Wpływ czynników demograficznych, kontekstowych i indywidualnych związanych z pracą na kształtowanie kontraktu psychologicznego w organizacjach BSS

• Autorzy: Anna Rogozińska-Pawełczyk , Marcin Buchali

Warianty tytułu

The Effect of Demographic, Contextual and Individual Work-Related Factors on the Formation of Psychological Contract in BSS Organizations

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

W opracowaniu badane są różnice w kontraktach psychologicznych (PC) zawieranych między pracownikami a pracodawcami oraz poszukiwane są czynniki je wywołujące. Używając szeregu czynników demograficznych, indywidualnych czynników pracy oraz czynników kontekstowych jako zmiennych kontrolnych, ocenia się wpływ każdego z nich na kształt kontraktu psychologicznego (PC). Na podstawie sześciu wymiarów kontraktu psychologicznego określono charakter współczesnego kontraktu psychologicznego w miejscu pracy. Wymiarom tym przypisano dwa zestawy po osiem cech, opisujące zobowiązania pracowników wobec pracodawcy oraz postrzegane przez nich zobowiązania pracodawcy. W celu określenia zależności pomiędzy zmiennymi kontrolnymi oraz oceny roli moderatorów przeprowadzono analizę korelacji oraz analizę regresji wielorakiej. Dane wykorzystane w badaniu zostały zebrane podczas badania ilościowego reprezentatywnych pracowników (n=500) z losowo wybranych firm wiedzochłonnych, mających siedzibę w sektorze usług dla biznesu (BSS). Analiza danych wskazała, że rodzaj pozycji pracownika w organizacji miał znaczenie dla kształtu jego PC, a na siłę zobowiązań pracowniczych istotny wpływ miały indywidualne czynniki pracy. Wyniki badań podkreślają znaczenie zrozumienia, jak kształtowane są PC. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The study investigates differences in psychological contracts (PCs) concluded between employees and employers and seeks factors that cause them. Using a range of demographic factors, individual work factors, and contextual factors as the control variables, the influence of each of them on the shape of a psychological contract (PC) is assessed. Based on six dimensions of a PC, the nature of contemporary PCs in the workplace is ascertained. The dimensions are assigned two sets of eight traits each to describe employees' obligations to their employer and their perceived obligations of the employer. To determine relationships between the control variables and to evaluate the role of moderators, correlation analysis and a multiple regression analysis are performed. The data used in the study were collected during a quantitative survey of representative employees (n=500) from randomly selected knowledge-intensive companies based in the Business Services Sector (BSS). The analysis of the data pointed out that the type of employee's position in the organization was significant for the shape of their PCs, and that the strength of employee obligations was significantly influenced by individual work factors. The research findings underscore the importance of understanding how PCs are shaped. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Ekonomia behawioralna; Zachowania organizacyjne; Kontrakt psychologiczny; Relacje pracodawca-pracownik; Usługi biznesowe

EN

Behavioral economics; Organisational behaviour; Psychological contract; Employer-employee relationships; Business services

• Czasopismo: Polityka Społeczna
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 10
• Strony: 19--30

Twórcy

autor

Anna Rogozińska-Pawełczyk

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

autor

Marcin Buchali

• Uniwersytet Łódzki

Bibliografia

• 1. Arieli, S., Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., 2018. Values at Work: The Impact of Personal Values in Organisations. Applied Psychology, 69(2), 230-275.
• 2. Atkinson, C., Cuthbert, P., 2006. Does One Size Fit All? A study of the psychological contract in the UK working population. International Journal of Manpower, 27, 647-665.
• 3. Bal, P.M., Jansen, P.G.W., 2015. Idiosyncratic Deals for Older Workers: Increased heterogeneity among older workers enhances the need for I-deals. In: P.M. Bal, D.T.A.M. Kooij, D.M. Rousseau, eds. Aging Workers and the Employee-Employer Relationship, Amsterdam: Springer.
• 4. Bal, P.M., De Lange, A.H., Zacher, H., Van der Heijden, B.I.J.M., 2013. A Lifespan Perspective on Psychological Contracts and Their Relations with Organizational Commitment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 279-292.
• 5. Bedyńska, S., Książek, M., 2013. Statystyczny drogowskaz 3. Statystyczny przewodnik wykorzystania modeli regresji oraz równań strukturalnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno: Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej.
• 6. Bellou, V., 2009. Profiling the Desirable Psychological Contract for Different Groups of Employees: Evidence from Greece. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(40), 810-830.
• 7. Benson, J., Brown, M., 2011. Generations at Work: Are there differences and do they matter? International Journal of Human Resources Management, 22 (9), 1843-1865.
• 8. Blomme, R., Van Rheede, A., Tromp, D.M., 2010. The Use of the Psychological Contract to Explain Turnover Intentions in the Hospitality Industry: A research study on the impact of gender on the turnover intentions of highly educated employee. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(1), 144-162.
• 9. Burr, R., Thomson, P., 2002. Expanding the Network: What about including "the all" in the psychological contract. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference. Denver, USA.
• 10. Chaudhry, A., Song, L., 2014. Rethinking Psychological Contracts in the Context of Organizational Change: The moderating role of social comparison and social exchange. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(3), 7-62.
• 11. Chen, Y., Chen, Z.X., Zhong, L.F., Son, J., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., 2015. Social Exchange Spillover in Leader-member Relations: A multilevel model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 673-697.
• 12. Conway, N., Briner, R.B., 2005. Understanding Psychological contracts at Work. A Critical Evaluation of Theory and Research, NY, Oxford University Press Inc.
• 13. Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M., Kessler, I., 2002. Exploring Reciprocity through the Lens of Psychological Contract: Employees and employer perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 69-86.
• 14. Cronbach, L.J., 1951. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
• 15. De Winter, J.C.F., Dodou, D., 2012. Factor Recovery by Principal Axis Factoring and Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis as a Function of Factor Pattern and Sample Size. Journal of Applied Statistics, 39( 4), 695-710.
• 16. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B., Gevers, J.M.P., 2015. Job Crafting and Extra-role Behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91, 87-96.
• 17. Dick, P., Nadin, S., 2011. Exploiting the Exploited: The psychological contract, workplace domination and symbolic violence. Culture and Organization, 17, 293-311.
• 18. Diefendorff, J., Brown, D., Kamin, A., Lord, B., 2002. Examining the Roles of Job Involvement and Work Centrality in Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behaviours and Job Performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23, 93-108.
• 19. Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M., Henderson, D.J., Wayne, S.J., 2008. Not All Responses to Breach are the Same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1079-1098.
• 20. Elizur, D., Borg, I., Hunt, R., Beck, I.M., 1991. The Structure of Work Values: A crosscultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 21-38.
• 21. Ellis, J.B., 2007. Psychological Contracts Does Work Status Affect Perceptions of Making and Keeping Promises? Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 335-362.
• 22. Fatima, T., Raja, U., Malik, M.A.R. Jahanzeb, S., 2020. Leader-member Exchange Quality and Employees Job Outcomes: A parallel mediation model. Eurasian Business Review, 10, 309-332.
• 23. Gadrey, J., Gallouj, F., 2002. Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services: New economic and socio-economic approaches. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• 24. Griep, Y., Cooper, C., Robinson, S., Rousseau, D.M., Hansen, S., Linde, B.J., 2019. Psychological Contracts: Back to the future. In: Y. Griep and C. Cooper, Handbook of Research on the Psychological Contract at Work, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• 25. Hirschfeld, R.R., Field, H.S., 2000. Work Centrality and Work Alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(7), 789-800.
• 26. Ho, V.T, Rousseau, M.D., Levesque, L.L., 2006. Social Networks and the Psychological Contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties and beliefs regarding employer obligations. Human Relations, 59(4), 459-481.
• 27. Kaiser, H.F., 1958. The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Pyschometrika, 23(3), 187-200.
• 28. Kanungo, R.N., 1982. Work Alienation: An integrative approach, New York: Praeger.
• 29. Kooij, D., De Lange, A., Jansen, P., Kanfer, R., Dikkers, J., 2011. Age and Work-Related Motives: Results of a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 32, 197-225.
• 30. Kristof-Brown, A.L., Billsberry, J., 2013, Organizational fit. Key issues and new Directions, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford: University Press.
• 31. Lester, S.W., Kickul, J.R., Bergmann, T.J., 2007. Managing Employee Perceptions of the Psychological Contract over Time: The role of employer social accounts and contract fulfillment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 191-208.
• 32. Lester, S.W., Turnley, W.H., Bloodgood, J.M., Bolino, M.C., 2002. Not Seeing Eye to Eye: Differences in Supervisor and Subordinate Perceptions of and Attributions for Psychological Contract Breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(1), 39-56.
• 33. Lub, X., Bijvank, M.N., Bal, P.M., Blomme, R., Schalk, R., 2012. Different or Alike?: Exploring the psychological contract and commitment of different generations of hospitality workers. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(4), 553-573.
• 34. Lv, Z., Xu, T., 2018. Psychological Contract Breach, High-performance Work System and Engagement: The mediated effect of person-organization fit. International Journal of Human Resources Management, 7-8, 1257-1284.
• 35. McLean, Parks J.M., Kidder, D.L., Gallagher, D.G., 1998. Fitting Square Pegs into Round Holes: Mapping the domain of contingent work arrangements onto the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 697-730.
• 36. MOW International Research Team, 1987. The Meaning of Working, London: Academic Press.
• 37. Naus, F., Van Iterson, A., Roe, R., 2007. Organizational Cynicism: Extending the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect model of employees responses to adverse conditions in the workplace. Human Relations, 60, 683-718.
• 38. Neale, M., Griffin, M. A., 2006. A Model of Self-Held Work Roles and Role Transitions. Human Performance, 19, 23-41.
• 39. Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A., 2019. Significance of the Psychological Contract for the Relationship Between Highly Effective HRM Systems and Employee Productivity. Organization and Management, 3(186), 9-23.
• 40. Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A., 2021. The Effect of HR Practices and Psychological Contract on Employee Performance: The Polish Experience in Business Services Sector. In: M.H. Bilgin et al. eds. Eurasian Business and Economics Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics 17, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 3-20.
• 41. Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A., Gadomska-Lila, K., 2022. The Mediating Role of Organisational Identification between Psychological Contract and Work Results: An individual level investigation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(9), 5404.
• 42. Rosso, B.D., Dekas, K.H., Wrzesniewski, A., 2010. On the Meaning of Work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127.
• 43. Rousseau, D.M., 1995. Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• 44. Rousseau, D.M., 2001. Schema, Promise and Mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511-541.
• 45. Rousseau, D.M., Hansen, D.S., Tomprou, M., 2018. A Dynamic Phase Model of Psychological Contract Processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 1081-1098.
• 46. Rousseau, D.M., Ho, V.T., and Greenberg, J., 2006. I-Deals: Idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977-994.
• 47. Ruiz, Ulloa, B.C., Adams, S.G., 2004. Attitude Toward Teamwork and Effective Teaming. Team Performance Management, 10 (7/8), 145-151.
• 48. Schalk, R., 2004. Changes in the Employment Relationship Across Time, In: J.A-M., Coyle-Shapiro, L.M., Shore, M.S. Taylor, L.E., Tetrick, eds. The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, New York: Oxford University Press.
• 49. Schalk, R., Roe, R.E., 2007. Towards a Dynamic Model of the Psychological Contract. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37, 167-182.
• 50. Sels, L., Janssens, M., Van den Brande, I., 2004. Assessing the Nature of Psychological Contracts: A validation of six dimensions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 461-488.
• 51. Shantz, A., Arevshatian, L., Alfes, K., Bailey, C., 2016. The Effects of HRM Attributions on Emotional Exhaustion and Mediating Roles of Job Involvement and Work Overload. Human Resource Management Journal, 26, 172-191.
• 52. Sherman, U.P., Morley, M.J., 2015. On the Formation of the Psychological Contract: A schema theory perspective. Group and Organization Management, 40(2), 160-192.
• 53. Shore, L.M., Porter, L.W., Zahara, S.A., 2004. Employer-Oriented Strategic Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship. In: J.A-M., Coyle-Shapiro, L.M., Shore, M.S. Taylor, L.E., Tetrick, eds. The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, New York: Oxford University Press.
• 54. Solinger, O.N., Hofmans, J., Bal, P.M., Jansen P.G., 2016. Bouncing Back from Psychological Contract Breach: How commitment recovers over time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 494-514.
• 55. Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., Liefooghe, A., 2005. Managing the Career Deal: The psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behawior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 821-838.
• 56. Suazo, M.M., Turnley, W.H., Mai-Dalton, R.R., 2008. Characteristics of the Supervisor-Subordinate Relationship as Predictors of Psychological Contract Breach. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(3), 295-312.
• 57. Sutton, G., Griffin, M.A., 2004. Integrating Expectations, Experiences, and Psychological Contract Violations: A longitudinal study of new professionals. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 77, 493-514.
• 58. Tekleab, A.G., Laulie, L., De Vos, A., De Jong, J.P., Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M., 2020. Contextualizing Psychological Contracts Research: A multi-sample study of shared individual psychological contract fulfilment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(2), 279-293.
• 59. Tomprou, M., Rousseau, D.M., Hansen, S.D., 2015. The Psychological Contracts of Violation Victims: A post-violation model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(4), 561-581.
• 60. Van der Smissen, S., Schalk, R., Freese, C., 2013. Organizational Change and the Psychological Contract. How change influences the perceived fulfillment of obligations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26, 1071-1109.
• 61. Vantilborgh, T., Bidee, J., Pepermans, R., Willems, J., Huybrechts, G., Jegers, M., 2014. Effects of Ideological and Relational Psychological Contract Breach and Fulfilment on Volunteers' Work Effort. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(2), 217-230.
• 62. Walsh, K., Gordon, J.R., 2008. Creating an Individual Work Identity. Human Resource Management Review, 18(1), 46-61.
• 63. Wang, X., Sun, J., Liu, X., Zheng, M., Fu, J., 2019. Psychological Contract's Effect on Job Mobility: Evidence from Chinese Construction Worker. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1476-1497.
• 64. Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J.E., Debebe, G., 2003. Interpersonal Sensemaking and the Meaning of Work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93-135.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0016.1072