Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The research aimed to check whether investment fund managers maintain costs similarly from period to period. The research verified the hypothesis that managers maintain costs in the subsequent periods at a similar level. The study used a method based on contingency tables which are used to analyse the persistence of performance. In this study, we replaced performance with costs, assuming that managers also control these values. Costs were defined as: (1) total costs, (2) total costs minus management fees and (3) active management costs (expressed as the active expense ratio). Based on the results obtained, it should be stated that managers maintain costs at a similar level from period to period in the case of the split using the median. On the other hand, the results indicate that the costs were not maintained at a similar level in subsequent periods when broken down into quartiles. Considering the detailed results for funds divided into quartiles, it is clearly visible that most managers keep the costs close to the average value. Less frequently, costs from period to period are changed to be allocated to the extreme quartiles. (original abstract)
Słowa kluczowe
Twórcy
autor
- Wroclaw University of Economics and Business
Bibliografia
- Brown, S.J. & Goetzmann, W.N. (1995). Performance Persistence. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 679-698.
- Chen, Y., Ferson & W., Peters, H. (2010). Measuring the Timing Ability and Performance of Bond Mutual Funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 72-89.
- Christensen, R. (1990). Log-Linear Models. New York: Springer.
- Cooper, M.J., Halling, M. & Yang, W. (2021). The Persistence of Fee Dispersion Among Mutual Funds. Review of Finance, 25, 365-402.
- Corzo Santamaria, T., Martinez de Ibarreta, C. & Rodriguez Calvo, J. (2018). Timid Performance Fees in Mutual Funds. Journal Asset Management, 19, 64-77. https, //doi.org/10.1057/s41260-017-0061-8.
- Deb, S.G. (2019). Persistence in Performance of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds: New Indian Evidence. IIMB Management Review, 31(2), 145-156.
- Diaz-Mendoza, A.C., López-Espinosa, G. & Martinez, M.A. (2014). The Efficiency of Performance-Based Fee Funds. European Financial Management, 20, 825-855.
- Elyasiani, E. & Jia, J. (2011). Performance Persistence of Closed -end Funds. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 37(3), 381-408.
- Ferreira, M.A., Keswani, A., Miguel, A.F. & Ramos, S.B. (2012). The Flow Performance Relationship Around the World. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1759-1780.
- Fraś, A. (2018). Are the Highest Mutual Fund Fees Justified by Their Performance? Management Issues, 2(74), 62-73.
- Galloppo, G. (2021). Asset Allocation Strategies for Mutual Funds. Evaluating Performance, Risk and Return. Palgrave MAcmillan.
- Gil-Bazo, J. & Ruiz-Verdü, P. (2009). The Relation Between Price and Performance in the Mutual Fund Industry. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2153-2183.
- Herrmann, U. & Scholz, H. (2013). Short-term Persistence in Hybrid Mutual Fund Performance: The Role of Style -shifting Abilities. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(7), 2314-2328.
- Malkiel, B.G. (1995). Returns From Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 549-572.
- Matallin-Saez, J.C., Soler-Dominguez, A. & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2016). On the Robustness of Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 36, 192-231.
- Miguel, A.F. & Chen, Y. (2021). Do Machines Beat Humans? Evidence From Mutual Fund Performance Persistence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78.
- Sheng, J., Simutin, M. & Zhang, T. (2021). Cheaper Is Not Better, On the 'Superior' Performance of High-Fee Mutual Funds. Rotman School of Management Working Paper, 2912511.
- Vidal-Garcia, J., Vidal, M. & Boubaker, S. (2016). The Short-term Persistence Of International Mutual Fund Performance. Economic Modelling, 52, 926-938.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171659938