Does Trade Openness Improve the Quality of Domestic Institutions? Evidence from Africa

• Autorzy: Tereza Němečková , Arshad Hayat
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Research background: The research article deals with impacts of international trade openness on institutions in less developed economies, namely in Africa.
Purpose of the article: It investigates the impacts of international trade openness on institutional quality in Africa measured by twelve various variables.
Methods: It applies generalized methods of moments to a dynamic panel data of 34 African countries in the period of 1988-2012. Institutional quality data come from International Country Risk Guide, the rest from World Development Indicators and UNESCO databases.
Findings & value added: Our results indicate that in the case of Africa, trade openness seems to be a positive and significant determinant of institutional quality, however, it differs across various institutional variables. Trade openness brings a positive impact on government stability, bureaucracy and law and order, we also identify its conflict-mitigating effects. This happens, unfortunately, with an exemption for natural resources exports. Trade openness also positively influences security and socioeconomic conditions, although we find the link much weaker. Regarding our control variables, we find two interesting results. First, GDP per capita has a strong and positive association with institutional quality when measured by one bundled indicator, however, individual variables show different intensities. Second, we find a strong and positive association of net foreign direct investment inflows and government stability. The added value of this research lies not only in focus on the less researched relationship, i.e., how trade impacts the institutional quality, but dominantly in focus on many institutional variables at once and comparison of their effects. Other empirical studies usually focus on selected variables only, or on selected trade items (natural resources). (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

International trade; Social economic development; Panel data

PL

Handel międzynarodowy; Rozwój społeczno-gospodarczy; Dane panelowe

• Czasopismo: Equilibrium
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 17
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 881--908

Twórcy

autor

Tereza Němečková

• Metropolitan University Prague, Czechia

autor

Arshad Hayat

• Metropolitan University Prague, Czechia

Bibliografia

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2006). Economic backwardness in political perspective. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 115-131. doi: 10.1017/S0003055406062046.
• Adams, S., & Opoku, E. E. O. (2015). Foreign direct investment, regulations, and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 47(C), 48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2015.07.001.
• Alonso, J. A., & Garcimartín, C. (2013). The determinant of institutional quality. More on the debate. Journal of International Development, 25, 206-226. doi: 10.1002/jid.1710.
• Álvárez, I. C., Barbero, J., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Zofío, J. (2018) Does institutional quality matter for trade? Institutional conditions in a sectoral trade framework. World Development, 103, 72-87. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.10.010
• Anderson, J. E., & Marcoullier, M. (2002). Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 342-352. doi: 10.1162/003465302317411587.
• Anderson, J. E. (2008). Does trade foster contract enforcement? Economic Theory, 41(1), 105-130. doi: 10.1007/s00199-008-0378-0.
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. doi: 10.2307/2297968.
• Arshavskiy, A. (2019). Institutions and comparative advantage in services trade. Leibnitz Information Centre for Economics. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/11159/4031.
• Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2016). Foreign aid and governance in Africa. International Review of Applied Economics, 30(1), 69-88. doi: 10.1080/02692171.2015.1074164.
• Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 529-545. doi: 10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00011-9.
• Berman, H. (1983). Law and revolution: the formation of the Western legal tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Berman, N., & Couttenier, M. (2014). External shocks, internal shots: the geography of civil conflicts. CEPR Discussion Paper, 9895.
• Bah, M., Ondoa, H., & Kpognon, K. D. (2021). Effects of governance on exports in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Economics, 167, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco. 2021.05.003.
• Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). Trade and poverty in the poor countries. American Economic Review, 92(2), 80-183. doi: 10.1257/000282802320189212.
• Bhattacharya, P., & Thomakos, D. (2007). Trade, openness, and domestic conflict: an empirical investigation for Latin America. Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 2(2), 77-80. doi: 10.15355/epsj.2.2.77.
• Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
• Bond, S., Hoeffler, A., & Tample, J. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Oxford: University of Oxford.
• Borrmann, A., Busse, M., & Neuhaus, S. (2006). Institutional quality and gains from trade. Kyklos, 59(3), 345-368. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.895242.
• Boxell, L., Dalton, J., & Leung, T. (2019). Slave trade and conflict in Africa 1400-2000. MPRA Paper, 94468.
• Cali, M. (2015). Trading away from conflict, using trade to increase resilience in fragile states. Washington: The World Bank.
• Candau, F., & Gbandi, T. (2019). Trade and institutions: explaining urban giants. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(6), 1017-1035. doi: 10.1017/S1744137419000328.
• Castilho, M., Menéndez, M. & Sztulman, A. (2012). Trade liberalisation, inequality and poverty in Brazilian states. World Development, 40(4), 821-835. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.018.
• Chan, K. S. (2002). Trade and bureaucratic efficiency. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(3), 735-754. doi: 10.1086/342248.
• Chong, A. (2001). Law tradition and institutional quality: some empirical evidence. Journal of International Development, 12(8), 1057-1068. doi: 10.1002/jid.681.
• De Groot, H., Linders, G.-J., & Rietveld, P. (2003). The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Tinbergen Institute Working Paper, 03-044/3.
• Dutt, P. (2009). Trade protection and bureaucratic corruption: an empirical investigation. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique, 42(1), 155-183. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01503.x.
• Epo, B. N., & Faha, D. R. N. (2020). Natural resources, institutional quality, and economic growth: an African tale. European Journal of Development Research, 32(1), 99-128. doi: 10.1057/s41287-019-00222-6.
• Fauzel, S. (2020). Investigating the impact of trade on poverty reduction in a small island economy. Forum for Social Economics, 51(4), 433-452. doi: 10.1080/07360932.2020.1811746.
• Feeny, S., Iamsiraroj, S., & McGillivray, M. (2014). Growth and foreign direct investment in the Pacific Island countries. Economic Modelling, 37, 332-339. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.018.
• Frensch, R., Horvath, R., & Huber, S. (2021). Openness effects on the rule of law: size and patterns of trade. International Review of Law and Economics, 68, 106027. doi: 10.1016/j.irle.2021.106027.
• Gani, A. (2007). Governance and foreign direct investment links: evidence from panel data estimations. Applied Economics Letters, 14(10), 753-756. doi: 10.1080/13504850600592598.
• Garfinkel, M. F., Skaperdas, S., & Syropoulos, C. (2008). Globalisation and domestic conflict. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 296-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.07.005.
• Gatti, R. (2004). Explaining corruption: are open countries less corrupt? Journal of International Development, 16(6), 851-861. doi: 10.1002/jid.1115.
• Gori, O. D, Kun F., & Wilfred, D. (2018). Institutional quality and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa: can management effort and bribes compensate for low-quality institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 52(2), 473-482. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2018.1469920.
• Gui-Diby, S. L. (2014). Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Africa: evidence from three decades of panel data analyses. Research in Economics, 68(3), 248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2014.04.003.
• Hochman, G., Tabakis, C., & Zilberman, D. (2013). The impact of international trade on institutions and infrastructure. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(1), 126-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2012.07.001.
• ICRG (2020). Country data. The PRS Group. Retrieved from https://www.prsgroup.com/explore-our-products/icrg/.
• ICRG (2022). The ICRG methodology. The PRS Group. Retrieved from https://www.prsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/ICRG-Method.pdf.
• Iheonu, Ch. I., & Chigozie, G. O. (2017). Institutional quality and economic performance in West Africa. MRPA Paper, 82212.
• Inikori, J. E. (2002). African and the industrial revolution in England: a study in international trade and economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Islam, R., & Montenegro (2002). World development report: building institutions for markets. Washington: The World Bank.
• Islam, R., & Montenegro, C. (2002). What determines the quality of institutions? Background paper for World Development Report 2002. Washington: World Bank.
• Kamel, A. (2016). Trade and peace: the EU and Gaddafi's final decade. International Affairs, 92, 683-702. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12602.
• Kim, S., & Park, S. Ch. (2020). Institutional quality, trade costs and comparative advantage. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy Working Paper, 19-06.
• Kopperschmidt, A., & Jacint, M. (1997). Assessment of trade liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Intereconomics, 32(4), 193-202. doi: 10.1007/BF02928434.
• Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291-303.
• Kunčič, A. (2014). Institutional quality dataset. Journal of Institutional Economics, 10(1), 135-161. doi: 10.1017/S1744137413000192.
• Kwakwa, P. A., Adzawla, W., Alhassan, H., & Achaamah, A. (2021). Natural resources and economic growth: does political regime matter for Tunisia? Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2707. doi: 10.1002/pa.2707.
• Lee, K. K. (2014). Globalisation, income inequality and poverty: theory and empirics. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/60545338.pdf.
• Levchenko, A. (2007). Institutional quality and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 74(3), 791-819. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00435.x.
• Levchenko, A. (2016). The impact of trade openness on institutions. World Development Report. Working Paper.
• López-Córdova, J., & Meissner, C. (2008). The impact of international trade on democracy: a long-run perspective. World Politics, 60(4), 539-575. doi: 10.1353/wp.0.0016.
• Majeed, M. T. (2014). Corruption and trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 29(4), 759-782. doi: 10.11130/jei.2014.29.4.759.
• Martin, P. Mayer, T., & Thoenig, M. (2008). Make trade not war? Review of Economic Studies, 75(3), 865-900. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00492.x.
• Maystadt, J.-F., De Luca, G., Sekeris, P. G., Ulimwengu, J., & Folledo, R. (2014). Mineral resources and conflicts in DRC: a case of ecological fallacy? Oxford Economic Papers, 66(3), 721-749. doi: 10.1093/oep/gpt037.
• Mlambo, C., & Borz, G. (2022). Politics and natural resources curse: evidence from selected African states. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2035911. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2022.2035911.
• Mulwa, R., & Mariara, J. (2016). Natural resource curse in Africa: Dutch disease and institutional explanations. International Food Policy Research Institute. Working Paper. Retrieved from https://www.ifpri.org/publication/naturalresource-curse-africa-dutch-disease-and-institutional-explanations.
• Nicolini, M. (2011). On the evolution of institutional comparative advantages. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22(2), 162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2010.12.003.
• Nihal, M., Mohammad, H. S., Ishaq, M. A., & Mashiyat, T. (2019). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: who drives who? Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(47), 145-156. doi: 10.1108/JEFAS-05-2018-0048.
• Nunn, N., & Trefler, D. (2014). Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogof (eds). Handbook of international economics (pp. 263-315). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Nunn, N., & Wantchekon, L. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3221-3252. doi: 10.1257/aer.101.7.3221.
• Ploeg, F. (2007). Africa and natural resources: managing natural resources for sustainable growth. Background paper for the African Development Bank report. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1814/42392.
• Reale, F. (2019). Comparative institutional advantage: an obituary. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(4), 569-578. doi: 10.1017/S1744137418000474.
• Rigobon, R., & Rodrik, D. (2004). Rule of law, democracy, openness, and income: estimating the interrelationships. NBER Working Paper, 10750. doi: 10.3386/w10750.
• Robinson, J. A., Torvik, R., & Verdier, T. (2006). Political foundations of the resource curse. Journal of Development Economics, 79(2), 447-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.01.008.
• Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131-165. doi: 10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85.
• Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0900900106.
• Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2012). Addressing the natural curse: an Illustration from Nigeria. Journal of African Economies, 22(4), 570-615. doi: 10.1093/jae/ejs033.
• Suzuki, Y., & Gokcekus, O. (2013). Trade with the EU reduce corruption in Africa? Journal of Economic Integration, 28(4), 610-631. doi: 10.11130/jei.2013.28.4.610.
• Osei, D. B., Sare, Y. A., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). On the determinants of trade openness in low- and lower-middle-income countries in Africa: how important is economic growth? Future Business Journal, 5, 2. doi: 10.1186/s43093-019-0002-8.
• Topalova, P. (2007). Trade liberalization, poverty and inequality: evidence from Indian districts. In A. Harrison (Ed.). Globalisation and poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226318004.003.0008.
• UIS (2020). Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/ (20.2.2020).
• Usman, K. (2011). Does trade openness affect institutional quality? Lund University.
• Yang, J. (2020). The effect of international trade on rule of law. Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 17(1), 27-53. doi: 10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.1.258.
• Yushi, J., & Borojo, D. (2019). The impacts of institutional quality and infrastructure on overall and intra-African trade. Economics, 13(1), 20190010. doi: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-10.
• Wandeda, D., Masai, W., & Nyandemo, S. (2021). Institutional quality and economic growth: evidence from Sub-Saharan African countries. African Journal of Economic Review, 9(4), 106-125.
• WDI (2020). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (20.2.2020).

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24136/eq.2022.030