PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2022 | z. 1 (63) | 41--50
Tytuł artykułu

Factors Affecting the Level of Commercialization Among Households Owning Cattle. A Case Study of Makhado Municipality of Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study analyzed the factors affecting the level of commercialization among households owning cattle. The study was conducted at the Makhado Local Municipality of Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. The study used a quantitative research design whereby judgemental and stratified random sampling was used to select only households owning cattle and this formed part of the sampling frame. Data were collected from 150 sampled households owning cattle in five villages within the municipality namely, Basani, Dumani, Njhakanjhaka, Shitaci, and Wayeni using a well-structured questionnaire that was administered to the respondents face-to-face. For empirical reasons, the study used two analytical techniques, namely Household Commercialization Index and Multinomial Logistic Regression Model. The empirical results reveal that eight variables were significant in affecting the level of commercialization among households owning cattle. These variables are the marital status of household head, the age of the household head, source of income, the occupation of household, access to market information, distance to the nearest market, membership to farmer organization, and land size. The study recommended that the government should encourage youth participation in agriculture in general and in cattle production in particular, promotion of gender equality in decision-making, encouragement of market orientation in cattle production, and establishment of cattle input support programs (e.g., feed, water, and disease control).(original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
41--50
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • University of Limpopo, South Africa
  • University of Limpopo, South Africa
  • University of Limpopo, South Africa
Bibliografia
  • Babigumira, R., Angelsen, A., Buis, M., Bauch, S., Sunderland, T., Wunder, S. (2014). Forest clearing in rural live lihoods: household-level global-comparative evidence. World Dev., 64, 67-79.
  • Baloi, V.A. (2016). Community perceptions and attitudes towards integratedwildlife/livestock land-uses: the case of Greater-Giyani rural communities, Limpopo, Province (Doctoral dissertation, University of Limpopo).
  • Bjornlund, H., Zuo, A., Wheeler, S.A., Parry, K., Pittock, J., Mdemu, M., Moyo, M. (2019). The dynamics of the relationship between household decision-making and farm household income in small-scale irrigation schemes in southern Africa. Agric. Water Manag., 213, 135-145.
  • Blignaut, B., van Heerden, J., Reininghaus, B., Fosgate, G.T., Heath, L. (2020). Characterization of SAT2 foot-and- mouth disease 2013/2014 outbreak viruses at the wildlife- livestock interface in South Africa. Trans. Emerg. Dis., 67(4), 1595-1606.
  • Boka, G.T. (2017). Climate change challenges, smallholders' commercialization, and progress out of poverty in Ethiopia. Work. Paper Ser., (253).
  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries) (2018). A Profile of the South African Beef Market Value Chain. Pretoria, South Africa.
  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (2020). A profile of the South African beef market value chain.
  • DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries) (2019). Profile of the South African Cattle Market Value Chain. Retrieved Aug 6th 2020 from: http://www.nda.agric.za/docs/AMCP/cattle2019.pdf
  • Elum, Z.A., Modise, D.M., Marr, A. (2017). Farmer's perception of climate change and responsive strategies in three selected provinces of South Africa. Clim. Risk Manag., 16, 246-257.
  • Farnworth, C.R., Colverson, K.E. (2015). Building a gendertransformative extension and advisory facilitation system in Sub-Saharan Africa. J. Gender Agric. Food Sec. (Agri- Gender), 1(302-2016-4749), 20-39.
  • Govereh, J., Jayne, T.S., Nyoro, J. (1999). Smallholder commercialization, interlinked markets and food crop productivity: Cross-country evidence in Eastern and Southern Africa.
  • Greenberg, S. (2017). Corporate power in the agro-food system and the consumer food environment in South Africa. J. Peas. Stud., 44(2), 467-496.
  • Greenwood, P.L. (2021). An overview of beef production from pasture and feedlot globally, as demand for beef and the need for sustainable practices increase. Animal, 100-295.
  • Janzen, S.A., Carter, M.R. (2019). After the drought: The impact of microinsurance on consumption smoothing and asset protection. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 101(3), 651-671.
  • Mafukata, M.A. (2015). Skills-based constraints and com plexities affecting small-scale communal cattle farmer entrepreneurs in Vhembe District. Int. J. Res. Bus. Social Sci., 4(3), 11-27.
  • Makhado Final Local Municipality Integrated Development Plan (2019/2020). Makhado Printer.
  • Marine, S.C., Martin, D.A., Adalja, A., Mathew, S., Everts, K.L. (2016). Effect of market channel, farm scale, and years in production on mid-Atlantic vegetable producers' knowledge and implementation of Good Agricultural Practices. Food Control, 59, 128-138.
  • Martey, E., Al-Hassan, R.M., Kuwornu, J.K. (2012). Commercialization of smallholder agriculture in Ghana: A Tobit regression analysis. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 7(14), 2131-2141.
  • McDermott, J.J., Staal, S.J., Freeman, H.A., Herrero, M., Van de Steeg, J.A. (2010).Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livest. Sci., 130(1-3), 95-109.
  • McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 105-142.
  • Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Behrman, J., Biermayr- Jenzano, P., Wilde, V., Noordeloos, M., Ragasa, C., Beintema, N. (2010). Engendering agricultural research (No. 973). International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Mudzielwana, G. (2015). Determinants of cattle ownership and herd size in Vhembe District of Limpopo Province, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of Limpopo). Muricho, G.S., Manda, D.K., Sule, F.O. (2015). Determinants of agricultural commercialization and its impacts on welfare among smallholder farmers in Kenya. PhD Theses of the University of Nairobi, Nairobi, 234-266.
  • Musah, A.B., Bonsu, O.A.Y., Seini, W. (2014). Market participation of smallholder maize farmers in the upper west region of Ghana. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 9(31), 2427-2435.
  • Nekhavhambe, E. (2017). Factors contributing to the transformation of smallholder farming to commercial farming in Mutale Local Municipality of Limpopo Province, South Africa. PhD Thesis.
  • Ngxumeshe, A.M., Ratsaka, M., Mtileni, B., Nephawe, K. (2020). Sustainable Application of Livestock Water Footprints in Different Beef Production Systems of South Africa. Sustainability, 12(23), 3-4.
  • Prinsloo, T. (2019). The animal diseases act: what farmers should know-part 2: control of foot and-mouth disease. Stockfarm, 9(7), 72-73.
  • Sehar, M., Oyekale, A.S. (2020). Effect of livestock farmers' access to formal markets on marketing inefficiency in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev., 1-9.
  • Sotsha, K., Fakudze, B., Khoza, T., Mmbengwa, V., Ngqangweni, S., Lubinga, M.H., Mazibuko, N., Ntshangase, T., Nyhodo, B., Myeki, L., Ngetu, X. (2018). Factors influencing communal livestock farmers' participation into the National Red Meat Development Programme (NRMDP) in South Africa: the case of the Eastern Cape Province. OIDA Int. J. Sust. Dev., 11(1), 73-80.
  • Starkweather, J., Moske, A.K. (2011). Multinomial logistic regression. Retrieved Sep 10 th http://www.unt.edu/rss/ class/Jon/Benchmarks/MLR_JDS_Aug2011.pdf, vol. 29: 2825-2830. SSA (Statistics South Africa) (2011). Bungeni. Main Place 90601 from Census 2011.
  • Wossen, T., Abdoulaye, T., Alene, A., Haile, M.G., Feleke, S., Olanrewaju, A., Manyong, V. (2017). Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. J. Rural Stud., 54, 223.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171662398

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.