The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services : Bibliometric Analysis

• Autorzy: Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz , José A. Aznar-Sánchez , Marina Schoenemann , Belén López-Felices
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: The services provided by ecosystems are the main support for human populations and for the development of any type of activity. Today, the provision of these services is under threat. The economic valuation of ecosystem services is vital to design appropriate policies, define strategies and manage ecosystems.
Purpose of the article: The objective of this study is to analyse the evolution of research on the economic valuation of ecosystem services over the last two decades. More specifically, it aims firstly to identify the main agents driving research and, secondly, it seeks to synthesize in a single document the relevant information on the main economic valuation methods, relating them to the categories of services, ecosystems and regions where they have been employed.
Methods: A quantitative review was first carried out through a bibliometric analysis to identify the main drivers of this line of research and its development trends. Secondly, a qualitative review was conducted through a systematic review focusing on the most commonly used valuation techniques in relation to the characteristics of the service, the geographical scope and the ecosystem analysed.
Findings & value added: The main novelty of this work, compared to previous literature, is that the relationship between the study area, the type of ecosystem, the category of service and the economic valuation methodology are analysed for the first time. The results highlight the need to continue expanding knowledge in relation to the temporal and spatial scale in the economic value of ecosystem services, the subjective nature of the estimates and the heterogeneity between the different social sectors with respect to the benefit obtained. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sustainable development; Services; Bibliometric analysis

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Usługi; Analiza bibliometryczna

• Czasopismo: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 13
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 977--1014

Twórcy

autor

Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz

• University of Almeria, Spain

autor

José A. Aznar-Sánchez

• University of Almeria, Spain

autor

Marina Schoenemann

• University of Almeria, Spain

autor

Belén López-Felices

• University of Almeria, Spain

Bibliografia

• Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of green innovation. Sustainability, 9, 1011. doi: 10.3390/su9061011.
• Anderson, S., Ankor, B., & Sutton, P. (2017). Ecosystem service valuation of South Africa using a variety of land cover data sources and resolutions. Ecosystem Services, 27, 173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.001.
• Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018a). Economic analysis of sustainable water use: a review of worldwide research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1120-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.066.
• Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., García-Gómez, J. J., & López-Serrano, M. J. (2018b). The sustainable management of metals: an analysis of global research. Metals, 8, 805. doi: 10.3390/met8100805.
• Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., López-Serrano, M. J., & Velasco-Muñoz, J. F. (2018c). Forest ecosystem services: an analysis of worldwide research. Forests, 9, 453. doi: 10.3390/f9080453.
• Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2019). The worldwide research trends on water ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 99, 310-323. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.045.
• Badola, R., Hussain, S. A., & Mishra, B. K. (2010). An assessment of ecosystem services of Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environmentalist, 30, 320-329. doi: 10.1007/s10669-010-9278-5.
• Barbier, E. B. (2012). A spatial model of coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 78, 70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.015.
• Bateman, I. J., & Kling, C. L. (2020). Revealed preference methods for nonmarket valuation: an introduction to best practices. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14, 240-259. doi: 10.1093/reep/reaa009.
• Bell, M. D., Phelan, J., Blett, T. F., Landers, D., Nahlik, A. M., Van Houtven, G., Davis, C., Clark, C. M., & Hewitt, J. (2017). A framework to quantify the strength of ecological links between an environmental stressor and final ecosystem services. Ecosphere, 8, 01806. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1806.
• Bos, F., & Ruijs, A. (2021). Quantifying the non-use value of biodiversity in costbenefit analysis: the Dutch biodiversity points. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 12(2), 287-312. doi: doi:10.1017/bca.2020.27.
• Browne, M., Fraser, G., & Snowball, J. (2018). Economic evaluation of wetland restoration: a systematic review of the literature. Restoration Ecology, 26, 1120-1126. doi: 10.1111/rec.12889.
• Cascajares, M., Alcayde, A., Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2021). The bibliometric literature on Scopus and WoS: the medicine and environmental sciences categories as case of study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5851. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115851.
• Cheng, X., Van Damme, S., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100925. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925.
• Chitsaz, N., & Azarnivand, A. (2017). Water scarcity management in arid regions based on an extended multiple criteria technique. Water Resources Management, 31, 233-250. doi: 10.1007/s11269-016-1521-5.
• Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., & Raskin, R. G. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0.
• Dahal, R. P., Grala, R. K., Gordon, J. S., Munn, I. A., Petrolia, D. R., & Cummings, J. R. (2019). A hedonic pricing method to estimate the value of waterfronts in the Gulf of Mexico. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 41, 185-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.004.
• Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
• Damkjaer, S., & Taylor, R. (2017). The measurement of water scarcity: defining a meaningful indicator. Ambio, 46, 513-531. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-0912-z.
• De Rezende, C. L., Uezu, A., & Scarano, F. R. (2015). Atlantic forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24, 2255-2272. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0980-y.
• De Valck, J., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., De Nocker, L., Van Orshoven, J., & Vranken, L. (2016). Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 151, 64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.008.
• Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB Journal, 22, 2623-2628. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-107938.
• Farber, S., Costanza, R., Childers, D. L., Erickson, J. O. N., Gross, K., Grove, M., & Warren, P. (2006). Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience, 56, 121-133. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0121:LEAEFE]2.0.CO;2.
• Farr, M., & Stoeckl, N. (2018). Overoptimism and the underevaluation of ecosystem services: a case-study of recreational fishing in Townsville, adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef. Ecosystem Services, 31, 433-444. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.010.
• Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z. V., & Lorencová, E. (2014). Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services, 8, 110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001.
• Gan, F., Du, H., Wei, Q., & Fan, E. (2011). Evaluation of the ecosystem values of aquatic wildlife reserves: a case of Chinese Sturgeon Natural Reserve in Yichang reaches of the Yangtze river. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27, 376-382. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01659.x.
• Geijzendorffer, I. R., Cohen-Shacham, E., Cord, A. F., Cramer, W., Guerra, C., & Martín-López, B. (2017). Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 74, 40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.017.
• Ghermandi, A., Agard, J., & Nunes, P. (2018). Applying geographic information systems to ecosystem services valuation and mapping in Trinidad and Tobago. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 11, 289-306. doi: 10.1007/s12076-018-0210-9.
• Ginsburgh, V. (2017). Contingent valuation, willingness to pay, and willingness to accept. In B. Frey & D. Iselin (Eds.). Economic ideas you should forget (pp. 65-66). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47458-8_26.
• Gren, I. M. (2019). The economic value of mussel farming for uncertain nutrient removal in the Baltic Sea. PLoS One, 14, 0218023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218023.
• Groshans, G. R., Mikhailova, E. A., Post, C. J., Schlautman, M. A., Zurqani, H. A., & Zhang, L. (2018). Assesing the value of soil inorganic carbon for ecosystem services in the contiguous United States based on liming replacement costs. Land, 7, 149. doi: 10.3390/land7040149.
• Gusmão-Caiado, R. G., de Freitas-Dias, R., Veiga-Mattos, L., Gonçalves-Quelhas, O. L., & Leal-Filho, W. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency - a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 890-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166.
• He, J., Moffette, F., & Fournier, R. (2015). Meta-analysis for the transfer of economic benefits of ecosystem services provided by wetlands within two watersheds in Quebec, Canada. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 23, 707-725. doi: 10.1007/s11273-015-9414-6.
• Hekrle, M. (2022). What benefits are the most important to you, your community, and society? Perception of ecosystem services provided by nature-based solutions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 9(6), e1612. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1612.
• Hill, B. H., Kolka, R. K., McCormick, F. H., & Starry, M. A. (2014). A synoptic survey of ecosystem services from headwater catchments in the United States. Ecosystem Services, 7, 106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.004.
• Horváthová, E., Badura, T., & Duchková, H. (2021). The value of the shading function of urban trees: a replacement cost approach. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 62, 127166. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127166.
• Hossain, M. S., Pogue, S. J., Trenchard, L., Van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., Washbourne, C. L., Muiruri, E. W., Tomczyk, A. M., García-Llorente, M., Hale, R., Hevia,V., Adams, T., Tavallali, L., De Bell,S., Pye, M., & Resende, F. (2018). Identifying future research directions for biodiversity, ecosystem services and sustainability: perspectives from early-career researchers. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25, 249-261. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2017.1361480.
• Hynes, S., Norton, D., & Hanley, N. (2013). Adjusting for cultural differences in international benefit transfer. Environmental and Resource Economics, 56, 499-519. doi: 10.1007/s10640-012-9572-4.
• Ignatyeva, M., Yurak, V., & Dushin, A. (2022). Valuating natural resources and ecosystem services: systematic review of methods in use. Sustainability, 14(3), 1901. doi: 10.3390/su14031901.
• Jiang, B., Wong, C. P., & Ouyang, Z. Y. (2016). Beneficiary analysis and ecological production function to measure lake ecosystem services for decisionmaking in China. Shengtai Xuebao, 36(8), 2422-2430. doi: 10.5846/stxb201410192051.
• Johnston, R. J., Besedin, E. Y., & Stapler, R. (2017). Enhanced geospatial validity for meta-analysis and environmental benefit transfer: an application to water quality improvements. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 343-375. doi: 10.1007/s10640-016-0021-7.
• Kabil, M., Alayan, R., Lakner, Z., & Dávid, L. D. (2022). Enhancing regional tourism development in the protected areas using the total economic value approach. Forests, 13(5), 727. doi: 10.3390/f13050727.
• Kecinski, M., Messer, K., & Peo, A. J. (2018). When cleaning too much pollution can be a bad thing: a field experiment of consumer demand for oysters. Ecological Economics, 146, 686-695. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.011.
• Khan, J. R, Vasquez, F., & de Rezende, C. E. (2017). Choice modeling of systemwide or large scale environmental change in a developing country context: lessons from the Paraíba du Sul River. Science of the Total Environment, 598, 488-496. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.059.
• Khan, S., Khan, I., Zhao, M., Khan, A., & Ali, M. (2019). Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity: a benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin. Science of the Total Environment, 679, 126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.049.
• Koschke, L., Fürst, C., Frank, S., & Makeschin, F. (2012). A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators, 21, 54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.
• Kumar, P. (Ed.) (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity (TEEB) ecological and economic foundations. Oxford: Routledge.
• Li, W., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.012.
• Limaei, S. M., Safari, G., & Merceh, G. M. (2017). Non-market valuation of forest park using travel cost method (case study: Saravan forest park, north of Iran). Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 134, 53-74.
• Liu, S., Costanza, R., Troy, A., D'Aagostino, J., & Mates, W. (2010). Valuing New Jersey's ecosystem services and natural capital: a spatially explicit benefit transfer approach. Environmental Management, 45, 1271-1285. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9483-5.
• Liu, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2012). An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China. Ecological Modelling, 225, 127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.017.
• Liu, W., Lin, Y., & Hsieh, C. (2019a). Assessing the amenity value of forest ecosystem services: perspectives from the use of sustainable green spaces. Sustainability, 11, 4500. doi: 10.3390/su11164500.
• Liu, W., Chen, P., & Hsieh, C. (2019b). Assesing the recreational value of a national forest park from ecotourists' perspective in Taiwan. Sustainability, 11, 4084. doi: 10.3390/su11154084.
• Macaskill, J., & Lloyd-Smith, P. (2022). Six decades of environmental resource valuation in Canada: a synthesis of the literature. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 73-89. doi: 10.1111/cjag.12304.
• May, N., Guenther, E., & Haller, P. (2017). Environmental indicators for the evaluation of wood products in consideration of site-dependent aspects: a review and integrated approach. Sustainability, 9, 1897. doi: 10.3390/su9101897.
• Mikhailova, E. A., Post, C. J., Schlautman, M. A., Groshans, G. R., Cope, M. P., & Zhang, L. (2019). A systems-based approach to ecosystem services valuation of various atmospheric calcium deposition flows. Resources, 8, 66. doi: 10.3390/resources8020066.
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA, 2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: biodiversity symthesis. Washington: World Resources Institute.
• Mitrică, B., Mitrică, E., Enciu, P., & Mocanu, I. (2017). An approach for forecasting of public water scarcity at the end of the 21st century, in the Timiş Plain of Romania. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 258-269. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.026.
• Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Science, 106, 213-228. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
• Moondoko, P., Manson, R. H., & Pérez-Maqueo, O. (2016). Assessing the service of water quality regulation by quantifying the effects of land use on water quality and public health in central Veracruz, Mexico. Ecosystem Services, 22, 161-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.001.
• Newton, A. C., Hodder, K., Cantarello, E., Perrella, L., Birch, J. C., Robins, J., Douglas, S., Moody, C., & Cordingley, J. (2012). Cost-benefit analysis of ecological networks assessed through spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 571-580. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02140.x
• Nie, W., Guo, H., & Banwart, S. A. (2021). Economic valuation of earth's critical zone: framework, theory and methods. Environmental Development, 40, 100654. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100654.
• Mirici, M. E. (2022). The ecosystem services and green infrastructure: a systematic review and the gap of economic valuation. Sustainability, 14(1), 517. doi: 10.3390/su14010517.
• Opejin, A. K., Aggarwal, R. M., White, D. D., Jones, J. L., Maciejewski, R., Mascaro, G., & Sarjoughian, H. S. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of food-energywater nexus literature. Sustainability, 12, 1112. doi: 10.3390/su12031112.
• Paletto, A., Geitner, C., Grilli, G., Hastik, R., Pastorella, F., & Rodríguez-García, L. (2015). Mapping the value of ecosystem services: a case study from the Austrian Alps. Annals of Forest Research, 58, 157-175. doi: 10.15287/afr.2015.335.
• Pascal, N., Brathwaite, A., Brander, L., Seidl, A., Philip, M., & Clua, E. (2018). Evidence of economic benefits for public investment in MPAs. Ecosystem Services, 30, 3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.017.
• Peñuelas, J., Sardans, J., Filella, I., Estiarte, M., Llusià, J., Ogaya, R., Carnicer, J., Bartrons, M., Rivas-Ubach, S., Grau, O., Peguero, G., Margalef, O., Pla-Rabés, S., Stefanescu, C., Asensio, D., Preece, C., Liu, L., Verger, A., Barbeta, A., Achotegui-Castells, A., Gargallo-Garriga, A., Sperlich, D., Farré-Armengol, G., Fernández-Martínez, M., Liu, D., Zhang, C., Urbina, I., Camino-Serrano, M., Vives-Ingla, M., Stocker, B. D., Balzarolo, M., Guerrieri, R., Peaucelle, M., Marañón-Jiménez, S., Bórnez-Mejías, K., Mu, Z., Descals, A., Castellanos, A., & Terradas, J., (2017). Impacts of global change on Mediterranean forests and their services. Forests, 8, 463. doi: 10.3390/f8120463.
• Pinke, Z., Vári, Á., & Kovács, E. T. (2022). Value transfer in economic valuation of ecosystem services - some methodological challenges. Ecosystem Services, 56, 101443. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101443.
• Raheem, N., Colt, S., Fleishman, E., Talberth, J., Swedeen, P., Boyle, K. J., Rudd, M., Lopez, R. D., Crockeri, D., Bohanj, D., Higginsk, T. O., Willerl, C., & Boumansm, R. M., (2012). Application of non-market valuation to California's coastal policy decisions. Marine Policy, 36, 1166-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.01.005.
• Rai, K. R., Shyamsundar, P., Nepal, M., & Bhatta, L. (2015). Differences in demand for watershed services: understanding preferences through a choice experiment in the Koshi Basin of Nepal. Ecological Economics, 119, 274-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.013.
• Randall, A., & Stoll, J. R. (1983). Existence value in a total valuation framework. In R. D. Rowe, L. G. Chestnut & R. E. Dickenson (Eds.). Managing air quality and scenic resources at national parks and wilderness areas (pp. 264-274), New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429050084.
• Reynaud, A., & Lanzanova, D. (2017). A global meta-analysis of the value of ecosystem services provided by lakes. Ecological Economics, 137, 184-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001.
• Rodríguez-Osuna, V., Börner, J., Nehren, U., Bardy-Prado, R., Gaese, H., & Heinrich, J. (2014). Priority areas for watershed service conservation in the Guapi-Macacu region of Rio de Janeiro, Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Ecological Processes, 3, 16. doi: 10.1186/s13717-014-0016-7.
• Roebeling, P. C., Costa, L., Magalhaes-Filho, L., & Tekken, V. (2013). Ecosystem service value losses from coastal erosion in Europe: historical trends and future projections. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 17, 389-395. doi: 10.1007/s11852-013-0235-6.
• Ruiz-Agudelo, C., & Bello, L. (2014). Valuation of the ecosystem services in the Colombian Andes. The benefit transfer method: a meta-analysis. Universitas Scientiarum, 19, 301-322. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC19-3.vase.
• Schmidt, S., Manceur, A. M., & Seppelt, R. (2016). Uncertainty of monetary valued ecosystem services-value transfer functions for global mapping. PLoS One, 11, e0148524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148524.
• Siikamäki, J., Sanchirico, J. N., & Jardine, S. L. (2012). Global economic potential for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from mangrove loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 14369-14374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200519109.
• Singh, N., Gourevitch, J., Wemple, B., Watson, K., Rizzo, D., Polasky, S., & Ricketts, T. (2019). Optimizing wetland restoration to improve water quality at a regional scale. Environment Research Letters, 14, 064006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1827.
• Smith, A., Yee, S. H., Russell, M., Awkerman, J., & Fisher, W. S. (2017). Linking ecosystem service supply to stakeholder concerns on both land and sea: an example from Guánica Bay watershed, Puerto Rico. Ecological Indicators, 74, 371-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.036.
• Solomon, N., Segnon, A. C., & Birhane, E. (2019). Ecosystem service values changes in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Dry Afromontane Forest in northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 4653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234653.
• Song, X. P. (2018). Global estimates of ecosystem service value and change: taking into account uncertainties in satellite-based land cover data. Ecological Economics, 143, 227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.019.
• Tardieu, L., & Tuffery, L. (2019). From supply to demand factors: what are the determinants of attractiveness for outdoor recreation? Ecological Economics, 161, 163-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.022.
• Thompson, D., Swallow, B., & Luckert, M. (2017). Costs of lost opportunities: applying non-market valuation techniques to potential REDD+ participants in Cameroon. Forests, 8, 69. doi: 10.3390/f8030069.
• Toledo, D., Briceño, T., & Ospina, G. (2018). Ecosystem service valuation framework applied to a legal case in Anchicaya region of Colombia. Ecosystem Services, 29, 352-359. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.022.
• Tu, Z., Chen, Z., Ye, H., Chen, S., & Huang, J. (2022). Integrating water quality restoration cost with ecosystem service flow to quantify an ecological compensation standard: a case study of the Taoxi Creek Watershed. Water, 14(9), 1459. doi: 10.3390/w14091459.
• Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., & Aznar-Sánchez, J. A. (2016). The economic valuation of ecosystem services in the agroecosystems in Spain: conceptual framework and methodology. Pecvnia, 22, 75-93. doi: 10.18002/pec.v0i22.5068.
• Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Batlles-delaFuente, A., & Fidelibus, M. D. (2019). Rainwater harvesting for agricultural irrigation: an analysis of global research. Water, 11, 1320. doi: 10.3390/w11071320.
• Vermaat, J. E., Wagtendonk, A. J., Brouwer, R. Sheremet, O., Ansink, E., Brockhoff, T., Plug, M., & Hellsten, S. (2016). Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach. Hydrobiologia, 769, 121-135. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2482-z.
• Viti, M., Löwe, R., Sørup, H. J. D., Rasmussen, M., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., & McKnight, U. S. (2022). Knowledge gaps and future research needs for assessing the non-market benefits of nature-based solutions and nature-based solution-like strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 841, 156636. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636.
• Widney, S., Kanabrocki Klein, A., Ehman, J., Hackney, C., & Craft, C. (2018). The value of wetlands for water quality improvement: an example from the St. Johns River watershed, Florida. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 26, 265-276. doi: 10.1007/s11273-017-9569-4.
• Yu, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Xu, D., & Cao, S. (2018). Evaluating the net value of ecosystem services to support ecological engineering: framework and a case study of the Beijing Plains afforestation. Ecological Engineering, 112, 148-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.12.017.
• Zandi, S., Limaei, S. M., & Amiri, N. (2018). An economic evaluation of a forest park using the individual travel cost method (a case study of Ghaleh Rudkhan forest park in northern Iran). Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 6, 48-55. doi: 10.2478/environ-2018-0014.
• Zhang, Y., Zhou, D., Niu, Z., & Xu, F. (2014). Valuation of lake and marsh wetlands ecosystem services in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24, 269-278. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0648-z.
• Zhong, S., Geng, Y., Liu, W., Gao, C., & Chen, W. (2016). A bibliometric review on natural resource accounting during 1995-2014. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.0.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/oc.2022.028