44
  • Drews, S., & Miklós, A. (2016). Degrowth: A "Missile Word" That Backfires? "Ecological Economics", 126, 182-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.001
  • Drews, S., & Reese, G. (2018). "Degrowth" vs. Other Types of Growth: Labelling Affects Emotions but Not Attitudes". "Environmental Communication", 12 (6), 763-772. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1472127
  • Evans, J. A., & Aceves, P. (2016). Machine translation: mining text for social theory. "Annual Review of Sociology", 42 (1), 21-50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074206
  • FABLE (2020). Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems. 2020 Report of the FABLE Consortium. Laxenburg and Paris: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). https:// doi.org/10.22022/ESM/12-2020.16896
  • Furman, E., Häyhä, T., & Hirvilammi, T. (2018) A future the planet can accommodate. SKYKE & SITRA, 2. ISBN: 978-952-11-4938-2. Retrieved from: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/235418/PB_A-future-the-planet-can-accommodate.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: 08.03.2021).
  • Hutto, C. J., & Gilbert, E. (2015). VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - The Fifth and the Sixth Assessment Cycle (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2020/05/2020-AC6_en.pdf (accessed: 06.03.2021).
  • Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One Year off Twitter worldwide. "Global Environmental Change", https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.02.008
  • Németh, R., Katona, E. R., & Kmetty, Z. (2020). Az automatizált szövegelemzés perspektívája a társadalomtudományokban [Perspectives on automated text analysis in the social sciences]. "SZOCIOLÓGIAI SZEMLE", 30 (1), 44-62. ISSN 1216-2051.
  • Nik-Bakht, M., & El-Diraby, T. E. (2016). Sus-tweet-ability: Exposing public communities perspective on sustainability of urban infrastructure through online social media. "International Journal of Human-Computer Studies", 89, 54-72, ISSN 1071-5819. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.11.002
  • Radi, S. A., & Shokouhyar, S. (2021). Toward consumer perception of cellphones sustainability: A social media analytics. "Sustainable Production and Consumption", 25,217-233, ISSN 2352-5509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.012
  • Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House.
  • Rockström, J., & Klum, M. (2015). Big world, small planet: Abundance within planetary boundaries. USA: Yale University Press.
  • Stevens, K., Kegelmeyer, P., Andrzejewski, D., & Buttler, D. (2012). Exploring topic coherence over many models and many topics. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL '12). Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 952-961.
  • https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/climate-change/paris-agreement/
  • https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020 -global-digital-overview
  • https://www.iea.org/news/after-steep-drop-in-early-2020-global-carbon-dioxide- emissions-https://www.internetlivestats.com/twitter-statistics/
  • https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/
  • https://ourworldindata.org/future-emissions
  • https://www.overshootday.org/
  • https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2016/03/16/1523119113
  • https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/marine-protected-areas
  • https://pypi.org/project/gensim/have-rebounded-strongly Research/Programmes/Green-Cities/Urban-food-systems.htm
  • https://www.rethinkx.com/food-and-agriculture-executive-summary
  • https://sdg-tracker.org/
  • https://www.thebluecarboninitiative.org/
  • https://www.un-redd.org/
  • https://www.wur.nl/en/Research-Results/Research-Institutes/Environmental-
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171657138

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.