Are You in the Network? The Impact of Co-Creation on the Network of Participants

• Autorzy: Tibor Ladancsik , Fanni Maszlak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

At present, local communities are increasingly confronted with problems that do not have simple solutions. To tackle them, complex responses are needed. One such problem is found in the question of who shall be responsible for stabilising the economic situation of people living in small villages? Is it the individual, who should be able to eff ectively manage his or her own farm, or is it the state, which is liable for creating a better economic environment? Is it the market, since it is the space for economic activities? Is it the municipality that is responsible for the well-being of the citizens living in the villages? Is it NGOs, because of their social responsibility? Boundaries have been blurred, making functions, goals, and responsibilities more complex. Th e aim of the H2020 CoSIE project is to revive the forgotten culture of farming, horticulture, and animal husbandry in 10 disadvantaged rural settlements in Hungary and, thus, to develop a new service model. The data presented are collected in two consecutive questionnaire surveys. The first took place in September 2019 and the second in January 2020, involving 72 households. Between the two surveys, the agricultural tools of the respond****ents developed remarkably and there were also significant changes in the network of the participants. Project participants regarded the change in their attitude as one of the most positive outcomes, as they became much more open to new things. The highest proportion of respondents reported an improvement in their relationships with locals. Joint communication has improved to a similar extent because there are more frequently spontaneous meetings than before the start of the project. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Network structure; Societal policy

PL

Struktury sieciowe; Polityka społeczna

• Czasopismo: Polish Political Science Review. Polski Przegląd Politologiczny
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: Vol. 10, Iss. 1
• Strony: 83--96

Twórcy

autor

Tibor Ladancsik

• Hungarian Central Statistical Office

autor

Fanni Maszlak

• University of Debrecen

Bibliografia

• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860.
• Byrkjeflot, H., Du gay, P. & Greve, C. (2018). What is the 'Neo-Weberian state' as a regime of Public Administration? in ongaro, E. & Van thiel, s. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave macmillan. 991-1009.
• Çolak, Ç . D. (2019). Why the new Public management is obsolete: An Analysis in the Context of the Post-New Public Management trends. Croatian and comparative pub-lic administration: a journal for theory and practice of public administration, 19(4), 517- 536.
• Csoba J. (2017): A kertkultúra és a há ztartá sgazdaság szerepe a vidé ki szegények tá r- sadalmi integrá ció já ban - 25 é ves a Szociá lis Fö ldprogram. Térés Társadalom, 31 (3): 85-102.
• Csoba J. (2017): A szociális földprogram társadalmi és munkaerőpiaci integrációs szerepe a vidéki Magyarországon, Debreceni Egyetem Kiadó
• Denhardt, R. B. & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). the new public service: serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559.
• Drechsler, W. (2009a). the rise and demise of the new public management: lessons and opportunities for southeast Europe. Uprava, 7(3), 7-27.
• Fazekas K. - Neumann L. (2014): The Hungarian labour market 2014. Budapest: Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences & National Employment Non-profit Public Company Ltd.
• Greve, C. (2010, november 4-5). Whatever happened to new public management? [Paper presentation]. Danish Political science Association meeting, Velje fjord.
• Johannisson, B. 1987 Beyond process and structure: social exchange networks, International Studies of Management and Organisations, 17: 3-23
• KSH (2018): 2016 évi mikrocenzus.
• Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: strategic management in government. Harvard University Press
• Mulgan, G. (2006). the process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145-162.
• O'fl ynn, J. (2007). from new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353-366.
• Osborne, S. P. (2006). the new Public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387
• Osborne, S. P. (2018): From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organisations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2), 225-231.
• Osborne, S. P. & SWtrokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24, 31-47.
• Paul J.M van Tongeren (2001): "The Challenge of Coordination and Networking," in Peace-building: A Field Guide, (Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2001) Community entrepreneurs: networking for local development
• Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: Into the Age of Austerity. Oxford University Press.
• Randmaliiv, T. & Drechsler, W. (2017). three decades, four phases: public administration development in Central and Eastern Europe, 1989-2017. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7), 595-605.
• Roszczynska-Kurasinska, m., Kacprzyk-murawska, m.,i Rychwalska, A. & Nowak, A. (2017). Between passive involvement and active participation - policy making on the crossroads. in moreso, j. j. & Casanovas, P. (eds.). Anchoring Institutions. Democracy and Regulations in a Global and Semi-automated World. Low Governance and Technology. springer.
• SCiE (2015). Co-Production in Social Care: What it is and how to do it? SCiE guide 51.
• United Nations (1994). The age of digital interdependence report of the Un secretary generals high-level Panel on Digital Cooperation. https://www.un.org/en/pdfs/DigitalCooperation-report-for%20web.pdf
• Terry D. Bergdall (2012): Facilitating Asset Based Community Development, Chapter 9 from CHANGING LIVES, CHANGING SOCIETY: ICA's Expereince in Nepal and in the World, edited by Tatwa Timsina and Dasarath Neupane, ICA Nepal, Kathmandu
• Veiko L., Taco B. & Piret T. (2019): The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation, Public Management Review, 21:11, 1665-1686

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ppsr-2022-0005