Tendencies of Chinese subways' Spatial Growth in 2000-2020

• Autorzy: Roman Panov

Warianty tytułu

Tendencje rozwoju przestrzennego chińskiego metra w latach 2000-2020

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The analysis presented herein is aimed at indicating disparities in accessibility to some selected travel destinations by means of private and public transport in the city of Szczecin. Accessibility is a simple measure of potential interactions between two points in space. For the purpose of the study, an original model of an individual transportation system has been developed using Google Maps API data. In order to do so, some GTFS and pedestrian-related data have been downloaded. To calculate source-destination travel times at certain times of the day for four different parameters of pedestrian motion speed, ArcGIS Network Analyst software has been used. Five research methods have been applied: the proximity measure, the population percentage measure, the cumulative accessibility measure, the potential accessibility index and the potential accessibility quotient. In order to develop an ultimate accessibility rating for housing estates in Szczecin, a synthetic accessibility measure has been developed. The synthetic accessibility measure consists of 9 standardised components/values for both public and private (car) transport. The potential accessibility to the population is part of the synthetic accessibility sub-measure. The isochrones have been drawn in order to analyse the workplaces and secondary schools. Moreover, data concerning accessibility to the nearest kindergarten, primary school, hospital, cinema, shopping centre and indoor swimming pool have also been taken into consideration when calculating the synthetic measure. In the case of potential accessibility measures, it is usually the highest in the city centre. Obviously, the nearer a particular facility, the higher its accessibility measure is. The only disparities between the measures for public and private transport are observed in areas which are not covered by the public transportation network(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Public transport; Underground; Spatial structure

PL

Transport publiczny; Metro; Struktura przestrzenna

• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 25(2)
• Strony: 42--51

Twórcy

autor

Roman Panov

Bibliografia

• Angeloudis P, Fisk.D, 2006, Large subway systems as complex networks // Physica A, Vol. 367. № 3, 553-558.
• Derrible S., Kennedy C., 2009, A network analysis of subway systems in the world using updated graph theory //Transportation Res. Rec., V. 2112. № 1, 17-25.
• Gattuso D., Miriello E., 2005, Compared Analysis of Metro Networks Supported by Graph Theory // Networks and Spatial Economics, V. 5. № 4, 395-414.
• Guo J., Sun M., Wang T, Lu L., 2015, Transportation Development and Congestion Mitigation. Measures of Beijing, China. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20, 651-63.
• Haggett P., Chorley R.J., 1969, Network Analysis in Geography. London: Edward Arnold,. 348 p.
• Hong C., Xu T., Zhu J., 2017, A comparative study of the topological structure of Nanjing metro network based on whole perspective // Ind. Eng J., Vol. 20. № 5, 51-57.
• Hyun K., Song Y., 2015, Examining Accessibility and Reliability in the Evolution of Subway Systems // Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 18. №. 3, 89-106.
• Jie G., Shi Q., 2007, Definition and evaluation modeling of metro network invulnerability // Journal of China Railway Society, Vol.29. №. 3, 26-36.
• Lu K., Han B., Lu F., 2016, Urban Rail Transit in China: Progress Report and Analysis (2008-2015). Urban Rail Transit, 2, 93-105.
• Kansky K.J., 1963, Structure of transportation networks: relationships between network geometry and regional characteristics. Chicago: Chicago Univ., Department of geography, Research paper, 155 p.
• Lam T.N., Schuler H.J., 1981, Public Transit Connectivity. V. 1. Report DMT-084. Irvine: Univ. of California, 51 p.
• Lam T.N., Schuler H.J., 1982, Connectivity Index for System wide Transit Route and Schedule Performance //Transportation Res. Rec. 854. TRB. National Res. Council. Washington, D.C., 17-23.
• Musso A., Vuchic V.R., 1988, Characteristics of Metro Networks and Methodology for Their Evaluation // Transportation Res. Rec. V. 1162. TRB. National Res. Council. Washington, D.C., 22-33.
• Panov R.D., 2020, Evolyutsiya prostranstvennoi struktury krupmeishih metropolitenov mira [Evolution of Spatial Structure of the World's Biggest Subway Networks], Moscow, Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. Vol.1, 20-26.
• Roth C.,Kang M.C., Batty M., Barthelemy M., 2012, A long-time limit for world subway networks // Journal of Royal Society Interface, Vol. 9. № 9, 2540-2550.
• Taaffe E.J., 1996, Geography of Transportation. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 422 p.
• Tarkhov S.A., 2005, Evolyutsionnaya morfologiya transportnykh setei [Evolutional Morphology of Transport Networks]. Smolensk, Moscow: Universum Publ., 384 p. (in Russian)
• Wu X., Dong H. Tse C.H. et al., 2018, Analysis of metro network performance from a complex network perspective // Physica.A. Vol.492, 553-563.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/2543859XPKG.22.008.16266