In the Eye of the Beholder?: Gendered Perception of CEOs' Ethical and Unethical Leadership

• Autorzy: Kári Kristinsson , Inga Minelgaite , Olga Stangej
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Over the last decade, enabled by the ever-faster dissemination of information, customers have increasingly begun to scrutinize CEOs' ethical leadership behavior. Although potentially hazardous for companies, this development also poses opportunities, with some CEOs managing to create a positive image of their organizations through ethical leadership. Extensive literature also suggests that perception of leadership is not only influenced by CEOs' behavior but also by gender stereotypes. The present study seeks to accentuate the relevance of gender in the public perception of ethical and unethical leadership. In a survey experiment using a nationally representative sample (N=1055) from Iceland, one of the most egalitarian countries in the world, we find that male CEOs suffer more severe negative consequences for unethical behavior then female CEOs do. Additionally, our results suggest that female members of the public are more appreciative of ethical leadership than their male counterparts. These results underscore the importance of gender stereotypes and perceiver's gender when examining ethical leadership perceptions and indicate that ethical leadership might possess some unique characteristics that set it apart from other leadership concepts. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for theory and practice and suggest avenues for further research. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Leadership; Society; Ethics of management

PL

Przywództwo; Społeczeństwo; Etyka zarządzania

• Czasopismo: Economics & Sociology
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 15
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 21--38

Twórcy

autor

Kári Kristinsson

• University of Iceland, Iceland

autor

Inga Minelgaite

• University of Iceland, Republic of Iceland

autor

Olga Stangej

• ISM University of Management and Economics, Lithuania

Bibliografia

• Aguinis, H., and Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 192-206.
• Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., and McMillan, J. J. (1996). Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 591-597.
• Anderson, J., Burks, S.V., Carpenter, J., Götte, L., Maurer, K., Nosenzo, D., Potter, R., Rocha, K., Rustichini, A. (2013). Self-selection and variations in the laboratory measurement of other-regarding preferences across subject pools: evidence from one college student and two adult samples. Experimental Economics 16, 170-189.
• Arlow, P. (1991). Personal characteristics in college students' evaluations of business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 63-69.
• Barr, A. and D. Serra. (2010). Corruption and Culture: An Experimental Analysis. The Journal of Public Economics, 94(11-12): 862-869.
• Beekun, R. I., Stedham, Y. E., Westerman, J. W., & Yamamura, J. H. (2010). Effects of justice and utilitarianism on ethical decision-making: A cross-cultural examination of gender similarities and differences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(4), 309-325.
• Beeson, J. (2009). Why you didn't get that promotion. Harvard Business Review, 87(6), 101- 105.
• Bendahan, S., Zehnder, C., Pralong, F. P., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Leader corruption depends on power and testosterone. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 101-122.
• Bendick, M., Brown, L. E., and Wall, K. (1999). No foot in the door: An experimental study of employment discrimination against older workers. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 10(4), 5-23.
• Berinsky, A.J., Michele F. Margolis, M.F. and Sances, M.W. (2014). Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 739-753
• Betz, M., L. O'Connell and J. Shepherd: (1989), 'Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior', Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 321-324.
• Brescoll, V. L., Dawson, E., & Uhlman, E. L. (2010). Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psychological Science, 21, 1640-1642.
• Brown, M. E. and Treviño, L. K. (2006). Socialized charismatic leadership, values congruence, and deviance in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 954-62.
• Brown, M. E., and Treviño, L. K. (2006. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
• Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117-134.
• Browning, J., & Zabriskie, N.B. (1983). How ethical are industrial buyers? Industrial Marketing Management 12: 219-224.
• Brunton, M., and Eweje, G. (2010). The influence of culture on ethical perception held by business students in a New Zealand university. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(4), 349-362.
• Calder, B.J., Philips, L.W., & Tybout, A.M. (1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research. 8(Sept): 197-207.
• Callan, V.J. (1992). Predicting ethical values and training needs in ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 761-769.
• Carlsson, M., & D.-O. Rooth (2007): Evidence of Ethnic Discrimination in the Swedish Labor Market Using Experimental Data. Labour Economics, 14, 716-729.
• Carroll, A. B. (1987). In search of the moral manager. Business Horizons, 30(2), 7-15.
• Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33-42.
• Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (1998). The effect of gender and academic discipline diversity on the ethical evaluations, ethical intentions, and ethical orientation of potential public accounting recruits. Accounting Horizons, 12, 250-270.
• Collins, R. (1975). Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science, Academic Press, New York.
• Davis, J. R. & Welton R. E. (1991). Professional Ethics: Business Students Perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 451-463.
• Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical differences between men and women in the sales world. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1143-1152.
• Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 409-434.
• Dietz, J., & Petersen, L.-E. (2006). Diversity Management.In G. Stahl and I. Bjorkman (eds.), Handbook of Research in International HR Management (Edward Elgar Pub, Cheltenham, UK), pp. 223-243.
• Dornbusch, S. M., Hastorf, A. H., Richardson, S. A., Muzzy, R. E., & Vreeland, R. S. (1965). The perceiver and the perceived: Their relative influence on the categories of interpersonal cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(5), 434-440.
• Dubinsky, A.J., & Levy, M. (1985). Ethics in retailing: Perceptions of retail salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(1), 1-16.
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence.The Leadership Quarterly,14, 807-834.
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
• Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,15, 543-558.
• Eagly, A.H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes,beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
• Edwards, G., Hawkins, B., & Schedlitzki, D. (2018). Bringing the ugly back: A dialogic exploration of ethics in leadership through an ethno-narrative re-reading of the Enron case. Human Relations, 0018726718773859.
• Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 791-808.
• Eisenbeiss, S. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Fahrbach, C. M. (2015). Doing well by doing good? Analyzing the relationship between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 635-651.
• Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., and Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573.
• Ely, R. J. and D. A. Thomas: (2001). Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly 46, 229-273.
• Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure,generalizability and stability over time.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 293-310.
• Ford R.C., Richardson W.D. (2013) Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. In: Michalos A., Poff D. (eds) Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics. Advances in Business Ethics Research (A Journal of Business Ethics Book Series), vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht
• Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., and Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920-934.
• Fritzche, D. J.: (1988), An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position, and Sex of the Respondent, Journal of Macromarketing 8, 29-39.
• Gerstner, C. R., and Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 121-134.
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard University Press.
• Haslam, N. and Levy, S.R. (2006). Essentialist Beliefs About Homosexuality: Structure and Implications for Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32:471.
• Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 657-674.
• Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135.
• Heilman, M. E., and Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(4), 393-398.
• Heilman, M.E., Block, C.J.,and Martell, R.F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 237-252.
• Helgesen , S. (1990). The Female Advantage: Women ' s Ways of Leadership.
• Hoobler, J. M., and Brass, D. J. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91:1125-33.
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., and Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Jones, D. V. (1991) Code of Peace: Ethics and Security in the World of Warlord States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Jones, G. E., and Kavanagh, M. J. (1996). An empirical examination of the effects of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 511-523.
• Kark, R., Shamir, B., and Chen (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 246-255.
• Kidwell, J. M., R. E. Stevens and A. L. Bethke: 1987, 'Differences in Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality?', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 489-493.
• Kim, C. (2014) The Smell of Communities to Come: Jeremy Lin and Post-racial Desire, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 35:3, 310-327
• Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., and Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 137 (4): 616-42
• Kohlberg, L.: 1984, 'The Psychology of Moral Development', in Essays on Moral Development, Volume 2 (Harper and Row, San Francisco).
• Kristinsson, K. Candi, M and Saemundsson, R.J. (2016). The Relationship between Founder Team Diversity and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Causation Logic. Long Range Planning, 49 (4), 464-476.
• Kum-Lung, C., and Teck-Chai, L. (2010). Attitude towards business ethics: examining the influence of religiosity, gender and education levels. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(1), 225.
• Kuntz, J. R. C., Kuntz, J. R., Elenkov, D., and Nabirukhina, A. (2013). Characterizing ethical cases: A cross-cultural investigation of individual differences, organisational climate, and leadership on ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 317-331.
• Loi, R., Yang, J., and Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Four-factor justice and daily job satisfaction: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 770-781
• Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., and De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,34, 343-378.
• Lord, R. G., Foti, R. J., and Phillips, J. S. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. In J. G. Hunt, U. Sekaran, and C. Schriesham (Eds.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views (pp. 104-121). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Lord, R.G., Brown, D.J., Harvey, J.L. and Hall, R.J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. Leadership Quarterly , 12(3), 311-338.
• Lyall, S. (2007). Annita Roddick, body shop founder, dies at 64. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/12/world/europe/12roddick.html
• Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., and Prussia, G. (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561-577.
• Markham, W.T., South, S.J., Bonjean, C.M., Corder, J. (1985). Gender and Opportunity in the Federal Bureaucracy. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 129-150.
• Marquardt, D. J., Brown, L. W., and Casper, W. J. (2016). Ethical Leadership Perceptions: Does It Matter If You're Black or White?. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-14.
• Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., and Salvador, R. 2009. How low does ethical leadership now? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 1-13.
• Meade, Adam W., and S. Bartholomew Craig. 2012. "Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data" Psychological Methods 17(3): 437-55
• Mitchell, M. S., and Ambrose, M. L. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1159-68.
• Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., and Peters, K. (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants' goals. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 465-483.
• O'Fallon, M. J., and Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375-413.
• Pandey, S., DeHart-Davis, L. and S. Pandey (2017). Follower Response to Deviant Leader Behavior: Does Leader´s Gender Matter? Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. No.1.
• Park, D. and Berger, B.K. (2004). The presentation of CEOs in the press, 1990-2000: increasing salience, positive valence, and a focus on competency and personal dimensions of image. Journal of Public Relations Research 16(1): 93-125.
• Pearce, C. L., Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2008). The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 353-359.
• Petersen, LE. and Krings, F. (2009). Are Ethical Codes of Conduct Toothless Tigers for Dealing with Employment Discrimination? Journal of Business Ethics, 85:501-514.
• Peterson, D., Rhoads, A., and Vaught, B. C. (2001). Ethical beliefs of business professionals: A study of gender, age and external factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 31(3), 225-232.
• Phau, I., and Kea, G. (2007). Attitudes of university students toward business ethics: a cross-national investigation of Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(1), 61-75.
• Phillips, J. S. (1984). The accuracy of leadership ratings: A cognitive categorization perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(1), 125-138.
• Phillips, J. S., and Lord, R. G. (1981). Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(2), 143-163.
• Ranft A, Ferris G, Zinko R, et al. (2006) The costs and benefits of CEO reputation. Organizational Dynamics 35(3): 279-290.
• Resick, C. J., Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., and Mitchelson, J. K. (2006). A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(4), 345-359.
• Rest, J.R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger Publishers.
• Robin, D., and Babin, L. (1997). Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: A critical analysis and extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 61-90.
• Rosch, E., and Lloyd, B. B. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Roxas, M. L., and Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 149.
• Ruegger, D. and E. King: 1992, 'A Study of the Effect of Age and gender upon Student Business Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179-186.
• Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., and Miles, J. A. (2003). The impact of gender and setting on perceptions of others' ethics. Sex Roles, 48(7), 361-375.
• Scott, K. A., and Brown, D. J. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 101(2), 230-242.
• Serwinek, P.: 1992, 'Demographic and Related Differences in Ethical Views Among Small Businesses', Journal of Business Ethics,11, 555-566.
• Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of ethics and ethical decisions in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 45, 89-99.
• Singhapakdi, A. & Vitell, S. J. (1990). Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing, 10, 4-18.
• Spence, J.T., & Buckner, C.E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
• Stanga, K., & Turpen, R. (1991). Ethical Judgments on Selected Accounting Issues: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 739-747.
• Stevenson, T. H., & Bodkin, C. D. (1998). A cross-national comparison of university students' perceptions regarding the ethics and acceptability of sales practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(1), 45-55.
• Suar, D., & Gochhayat, J. (2016). Influence of biological sex and gender roles on ethicality. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 199-208.
• Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-90.
• Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., Lockhart, D. E., & Carr, J. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates' psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1169-80.
• Trevino, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5-37.
• Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4),128-142.
• Tsai, W. H. S., & Men, L. R. (2017). Social CEOs: The effects of CEOs' communication styles and parasocial interaction on social networking sites. New media & society, 19(11), 1848-1867.
• Tyson, T. (1990). Believing that everyone else is less ethical: Implications for work behavior and ethics instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 715-721.
• Uleman, J. S., & Saribay, S. A. (2018). 14 Initial Impressions of Others. The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, 415.
• Valet, V. (2018, May 18). The World's most reputable CEOs 2018. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com /sites/vickyvalet/2018/05/17/the-worlds-most-reputable-ceos2018/

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-4/1